Immense COVID-19 'Vaccine' Antigenic Sin Research Library Published

131 peer-reviewed studies suggest that COVID-19 'vaccines' deleteriously imprinted the immune systems of recipients through exposure to Wuhan Spike protein.

By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A new comprehensive research library that contains over 100 peer-reviewed papers (n=131) suggests that COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ imprinted the immune systems of recipients through exposure to the “wild type” spike protein from the original Wuhan strain, shaping their response to subsequent variants in potentially harmful ways (Compiled by Dr. Steven Hatfill, MD, MMed, Erik Sass, et al). You can read it here:

Immune imprinting, dubbed “original antigenic sin” by Thomas Francis Jr., occurs when memory B lymphocytes produced in response to an initial viral infection dominate subsequent responses to related viruses, producing antibodies geared to the original exposure. Long-term immune memory has many advantages, but immune imprinting can be harmful if it interferes with immune response to later infections.

The following collection of over 100 peer-reviewed papers (n=131) suggests that COVID “vaccines” imprinted the immune systems of recipients through exposure to the “wild type” spike protein from the original Wuhan strain, shaping their response to subsequent variants in potentially harmful ways. Immune imprinting impaired responses to new variants by skewing B cell production of antibodies toward the “ancestral” spike protein at the expense of new antibodies specifically tailored to the variants’ heavily mutated spike. Additionally, by imprinting a single antigen – the spike protein – on recipients’ immune systems, the “vaccines” prevented them from forming antibodies to other, less mutation-prone parts of the virus, such as proteins from the virus nucleocapsid (Ahmed MIM et al., Delgado JF et al., Paula NM et al., Smith CP et al., Yao D et al). Further findings point to “deep immunological imprinting” or “hybrid immune damping,” in which “vaccination” combined with infection alters later immune response unpredictably (Aguilar-Bretones M et al., Gao B et al., Hornsby H et al., Ju B et al., Reynolds CJ et al., Wang Q et al.).

This collection originated with Dr. Steven Hatfill’s contribution to TOXIC SHOT: Facing the Dangers of the COVID “Vaccines” (Chapter 5: Debunking CDC’s Bad Science).

See also:

“SARS-CoV2 spike protein pathogenicity research collection” (n=320) https://zenodo.org/records/14559644

“mRNA ‘vaccine’ biodistribution, persistence, and adjuvant toxicity library” (n=130) https://zenodo.org/records/14559625

“SARS-CoV2 vaccine and viral variant research library” (n=63) https://zenodo.org/records/14594436

“The original antigenic sin: When the body first encounters an infection it produces effective antibodies against its dominant antigens and thus eliminates the infection. But when it encounters the same infection, at a later evolved stage, with a new dominant antigen, with the original antigen now being recessive, the immune system will still produce the former antibodies against this old "now recessive antigen" and not develop new antibodies against the new dominant one. This results in the production of ineffective antibodies and thus a weak immunity.”

This suggests that the COVID-19 ‘vaccination’ campaign significantly and detrimentally altered the population’s immune response to future SARS-CoV-2 variants. Relying on ‘vaccines’ targeting the original Wuhan strain has hindered adaptive immune responses to newer, more heavily mutated variants. Our public health authorities have yet to grasp the lesson that you cannot vaccinate your way out of a pandemic, particularly when dealing with a rapidly evolving virus.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Please consider following the McCullough Foundation and Nicolas Hulscher on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.