Every single person I know who has received multiple jabs admits that each successive shot is worse than the last. How many more people died in 2022? Hopefully we can stop the madness/evil in 2023.
116,309 vaccinees who died as a direct consequence of receiving a dose of the nucleotide-based vaccines against COVID-19 in Germany (95% CI: 105,669 - 129,331).
The Underreported Ratio of 30 is a Conservative Estimate. Suppose it’s actually 50 or even 75? So it could be 400,000 or 600,000. When are people going to admit that the shots are killing hundreds of thousands of people.
A Demar Hamlin Simulation was shown in the Stadium last Sunday. I don’t think it was him because if it was we would have seen his face.
I have read this study. The data was collected using an online self-selecting sample. A sample collected in this manner cannot be reproduced, thus violating the mathematical theory underlying statistical theory. It is not possible to calculate valid distributions without replication. That is simply not a possibility. No statistical technique can be applied to the data gathered in this manner and conclusions cannot be drawn. This applies equally to observational data and even to so-called "gold standard" clinical trials because participants are self-selected. Modern research is fraught with poorly done studies. It is unfortunate that all these so-called "researchers" do not understand the most elementary concepts and the mathematical underpinnings of statistical theory. They never ask a statistician nor do they have the mathematical maturity to understand the very theory they constantly abuse. Modern “research” has been reduced to collecting data the easiest way possible, throw the data into a computer, and generate a thousand t-tests, regressions, and CI’s with meaningless p-values in table after table. They have absolutely no idea what it means.
We know that this "vaccine" is killing a lot of people... However, let me make a couple of observations. As usual, the author, in his conclusions, does not make a big deal out of this result, and limits himself to saying that whether people know someone who was adversely affected by COVID-19 or the "vaccine" will have an impact on the person's decision to get "vaccinated"; I wouldn't need to do a research project to tell you that. The title of the article does not say anything about the number of "vaccine deaths". It has become the norm that authors find results that hit you in your face about the uselessness and dangers of these "vaccines", but somehow, they find a way to ignore these results in their conclusions.
Also, I am certain that "the experts" will find a way to criticize the method used by the author to estimate these deaths. I have to study his formula with a little more detail in order to say one way or another.
The plan is to have one COIVD shot per year, designed to work against the variants then circulating. Similar to the flu shot. I wonder if it will be harder to see the deaths when this happens.
This is unlikely to be very effective against COVID as the antibodies produced from a shots fade in a few months.
Every single person I know who has received multiple jabs admits that each successive shot is worse than the last. How many more people died in 2022? Hopefully we can stop the madness/evil in 2023.
Thank you
My own estimate for Germany (https://vigilance.pervaers.com/p/german-excess-mortality-part-3):
116,309 vaccinees who died as a direct consequence of receiving a dose of the nucleotide-based vaccines against COVID-19 in Germany (95% CI: 105,669 - 129,331).
Igor Chudov (https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/covid-vaccines-killed-278000-americans) translated this to figures for the USA:
"Fabian Spieker based on the number of american doses: 266,400"
So that is very close to Skidmore's estimate of 278,000!
This is staggering.
But why?
Is this a system too big and important to our economy to fail?
Was it a master planned campaign to reduce the population?
Was it a social experiment for the government the medical industry and the media to gauge their power over the whole of society?
I refuse to believe that this was the result of ineptitude and negligence. ( like,… OOPS!! We’re NOT sorry!)
Thank you, Dr. McCullough, for your continued courage and insight.
Thank you Dr McCullough for sharing the excellent research from our best and brightest...!
The Underreported Ratio of 30 is a Conservative Estimate. Suppose it’s actually 50 or even 75? So it could be 400,000 or 600,000. When are people going to admit that the shots are killing hundreds of thousands of people.
A Demar Hamlin Simulation was shown in the Stadium last Sunday. I don’t think it was him because if it was we would have seen his face.
I have read this study. The data was collected using an online self-selecting sample. A sample collected in this manner cannot be reproduced, thus violating the mathematical theory underlying statistical theory. It is not possible to calculate valid distributions without replication. That is simply not a possibility. No statistical technique can be applied to the data gathered in this manner and conclusions cannot be drawn. This applies equally to observational data and even to so-called "gold standard" clinical trials because participants are self-selected. Modern research is fraught with poorly done studies. It is unfortunate that all these so-called "researchers" do not understand the most elementary concepts and the mathematical underpinnings of statistical theory. They never ask a statistician nor do they have the mathematical maturity to understand the very theory they constantly abuse. Modern “research” has been reduced to collecting data the easiest way possible, throw the data into a computer, and generate a thousand t-tests, regressions, and CI’s with meaningless p-values in table after table. They have absolutely no idea what it means.
We know that this "vaccine" is killing a lot of people... However, let me make a couple of observations. As usual, the author, in his conclusions, does not make a big deal out of this result, and limits himself to saying that whether people know someone who was adversely affected by COVID-19 or the "vaccine" will have an impact on the person's decision to get "vaccinated"; I wouldn't need to do a research project to tell you that. The title of the article does not say anything about the number of "vaccine deaths". It has become the norm that authors find results that hit you in your face about the uselessness and dangers of these "vaccines", but somehow, they find a way to ignore these results in their conclusions.
Also, I am certain that "the experts" will find a way to criticize the method used by the author to estimate these deaths. I have to study his formula with a little more detail in order to say one way or another.
The plan is to have one COIVD shot per year, designed to work against the variants then circulating. Similar to the flu shot. I wonder if it will be harder to see the deaths when this happens.
This is unlikely to be very effective against COVID as the antibodies produced from a shots fade in a few months.