Seeing the Virus Up Close Makes It Difficult to Deny its Existence
I'm writing this comment, Dr. McCullough only because I have great respect for your willingness to speak truth as you see it in the face of an establishment that doesn't want to hear it. I really hope you keep going with that attitude, because there's so much more to discover.
The article perfectly demonstrates how totally illogical conclusions and nonsense 'research' is passed off as scientific conclusions.
First, need I remind you that the 'vaccines' that are killing probably millions of people globally, and injuring many times more, are "well accepted" too? And I could make a long list of ideas "well accepted" that are very irrational, but I think you get the point.
The first two sentences are full of condescension, misrepresentation, and factually incorrect assertions. German virologist/microbiologist Dr Stefan Lanka has been exposing the fact that virology is all fraud for almost 30 years, so those who've actually studied the research are hardly motivated by "endless frustrations". And in fact nobody is "denying the existence" of anything. The "denying" allegation is your manipulative spin as a form of mockery. Those of us who've put in the work to go through a century of virology research and fully understand Lanka's conclusions are not denying the existence of anything. What we're saying is that there is no published research to date that demonstrates isolating a 'virus' from a sick person. It is the Rockefeller medicine establishment, which you represent, that's the party claiming there's a SARS-CoV-2 'virus' and "it" is the cause of the new disease. Therefore the burden of proof is on you and Rockefeller medicine, and that burden has not been satisfied. Because a few people have discovered the virology con, and have challenged the supposed proof that the establishment puts forward, we're labeled "virus deniers" as clueless people laugh, everyone assures each other that there's still 'consensus' that there's really a virus making everyone sick, and that's the end of it, in your view. No need to actually, honestly look at the research and answer the tough questions, because there's "consensus". What a profoundly cowardly reality...
Laboratory methods in virology do not "demonstrate cellular invasion, replication, transfer and repeated infection". The claimed 'virus' is only an end product of the culture of dying cells; there is no isolated 'virus' at the beginning, so the assertion of "invasion" is pure imagination. The same 'virus' can be produced with no sick patient sample added at the beginning, which is why the "well accepted" virology lab processes never include true controls. The so-called 'viruses' are exosomes, which you probably know are encapsulated genetic debris from the process of cell death. Virology has simply perfected the methods for reliably producing cell death via added toxins and inducing cell starvation in ways that trigger the release of certain types of exosomes, which are then photographed and touted as proof of 'viruses'.
And if the exosomes are then added to a new cell culture, that also receives the same cocktail of additives that poisons and starves the cultured cells, voila, more exosomes excreted by the dying cells, and 'proof of virus transmission'! No, it's only proof that people are being willfully blind.
Surely, Dr McCullough, you must be aware of Christine Massey's two-and-a-half year FOIA campaign to find the "well accepted" proof of isolation of a SARS-CoV-2 'virus'. With over 200 responses from government health agencies and scientific institutions all over the world, not one can cite any research proof of virus isolation. Their replies do not claim Massey misunderstands what constitutes 'virus isolation'; they simply admit they have no proof of virus isolation. This includes the US CDC.
So the photos you parade here are completely meaningless, utter nonsense, because you have no idea what the photographed particles are or where they came from. Revealingly, the article says nothing about where they came from, not even in the footnotes or references. The article simply asserts that they're SARS-CoV-2 particles without evidence, and you treat it as a scientific conclusion. I'll wager that if you find out where the particles came from, they're lab creations from cultures of dying cells that had no real 'virus' isolated from a sick person added at the beginning.
Which is why you started the article with the "well accepted" theme, and mocking the "virus deniers": because that's all you have, and something deep inside of you knows it.
It will be interesting to see which way you go, Dr. McCullough. You're in an interesting predicament of either conforming to what's "well accepted" in your field (which means telling the public that the 'vaccines' are good for them and everyone should go get boosted today) and keeping your prestigious professional standing, or recognizing that 'the emperor' has no clothes and is a pathological liar, and losing the establishment endorsement deal in order to find the inconvenient truths.
I wish you the best.
Thank you for this evidence.
Further clinical observations that I've seen of COVID being a distinct disease from earlier coronavirus infections mainly consisted of
1) dyspnea with hypoxia of low 80's to low 90's oxygen saturation, and
2) anosmia, sometimes ageusia, of long duration and not correlated with nasal congestion.
People's frustration with the considerable and devastating scam aspects of the COVID era have inspired an unsubstantiated leap of tossing out all knowledge and clinical experiences of all coronaviruses, rhinoviruses, adenoviruses, and even all viruses altogether. That is much too far a leap.
As you so well explained to the world, Dr. McCullough, dilute povidone iodine applied nasally at first symptoms sends the viruses to defeat. I credit you with this on a flyer that I hand out to my patients.
These pictures are excellent. Thanks for sharing. I've run into a few people who deny the existence of Covid. Part of their skepticism probably comes from the deceptions that government and health agencies exercise around the pandemic. This probably causes them to doubt everything about it. But definitely the deaths are real, and where there is death, there must be a cause.
One unfortunate consequence of doubting the existence of Covid, is that these people might not take steps to strengthen their immune system and learn what they can do to protect themselves from the virus. I myself recently had Covid (probably Omicron), and was unvaccinated. I found it to be subtly different than any other kind of flu I had experienced in the past. I had some supplements and treatments I had gathered together from reading the regimens of doctors who were doing early treatments, and I think these things helped. Didn't have any Ivermectin, unfortunately, but that is hard to get.
Yes, many thanks. I was one of those who argued (in March 2020) that without the Koch’s postulates, lab isolates, and so forth that the virus could not be “real”. It simply failed to fit into my frame of reference at the time. But gradually it was revealed to be quite real and no figment of any one’s imagination. The mainstream argument got framed as if the virus itself was what the “story” - unfolding all around us - was actually about. Although now we know there is a virus, interpreting the story at that time was about the use of the virus to create a crisis, a crisis used to control the planet. Used by nefarious forces to effect an insane plan so diabolical. Despite all we know about the virus, the overarching and critical threads of the story lie there. We projected a story to try to reason and persuade people to stay away from the tests, from hospitals, from the vaccines. That it was wrong was not as important as our intent. But the story, as all good stories do, demanded to be told. Being willing to be wrong to tell it wasn’t as important as telling it. Now we have the entire, truthful, horrifying story. We have lived this one. It is tragic.
A picture of something proves that our ideas about what it is are correct.
It amazes me that otherwise apparently intelligent people cannot see the inanity of this "argument".
"Seeing the virus up close makes it difficult to deny its existence"... no it does not, obviously.
Let us now see if anyone on this list is capable of rational, courageous and polite debate. Would anyone like to defend the claim/implication that a picture of something proves that our ideas about it are correct? I am also ready to debate any aspect of virus existence claims you can offer.
And yes, I do value the remarkable courage Dr McCullough has shown to date, but the next step is even harder. Will he, like Michael Yeadon who now agrees there is no legitimate evidence for the existence of viruses, dare to critically examine the network of premises and procedures that has undergirded his entire career, or will he continue to evade the issue and offer empty arguments like this. It is a terrible bind, I do sympathize with the challenge of placing intellectual and moral integrity over material benefit and social status, but this is the nature of our time.
Thank you for this. I have had friendly arguments with those who do not believe viruses exist and up to now I was using Steve Kirsch's line of 'well give me another hypothesis for 80% of the kids at a school my kids attended all going down with norovirus' The answers were astonishing. On another topic I don't know what to think about these apparent 'self assembly nano particle' articles which are doing the rounds - do you have any information or ideas on that?
Thank you for this.
How do we know that the thing in the photograph is SARS-CoV-2? If so, how do we know that entity is the disease-causing agent? You cannot just say here's a photo, we have it you fools. This has to be carried all the way through to making sure that the amplicion of the PCR is looking for an actual bit of genetic code from the thing that is causing the disease. Can you show me where that has been done?
If it is so easy to snap a photo of SARS-CoV-2, why do 213 governments and institutions still deny that they have a sample of the virus taken from a human host? Why is every claimed sequence really a metagemonic transcript, contrived virus, mimicked clinical specimen or in silico script?
Read article Dr. McCullough and effort in the financing to make it down to Puerto Rico I think we would have a very enlightening and helpful conversation should we speak together because as I said before and as you already know we fight for the same cause and I just amplify your voice and add my own together we win where we go when we go walk hope this note finds you well your supporter Dr. Jeffrey 🌎🕊❤️🇺🇸🌞🌻🙏😇
Is there a list of sympathetic MDs in the boise Idaho area? I don't know where to start.
I have never quite understood the purpose of asserting that viruses don't exist. Good to see then imaged which is not an easy thing to do.