"Anti-Science" a Weaponized Term Used by Those Who Refuse to Face Vaccine Safety Data
Trend Over Last Few Years Indicates Fear of the Truth Amongst Vaccine Promoters
By Peter A. McCullough
Last night I was invited on national TV and appeared with former US Representative Jason Chaffetz on FOX News Ingraham Angle and was asked to react to the term “anti-science” used by Anthony Fauci. During my preparation I learned the term “anti-science” had been used to describe the conflict between old paradigms during the scientific revolution and the introduction of the scientific method. In recent years the term has been used within modern clinical science in a different and dark way. Dr. Peter Hotez, vaccine promoter at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, has developed a lecture tour and set of writings for several years before the COVID-19 crisis using the term “anti-science” as a way of denigrating those who are evaluating and discussing safety data on vaccines.
Hotez is now joined by Tedros at the WHO and Fauci (retired NIH) in promulgating the term anti-science as a pejorative and insulting way of positioning clinical scientists who are studying the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical consequences of COVID-19 vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths. Yes, the study of what COVID-19 vaccines do to the human body is “science” and it is insulting to hear the term “anti-science” thrown out as a blocking tool in order to discount any side effects of vaccination.
Tedros went so far as to say those studying vaccine injuries and who wisely chose to defer on vaccination themselves are “killing machines.” This unhinged hyperbole is symptomatic of a psychotic break in those who who have been the vanguard of the imploding worldwide narrative supporting mass vaccination.
I summarized these comments and pivoted on television to the opportunities that Drs Fauci, Walensky, Jha, Murthy, and several others had on Jan 24 and Dec 7, 2022, to attend US Senate Hearings and listen to COVID-19 experts and have an interchange on the “science” of what we have learned. Instead none of them showed up and now are painting themselves with the term “anti-science”. This regression can only lead to greater loss of credibility and dissolution of the crumbling false narrative “safe and effective.”
If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and your extended circles.
Criminals and psychotics accuse others of what they themselves do. "Anti-science rhetoric and extremism" as described by Hoetz is EXACTLY what the globalist alliance of the WEF, Pharma, the Rockefeller Foundation, Fauci and Gates have done the past 3 years. This globalist cabal falsely inflated the dangers of covid to generate as much fear as possible, falsely discredited inexpensive and successful treatments that would have saved lives and voided the need for vaccines, fraudulently pushed unsafe and ineffective products masquerading as "vaccines," and forced the media (which they control) to censor and suppress all doctors who presented the true science and scientific facts. All individuals involved in this alliance are psychotic or corrupt or both. Fortunately, the majority of the population now knows the truth, thanks to thousands of people like you. Truth ultimately conquers all censorship.
Much love to you and yours Doc. You are an inspiration and proof that there is still a lot of good in this world. And it’s worth fighting for.