I am not worried about confounders. They have adjusted and stratified for most of the confounders you may think. I am worried that they do not include the supplemental table presented by Dr. McCullough on the main article. They conclude that there is no increased risk of hearing loss with the "vaccine". This has become common practice in "peer reviewed" articles. The data show one thing, the authors always conclude "safe and effective". It is disgusting.
The elderly were the targets of these horrible injections. The last thing any older person needs is hearing loss to go along with all the other body failures that occur with old age🥲🥲
Thank you Dr. McCullough. I've been wondering about the cause of my mother's increased hearing loss recently and had attributed her rapid increase in dementia symptoms to another shot, but didn't know about the hearing. In a fair world, the siblings responsible for the shot would take care of her, but they'd rather move her into memory care. Appreciate the information.
Dr. McCollough, As you continue your survey of sequelae on disparate systems, could you add Crohn’s disease to your queue?  Please recommend a study or case report for my armamentarium to talk to my 4x vaxxed younger sister. As Princess Leia said, “Help Me Obi-Wan Kenobi, You’re My Only Hope.” Take care,
I have a customer who had slight hearing loss in the left ear after dose 1, full loss (temporary but never regained full hearing) after #2. And then full loss again after #3 (yes he did it again). I’ll have to ask him if it ever came back but he’s getting it looked at.
Only got the shots as his largest account was Cargill. (mandatory to enter)
I'm a little worried about my own hearing loss (age 79) after being around airplanes a lot without wearing ear protection. Yes, I have had five -- count 'em -- shots of Pfizer vaccine product. I had hearing loss Before vaccination. I am more than a little worried that this kind of "study" is a sitting duck for FCA (Fallacious Causal Attribution) unless the most severe epidemiology tools available have been applied to remove the effect(s) of confounding on the final risk ratio estimation. Without such attention to details, ya'll just have another click-bait story here that will rile up the rubes, worry the goobers, and confuse more than a few yokels. Please.
Thanks for your concern for the rubes. Since the evidence is not meeting your standard, please disregard. You imply the double blinded randomized critical trials are required to properly assess the risks. This statement tells me you have not reviewed the Pfizer trial data which does not show any reduction of hospitalization or death, and in fact there are more deaths in the placebo arm. Here is a summary since you have not read the trials for yourself.
Hey, I am very sorry about your Dad. It is unbelievable this is happening. The pain, anger and frustration these irresponsible psychopaths have caused is immeasurable. My father recently passed as well, not from the vaccine, but a routine medical procedure. The medical and pharma businesses are killing millions, I read they are the #3 cause of death behind cancer and heart disease. Given the complete corruption they are likely #1. Again sorry for your loss.
Hopefully enough people will one day receive the truth, that there is no strong evidence supporting the benefits of these mRNA vaccines and only risks (downside). I expect one day this will happen; however, governments around the world are intensifying their efforts to control communication and free speech. I am hopeful we can win the war for free speech, the media has been controlled for so long, many decades, so this is not going be easy or quick. For example, big pharma has historically harmed millions of people with their other "approved" drugs and vaccines, yet what percentage of people know this history? If people knew, would these people be so quick to believe pharma has changed their character and past behavior's? I think not, if the past record of pharma was understood, people would think more critically about the potential that these vaccines may not be what they have been told (safe and effective).
I am not worried about confounders. They have adjusted and stratified for most of the confounders you may think. I am worried that they do not include the supplemental table presented by Dr. McCullough on the main article. They conclude that there is no increased risk of hearing loss with the "vaccine". This has become common practice in "peer reviewed" articles. The data show one thing, the authors always conclude "safe and effective". It is disgusting.
The elderly were the targets of these horrible injections. The last thing any older person needs is hearing loss to go along with all the other body failures that occur with old age🥲🥲
Thank you Dr. McCullough. I've been wondering about the cause of my mother's increased hearing loss recently and had attributed her rapid increase in dementia symptoms to another shot, but didn't know about the hearing. In a fair world, the siblings responsible for the shot would take care of her, but they'd rather move her into memory care. Appreciate the information.
Thanks for letting us know about this, Dr. M.
Dr. McCollough, As you continue your survey of sequelae on disparate systems, could you add Crohn’s disease to your queue?  Please recommend a study or case report for my armamentarium to talk to my 4x vaxxed younger sister. As Princess Leia said, “Help Me Obi-Wan Kenobi, You’re My Only Hope.” Take care,
I have a customer who had slight hearing loss in the left ear after dose 1, full loss (temporary but never regained full hearing) after #2. And then full loss again after #3 (yes he did it again). I’ll have to ask him if it ever came back but he’s getting it looked at.
Only got the shots as his largest account was Cargill. (mandatory to enter)
I'm a little worried about my own hearing loss (age 79) after being around airplanes a lot without wearing ear protection. Yes, I have had five -- count 'em -- shots of Pfizer vaccine product. I had hearing loss Before vaccination. I am more than a little worried that this kind of "study" is a sitting duck for FCA (Fallacious Causal Attribution) unless the most severe epidemiology tools available have been applied to remove the effect(s) of confounding on the final risk ratio estimation. Without such attention to details, ya'll just have another click-bait story here that will rile up the rubes, worry the goobers, and confuse more than a few yokels. Please.
You really should get a sixth shot. Go right now!!
A little harsh but I understand the emotion.
Only harsh because this guy is a fake and sick of his ridiculous, condescending comments.
Thanks for your concern for the rubes. Since the evidence is not meeting your standard, please disregard. You imply the double blinded randomized critical trials are required to properly assess the risks. This statement tells me you have not reviewed the Pfizer trial data which does not show any reduction of hospitalization or death, and in fact there are more deaths in the placebo arm. Here is a summary since you have not read the trials for yourself.
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/the-pfizer-inoculations-for-covid-19-more-harm-than-good-2/
If the above is not clear enough, I hope these testimonials are not too confusing.
https://rumble.com/v20t0m4-new-documentary-anecdotals-movie-covid-vaccine-damage.html
Hey, I am very sorry about your Dad. It is unbelievable this is happening. The pain, anger and frustration these irresponsible psychopaths have caused is immeasurable. My father recently passed as well, not from the vaccine, but a routine medical procedure. The medical and pharma businesses are killing millions, I read they are the #3 cause of death behind cancer and heart disease. Given the complete corruption they are likely #1. Again sorry for your loss.
Hopefully enough people will one day receive the truth, that there is no strong evidence supporting the benefits of these mRNA vaccines and only risks (downside). I expect one day this will happen; however, governments around the world are intensifying their efforts to control communication and free speech. I am hopeful we can win the war for free speech, the media has been controlled for so long, many decades, so this is not going be easy or quick. For example, big pharma has historically harmed millions of people with their other "approved" drugs and vaccines, yet what percentage of people know this history? If people knew, would these people be so quick to believe pharma has changed their character and past behavior's? I think not, if the past record of pharma was understood, people would think more critically about the potential that these vaccines may not be what they have been told (safe and effective).
https://youtu.be/RhkjYJAHCjM
Relying on name-calling and ridicule to make a point is the same as relying on profanity. Lame and tired. And a hallmark of the left.
Thank you Dr. McCoulough. Merry Christmas.
Could the cause of the hearing loss also cause ED?