12 Comments

Every single person I know who has received multiple jabs admits that each successive shot is worse than the last. How many more people died in 2022? Hopefully we can stop the madness/evil in 2023.

Expand full comment

Roughly the same amount as 2021. This will reach far into the future though if worse comes to worst.

Expand full comment

Yes sir! Thank for that excellent analysis!.. Absolutely this could reach well into the future.. the poison jab turns the human body into a biological time bomb more and more with each and every jab. My guess at this point is By the 3rd or 4th the immune system is substantially debilitated and cancers previously contained become aggressive as well as covid variants become more and more tolerated instead of terminated.. the more jabs the more debilitation.. heaven only knows how crippled an immune system becomes after the 5th dose of poison...? effectively reducing it to that of a 90yr olds? hence the increase of All cause mortality will continue into the future..

unless a miraculous protocol is developed to neutralize the poison effects..??? This could get even more ugly..

Mission 1 Stop the Jab... mission 2 Nuremberg..

Expand full comment

Thank you

My own estimate for Germany (https://vigilance.pervaers.com/p/german-excess-mortality-part-3):

116,309 vaccinees who died as a direct consequence of receiving a dose of the nucleotide-based vaccines against COVID-19 in Germany (95% CI: 105,669 - 129,331).

Igor Chudov (https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/covid-vaccines-killed-278000-americans) translated this to figures for the USA:

"Fabian Spieker based on the number of american doses: 266,400"

So that is very close to Skidmore's estimate of 278,000!

Expand full comment

This is staggering.

But why?

Is this a system too big and important to our economy to fail?

Was it a master planned campaign to reduce the population?

Was it a social experiment for the government the medical industry and the media to gauge their power over the whole of society?

I refuse to believe that this was the result of ineptitude and negligence. ( like,… OOPS!! We’re NOT sorry!)

Expand full comment

I agree. Not ineptitude or incompetence. Perhaps the perfect storm of greed, corruption and misguided virtue signaling. Still....I’m not buying that either. Fear was induced purposefully and regularly (and I’d argue knowingly) which was all that was needed to lead many to slaughter and cause others to stand back and say “still, not going to believe it because it has not happened to me, and I’m not reading anything in the news.”

At this point, feels like people are waiting for the smoking gun to go after the perpetrators. I get that.

The reality is the waters have been so muddied (again....chance? Or design?) that trying to unravel and do a post mortem on the COVID chronicles is near impossible, especially as the can is being routinely and regularly kicked down the road.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Dr. McCullough, for your continued courage and insight.

Expand full comment

Thank you Dr McCullough for sharing the excellent research from our best and brightest...!

Expand full comment

The Underreported Ratio of 30 is a Conservative Estimate. Suppose it’s actually 50 or even 75? So it could be 400,000 or 600,000. When are people going to admit that the shots are killing hundreds of thousands of people.

A Demar Hamlin Simulation was shown in the Stadium last Sunday. I don’t think it was him because if it was we would have seen his face.

Expand full comment

I have read this study. The data was collected using an online self-selecting sample. A sample collected in this manner cannot be reproduced, thus violating the mathematical theory underlying statistical theory. It is not possible to calculate valid distributions without replication. That is simply not a possibility. No statistical technique can be applied to the data gathered in this manner and conclusions cannot be drawn. This applies equally to observational data and even to so-called "gold standard" clinical trials because participants are self-selected. Modern research is fraught with poorly done studies. It is unfortunate that all these so-called "researchers" do not understand the most elementary concepts and the mathematical underpinnings of statistical theory. They never ask a statistician nor do they have the mathematical maturity to understand the very theory they constantly abuse. Modern “research” has been reduced to collecting data the easiest way possible, throw the data into a computer, and generate a thousand t-tests, regressions, and CI’s with meaningless p-values in table after table. They have absolutely no idea what it means.

Expand full comment

We know that this "vaccine" is killing a lot of people... However, let me make a couple of observations. As usual, the author, in his conclusions, does not make a big deal out of this result, and limits himself to saying that whether people know someone who was adversely affected by COVID-19 or the "vaccine" will have an impact on the person's decision to get "vaccinated"; I wouldn't need to do a research project to tell you that. The title of the article does not say anything about the number of "vaccine deaths". It has become the norm that authors find results that hit you in your face about the uselessness and dangers of these "vaccines", but somehow, they find a way to ignore these results in their conclusions.

Also, I am certain that "the experts" will find a way to criticize the method used by the author to estimate these deaths. I have to study his formula with a little more detail in order to say one way or another.

Expand full comment

The plan is to have one COIVD shot per year, designed to work against the variants then circulating. Similar to the flu shot. I wonder if it will be harder to see the deaths when this happens.

This is unlikely to be very effective against COVID as the antibodies produced from a shots fade in a few months.

Expand full comment