COVID-19 "Aggressive Measures" Advocacy Bias in the BMJ Misled the World and Caused Harm
COVID-19 "Aggressive Measures" Advocacy Bias in the BMJ Misled the World and Caused Harm
Evidence of Massive Editorial Bias for Failed Contagion Control and Vaccines
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
Why are doctors some of the most fearful, mask-wearing, vaccine accepting individuals on earth? A recent analysis from Dr. John Ioannidis and colleagues from Stanford of the British Medical Journal has concluded there was intentional “editorial nepotism” or favoritism for the same group of frequent editorialist who espoused “COVID-19 zero” policies.
COVID-19 zero was the fantasy that one could mask, social distance, lock-down, and take vaccines every six months and avoid contracting SARS-CoV-2. This was a ridiculous notion once it became clear we were all going to become ill with the virus no matter what we did in our lives. In fact, the vaccines created the resistant Omicron strain which has dominated the pandemic for over two years allowing us to become ill with COVID-19 over and over again regardless of how many vaccines were taken.
You can see from the figure, that the BMJ had intentionally biased their array of articles and was very different from the literature at large. The blue parts of the pie were authors pushing “aggressive measures” including the failed lockdowns, masks, and vaccines. What was in the minds of BMJ editors and the publisher? Did they think the world would not discover this obvious bias? I would conjecture that Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, and the other high impact journals were very similar in this systematic publication bias. Now it is up to investigative reporters to find out if and how the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex was pulling the strings.
Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying ($5 monthly) or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
President, McCullough Foundation
Re: “What was in the minds of BMJ editors and the publisher? Did they think the world would not discover this obvious bias?”
Good questions…
What was in the minds of BMJ editors and the publisher?
How on earth could they be taken in by the ‘COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2’ scam?
How could this happen after the obvious and exposed H1N1 Swine Flu scam in 2009?
Seriously?!
The BMJ actually reported on this, see: WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies”, June 2010: https://www.bmj.com/bmj/section-pdf/186584?path=/bmj/340/7759/Feature.full.pdf
So why did The BMJ collaborate with the ‘COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2’ scam?
And betray the people of the world…
Hi Peter and thank you for your good work.
I emailed Premier Jason Kenney and all Alberta MLA's on 8Jan2021, strongly advising AGAINST deploying the high-risk/low-reward Covid-19 injections. Those toxic "vaccines" have now killed ~150,000 Canadians and ~1.6 million Americans, more than we lost on ALL our wars, back to the 1500's.
Previously, on 21Mar2020 I published the correct assessment of the Lockdowns - that we only had to over-protect the very elderly and infirm, and send everyone else back to work and school. Six months later, world-class scholars published the same recommendations in their Great Barrington Declaration.
There was no real Covid-19 pandemic, because Alberta had no excess deaths through 1July2020.- it was all a scam, like the earlier Climate scam - both were concocted to gain money and power.
I published the best disproof of the Climate fraud in 2008 – that atmospheric CO2 changes LAG temperature changes at all measured time scales. The Global Warming (CAGW) hypothesis assumes that the future is causing the past – FALSE!. The great American scholar Thomas Sowell recently published his agreement with this disproof.
We are governed by scoundrels and imbeciles who promoted these false narratives, costing us hundreds of millions of lives worldwide.
- The scoundrels know they are lying;
- The imbeciles believe them.
There is ample evidence that the perpetrators of this carnage knew they were doing wrong.
We need Nuremberg 2.0! Military tribunals, hangings and firing squads.
Regards, Alan MacRae, Calgary
Proofs:
THE CULL TRILOGY – by Allan Malcolm MacRae, on Amazon
"The ability to correctly predict is the best objective measure of scientific and technical competence."
1. MURDER OF MULTITUDES
Covid & Climate Chronicles – The Big Cull
2. THE CLIMATE SCAM
Fifty Years of False Fears
3, THE CORRUPTION OF OUR INSTITUTIONS
The New Dark Age
Regards, Allan MacRae, Calgary