Not only does this paper get pulled after a month in which it set all records for views, reads, and downloads, now the unjustified retraction will prompt scores of interviews which will further amplify the message that the COVID-19 vaccines should be removed from the market. They are unsafe for human use.
Dr. McCullough, It is inconceivable to me how you have the energy AND the intellect to not only research and publish, but to also respond so thoroughly to incompetent bureaucrats. Yes, bureaucrats are not just in government.
It is tragic that a quality, thoroughly researched and valuable paper is being retracted because the WHO sicked its pit bulls on it. World Health Org has WAY too much money and needs to be dismantled.
"...we note that the average Cureus-promoted paper receives 2700 views in a year. Our “Lessons Learned” paper has received more than 320,000 views in a single month.". AWESOME 👍😎
My heart is with each of the authors of the retracted paper. I'm sorry if not surprised this happened, and sorry you had to take the time to write a rebuttal (necessary, but just a damned shame). The fight continues. God bless you.
Thank you for this write up Dr. McCullough. And thank you for the heads up to download the article.
I don't know if you heard, but this has already made a big difference:
Here is a previously pro vaccine Doctor who has a very large following on YouTube… Talking about this very peer-reviewed article. It was the straw that broke the camel's back for her. This show got the most reviews of any of her shows.
It’s time to decentralize science. We don’t need centralized peer review pillars and gatekeepers. We can do this with every system. Let’s make our own new systems.
Decentralize everything. Make it transparent. These are the systemic cures for corruption.
Just like humans have done with the music industry, Bitcoin, and media (substack and podcasts).
This is no surprise. The entirety of much of what we are seeing, whether medically, politically, societally, etc., comes from individuals with a very specific ideological outlook. Take a look at Tim Kerjses….a woke individual who will not tolerate any deviation from the ideology that he believes (or has been funded to believe). We see something similar with the creator of Google Gemini, who has decided that George Washington was a black man, and injected minorities into any and all responses that Gemini gave. It’s almost laughable, but, if nothing else, is ridiculously obvious that they will tolerate nothing other than the message that they have been indoctrinated to portray.
Thank you. I saved the PDF, printed the 38 pages, and emailed my friends your summary along with the link to the study. They were instructed to save this information as soon as possible.
The article was excellent, and left no room for rebuttal, yet they had to make an attempt to "muddy the waters". The reply to their BS was second to none, and *should* silence all others that would attempt to discredit it.
This is hands down the best article I never read. Like most everything coming from the so called experts on both sides of the aisle, the core content is immersed in medical-ese that it is virtually impossible for a normal person to digest. The reasons why I found it so important was not because of what the original article said &/or the supposed reasons why it was withdrawn after being published, but solely because the original paper was withdrawn. Truth always withstands the light of day. If what the “medical/scientific” community wants to do is expose the mis/dis-information then what better way than to compare the ‘truth’ to the ‘lie’. They are not hiding your lies they are hiding their lies. Also that Dr.Boz YT link was very interesting as she dissected the original article saying that it completely red pilled her by exposing the bogus data used to promote the jab.
It's quite funny to read part of Kersjes' bio: "...he worked at a number of Dutch NGOs to promote innovation in democratic processes and civil society." Ah, yes, he's promoting "innovation in democratic processes" alright! Unfortunately, the innovation is to over-ride valid research and replace it with corporate propaganda.
Colleagues:
Not only does this paper get pulled after a month in which it set all records for views, reads, and downloads, now the unjustified retraction will prompt scores of interviews which will further amplify the message that the COVID-19 vaccines should be removed from the market. They are unsafe for human use.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
Dr. McCullough, It is inconceivable to me how you have the energy AND the intellect to not only research and publish, but to also respond so thoroughly to incompetent bureaucrats. Yes, bureaucrats are not just in government.
It is tragic that a quality, thoroughly researched and valuable paper is being retracted because the WHO sicked its pit bulls on it. World Health Org has WAY too much money and needs to be dismantled.
"...we note that the average Cureus-promoted paper receives 2700 views in a year. Our “Lessons Learned” paper has received more than 320,000 views in a single month.". AWESOME 👍😎
My heart is with each of the authors of the retracted paper. I'm sorry if not surprised this happened, and sorry you had to take the time to write a rebuttal (necessary, but just a damned shame). The fight continues. God bless you.
Thank you for this write up Dr. McCullough. And thank you for the heads up to download the article.
I don't know if you heard, but this has already made a big difference:
Here is a previously pro vaccine Doctor who has a very large following on YouTube… Talking about this very peer-reviewed article. It was the straw that broke the camel's back for her. This show got the most reviews of any of her shows.
https://www.youtube.com/live/v3N-uFfvU5s?si=y1Bt0M-bjRB5L13v
It’s falling apart and they don’t know how to deal with it.
The medical community will never recover from this cowardly, greed-riddles tragedy.
It’s time to decentralize science. We don’t need centralized peer review pillars and gatekeepers. We can do this with every system. Let’s make our own new systems.
Decentralize everything. Make it transparent. These are the systemic cures for corruption.
Just like humans have done with the music industry, Bitcoin, and media (substack and podcasts).
Decentralize science and medicine. Like this: https://open.substack.com/pub/joshketry/p/decentralize-everything?r=7oa9d&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
wow, a superb rebuttal!
This is no surprise. The entirety of much of what we are seeing, whether medically, politically, societally, etc., comes from individuals with a very specific ideological outlook. Take a look at Tim Kerjses….a woke individual who will not tolerate any deviation from the ideology that he believes (or has been funded to believe). We see something similar with the creator of Google Gemini, who has decided that George Washington was a black man, and injected minorities into any and all responses that Gemini gave. It’s almost laughable, but, if nothing else, is ridiculously obvious that they will tolerate nothing other than the message that they have been indoctrinated to portray.
Thank you. I saved the PDF, printed the 38 pages, and emailed my friends your summary along with the link to the study. They were instructed to save this information as soon as possible.
The article was excellent, and left no room for rebuttal, yet they had to make an attempt to "muddy the waters". The reply to their BS was second to none, and *should* silence all others that would attempt to discredit it.
Let's all hope that Mr. Kersjes is triple jabbed and triple boosted, we want him safe from the Covid virus don't we?
This is hands down the best article I never read. Like most everything coming from the so called experts on both sides of the aisle, the core content is immersed in medical-ese that it is virtually impossible for a normal person to digest. The reasons why I found it so important was not because of what the original article said &/or the supposed reasons why it was withdrawn after being published, but solely because the original paper was withdrawn. Truth always withstands the light of day. If what the “medical/scientific” community wants to do is expose the mis/dis-information then what better way than to compare the ‘truth’ to the ‘lie’. They are not hiding your lies they are hiding their lies. Also that Dr.Boz YT link was very interesting as she dissected the original article saying that it completely red pilled her by exposing the bogus data used to promote the jab.
It's quite funny to read part of Kersjes' bio: "...he worked at a number of Dutch NGOs to promote innovation in democratic processes and civil society." Ah, yes, he's promoting "innovation in democratic processes" alright! Unfortunately, the innovation is to over-ride valid research and replace it with corporate propaganda.