Peter, rather than postulating differential responses of spike protein manufacturing in different COVID-19 vaxx recipients, I think it more likely that the vaccines themselves differ one from the next in their capacity to cause the body to produce spike protein. This theory is consonant with the www.howbadismybatch.com data which demonstrates that different batches had different adverse event rates. These phenomena suggest the obvious: that good manufacturing principles were not followed by the vaccine makers, and that therefore some batches contained far more mRNA than others. There is some evidence that the manufacturers were aware of the toxic batches, and rather than withdrawing them from the market, they distributed them widely across the country in a deliberate attempt to obscure the harm, which would have been glaringly apparent had the bad batches been confined to local distribution.
What if the manufacturing was "as intended" (I am aware there was evidence it was not as there were little controls). But what if, as in any Experiment, the jab juice was intentionally randomized with pathogens, adjuvant material, and just placebo? Isn't it possible the variability was all as intended, to gain experimental data?
"Thus, it is possible that some persons do not make specific neutralizing antibodies after injection, and thus, the Spike protein is able to circulate and damage the body, specifically the heart muscle." It seems that for vaccines to be effective a properly functioning immune system is needed, More immune system research is needed and maybe vaccines could be eliminated if the immune system was functioning properly. There has not been a pandemic yet that killed everyone. Those with good immune systems survived. We have to get a better understanding of what is needed to have an immune system that can rise to any challenge.
It’s good to know that there has not yet been a pandemic that’s killed everyone. And this also applies to the current panicdemic. Better questions are whether this virus was lethal enough to warrant taking any rushed and experimental vaccine and whether there were safe and effective alternative treatments. It is not clear to me that those with good immune systems survived the vaccine but those of us who did not panic and take the vaccine but instead concentrated on our overall fitness seem to have survived.
Half the people you meet are below average - intelligence, wealth, looks, and immune health. The rational goal is to become above average. Half the people are, why not us? Apparently below average is easier, and more comfortable.
This whole thing today sounds like one of Jon Rappoport’s fantasies. “Get your shot then line up for the booster. Then line up for the drug that counters the effects of the shots and boosters. And they are all safe and effective.” The more we find out about these shots the more people are going to start looking for remedies to them. That is good for the folks who took the shots and for the people who design the remedies and for the government forcing us to take the shots. It would be cheaper all ‘round to stop taking the shots and just learn how to be infected, recover and move on. The whole idea of a vaccine is a waste of time and money. We will always have microbes to infect us. We need to develop strong immune systems and bodies; strong minds able to see beyond propaganda; and figure out a way take power from Pharma, corporations, rich people and governments.
Dr. McCullough, I have a data request. I have provided a statistical analysis to Dr. Colleen Huber, who published on her Substack D-dimer concentrations for 5 of her injected patients. I found a strong trend of increasing D-dimer as a function of number of doses (dose dependency). We can't publish this work with n = 5. Do you have access to a larger number of D-dimer tests, including uninjected patients as a control? Thank you.
“Should spur some research” ...which is often funded ..let us hear it...by THE GOVT...the very people hiding the real data on all these “vaccines’ and the least transparent huge health problem in this World. That very Govt and the FDA/HHS who pays the Big Pharma folks billions to harm our kids....So who is insane enough to go up against the Govt and the cartel of harm....you would think the parents but so many are sheep and keep voting these characters in?! The House has a chance to EXPOSE this harm but they are going to put in charge the very member of the cartel RINO McCarthy.
I share with you a great need to have a test of those at risk of harm...easy test of the spike protein...but first we need the power to fund such via people truly interested in our health and wellbeing...and it was not the past Congress or anyone in the Biden orbit for they likely never actually took the jab..and do not care.
It’s either McCarthy or no one. How many written commitments do you need to assuage your paranoid distrust? He’s agreed that one moron can force a vote for his removal.
You obviously are a herd animal. We live in a republic. That Speakers have always been shoe ins for so long (like Pelosi) does not mean they should be. McCarthy like McConnell has been a failure in countering the leftists. He's ultimately beholden to his California voters not Americans at large. Republicans need a Speaker from a swing state who will not kiss the ring of a Pelosi or a RINO.
You said: "The race is on to develop commercialized Spike protein tests and possibly monoclonal antibodies against the vaccine-induced Spike that could neutralize it and prevent more heart damage. It is ironic that our government quickly pulled monoclonal antibodies off the market for anticipated lack of efficacy with new strains and now these [very same] products could be useful against the legacy Spike protein produced by the ill-conceived COVID-19 vaccines".
If you are accurate with this "spike protein toxicity" hypothesis, there is a fortune about to be made (and many patients saved) by engineering a remedy for this unwanted side effect of vaccination. Let's Roll !
The remedy...never take the vaccine...if one did take it...try what ever valid treatment to reduce the risk of harm further to the body...find a knowledgeable and willing provider in a State when drugs that are helpful and use them. Have young adults and kids...particularly those males at risk undergo a cardiac ECHO. Vote to get the power to remove these agents of harm out of office...but as we see the voting corruption runs deep which too needs to be addressed. Failure on the voting front only solidifies more harm to society and our kids.
The greatest crime in this disaster has not been the coercion for destructive actions, but the systematic prohibitions and suppression of analysis. That was only possible with a frightened and ignorant population. We caused this disaster, all of us, by meekly submitting to tyranny.
Not necessarily, but it's a clue. We need theories of mechanisms of how the toxic protein affects us, and tests to confirm those theories. For now, we have to rely on conjecture and anecdotal observations. There have been several reports recently of increased cancers. That's a good start.
Is it possible to set up a trial utilizing your network of doctors and their patients. The trial design and end points can be determined collorativley. Completely cutout the Medical Industrial Complex from involvement in the trial, no body trusts them anyways. You and your colleagues have more trust and large audience. Cost can hopefully be minimize and required funding can raised through various channels. Not sure if this is feasible but what are the alternatives to get unbiased research?
I have a question regarding people who got the shot. Are you seeing brain fog, inability to follow instructions, memory issues? Everyone I work with got it and productivity has been taking a big hit along with quality lately. Also, my Mom was recently in the hospital and the nurses were incapable of thinking rationally in relation to pain management. As a nurse myself, that is very concerning.
after watching Steve Kirsch's interview with RFK Jr. on vaccines and autism - I'm thinking most vaccines are dangerous and harmful especially to our young people. If 1 in 34 children are now diagnosed with autism - this is unconscionable. Tetenous shot - that's it for me.
It seems from all I've read that there are two things going on, acting synergistically to produce myocarditis.
(1) The circulating spikes seem to be causing damage in and of themselves.
(2) The body's immune system is being shifted to a more inflammatory (Ig4 immune response) in response to repeated mRNA boosters.
Originally, the CDC etc were hand waving away the possibility that spikes were showing up in distant organs (such as the heart) by saying that the particular spikes produced by the vaccine were not as toxic. However, if you combine the presence of abnormal spikes being attacked by a more inflammatory response (due to shifting the immune response) you would likely have a more damaging "off target" effect from the immune response than would otherwise have been produced either by the disease itself (Covid disease/spikes without vaccination) or by vaccination (excess circulating spikes) but without the presence of a more damaging immune response.
Precautionary principles should guide treatment. But in terms of even look-back research, where can we find data on the number of boosters and incidence of myocarditis? And, has anyone quantified the real risk of myocarditis in the non-vaccinated, but prior infected? The authorities (and mainstream articles) always seem to conclude any piece on vaccine induced myocarditis with the bromide that "risks of myocarditis from Covid infection are much higher" --but without citing any authority.
But I think the synergy between immune shifts and spikes circulating (or produced by!) the heart due to mRNA really needs to be explored.
If I understand correctly, the RNA is packaged with some lipids that allow the RNA to become DNA. We seem to have no idea what happens to those lipids once in the body, shouldn't we ought to know? Where are the studies? So the RNA shows up in place it shouldn't, like the heart. Once there it can cause scarring. Apparently that's because the immune system which varies widely among people reacts better in some people compared to others. Ordinary folk who rarely stress themselves to the limit may never notice the heart damage; others under stress may end up with heart issues when a little damage allows even more damage. So we see a variety of delayed action which can then be associated with all sorts of causes other than the vaccine. So that might apply to other organs as well.
Getting vaccinated might have avoided a bad illness but also may end up as a time bomb awaiting a new stress. Of course we have no long term data yet we allowed children to be vaccinated. Hoe could that be conscionable?
Peter, rather than postulating differential responses of spike protein manufacturing in different COVID-19 vaxx recipients, I think it more likely that the vaccines themselves differ one from the next in their capacity to cause the body to produce spike protein. This theory is consonant with the www.howbadismybatch.com data which demonstrates that different batches had different adverse event rates. These phenomena suggest the obvious: that good manufacturing principles were not followed by the vaccine makers, and that therefore some batches contained far more mRNA than others. There is some evidence that the manufacturers were aware of the toxic batches, and rather than withdrawing them from the market, they distributed them widely across the country in a deliberate attempt to obscure the harm, which would have been glaringly apparent had the bad batches been confined to local distribution.
What if the manufacturing was "as intended" (I am aware there was evidence it was not as there were little controls). But what if, as in any Experiment, the jab juice was intentionally randomized with pathogens, adjuvant material, and just placebo? Isn't it possible the variability was all as intended, to gain experimental data?
Very probable. The DOD made it.
"Thus, it is possible that some persons do not make specific neutralizing antibodies after injection, and thus, the Spike protein is able to circulate and damage the body, specifically the heart muscle." It seems that for vaccines to be effective a properly functioning immune system is needed, More immune system research is needed and maybe vaccines could be eliminated if the immune system was functioning properly. There has not been a pandemic yet that killed everyone. Those with good immune systems survived. We have to get a better understanding of what is needed to have an immune system that can rise to any challenge.
John Alton
It’s good to know that there has not yet been a pandemic that’s killed everyone. And this also applies to the current panicdemic. Better questions are whether this virus was lethal enough to warrant taking any rushed and experimental vaccine and whether there were safe and effective alternative treatments. It is not clear to me that those with good immune systems survived the vaccine but those of us who did not panic and take the vaccine but instead concentrated on our overall fitness seem to have survived.
Half the people you meet are below average - intelligence, wealth, looks, and immune health. The rational goal is to become above average. Half the people are, why not us? Apparently below average is easier, and more comfortable.
This whole thing today sounds like one of Jon Rappoport’s fantasies. “Get your shot then line up for the booster. Then line up for the drug that counters the effects of the shots and boosters. And they are all safe and effective.” The more we find out about these shots the more people are going to start looking for remedies to them. That is good for the folks who took the shots and for the people who design the remedies and for the government forcing us to take the shots. It would be cheaper all ‘round to stop taking the shots and just learn how to be infected, recover and move on. The whole idea of a vaccine is a waste of time and money. We will always have microbes to infect us. We need to develop strong immune systems and bodies; strong minds able to see beyond propaganda; and figure out a way take power from Pharma, corporations, rich people and governments.
Dr. McCullough, I have a data request. I have provided a statistical analysis to Dr. Colleen Huber, who published on her Substack D-dimer concentrations for 5 of her injected patients. I found a strong trend of increasing D-dimer as a function of number of doses (dose dependency). We can't publish this work with n = 5. Do you have access to a larger number of D-dimer tests, including uninjected patients as a control? Thank you.
“Should spur some research” ...which is often funded ..let us hear it...by THE GOVT...the very people hiding the real data on all these “vaccines’ and the least transparent huge health problem in this World. That very Govt and the FDA/HHS who pays the Big Pharma folks billions to harm our kids....So who is insane enough to go up against the Govt and the cartel of harm....you would think the parents but so many are sheep and keep voting these characters in?! The House has a chance to EXPOSE this harm but they are going to put in charge the very member of the cartel RINO McCarthy.
I share with you a great need to have a test of those at risk of harm...easy test of the spike protein...but first we need the power to fund such via people truly interested in our health and wellbeing...and it was not the past Congress or anyone in the Biden orbit for they likely never actually took the jab..and do not care.
Right on. That's why I hope the House can get a speaker other than McCarthy.
Failed executives are routinely removed. Kevin has overseen deterioration and defeat for his party. Retaining him would continue the failures.
Hope in one hand a shit in the other. The notion that 20 irrational hotheads should prevail over 200 moderates is madness.
Thomas Marsh
It’s either McCarthy or no one. How many written commitments do you need to assuage your paranoid distrust? He’s agreed that one moron can force a vote for his removal.
You obviously are a herd animal. We live in a republic. That Speakers have always been shoe ins for so long (like Pelosi) does not mean they should be. McCarthy like McConnell has been a failure in countering the leftists. He's ultimately beholden to his California voters not Americans at large. Republicans need a Speaker from a swing state who will not kiss the ring of a Pelosi or a RINO.
You said: "The race is on to develop commercialized Spike protein tests and possibly monoclonal antibodies against the vaccine-induced Spike that could neutralize it and prevent more heart damage. It is ironic that our government quickly pulled monoclonal antibodies off the market for anticipated lack of efficacy with new strains and now these [very same] products could be useful against the legacy Spike protein produced by the ill-conceived COVID-19 vaccines".
If you are accurate with this "spike protein toxicity" hypothesis, there is a fortune about to be made (and many patients saved) by engineering a remedy for this unwanted side effect of vaccination. Let's Roll !
The remedy...never take the vaccine...if one did take it...try what ever valid treatment to reduce the risk of harm further to the body...find a knowledgeable and willing provider in a State when drugs that are helpful and use them. Have young adults and kids...particularly those males at risk undergo a cardiac ECHO. Vote to get the power to remove these agents of harm out of office...but as we see the voting corruption runs deep which too needs to be addressed. Failure on the voting front only solidifies more harm to society and our kids.
J. Lee MD PhD
The remedy is to ban the vaccine rather than rush ahead with a new invention.
Just don't let the DOD take the lead on the research.
That reduces future injuries, but we still need to treat those already injured.
The greatest crime in this disaster has not been the coercion for destructive actions, but the systematic prohibitions and suppression of analysis. That was only possible with a frightened and ignorant population. We caused this disaster, all of us, by meekly submitting to tyranny.
Has the spike protein from the vax been shown to cross the blood brain barrier?
Yes.
If spike protein was found in an extracted brain tumor, would it be accurate to say the spike protein caused the tumor?
Not necessarily, but it's a clue. We need theories of mechanisms of how the toxic protein affects us, and tests to confirm those theories. For now, we have to rely on conjecture and anecdotal observations. There have been several reports recently of increased cancers. That's a good start.
Is it possible to set up a trial utilizing your network of doctors and their patients. The trial design and end points can be determined collorativley. Completely cutout the Medical Industrial Complex from involvement in the trial, no body trusts them anyways. You and your colleagues have more trust and large audience. Cost can hopefully be minimize and required funding can raised through various channels. Not sure if this is feasible but what are the alternatives to get unbiased research?
Where is the research to figure out how to fix this?
Forbidden. Better question is why the public tolerates the prohibitions? We're hopeless losers and deserve the abuse.
Thank you. Succinct, clear, informative, and powerful.
The best explanation i have read of the current dilemma is that of Theoretical Physicist Rudolf Rigger’s “Thank God For The Time Travellers”.
I have a question regarding people who got the shot. Are you seeing brain fog, inability to follow instructions, memory issues? Everyone I work with got it and productivity has been taking a big hit along with quality lately. Also, my Mom was recently in the hospital and the nurses were incapable of thinking rationally in relation to pain management. As a nurse myself, that is very concerning.
after watching Steve Kirsch's interview with RFK Jr. on vaccines and autism - I'm thinking most vaccines are dangerous and harmful especially to our young people. If 1 in 34 children are now diagnosed with autism - this is unconscionable. Tetenous shot - that's it for me.
It seems from all I've read that there are two things going on, acting synergistically to produce myocarditis.
(1) The circulating spikes seem to be causing damage in and of themselves.
(2) The body's immune system is being shifted to a more inflammatory (Ig4 immune response) in response to repeated mRNA boosters.
Originally, the CDC etc were hand waving away the possibility that spikes were showing up in distant organs (such as the heart) by saying that the particular spikes produced by the vaccine were not as toxic. However, if you combine the presence of abnormal spikes being attacked by a more inflammatory response (due to shifting the immune response) you would likely have a more damaging "off target" effect from the immune response than would otherwise have been produced either by the disease itself (Covid disease/spikes without vaccination) or by vaccination (excess circulating spikes) but without the presence of a more damaging immune response.
Precautionary principles should guide treatment. But in terms of even look-back research, where can we find data on the number of boosters and incidence of myocarditis? And, has anyone quantified the real risk of myocarditis in the non-vaccinated, but prior infected? The authorities (and mainstream articles) always seem to conclude any piece on vaccine induced myocarditis with the bromide that "risks of myocarditis from Covid infection are much higher" --but without citing any authority.
But I think the synergy between immune shifts and spikes circulating (or produced by!) the heart due to mRNA really needs to be explored.
If I understand correctly, the RNA is packaged with some lipids that allow the RNA to become DNA. We seem to have no idea what happens to those lipids once in the body, shouldn't we ought to know? Where are the studies? So the RNA shows up in place it shouldn't, like the heart. Once there it can cause scarring. Apparently that's because the immune system which varies widely among people reacts better in some people compared to others. Ordinary folk who rarely stress themselves to the limit may never notice the heart damage; others under stress may end up with heart issues when a little damage allows even more damage. So we see a variety of delayed action which can then be associated with all sorts of causes other than the vaccine. So that might apply to other organs as well.
Getting vaccinated might have avoided a bad illness but also may end up as a time bomb awaiting a new stress. Of course we have no long term data yet we allowed children to be vaccinated. Hoe could that be conscionable?