I have been suspicious from the start about the apparent refusal by authorities to conduct autopsies in the US. I see it to be a strong clue as to the coverup and deception.
Interesting on the autopsy, and worth noting that the fundamental flaws in mRNA technology can explain what the autopsy found with enough simplicity for most to understand. Highlighting such knowledge would enable most to protect their kids from injury/death caused by mRNA technology.
That is, to remedy the ongoing mRNA crimes requires average parents to know enough to call out any MD pushing these poisons on their children. Suggest parents educate themselves as noted below.
Some key points from this tutorial follow as reminders.
* Antibodies, made by body in response to mRNA message in these jabs, are in the bloodstream and thus never get to airway surfaces where they must be to prevent respiratory infection. (so, covid and new flu shots cannot prevent infection)
* The mRNA in these jabs, cause the cells they infect to make foreign, non-self-proteins, which automatically finger these mRNA-infected cells for violent death by “complement” (killer system #2 of human immune system, which is triggered by antibodies). (so all mRNA shots are unsafe)
___* Blood vessels are damaged first, causing blood clots and leaks (that expose surrounding organs to damage, with damaged heart/brain cells not being replaced)
___* Sudden death, and most other mRNA shot injuries, can be explained as the result of the mechanisms noted in tutorial
* Use of the “mRNA is bad for humans” argument with MDs (and in court) still applies because mRNA is what is claimed by the criminals, and it turns into a fraud (and other toxic agents) case, if the crooks prove that there is no mRNA in your specific batch of covid shots.
Dear Peter, the weight of the truth in all such cases is accumulating. As seekers and researchers such as yourself, won't just let all the immense deceptions of death and injury be just ignored. A+
In light of such findings confirming the lack of protection, the Lancet paper which claims millions of lives were saved due to the Covid-19 vaccines based solely on mathematical modeling, might need a serious independent peer review, a revision or possibly a retraction?
Findings such as this may support that the vaccine was far less effective at ending the pandemic than say omicron was. Would not be surprised if one day the conclusion is simply that natural infection ended the covid crisis.
Also it probably would have been helpful if health authorities had continued to report health issues by number of shots, it likely would have produced useful signals for who were having the worst outcomes. In Canada between March and June 2022 the incident rates per 1000 population did an amazing flip from the unvaccinated being over represented to the vaccinated in both hospitalizations and deaths. Data up to June 5 was the last update of the tables that stayed in place until June 30. July 1 the tables on the govt of Canada website that largely fed the pandemic of the unvaccinated story were reformatted forever removing the covid hospitalizations and death statistics by number of shots.
The fact that the health authorities and media went silence on this angle (unvaccinated are the only ones affected by covid) to encouraging vaccination begs the question, did the vaccinated start having more trouble? And this was just for covid impacts, imagine if they were real trying to solve a health crisis they would have been studying and reporting total health outcomes by vaccination status. Based on how they paraded the whole pandemic of the unvaccinated story, I tend to believe they probably looked at such things but didn’t report it because it painted the wrong picture for what they were driving. The fact that they pulled information that turned against the story they were pitching supports this idea.
Anyway it’s more clear all the time health authorities did not do things that logically would have been done if they were really trying to save lives rather than sell drugs. When you are apparently trying to save people from a disease that you claim is novel and we don’t know how to treat, why would they be opposed to trying drugs such as steroid inhalers, etc that have been around for many years and are no riskier than taking an aspirin, what would people of had to lose by trying?
The hospitals told patients and their families they were going to die, at that point, try anything. Instead they gave drugs that would be appropriate for end of life care. Drugs that slow down your breathing and make you comfortable when you’re going to die. So someone that is in the hospital because they are having a hard time breathing you give them drugs that make it even harder to breath? The question for this is, how many times did this treatment protocol get applied to people say 40 years old? It’s one thing if a person is 95 and is having system wide shut down, perhaps end of life protocols would be correct, but for young people you have to raise an eyebrow. And in the case of the old folks, it would have been nice for hospitals to invite family members in and make those decisions together, but they did not, nurses and doctors acted on their own as per the protocols they were given to follow.
Never has the medical profession done so much to lose the trust of society, and it will cost us dearly going forward with collateral implications for avoiding them when patients need help. But many people feel they are not to be trusted, how do doctors / nurses / health authorizes gain that trust back? Let’s face it, the protocols and messaging and censorship, etc killed and continues to kill people, there continues to be excess mortality in all age groups particularity in regions with high vaccinations rates. Is it the vaccines, is it all the collateral damage issues, is it a combination? Who knows, Gov’t and health authorizes are not being transparent so at this point it’s very difficult to be certain.
Again any authority that was serious about health would have all data and people from all sides of the issue at the table, but they do not, so you have to ask the question what is really going on. Probably a number of objectives, but again hard to say what those might be when there is very little from govt to clarify the objectives, or any that are logical.
Hard to believe that bodies put in place by citizens to work on their behalf (civil servants) would appear to not be accountable to those same citizens any longer.
Mccullough is one of the most courageous, important, valuable, altruistic voices in this debacle. Now that it can be profitable to be against the mrna, some substackers are caching in and only sharing their information with paid subscribers. Not dr. Mccullough. I encourage everyone to at least once in a while, contribute something for his efforts and the scorn he endured. Thanks doc! (PS substack needs to make a netflix or spotify model where you pay one monthly fee and get access to all, or many publishers/topics. There are just too many good writers who need our support right now, and few uf us can afford to support 50 of them at $5/mo minimum).
Most of the stack writers I follow allow content to be accessed for free. A few do restrict to teasers and I must decline; like you and many others, I can only pay for a few writers but read more. I suppose some writers do need the income but other writers simply wish to share their observations and need no compensation.
People who lost a loved one should put up the money for a good autopsy. They should consider it an investment, and a way to get remunerated for their suffering and loss, when their case goes to court.
Say, the autopsy costs $10,000, and you win $5,000,000 in damages?
That would make it worth it, and benefit society also.
It's painfully obvious. The gene-therapy transfection shots kill people. See Walter Chesnut's SubStack covering the pathology of the spike protein - it is lethal, both short and long term. No gene-therapy shots are safe for humans - none. Peace.
I believe in this case the conclusion is that the patient died of covid, the vaccine didn’t work to prevent the type of pathology that was consistent with people that were concluded to have died from covid that were unvaccinated.
But let’s face it the person was in their 80’s and had other health problems. Is there an age that at some point they could simply put old age as the cause of death? When the average age of the type covid death in 2020 was over 80, does society really need to panic so much? All that panic was handy for getting people to comply and line up for those as it turned out very profitable shots. Remembers at the very. Econ if the Pfizer CEO saying they weren’t in this to make great profits? They sure messed up their pricing model if that was their intension.
More evidence the politicians and bureaucrats have no idea what they are doing, have caused untold damage to millions of people; they will never admit and correct their errors. They are oblivious and don't care.
I agree with you that people should get their own private autopsies done. And some have. And they have found that the vax was a direct cause of death. But most people don’t know to do this or can’t afford it or are paid not too. It’s crazy.
I did see the Jane and Sasha interview! Thank you! I have been following Sasha closely. I found her conclusion regarding the lack of randomness compelling. I know enough about patents to be dangerous. I agree with you on the rest of the sadness/madness.
I have been suspicious from the start about the apparent refusal by authorities to conduct autopsies in the US. I see it to be a strong clue as to the coverup and deception.
It kind of is prima facie evidence of a coverup.
The only way for them to be more obvious would be the offering of free cremations.
There was a bill passed in NZ late last year to allow for more causes of death to be unknown.
who on earth or what on earth would allow that to happen?
Evil
Interesting on the autopsy, and worth noting that the fundamental flaws in mRNA technology can explain what the autopsy found with enough simplicity for most to understand. Highlighting such knowledge would enable most to protect their kids from injury/death caused by mRNA technology.
That is, to remedy the ongoing mRNA crimes requires average parents to know enough to call out any MD pushing these poisons on their children. Suggest parents educate themselves as noted below.
Surprisingly, it is not that hard to do this, as the immunology functions involved – revealed by Nobel-Prize-winning discoveries that have been taught in med-school for decades -- have been explained at the Jr-High-level by a brilliant med-school professor (00:53-22:02+ of https://rumble.com/v1p3855-friday-roundtable-worrying-developments-with-michael-palmer-m.d.-sucharit-b.html).
Some key points from this tutorial follow as reminders.
* Antibodies, made by body in response to mRNA message in these jabs, are in the bloodstream and thus never get to airway surfaces where they must be to prevent respiratory infection. (so, covid and new flu shots cannot prevent infection)
* The mRNA in these jabs, cause the cells they infect to make foreign, non-self-proteins, which automatically finger these mRNA-infected cells for violent death by “complement” (killer system #2 of human immune system, which is triggered by antibodies). (so all mRNA shots are unsafe)
___* Blood vessels are damaged first, causing blood clots and leaks (that expose surrounding organs to damage, with damaged heart/brain cells not being replaced)
___* Sudden death, and most other mRNA shot injuries, can be explained as the result of the mechanisms noted in tutorial
Thanks for the info, and agree serious hoaxes are involved, but think reality is more likely to be the following.
* Wide variations in toxicity exist between batches of covid shots by Moderna, Pfizer, etc (https://www.howbadismybatch.com/)
* Average citizens like us have no way to be sure what is actually in each specific batch of covid shots because quality assurance mechanisms have been gamed and big pharma did not even manufacture the covid shots, military contractors did (34:50-42:20 of https://rumble.com/v2nermq-russell-and-rfk-jr-fauci-cia-secrets-and-running-for-president-128-stay-fre.html)
* Use of the “mRNA is bad for humans” argument with MDs (and in court) still applies because mRNA is what is claimed by the criminals, and it turns into a fraud (and other toxic agents) case, if the crooks prove that there is no mRNA in your specific batch of covid shots.
The no autopsy game is just one of many changes from authorities in various key positions. We are under attack.
Dear Peter, the weight of the truth in all such cases is accumulating. As seekers and researchers such as yourself, won't just let all the immense deceptions of death and injury be just ignored. A+
In light of such findings confirming the lack of protection, the Lancet paper which claims millions of lives were saved due to the Covid-19 vaccines based solely on mathematical modeling, might need a serious independent peer review, a revision or possibly a retraction?
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00320-6/fulltext
Findings such as this may support that the vaccine was far less effective at ending the pandemic than say omicron was. Would not be surprised if one day the conclusion is simply that natural infection ended the covid crisis.
Also it probably would have been helpful if health authorities had continued to report health issues by number of shots, it likely would have produced useful signals for who were having the worst outcomes. In Canada between March and June 2022 the incident rates per 1000 population did an amazing flip from the unvaccinated being over represented to the vaccinated in both hospitalizations and deaths. Data up to June 5 was the last update of the tables that stayed in place until June 30. July 1 the tables on the govt of Canada website that largely fed the pandemic of the unvaccinated story were reformatted forever removing the covid hospitalizations and death statistics by number of shots.
The fact that the health authorities and media went silence on this angle (unvaccinated are the only ones affected by covid) to encouraging vaccination begs the question, did the vaccinated start having more trouble? And this was just for covid impacts, imagine if they were real trying to solve a health crisis they would have been studying and reporting total health outcomes by vaccination status. Based on how they paraded the whole pandemic of the unvaccinated story, I tend to believe they probably looked at such things but didn’t report it because it painted the wrong picture for what they were driving. The fact that they pulled information that turned against the story they were pitching supports this idea.
Anyway it’s more clear all the time health authorities did not do things that logically would have been done if they were really trying to save lives rather than sell drugs. When you are apparently trying to save people from a disease that you claim is novel and we don’t know how to treat, why would they be opposed to trying drugs such as steroid inhalers, etc that have been around for many years and are no riskier than taking an aspirin, what would people of had to lose by trying?
The hospitals told patients and their families they were going to die, at that point, try anything. Instead they gave drugs that would be appropriate for end of life care. Drugs that slow down your breathing and make you comfortable when you’re going to die. So someone that is in the hospital because they are having a hard time breathing you give them drugs that make it even harder to breath? The question for this is, how many times did this treatment protocol get applied to people say 40 years old? It’s one thing if a person is 95 and is having system wide shut down, perhaps end of life protocols would be correct, but for young people you have to raise an eyebrow. And in the case of the old folks, it would have been nice for hospitals to invite family members in and make those decisions together, but they did not, nurses and doctors acted on their own as per the protocols they were given to follow.
Never has the medical profession done so much to lose the trust of society, and it will cost us dearly going forward with collateral implications for avoiding them when patients need help. But many people feel they are not to be trusted, how do doctors / nurses / health authorizes gain that trust back? Let’s face it, the protocols and messaging and censorship, etc killed and continues to kill people, there continues to be excess mortality in all age groups particularity in regions with high vaccinations rates. Is it the vaccines, is it all the collateral damage issues, is it a combination? Who knows, Gov’t and health authorizes are not being transparent so at this point it’s very difficult to be certain.
Again any authority that was serious about health would have all data and people from all sides of the issue at the table, but they do not, so you have to ask the question what is really going on. Probably a number of objectives, but again hard to say what those might be when there is very little from govt to clarify the objectives, or any that are logical.
Hard to believe that bodies put in place by citizens to work on their behalf (civil servants) would appear to not be accountable to those same citizens any longer.
Mccullough is one of the most courageous, important, valuable, altruistic voices in this debacle. Now that it can be profitable to be against the mrna, some substackers are caching in and only sharing their information with paid subscribers. Not dr. Mccullough. I encourage everyone to at least once in a while, contribute something for his efforts and the scorn he endured. Thanks doc! (PS substack needs to make a netflix or spotify model where you pay one monthly fee and get access to all, or many publishers/topics. There are just too many good writers who need our support right now, and few uf us can afford to support 50 of them at $5/mo minimum).
Most of the stack writers I follow allow content to be accessed for free. A few do restrict to teasers and I must decline; like you and many others, I can only pay for a few writers but read more. I suppose some writers do need the income but other writers simply wish to share their observations and need no compensation.
300,000 + excess deaths in ages 16-64 2021-2022 in the US equals a pandemic of the vaccinated. And the numbers will climb.
I wonder why the FLCCC and other honest doctors are not calling for autopsies.
They are calling for autopsies. But autopsies are prohibited but powers that be.
People who lost a loved one should put up the money for a good autopsy. They should consider it an investment, and a way to get remunerated for their suffering and loss, when their case goes to court.
Say, the autopsy costs $10,000, and you win $5,000,000 in damages?
That would make it worth it, and benefit society also.
It's painfully obvious. The gene-therapy transfection shots kill people. See Walter Chesnut's SubStack covering the pathology of the spike protein - it is lethal, both short and long term. No gene-therapy shots are safe for humans - none. Peace.
How is it determined if it was Delta or the “vaccines” that killed the man?
I believe in this case the conclusion is that the patient died of covid, the vaccine didn’t work to prevent the type of pathology that was consistent with people that were concluded to have died from covid that were unvaccinated.
But let’s face it the person was in their 80’s and had other health problems. Is there an age that at some point they could simply put old age as the cause of death? When the average age of the type covid death in 2020 was over 80, does society really need to panic so much? All that panic was handy for getting people to comply and line up for those as it turned out very profitable shots. Remembers at the very. Econ if the Pfizer CEO saying they weren’t in this to make great profits? They sure messed up their pricing model if that was their intension.
Heart failure due to .. ?
More evidence the politicians and bureaucrats have no idea what they are doing, have caused untold damage to millions of people; they will never admit and correct their errors. They are oblivious and don't care.
no benefit, only miriad risks.
.
Vaccines Are Violence
.
I agree with you that people should get their own private autopsies done. And some have. And they have found that the vax was a direct cause of death. But most people don’t know to do this or can’t afford it or are paid not too. It’s crazy.
I did see the Jane and Sasha interview! Thank you! I have been following Sasha closely. I found her conclusion regarding the lack of randomness compelling. I know enough about patents to be dangerous. I agree with you on the rest of the sadness/madness.