117 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

The spread of a singular virus is considered dubious by many in the field. From what I gather much of the claim of a singular virus spreading is based on (overcycled) PCR tests that were used a)to detect infection (which they cannot) and b)they were not necessarily specific i.e. the protein signatures they detected could be have been shared by wild-type coronaviruses (either contaminated by lab ones or not). Further more we have no background signal for these viruses BEFORE they rolled out the PCR. Someone made the analogy that you start looking for a certain car on the road, all of a sudden you'll see it everywhere but it was always there, you just weren't identifying it. Coronaviruses exist in a quasi swarm, constantly mutating. Like in the case of SARS Cov1. It didn't die out, it has just blended in with the other coronaviruses.

Outside of the strange death tolls of NYC and that one city in Italy, the overwhelming data does not seem to support the signal of a singular contagion spreading, according to researchers like Denis Rancourt and Norman Fenton.

I think that is what is frustrating is that we know the officials are lying but it's about lots of things. Regardless of the uncertainties amongst the murkiness I think we can agree that: lockdowns, masking, transfections and their mandates, hospital protocols, denial of early treatment were all evil and deliberate. As MAA says: "Mistakes were not made."

Expand full comment

Agreed, we can treat natural corona withe herbs and restricted diet, but these monkey/bat/snake/pengalin bioweapons are harder to treat (as with Long CoVid). Our bodies are amazingly resilient, though, despite this, and despite the toxicity of the genome treatments and it's shedding. Some functional doctors say we have to rid ourselves of the spike protein, through fasting and cleansing to gain sufficient immune health.

Expand full comment