I can't say that this story is a fact but I heard from several sources that the pilots that flew various people to Davos were all unvaccinated. If this is true, it seems to prove that the WEF members were aware of the dangers of the vaccine.
If and until we know more about shedding, I’m using common sense in assuming that it’s not nearly as dangerous as a direct hit from a syringe, save perhaps for a highly sensitive minority of folks.
Agree. I actually think this is being spread so people give up on growing their own food as it will be in our food soon. I am also considering the fact that people may test for the spike protein to donate their DNA as I was considering it to see if I had antibodies and then thought. F that. I'm not giving anyone the option to collect my gene sequence.
That said, I think it is likely that it can be sexually transmitted
No shedding? Are you serious? The whole predicate of viral infection theory and the use of vaccines to forestall disease is based on the concept of shedding. The human body -- in fact, all biological entities -- shed constantly. No one in the scientific community disagrees with that. The only question is: How serious is it? And that is a topic too broad for here.
That's shedding live virus, not pieces of the virus or specific proteins. I get hay fever from pollen "shedding" but not any long-term disease. I can injest a shedded spike protein and have an immune reaction, but my body isn't going to keep reproducing it like live virus or an mRNA vaccine.
I think they are spraying COVID, like agent orange. I also think the spike protein may be sexually transmitted. But I think it's unlikely to be airborne. Time will tell.
Completely agree. I am an award winning wine educator that used to host corporate events - you couldn't pay me a million dollars to work for these people. Our of principle people with unique skills should boycott.
I’m assuming if they’re un-jabbed, they are aware of both the dangers of the jabs, and the criminal cabal responsible for them. If un-jabbed pilots are answering calls from members of the cabal, they can go straight to hell as well.
I'm sure its True. These Extremist Elites believe in; Rules for Thee, but not for Me. Also, They all fly their Carbon producing Jets to Davos, Feast on finest of Meats at their Summit Meetings, Use Gas Vehicles Ubers only in Davos...........
Both Igor Chudov (Igor's Newlsetter on Substack) and Jeff Childers (Coffee & Covid on Substack) have written useful articles with regard to the NZ whistleblower.
The public should start implementing justice. Biden,Faucci,Garland,Kamala,RINOS,Gray,Gates and so on.Do not wait for the law to do something about this.
It's always good to look at reasons for information leaking. However, the pilot interviewed, Shane, is a personal friend of mine and I can assure you, he has not been bought by anyone!
Until the world rids itself of the WEF, Soros, Gates, Rockefellers, WHO, UN - I and many of my colleagues believe all sense of normalcy will struggle greatly or be totally lost. The overarching thirst for control of all humanity by these evil beings stops at nothing. Killing people, reducing livelihoods to the impossible - all is part of their game to win. The COVID farce and the mandated jab speaks for itself.
Your video interview with the New Zealand pilot reinforces my belief that with “truth” as our guiding principle, the world can annihilate scum such I outlined above. It will not be fast or easy but WE WILL WIN!!
Netherlands, New Zealand, Argentina plus several others just recently elected conservative governments. There are a number of petitions circling in my country, canada, to remove our WEF communist loving PM, Trudeau from office with multi-thousands of signatures. I live in the province of Alberta, Canada where a Conservative Party was elected earlier this year, with a Premier that stands down to no one….definitely not our pitiful PM!
It will be a slow process due to main stream media propaganda. This contributes to lack of truthful reporting thus a percentage of folks really have very little knowledge of what’s actually going on. Hope what I’ve said gives some light to your day.
Unfortunately, or perhaps fortunately.... Not quite sure which... Time is NOT on our side for that! However, to the good, Yhwh 's plan is right on schedule too, and the NWO plan is time limited by His plan. It WILL get worse before it gets better, for those who choose to be here for all the drama coming. But NO ONE is forced to choose that. While there is still a choice to miss out on it, now is the time to repent ( confess ALL one's sins, then do a 180° about face from those thoughts and behaviors and walk away from them for good), invite Jesus into one's heart as Kinsman Redeemer, and be listening for a shout and a shofar calling all the redeemed out of this life and world. It's your choice...
They have a program where one can purchase and have delivered to a designated postal code the current issue. When it first came out I built a simple dispenser made out of scrap but water resistant and mounted it on rebar. I erected it next to the rural mailboxes with the assorted advertising flyer dispensers. One place it was bent over and pulled out and thrown behind the mailboxes within two days and at the other set of mailboxes where I did it, the whole thing was ripped out and taken away within a day. The power of instilled fear is incredible. This fear can be completely evaporated into thin air with one simple realization. “That the concept of nothing is absurd and is not of this world”
Truth equals trust!! When leaders across the world learn that eventually “truthfulness” breeds trust which is the ultimate big winner.
Give some thought to a single thing you’ve heard from your government that’s had an ounce of truth. You and I like millions of others KNOW whether what’s being promoted is honest - just use COVID as an example.
Take some time and research dynasties of the world. They all seemed to enjoy a Marxist type of success….but not one is still around. Today’s evil elites place money and absolute control at the top of their dynasty dream. They use fear to promote hatred and division between people…the old concept of ‘divide and conquer’. Reflect on the friends and family that turned on each other during the COVID farce.
Many people today have discarded the principles of Christianity from their lives as old fashioned or not in tune with today’s internet craziness.
But……it is the only “dynasty” that still exists and the one most eventually return to when all else fails.
As I flew during Thanksgiving and saw the 2 pilots , in the cockpit , about 30 yrs old , the stewardess saw my eyes open wide and told me they are well vetted and not to worry, and she said many pilots are sick now .
After we landed , in snow , the pilot got off and looked out the window on bridge way , shookhis head and did one clap of his hand . He was young ; he turned and I shook his hand and said thank you , God bless you … he smiled .
If only about 4% of the jabbed experience severe adverse reactions. 96% of people will not. So, many people are unaware of the subclinical damage that may have been done to themselves or their family members or friends, possibly 100% of them, judging my the Nakahara study of cardiac PET scans. Many will think, if I’m ok, that’s all that counts. However, 4% of the whatever billion people who got jabbed, is still a heck of a lot of people! And, if you or a loved one is one of those unfortunate 4%, it matters. And who knows what the long term effects will be to the rest of the 96%, not to mention the effects of shedding of spike protein and modRNA from the jabbed to the unjabbed, the contamination of our blood supply, etc.
"And who knows what the long term effects will be to the rest of the 96%, not to mention the effects of shedding of spike protein and modRNA from the jabbed to the unjabbed, the contamination of our blood supply, etc."
EXACTLY! I hear unvaxxed blood is becoming quite a valuable commodity! As an unvaxxed myself, there is no way I would take vaxxed blood. Though as you say, there, is shedding. Dr Ana Mihalcea is doing a great job at cleansing the blood of vaxx-junk etc
My unjabbed wife is in the hospital at the moment and the doc came to me and asked if I had any objections (religious or other) to her taking blood products. I had to think about it as my wife instructed me to insist she not be given any MRNA bearing products so I answered "only as a last resort to save her life".
OMG! Why am I not surprised!? Canada needs to get rid of that tyrant you currently have as a leader! Right now , I bet it is probably not available in teh UK either, but with MP Andrew Bridgen's help that may start to change, especially after the presentation he hosted on Monday with Drs Ryan Cole, Pierre Jory, R Malone, Angus Dalgleish et al.
Coming home from a recent business trip into IAH (Houston) on United, my husband experienced an abrupt abort of a landing. Very jarring, and the pilot reported eventually another plane was on the tarmac where he had been instructed to land. I immediately knew it was a combo of fewer traffic controllers due to Covid mandate and DEI policies.
Or the crew hadn't stabilized their approach and had to go around. "There was another airplane on the runway" is the standard lie told to passengers in that situation. No one's going to say, "I had my head up my ass and didn't meet the stabilized approach criteria."
The rule at my company was "no-fault go-arounds." You were expected to go around if any of the stabilized approach criteria weren't met or if the other pilot got a funny feeling, or really for anything other than total certainty that you were about to make a safe landing. We were more likely to get called on the carpet for *not* going around, and the airplane reporting systems tattle, so you can't lie about what your airspeed, configuration, or descent rate were. The DC-10/MD-11 is notorious for being unforgiving on landing, and the crew you saw might have been trying to avoid something worse than being told, "That landing sucked."
Once more, to the good, pilots practice "touch and go" landings regularly. And those happen more often than most realize, without mishap. I experienced 1 yrs ago coming out of ORD to JFK. Someone was a bit slow clearing a runway that time too, in typical winter weather, so we did a go-around. Scared a bunch of infrequent fliers, but no other harm done.
It's true that in general aviation touch-and-gos are often used to increase the number of landings performed within a given lesson slot, but airline pilots aren't (or are rarely) trained in touch-and-go techniques. It's usually considered negative training and is just asking for configuration trouble--slats, flaps, spoilers, gear--and an excursion off the far end of the runway. Once you've touched down and deployed the reversers you're expected to stay there. If you initiate the go-around very late and low, the aircraft trajectory will continue downward briefly and it's possible for the wheels to make contact with the ground until the engines increase to climb power, but that contact is incidental, unlike that with a touch-and-go. In 30 years of getting paid to fly I was never trained in or practiced touch-and-gos.
Not according my Dad, the 30 yrs TWA pilot. They DID train and practice "touch and go" landings specifically. "Go-around" are due to poor configuration and approach, and a different technique and situation as well, and those are not practiced specifically, although I think they need to be now, with the disconnect between pilots and planes.
You've got it exactly backward. Airline pilots routinely practice go-arounds. They do not practice touch-and-gos. A go-around can be due to any number of things, including a windshear alert or warning, a runway incursion by another aircraft, an unstabilized approach, or anything else that makes the crew think that the landing can't be accomplished safely within the touchdown zone.
Excuse me, I believe my Dad knew the difference, and which he was practicing at Olathe field in Kansas. He had6 years experience island hopping in the Navy during WW II, before joining TWA, so it wasn't like he was a novice. I understand the difference too, and a missed approach go around doesn't involve landing momentarily, as does a touch and go
Whatever TWA did with DC-6's and Constellations was a long time ago. Airline pilots today do not practice touch-and-gos and haven't since the jet era began. They practice go-arounds ad nauseam. A go-around can include momentarily touching down if it's started low enough above the ground. The engines don't respond instantly and the airplane's trajectory will continue downward until there's enough power to arrest the descent and climb. If you're close enough to the runway when the go-around is initiated the wheels can make contact. That's not the same as a touch-and-go, which *nobody* practices in transport category jets. It's too dangerous in real airplanes for zero gain. The only thing touch-and-gos do is let a student fit as many landings into a training period as possible, and they've been rendered completely obsolete by simulators. The simulator can be reset instantly back to X miles from the runway so you can try again without forging negative learning patterns through touch-and-gos.
Now, if you want to keep arguing about how airline pilots train with someone who just retired after 30 years as an airline pilot, I'll know you're being obdurate just for the sake of it, instead of trying to learn something.
Steve Kirsch and Igor Chudov have been analyzing the NZ data and have both published Substack on their thoughts. They don't completely agree but both sides are very interesting.
I'm leaving the same comment here that I left on Dr. Stillwagon's Substack, with respect to his description of the implications of the first officer pushing on a rudder pedal as a result of a seizure:
The rudder pedals control yaw, or movement around the aircraft's vertical axis. They don't control roll, which is movement around the longitudinal axis. It's not possible to flip the airplane over just by pushing on a rudder pedal. Roll is controlled by the ailerons using the control wheel (or joystick, depending on the aircraft model), and in the scenario described there's no indication that the flying pilot made any roll inputs. The margin of safety was degraded but not eliminated, and for a pilot operating in the most demanding part of the flight, when he's most likely to be alert to problems, regaining control isn't likely to be a catastrophic problem even if the other pilot is inadvertently applying strong forces to the controls. It's not a big emphasis item in training, but crews are trained to respond to the incapacitation of other crew members. From the audio it didn't sound like they were on short final when it happened, either. It sounded like the IRO (relief pilot) was already in the right seat, already squared away, and that the incapacitated F/O had probably been removed from the cockpit. "Short final" is inside the final approach fix, or roughly five miles from the runway. Maybe the seizure did happen on short final and the captain initiated a go-around, so the audio reflects their second attempt to land; I don't know. But they didn't remove the F/O, install the IRO, and make those in-flight transmissions in just the 4-5 miles between the marker and the runway. For the F/O to seize wasn't safe, but they weren't in imminent danger of crashing, either.
I agree, there was no way all that happened on short final. The IRO and purser trying to get the stiffened incapacitated FO out of the seat in a small space while the captain is on short final?....ya, no.
I flew acrobatics in a Pitts and a Stearman for 20 years. It is possible to roll a plane with the rudder alone. I can roll a real plane with rudder alone; I've also done it numerous times with my RC planes - the roll by rudder usually leads to a rapid descent rate.. Another fail situation: strong yaw, rudder induced, can cause a crash because to keep flying in a straight line, opposite aileron will be necessary. This leads to the "crossed control" configuration. A plane in this configuration requires more pilot skill to keep from stalling: stalling is never a good idea near the ground, ie on final approach to land. Thus, it is not necessary to roll completely over to crash. A jammed rudder is an emergency situation.
What you might be able to do with the rudder in a Pitts designed for near-instant response to control inputs is not the same as what you can do with it in an Airbus, and good luck doing much at all when there's another pilot in the next seat who's very motivated not to let the airplane do something it's not designed to do. The rudders in a transport category aircraft are designed to control yaw, not roll. Aside from crosswind landings, about the only time the rudders come into play at all is during an engine failure--to counteract the resulting yaw. Almost no one in a US airline cockpit is incapable of automatically and immediately preventing the aircraft from even approaching a stall in the situation the American crew encountered, crossed controls or not. Just as runaway rudder trim can be countered with the rudder pedals, so can the input from the other crew member.
Next time jam feet on rudders & slump or seize the yolk while having a unilateral seizure (twisting the yolk)or a clonic (jerking ) upper extremity seizure, and, though I am no pilot, I can see that being a catastrophic situation.
There's almost no scenario in a cockpit that's an instant, catastrophic emergency aside from structural failure of the aircraft, and usually if parts break off there's nothing you can do about it no matter how fast you react. This idea that someone seizing could grab and maintain a grip on the flight controls to the extent that it could overpower both the autopilot (which is almost certainly on until within a couple hundred feet of the ground because most people are lazy) or the other very alarmed crew member just isn't realistic. Slumping against the yoke is even less likely to be catastrophic, especially if the aircraft has a joystick, because there's nothing against which to slump. With a conventional yoke the fix is to push the other guy back in his seat or to one side until someone else can remove him.
Thank you for the reality testing (I am assuming that you are commercial airline pilot (or were, or have some actual knowledge/ expertise in cockpit processes.
This reassures me, somewhat, as I am flying to Nepal in February.
I realize that flying is not as safe as it used to be, but not as dangerous as I was speculating.🤔
I flew for a commuter (now called regional) airline operating turboprops for five years, and for 25 years at a major US airline from which I retired two years ago with over 15,000 hours in the 757/767 and A300, plus a little time as a 727 engineer.
Notwithstanding the effects of the jabs now coming in to play, flying in the US is safer now than it has ever been. I don't know whether it will stay that way, but the attention to safety, from the corporate level to maintenance programs to training to daily cockpit operations, is almost unbelievably high. The awareness among crews, especially, of historical mistakes is profound, and where human factors might be a chink in the safety armor, the technology provides another layer of defense. On-board windshear warnings, terrain collision warnings, configuration warnings, system redundancy, moving maps on the tablets that have replaced paper charts...in so many ways the weaknesses revealed by accidents from decades ago have been addressed and the fixes incorporated into the culture and knowledge base of modern aviation. There's a great account at Medium.com called Admiral Cloudberg that dissects airline accidents from the 1950's and 1960's through the current day, in the US and abroad. What makes them so fascinating is seeing the contrast between aviation now and in the past--even as late as just 10 years ago. So few of those accidents would happen today because of the way the aviation culture has changed. And it's not Monday morning quarterbacking. People really have the lessons of those flights in mind now, or at least benefit from them even if they don't know they're the source of today's safety culture.
On the other hand...Dude: Nepal? I wouldn't fly into Nepal for a winning Superball ticket. It's better than Africa, but not by a lot. Can't you fly into India and drive there?
I go with a group of a few long time friends to do short term medical missions work, 4th time going. Already booked on Qatar Airlines though Doha to Kathmandu.(through).
Other than flying into the foothills of the Himalayas, what should I be concerned about?
The organizer is an experienced 3rd world traveler who has done a lot of this stuff, rancher, paramedic, physician assistant, LEO, and Sheriff, and ex District Judge from Nevada. I have trusted his judgment up until you made that comment.
Besides, driving in the 3rd world is both unsafe and uncomfortable!
17-18 years ago I learned how much safer flying is than driving (before all the stuff you just said has been done to make it even safer).
I was doing a locum tennens (temporary medical assignment) in Barrow Alaska. I live in Lancaster, PA, and they had me fly out of the local Lancaster Airport, (10-15 minutes from home) in a turboprop ~10 passenger plane when I could have driven to the Harrisburg International Airport, 35 minutes from home. They insisted that I take the puddle jumper, because it was so much safer than me driving. They had just within the previous 3-6 months had a physician killed in an auto accident on his way to the major international airport to catch his flight to Barrow for a 6 month assignment. As a result, the hospital was down a doc for at least 3-6 months, as they couldn’t recruit a replacement on such short notice. And that was the US of A!
I too have airline flying experience, two years at Eastern pre-strike as an engineer on the 727, four years on the Brasilia turboprop at Comair, and the rest at Northwest/Delta on the DC9, DC10, and A319/320/321 for 33 years total, 25 as a captain. The safety changes that are implemented into airline flight decks usually come after disasters. The perfectly working Eastern L1011 that descended into the everglades while the pilots were distracted lead to aural warnings for ground proximity. The Delta L1011 that crashed due to windshear lead to windshear escape training maneuvers, windshear detection equipment on the aircraft, and windshear detection equipment around airports. Those are just two examples of how aviation has become much safer after disasters to prevent future similar disasters. You and I both know that after these shots were mandated, the incidences of pilot incapacitations, sudden deaths, and pilots dying younger than ever before have increased. The chance of an involutary control input from a seized pilot is rare but real, and if it happens at a bad time, there could be a bad outcome. There are known subclinical reactions to the shot that can be tested for and treated to try to prevent seizures and sudden cardiac deaths in pilots. We should be testing and treating now. We’re not.
People got very excited here about the merest suggestion that they can't 100% blame the injections for the F/O's seizure and an overall degradation in aviation safety. That's not at all what I said or implied with any of my comments. I mentioned to another commenter here that the Admiral Cloudberg account at Medium.com provides interesting, detailed discussions about how accidents have led to incredible improvements in airline safety today, so I'm perfectly aware that most safety improvements in the industry are made by counting corpses. However, the chances of an accident from a seized pilot's involuntary control input are so low that they're almost not worth speaking of, for the reasons I already discussed.
As for testing and treating now, that's history's biggest barn door closure following the horse's stroll from the barn. There's no such thing in US law as a "mandate" that allows a politician or bureaucrat to compel or constrain the medical decisions of another American. I quit my job two years early--seven, if you count age 65--to avoid the slave muzzles and injections, for which everyone else in my pilot group was clamoring, if they hadn't already rushed out to shoot up. No "mandates" required. The near-total servility from a bunch of self-styled iconoclasts and independent thinkers, all college-educated, white-collar professionals, was stunning. My union not only didn't tell the company that the right to make medical decisions about one's health belongs to each individual, it demanded that the pilot group go to the front of the line when the jabs became available. Now those same candies, along with the same public that couldn't consult the supercomputers in their pockets to read Wikipedia about coronaviruses (they cause colds); couldn't stand up for themselves and their children over the ritual public humiliation of muzzling; disinfected their groceries; and lined up around the block to save themselves from a 99.998% survivable cold virus, are getting the vapors over the fallout of their compliance. Anyone who wants to get tested and treated still has the freedom to do that much, at least. There is no "we" involved and there's no reason to wait if one is concerned about it. But I'm guessing that the same people who couldn't do the moral heavy lifting to protect themselves and their rights three years ago aren't going to lift a finger to discover how their complicity is affecting them now.
So then with your experience you clearly know that other than airbuses (which have side sticks, not joy sticks), commercial airliners do still have control yokes that can be slumped over...and, that the autopilot will automatically disengage with too much manual input, right?
From my previous comment: "This idea that someone seizing could grab and maintain a grip on the flight controls to the extent that it could overpower both the autopilot (which is almost certainly on until within a couple hundred feet of the ground because most people are lazy) or the other very alarmed crew member just isn't realistic. Slumping against the yoke is even less likely to be catastrophic, especially if the aircraft has a joystick, because there's nothing against which to slump."
Mandating that airline pilots get the death shot not only puts their lives at risk, but -obviously - all those that they are responsible for on a daily basis. So this particular mandate has a higher return on investment ( for TPTB/ elite/WEF etc) than a vaxx mandate for a teacher , for example.
Nurses and care workers are another category of potential multiple-casualty-result vaxx recipients, so mandating them (as was done early on) also has a higher return than vaxxing an individual. Doctors , of course are another. Train drivers also - and they don't usually have co-drivers either. Taxi drivers - surprised they were not mandated. Perhaps sone were.
Airline pilots are probably the "pinnacle" , though, when it come to the return on investment for a single vaxxed individual.
I agree that the COVID vaccinated pilots are a disaster in the making. By the way, did you guys see the new satellite video of the March, 8th 2014 Malaysian flight? The plane just disappears. There are three spherical orbs circling it, and then boom, it's gone. It is crazy. Kim Iverson did an episode on it. Check it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hcCTWkvT2I&t=5s
Thanks ! Is that MH370? Did you see the Netflix film on that? One of the wreckage search team is sure that the wreckage is in the south China sea, just to SW of the coast of China, just where the 3 other craft were surrounding it." Fake" flight data has its last location being way out in the S Indian Ocean. My money is on a directed-energy-weapon burst from the base in Antarctica!
It was pretty interesting, and good background for this latest video. HOwever, I doubt there will be any wreckage - anywhere - if what the guy in the Kim Iverson interview's theory is correct. H-Shit!
This is a real problem at the highest level. I ve been following for awhile; since the mandated jabs . Union pilots associations are good source of information.
Yes they are, tough to get the word out. Yet there are tv commercials out decrying a pilot shortage. They just don’t say why. I wonder why? Where did they all go? We know!!!
Actually it’s been a pilot shortage has been an imminent problem for a while. Then the airlines pushing early retirements every chance they get...the most recent being during Covid...doesn’t help.
I can't say that this story is a fact but I heard from several sources that the pilots that flew various people to Davos were all unvaccinated. If this is true, it seems to prove that the WEF members were aware of the dangers of the vaccine.
Yes I read several different news reports at the time that the attendees were searching for unvaccinated pilots.
Honestly, at this point, unjabbed pilots should REFUSE to fly any filthy rich son of a bitch ANYWHERE. Why are they okay catering to these murderers?
If we get the vaxx from shedding than no one is un vaccinated
If and until we know more about shedding, I’m using common sense in assuming that it’s not nearly as dangerous as a direct hit from a syringe, save perhaps for a highly sensitive minority of folks.
No shedding; just more fear rammed down our throats.
Agree. I actually think this is being spread so people give up on growing their own food as it will be in our food soon. I am also considering the fact that people may test for the spike protein to donate their DNA as I was considering it to see if I had antibodies and then thought. F that. I'm not giving anyone the option to collect my gene sequence.
That said, I think it is likely that it can be sexually transmitted
No shedding? Are you serious? The whole predicate of viral infection theory and the use of vaccines to forestall disease is based on the concept of shedding. The human body -- in fact, all biological entities -- shed constantly. No one in the scientific community disagrees with that. The only question is: How serious is it? And that is a topic too broad for here.
That's shedding live virus, not pieces of the virus or specific proteins. I get hay fever from pollen "shedding" but not any long-term disease. I can injest a shedded spike protein and have an immune reaction, but my body isn't going to keep reproducing it like live virus or an mRNA vaccine.
I think they are spraying COVID, like agent orange. I also think the spike protein may be sexually transmitted. But I think it's unlikely to be airborne. Time will tell.
No shedding; just more fear rammed down our throats.
Completely agree. I am an award winning wine educator that used to host corporate events - you couldn't pay me a million dollars to work for these people. Our of principle people with unique skills should boycott.
Money?
Assuming they are any more aware than half of America, everybody has bills to pay.
And the pilots may be of the brainwashed half of the public.
I’m assuming if they’re un-jabbed, they are aware of both the dangers of the jabs, and the criminal cabal responsible for them. If un-jabbed pilots are answering calls from members of the cabal, they can go straight to hell as well.
I'm sure its True. These Extremist Elites believe in; Rules for Thee, but not for Me. Also, They all fly their Carbon producing Jets to Davos, Feast on finest of Meats at their Summit Meetings, Use Gas Vehicles Ubers only in Davos...........
Make a damn good movie of the sardonic genre....
I think that has been well documented.
Or that the employers of the pilots avoided the disaster. Several of them got stuck in a snowstorm in Munich.
Both Igor Chudov (Igor's Newlsetter on Substack) and Jeff Childers (Coffee & Covid on Substack) have written useful articles with regard to the NZ whistleblower.
Thanks for your comment! Highly recommend both Igor's and Jeff's posts; today's C&C is entitled, "Lost in New Zealand."
NZ updated:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/political-theatre/freenz-emergency-update-new-zealand-whistleblower-raided/
Yes, Igor mentions the whistleblower but wants to verify as well:
https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/update-nz-whistleblower?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
and both have factual errors.
Care to share the errors that you claim?
Another way to get the flying public to reduce their miles in the air.....
And just another way to kill off bunches of people quickly to further the genocide. Crashes tend to kill hundreds at once.
The public should start implementing justice. Biden,Faucci,Garland,Kamala,RINOS,Gray,Gates and so on.Do not wait for the law to do something about this.
Has anyone tested for low levels of nitrous oxide or ether in the air mix inside cabins? I haven't seen or heard about other changes to account...
It's always good to look at reasons for information leaking. However, the pilot interviewed, Shane, is a personal friend of mine and I can assure you, he has not been bought by anyone!
Until the world rids itself of the WEF, Soros, Gates, Rockefellers, WHO, UN - I and many of my colleagues believe all sense of normalcy will struggle greatly or be totally lost. The overarching thirst for control of all humanity by these evil beings stops at nothing. Killing people, reducing livelihoods to the impossible - all is part of their game to win. The COVID farce and the mandated jab speaks for itself.
Your video interview with the New Zealand pilot reinforces my belief that with “truth” as our guiding principle, the world can annihilate scum such I outlined above. It will not be fast or easy but WE WILL WIN!!
I could not agree more!!!But with the spineless guys that represent us how do we start.??/
Netherlands, New Zealand, Argentina plus several others just recently elected conservative governments. There are a number of petitions circling in my country, canada, to remove our WEF communist loving PM, Trudeau from office with multi-thousands of signatures. I live in the province of Alberta, Canada where a Conservative Party was elected earlier this year, with a Premier that stands down to no one….definitely not our pitiful PM!
It will be a slow process due to main stream media propaganda. This contributes to lack of truthful reporting thus a percentage of folks really have very little knowledge of what’s actually going on. Hope what I’ve said gives some light to your day.
Unfortunately, or perhaps fortunately.... Not quite sure which... Time is NOT on our side for that! However, to the good, Yhwh 's plan is right on schedule too, and the NWO plan is time limited by His plan. It WILL get worse before it gets better, for those who choose to be here for all the drama coming. But NO ONE is forced to choose that. While there is still a choice to miss out on it, now is the time to repent ( confess ALL one's sins, then do a 180° about face from those thoughts and behaviors and walk away from them for good), invite Jesus into one's heart as Kinsman Redeemer, and be listening for a shout and a shofar calling all the redeemed out of this life and world. It's your choice...
Amen Sister :-)
Many of the evil monsters have retired and are laughing all the way to the bank with bags of our money
Encourage Canadians to read Druthers either online or paper edition.
👍👍
They have a program where one can purchase and have delivered to a designated postal code the current issue. When it first came out I built a simple dispenser made out of scrap but water resistant and mounted it on rebar. I erected it next to the rural mailboxes with the assorted advertising flyer dispensers. One place it was bent over and pulled out and thrown behind the mailboxes within two days and at the other set of mailboxes where I did it, the whole thing was ripped out and taken away within a day. The power of instilled fear is incredible. This fear can be completely evaporated into thin air with one simple realization. “That the concept of nothing is absurd and is not of this world”
https://druthers.net/ - Aha thanks
Hmmm... all the articles seem to be from 2 years ago???
Unfortunately movements get infiltrated etc. so....
The list of mass murderers is much longer .
That begs the question:
What is this truth you are referring to?
Truth equals trust!! When leaders across the world learn that eventually “truthfulness” breeds trust which is the ultimate big winner.
Give some thought to a single thing you’ve heard from your government that’s had an ounce of truth. You and I like millions of others KNOW whether what’s being promoted is honest - just use COVID as an example.
Take some time and research dynasties of the world. They all seemed to enjoy a Marxist type of success….but not one is still around. Today’s evil elites place money and absolute control at the top of their dynasty dream. They use fear to promote hatred and division between people…the old concept of ‘divide and conquer’. Reflect on the friends and family that turned on each other during the COVID farce.
Many people today have discarded the principles of Christianity from their lives as old fashioned or not in tune with today’s internet craziness.
But……it is the only “dynasty” that still exists and the one most eventually return to when all else fails.
His link to the Murock paper does not work.
Here is the link https://www.aflsolicitors.com.au/information/blog-post-title-one-5gjt2-kf9mk-z5xpe-m35tp-r9cr6-3tmye-42nsx-z4akc
Just replaced the link. Thanks for the notification. JSL
As I flew during Thanksgiving and saw the 2 pilots , in the cockpit , about 30 yrs old , the stewardess saw my eyes open wide and told me they are well vetted and not to worry, and she said many pilots are sick now .
After we landed , in snow , the pilot got off and looked out the window on bridge way , shookhis head and did one clap of his hand . He was young ; he turned and I shook his hand and said thank you , God bless you … he smiled .
I have worked in the airline industry for 30+ years. Trust me, you do not want a young , inexperinced Captain when the s**t hit the fan.
If only about 4% of the jabbed experience severe adverse reactions. 96% of people will not. So, many people are unaware of the subclinical damage that may have been done to themselves or their family members or friends, possibly 100% of them, judging my the Nakahara study of cardiac PET scans. Many will think, if I’m ok, that’s all that counts. However, 4% of the whatever billion people who got jabbed, is still a heck of a lot of people! And, if you or a loved one is one of those unfortunate 4%, it matters. And who knows what the long term effects will be to the rest of the 96%, not to mention the effects of shedding of spike protein and modRNA from the jabbed to the unjabbed, the contamination of our blood supply, etc.
"And who knows what the long term effects will be to the rest of the 96%, not to mention the effects of shedding of spike protein and modRNA from the jabbed to the unjabbed, the contamination of our blood supply, etc."
EXACTLY! I hear unvaxxed blood is becoming quite a valuable commodity! As an unvaxxed myself, there is no way I would take vaxxed blood. Though as you say, there, is shedding. Dr Ana Mihalcea is doing a great job at cleansing the blood of vaxx-junk etc
My unjabbed wife is in the hospital at the moment and the doc came to me and asked if I had any objections (religious or other) to her taking blood products. I had to think about it as my wife instructed me to insist she not be given any MRNA bearing products so I answered "only as a last resort to save her life".
Good answer! I sincerely hope she will be ok. Why did you not ask if the blood is from unvaxxed people?
Unvaxed blood from donor blood is not available in Canada. Canadian Blood services refuses to separate vaxed blood.
OMG! Why am I not surprised!? Canada needs to get rid of that tyrant you currently have as a leader! Right now , I bet it is probably not available in teh UK either, but with MP Andrew Bridgen's help that may start to change, especially after the presentation he hosted on Monday with Drs Ryan Cole, Pierre Jory, R Malone, Angus Dalgleish et al.
https://soniaelijah.substack.com/p/world-leading-experts-testify-at
Coming home from a recent business trip into IAH (Houston) on United, my husband experienced an abrupt abort of a landing. Very jarring, and the pilot reported eventually another plane was on the tarmac where he had been instructed to land. I immediately knew it was a combo of fewer traffic controllers due to Covid mandate and DEI policies.
Or the crew hadn't stabilized their approach and had to go around. "There was another airplane on the runway" is the standard lie told to passengers in that situation. No one's going to say, "I had my head up my ass and didn't meet the stabilized approach criteria."
Those seldom touch down before going around.
The rule at my company was "no-fault go-arounds." You were expected to go around if any of the stabilized approach criteria weren't met or if the other pilot got a funny feeling, or really for anything other than total certainty that you were about to make a safe landing. We were more likely to get called on the carpet for *not* going around, and the airplane reporting systems tattle, so you can't lie about what your airspeed, configuration, or descent rate were. The DC-10/MD-11 is notorious for being unforgiving on landing, and the crew you saw might have been trying to avoid something worse than being told, "That landing sucked."
Once more, to the good, pilots practice "touch and go" landings regularly. And those happen more often than most realize, without mishap. I experienced 1 yrs ago coming out of ORD to JFK. Someone was a bit slow clearing a runway that time too, in typical winter weather, so we did a go-around. Scared a bunch of infrequent fliers, but no other harm done.
It's true that in general aviation touch-and-gos are often used to increase the number of landings performed within a given lesson slot, but airline pilots aren't (or are rarely) trained in touch-and-go techniques. It's usually considered negative training and is just asking for configuration trouble--slats, flaps, spoilers, gear--and an excursion off the far end of the runway. Once you've touched down and deployed the reversers you're expected to stay there. If you initiate the go-around very late and low, the aircraft trajectory will continue downward briefly and it's possible for the wheels to make contact with the ground until the engines increase to climb power, but that contact is incidental, unlike that with a touch-and-go. In 30 years of getting paid to fly I was never trained in or practiced touch-and-gos.
Not according my Dad, the 30 yrs TWA pilot. They DID train and practice "touch and go" landings specifically. "Go-around" are due to poor configuration and approach, and a different technique and situation as well, and those are not practiced specifically, although I think they need to be now, with the disconnect between pilots and planes.
You've got it exactly backward. Airline pilots routinely practice go-arounds. They do not practice touch-and-gos. A go-around can be due to any number of things, including a windshear alert or warning, a runway incursion by another aircraft, an unstabilized approach, or anything else that makes the crew think that the landing can't be accomplished safely within the touchdown zone.
Excuse me, I believe my Dad knew the difference, and which he was practicing at Olathe field in Kansas. He had6 years experience island hopping in the Navy during WW II, before joining TWA, so it wasn't like he was a novice. I understand the difference too, and a missed approach go around doesn't involve landing momentarily, as does a touch and go
Whatever TWA did with DC-6's and Constellations was a long time ago. Airline pilots today do not practice touch-and-gos and haven't since the jet era began. They practice go-arounds ad nauseam. A go-around can include momentarily touching down if it's started low enough above the ground. The engines don't respond instantly and the airplane's trajectory will continue downward until there's enough power to arrest the descent and climb. If you're close enough to the runway when the go-around is initiated the wheels can make contact. That's not the same as a touch-and-go, which *nobody* practices in transport category jets. It's too dangerous in real airplanes for zero gain. The only thing touch-and-gos do is let a student fit as many landings into a training period as possible, and they've been rendered completely obsolete by simulators. The simulator can be reset instantly back to X miles from the runway so you can try again without forging negative learning patterns through touch-and-gos.
Now, if you want to keep arguing about how airline pilots train with someone who just retired after 30 years as an airline pilot, I'll know you're being obdurate just for the sake of it, instead of trying to learn something.
You immediately “knew”? With no evidence as to how many were working, who was working, or ANY of the circumstances whatsoever? And you “knew”? 👌
Your point is valid. A better word to more accurately describe my initial reaction was ‘feared’ vs ‘knew’.
I have been a pilot for 30+ years and I believe you are correct.
There were apparently (4) pilot incapacitations in a recent 2-week period; on 11/16, 11/20, 11/26, & 11/29...https://makismd.substack.com/p/pilot-incapacitation-american-airlines
Steve Kirsch and Igor Chudov have been analyzing the NZ data and have both published Substack on their thoughts. They don't completely agree but both sides are very interesting.
Some 6 months ago, Kirsch tried to present pilot vax-injured safety data - compiled by the Pilots’ Union - to the FAA and was rebuffed.
Hegel’s observation - which is the spiritual backbone of Collectivists - is, “People are
used by history and then discarded”.
I'm leaving the same comment here that I left on Dr. Stillwagon's Substack, with respect to his description of the implications of the first officer pushing on a rudder pedal as a result of a seizure:
The rudder pedals control yaw, or movement around the aircraft's vertical axis. They don't control roll, which is movement around the longitudinal axis. It's not possible to flip the airplane over just by pushing on a rudder pedal. Roll is controlled by the ailerons using the control wheel (or joystick, depending on the aircraft model), and in the scenario described there's no indication that the flying pilot made any roll inputs. The margin of safety was degraded but not eliminated, and for a pilot operating in the most demanding part of the flight, when he's most likely to be alert to problems, regaining control isn't likely to be a catastrophic problem even if the other pilot is inadvertently applying strong forces to the controls. It's not a big emphasis item in training, but crews are trained to respond to the incapacitation of other crew members. From the audio it didn't sound like they were on short final when it happened, either. It sounded like the IRO (relief pilot) was already in the right seat, already squared away, and that the incapacitated F/O had probably been removed from the cockpit. "Short final" is inside the final approach fix, or roughly five miles from the runway. Maybe the seizure did happen on short final and the captain initiated a go-around, so the audio reflects their second attempt to land; I don't know. But they didn't remove the F/O, install the IRO, and make those in-flight transmissions in just the 4-5 miles between the marker and the runway. For the F/O to seize wasn't safe, but they weren't in imminent danger of crashing, either.
I agree, there was no way all that happened on short final. The IRO and purser trying to get the stiffened incapacitated FO out of the seat in a small space while the captain is on short final?....ya, no.
I flew acrobatics in a Pitts and a Stearman for 20 years. It is possible to roll a plane with the rudder alone. I can roll a real plane with rudder alone; I've also done it numerous times with my RC planes - the roll by rudder usually leads to a rapid descent rate.. Another fail situation: strong yaw, rudder induced, can cause a crash because to keep flying in a straight line, opposite aileron will be necessary. This leads to the "crossed control" configuration. A plane in this configuration requires more pilot skill to keep from stalling: stalling is never a good idea near the ground, ie on final approach to land. Thus, it is not necessary to roll completely over to crash. A jammed rudder is an emergency situation.
What you might be able to do with the rudder in a Pitts designed for near-instant response to control inputs is not the same as what you can do with it in an Airbus, and good luck doing much at all when there's another pilot in the next seat who's very motivated not to let the airplane do something it's not designed to do. The rudders in a transport category aircraft are designed to control yaw, not roll. Aside from crosswind landings, about the only time the rudders come into play at all is during an engine failure--to counteract the resulting yaw. Almost no one in a US airline cockpit is incapable of automatically and immediately preventing the aircraft from even approaching a stall in the situation the American crew encountered, crossed controls or not. Just as runaway rudder trim can be countered with the rudder pedals, so can the input from the other crew member.
Not that time, anyway....
Can’t count on being lucky each & every time
Next time jam feet on rudders & slump or seize the yolk while having a unilateral seizure (twisting the yolk)or a clonic (jerking ) upper extremity seizure, and, though I am no pilot, I can see that being a catastrophic situation.
There's almost no scenario in a cockpit that's an instant, catastrophic emergency aside from structural failure of the aircraft, and usually if parts break off there's nothing you can do about it no matter how fast you react. This idea that someone seizing could grab and maintain a grip on the flight controls to the extent that it could overpower both the autopilot (which is almost certainly on until within a couple hundred feet of the ground because most people are lazy) or the other very alarmed crew member just isn't realistic. Slumping against the yoke is even less likely to be catastrophic, especially if the aircraft has a joystick, because there's nothing against which to slump. With a conventional yoke the fix is to push the other guy back in his seat or to one side until someone else can remove him.
Thank you for the reality testing (I am assuming that you are commercial airline pilot (or were, or have some actual knowledge/ expertise in cockpit processes.
This reassures me, somewhat, as I am flying to Nepal in February.
I realize that flying is not as safe as it used to be, but not as dangerous as I was speculating.🤔
I flew for a commuter (now called regional) airline operating turboprops for five years, and for 25 years at a major US airline from which I retired two years ago with over 15,000 hours in the 757/767 and A300, plus a little time as a 727 engineer.
Notwithstanding the effects of the jabs now coming in to play, flying in the US is safer now than it has ever been. I don't know whether it will stay that way, but the attention to safety, from the corporate level to maintenance programs to training to daily cockpit operations, is almost unbelievably high. The awareness among crews, especially, of historical mistakes is profound, and where human factors might be a chink in the safety armor, the technology provides another layer of defense. On-board windshear warnings, terrain collision warnings, configuration warnings, system redundancy, moving maps on the tablets that have replaced paper charts...in so many ways the weaknesses revealed by accidents from decades ago have been addressed and the fixes incorporated into the culture and knowledge base of modern aviation. There's a great account at Medium.com called Admiral Cloudberg that dissects airline accidents from the 1950's and 1960's through the current day, in the US and abroad. What makes them so fascinating is seeing the contrast between aviation now and in the past--even as late as just 10 years ago. So few of those accidents would happen today because of the way the aviation culture has changed. And it's not Monday morning quarterbacking. People really have the lessons of those flights in mind now, or at least benefit from them even if they don't know they're the source of today's safety culture.
On the other hand...Dude: Nepal? I wouldn't fly into Nepal for a winning Superball ticket. It's better than Africa, but not by a lot. Can't you fly into India and drive there?
I go with a group of a few long time friends to do short term medical missions work, 4th time going. Already booked on Qatar Airlines though Doha to Kathmandu.(through).
Other than flying into the foothills of the Himalayas, what should I be concerned about?
The organizer is an experienced 3rd world traveler who has done a lot of this stuff, rancher, paramedic, physician assistant, LEO, and Sheriff, and ex District Judge from Nevada. I have trusted his judgment up until you made that comment.
Besides, driving in the 3rd world is both unsafe and uncomfortable!
17-18 years ago I learned how much safer flying is than driving (before all the stuff you just said has been done to make it even safer).
I was doing a locum tennens (temporary medical assignment) in Barrow Alaska. I live in Lancaster, PA, and they had me fly out of the local Lancaster Airport, (10-15 minutes from home) in a turboprop ~10 passenger plane when I could have driven to the Harrisburg International Airport, 35 minutes from home. They insisted that I take the puddle jumper, because it was so much safer than me driving. They had just within the previous 3-6 months had a physician killed in an auto accident on his way to the major international airport to catch his flight to Barrow for a 6 month assignment. As a result, the hospital was down a doc for at least 3-6 months, as they couldn’t recruit a replacement on such short notice. And that was the US of A!
Nepal has one of the world's worst aviation safety records, that's all. Not sure if it's as bad as Africa, but it's not to US or European standards.
I too have airline flying experience, two years at Eastern pre-strike as an engineer on the 727, four years on the Brasilia turboprop at Comair, and the rest at Northwest/Delta on the DC9, DC10, and A319/320/321 for 33 years total, 25 as a captain. The safety changes that are implemented into airline flight decks usually come after disasters. The perfectly working Eastern L1011 that descended into the everglades while the pilots were distracted lead to aural warnings for ground proximity. The Delta L1011 that crashed due to windshear lead to windshear escape training maneuvers, windshear detection equipment on the aircraft, and windshear detection equipment around airports. Those are just two examples of how aviation has become much safer after disasters to prevent future similar disasters. You and I both know that after these shots were mandated, the incidences of pilot incapacitations, sudden deaths, and pilots dying younger than ever before have increased. The chance of an involutary control input from a seized pilot is rare but real, and if it happens at a bad time, there could be a bad outcome. There are known subclinical reactions to the shot that can be tested for and treated to try to prevent seizures and sudden cardiac deaths in pilots. We should be testing and treating now. We’re not.
People got very excited here about the merest suggestion that they can't 100% blame the injections for the F/O's seizure and an overall degradation in aviation safety. That's not at all what I said or implied with any of my comments. I mentioned to another commenter here that the Admiral Cloudberg account at Medium.com provides interesting, detailed discussions about how accidents have led to incredible improvements in airline safety today, so I'm perfectly aware that most safety improvements in the industry are made by counting corpses. However, the chances of an accident from a seized pilot's involuntary control input are so low that they're almost not worth speaking of, for the reasons I already discussed.
As for testing and treating now, that's history's biggest barn door closure following the horse's stroll from the barn. There's no such thing in US law as a "mandate" that allows a politician or bureaucrat to compel or constrain the medical decisions of another American. I quit my job two years early--seven, if you count age 65--to avoid the slave muzzles and injections, for which everyone else in my pilot group was clamoring, if they hadn't already rushed out to shoot up. No "mandates" required. The near-total servility from a bunch of self-styled iconoclasts and independent thinkers, all college-educated, white-collar professionals, was stunning. My union not only didn't tell the company that the right to make medical decisions about one's health belongs to each individual, it demanded that the pilot group go to the front of the line when the jabs became available. Now those same candies, along with the same public that couldn't consult the supercomputers in their pockets to read Wikipedia about coronaviruses (they cause colds); couldn't stand up for themselves and their children over the ritual public humiliation of muzzling; disinfected their groceries; and lined up around the block to save themselves from a 99.998% survivable cold virus, are getting the vapors over the fallout of their compliance. Anyone who wants to get tested and treated still has the freedom to do that much, at least. There is no "we" involved and there's no reason to wait if one is concerned about it. But I'm guessing that the same people who couldn't do the moral heavy lifting to protect themselves and their rights three years ago aren't going to lift a finger to discover how their complicity is affecting them now.
So then with your experience you clearly know that other than airbuses (which have side sticks, not joy sticks), commercial airliners do still have control yokes that can be slumped over...and, that the autopilot will automatically disengage with too much manual input, right?
From my previous comment: "This idea that someone seizing could grab and maintain a grip on the flight controls to the extent that it could overpower both the autopilot (which is almost certainly on until within a couple hundred feet of the ground because most people are lazy) or the other very alarmed crew member just isn't realistic. Slumping against the yoke is even less likely to be catastrophic, especially if the aircraft has a joystick, because there's nothing against which to slump."
Was thinking I might fly to Florida this winter. Prolly not…
I'm sure Klaus or Kerry will lend you their private jets, Rascal.
Stay grounded –
in both senses.
Or pack a chute!
To me, it is glaringly obvious.
Mandating that airline pilots get the death shot not only puts their lives at risk, but -obviously - all those that they are responsible for on a daily basis. So this particular mandate has a higher return on investment ( for TPTB/ elite/WEF etc) than a vaxx mandate for a teacher , for example.
Nurses and care workers are another category of potential multiple-casualty-result vaxx recipients, so mandating them (as was done early on) also has a higher return than vaxxing an individual. Doctors , of course are another. Train drivers also - and they don't usually have co-drivers either. Taxi drivers - surprised they were not mandated. Perhaps sone were.
Airline pilots are probably the "pinnacle" , though, when it come to the return on investment for a single vaxxed individual.
I agree that the COVID vaccinated pilots are a disaster in the making. By the way, did you guys see the new satellite video of the March, 8th 2014 Malaysian flight? The plane just disappears. There are three spherical orbs circling it, and then boom, it's gone. It is crazy. Kim Iverson did an episode on it. Check it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hcCTWkvT2I&t=5s
Thanks ! Is that MH370? Did you see the Netflix film on that? One of the wreckage search team is sure that the wreckage is in the south China sea, just to SW of the coast of China, just where the 3 other craft were surrounding it." Fake" flight data has its last location being way out in the S Indian Ocean. My money is on a directed-energy-weapon burst from the base in Antarctica!
Yes, it's the MH370. No, I didn't see the Netflix film on it yet, but am planning on watching it.
It was pretty interesting, and good background for this latest video. HOwever, I doubt there will be any wreckage - anywhere - if what the guy in the Kim Iverson interview's theory is correct. H-Shit!
This is a real problem at the highest level. I ve been following for awhile; since the mandated jabs . Union pilots associations are good source of information.
The unions are covering it up too.
Yes they are, tough to get the word out. Yet there are tv commercials out decrying a pilot shortage. They just don’t say why. I wonder why? Where did they all go? We know!!!
Actually it’s been a pilot shortage has been an imminent problem for a while. Then the airlines pushing early retirements every chance they get...the most recent being during Covid...doesn’t help.
The cover-up is being uncovered every day. All flight recorders should be monitored by an independent system to avert disaster.