NYT's Mendacious Reporting of VAX Death
Houdini style contortions and escapes from propaganda organ.
Yesterday the New York Times published a long and detailed report on the death of a 24-year-old man shortly after receiving his second COVID-19 vaccine. To quote the most relevant section:
Shortly after receiving his second dose, on Sept. 17, George Jr. started feeling pain in his heels, according to medical records and his father’s account. By early October, his fingers started going numb, and he had difficulty holding onto objects.
By mid-October, his father was so concerned that he drove him to the emergency room. Among other things, George Jr. had the markers of an upper respiratory infection: sinus congestion, a sore throat and a cough. An X-ray showed no abnormalities or fluid in his lungs, according to a summary of the visit from the coroner’s report. He said he didn’t have chest pain or shortness of breath, according to the coroner’s investigation, two common symptoms among myocarditis patients Doctors diagnosed him with a sinus infection and bronchitis and prescribed antibiotics. He also started taking NyQuil.
A week later, George Jr. was rushed back to the emergency room after coughing so much that he started vomiting. Doctors found no obvious lung problems, his heart wasn’t enlarged, and there were no signs of cardiac issues, according to the coroner’s report.
If there were clear signs of myocarditis, doctors would most likely have monitored George Jr. and prescribed drugs, like blood pressure medications, beta blockers or corticosteroids.
Eight days after his emergency room visit, George Jr. collapsed and died. His body was transported 40 minutes east, to Binghamton, for an autopsy at Lourdes Hospital.
The medical examiner at Lourdes found that the heart muscle, the myocardium, was losing some of its strength and sagging. Parts of the heart, when examined under a microscope, were inflamed. Both are clues that point toward myocarditis.
While the reporter frankly acknowledges that myocarditis was indeed “a known risk,” from the shots, he hastens to add:
the overall numbers are small — there were 224 verified cases of myocarditis among vaccinated children and young adults in the United States from late 2020 to mid-2022, out of the nearly seven million vaccine doses that were administered, according to one study.
The piece is a perfect example of reporting an incident while at the same time falsely minimizing its significance for the broader community. This propaganda technique conveys the impression that the issue is being addressed instead of concealed while at the same time concealing the true scope of the problem.
At no point in the report does the author consider any of the following questions:
1). Are cases of vaccine-induced myocarditis being overlooked, ignored, and misdiagnosed?
2). Are treating physicians making a diligent effort to LOOK for myocarditis in patients such as the subject of this report?
3). Are all unexpected deaths like the subject of this report being thoroughly investigated by Medical Examiners?
In it’s reporting about COVID-19 vaccine injuries and deaths, the New York Times should consider a notable historical precedent in recent American history—namely, the decades-long denial of the link between cigarette smoking and cancer by the tobacco industry and its hired gun medical experts.
The NYT will only print approved narrative stories. To think otherwise marks you as the fool.
We talk often about junk science. This is junk reporting.