EVA Project Finds 78% of Women Report Menstrual Changes after COVID-19 Vaccination
Discover more from Courageous Discourse™ with Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake
EVA Project Finds 78% of Women Report Menstrual Changes after COVID-19 Vaccination
Premenstrual and Menstrual Symptoms Portend Infertility and Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
One of the consequences of young healthy woman receiving an unnecessary COVID-19 vaccine is the dangerous transition from being previously well to a new state of discomfort and or altered reproductive physiology. This is exactly what has happened to the vast majority of women in the childbearing age range with mRNA and adenoviral vaccination. Both forms of the vaccine use lipid nanoparticles which for years have been known to be taken up by reproductive glands (ovaries and testis) and dump their payload of genetic code for the WIV BA4/BA5 Spike protein which starts producing the tissue damaging Spike within an hour. The mRNA is now known to circulate in the bloodstream for 28 days and continue to bombard the ovaries with more mRNA throughout the ovulatory cycle. Genetic vaccines loaded on lipid nanoparticles, are almost by design as depicted by Wang et al destined to influence ovulatory cycles, gametocyte production and viability, thus interfering with the complex and delicate reproductive cycle of human beings.
Baena-Garcia et al reported the EVA project which was a large (n=14,153) survey taken of women without reproductive problems at three months after COVID-19 vaccination. The authors reported: “The main premenstrual changes reported by women after vaccination are shown in Figure 2. The most prevalent changes in relation to premenstrual symptoms were increased fatigue (43%), abdominal bloating (37%), emotional irritability (29%), sadness or depression (28%), headaches (28%), breast discomfort (28%), and difficulty falling asleep (27%).”
The EVA Project has several important implications: 1) because the premenstrual and menstrual phases were impacted it is likely the reproductive cycle has been altered in the majority of women, 2) clotting and bleeding changes imply the Spike protein was damaging capillaries of the uterine lining and within menstrual flow, 3) it can be expected that conception would be influenced for several cycles if not longer, 4) with recommended injections every six months perpetuated infertility and dysfunctional uterine bleeding could be anticipated in a substantial portion of women who are in the childbearing age range.
If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and your extended circles.
EVA Project Finds 78% of Women Report Menstrual Changes after COVID-19 Vaccination
I wrote this note to a journalist who’s good & in the alt media. They wanted detailed replies to a few questions. I’m always tired, yet in declining the request, I began by explaining the bigger picture & it became a mini essay.
I’m sharing because it contains highly relevant information.
Best wishes
Mike
Dear X,
I no longer waste any time on details, even important ones.
Why not?
Well, because we’ve established beyond ANY doubt that:
1. *Every single thing we were told is a lie.
2. The “vaccines” not only don’t work to protect people, but they are injurious and have killed millions.
Personally I no longer believe there was any novel respiratory virus.
See Denis Rancourt’s articles & interviews.
So arguing details just wears us out.
I stick with big picture, because this is the heart of it.
If we can’t persuade people of that, humanity is going down.
Best wishes
Mike
Ps: Wodarg & I were absolutely correct to warn of these toxins in December 2020. Specifically in relation to pregnant women, we NEVER ever give experimental medical interventions to pregnant women. Not even in cases where she might benefit. Prior to even contemplating that act, we demand full reproductive toxicology reports, in two species. Also, a huge amount of anecdotal evidence from non-pregnant patients and usually some from inadvertently dosed pregnant women. Only then. So blasting all pregnant women using lies to back it up? Censorship & smearing of those simply reminding people what we have done since thalidomide (60 years+) is appropriate? No. It’s more evidence of malign acts of unconscionable evil.
*pps: by which I’m referring to (1) extent of population health threat; (2) who is at special risk (it’s not kids); (3) that lockdown worked; (4) that masking reduces transmission & is harmless; (5) that transmission from people without symptoms was a major driver; (6) that mass testing was useful and necessary; (7) that business & school closures were necessary; (8) that border restrictions were necessary (they’re STILL in force in USA, over three years since the start of this alleged “pandemic”); (9) that vaccination could EVER have been an appropriate response; (10) that early treatment of sick people, uniquely those declared as having COVID, was inappropriate, denying decades of off-label prescribing; (11) that EVERYONE needs to be jabbed, even those not at any risk, or having recovered & thus being immune, or being pregnant); (12) that certification of having been jabbed was necessary when it obviously isn’t.
The lies have not stopped. Anyone STILL believing the narrative is being paid to take that stance, or is frightened of their mental state if they accept the above or is really pretty dense, intellectually.
I point out in this rhetorical question: “What’s the right number of times your health officials & government should lie to you about matters that affect your health, life & liberty?” Obviously it’s ZERO. I don’t mean mistakes or ignorance. I mean knowingly telling untruthful things.
This is outrageous; 78% of women receiving the "vaccine" reporting menstrual changes. But... and I do not get tired of repeating this... the authors always minimize their findings when they formulate their conclusions. They say that the majority of women experience "mild" menstrual changes, and simply say that this should help "mitigate" the fears... This is disgusting. In the past, any sane medical doctor would find this enough to just discourage the patient from getting a shot.