This old, retired RN no longer has faith in the medical profession and proceeds with great caution.
One hero of mine is Dr. Mel Bruchet, who spoke out against the covid shots after seeing a huge increase of stillbirths in B.C., Canada. He was arrested and placed for 3 weeks in a Gero psych ward.
Is my observation correct that the covid shots cause increased clotting at or in the placenta and results in the death of the fetus? The covid shot was recommended to these women by their OB doctor without proper research and vetting, should they not be held legally culpable? Are there any OB doctors ready to come forward to say they were wrong in requiring the covid shot? If so, that would take great courage and INDEED, they would be another hero.
My unvaxed daughter had an office visit with a rheumatologist after the birth of her son and was yelled at by the so called physician who told her she could have killed her baby had she contracted covid while pregnant. This is the garbage that’s out there. Sad to say physician confidence is gone.
At the time the “vaccine” was released, the injection had not even been tested for pregnancy. Yet thousands of OB doctors were telling their pregnant patients to get it. At a minimum, they should have not allowed a women to get it in the first trimester when teratogenicity is at its highest. That’s when all of the organs are in the process of development. At least in the 8th and 9th month, the baby is just gaining weight and the potential for harm is somewhat mitigated. These doctors knew better. All doctors took an Embryology course in medical school.
It is a no-brainer that these pharmacological products (some insist in calling them "vaccines") should be classified as Pregnancy Category X. My question is: Who actually decides and publishes these categories? My guess is that it is the infamous FDA, and that they have not made that categorization. It is a disgrace.
What has faux mRNA, transposed to DNA, done to any surviving babies? It's unlike Thalidomide, no immediate disfigurement. It awaits Manifestation. And what, pray tell, will MORE mRNA do to THAT GENERATION? Think of it as Mutant Building Blocks, we.do.not.k.n.o.w.i f.h.u.m.a.n.i.s.part.o.f.it.
OB/GYN doctors in traditonal doctors' offices and in hospitals, in our country.
Please check my math, but if 100 of us mailed 160 copies of a pre-written letter each, each letter containing up to 10 pages (5 pages, back and front) of this crucial Covid vaccine pregnancy information to
OB/GYNs, it would only cost $128 each for stamps. If 200 of us mailed only 80 letters each, it would cost only $64 each for stamps. If 400 of us mailed only 40 letters each, it would only cost $32 each for stamps.
Should we do a mailing? Could we check around for more of us who would do this?
So, if a woman who is thinking of having a baby, but is not yet pregnant, takes a Covid vaccine less than 28 days before sperm fertilize one of her eggs, the mRNA spike protein can still pass through the mother's body, and pass through the placental barrier into the fetus. It might not, but the point is that it CAN and MAY happen.
Why? Because we know that a the mRNA spike protein in the vaccine the mother takes BEFORE she becomes pregnant, can easily "survive" in the mother's body 28+ days (it is thought to still be circulating in the body as long as 90 days) by which time sperm may have fertilized one of her eggs, even though she waited until after she took the Covid vaccine to attempt fertilization.
For example, Mrs. A says, "Well, I'll just get that Covid vaccine over with, and then we can get pregnant without worrying, because I won't have taken the vaccine while I'm pregnant." She gets the vaccine Fenruary 1. The mRNA spike protein easily stays in her body for 28+ days, which is at least until March 1, and it may be still circulating in her body on May 1. Thus, if Mrs. A becomes pregnant anytime between March 1 and June 1, the mRNA spike protein can pass through her placenta into the fetus during the those first months of the fetus's life. It won't matter that the baby is still considered to be a fetus. As a matter of fact, I think the circulatory system of a fetus is fairly well-developed by its second month, and I believe its heart is beating by then. Its kidneys may be forming by then, too.
So, I would argue that not only can there be harm to a mother's baby from a Covid vaccine taken DURING pregnancy, which we understand, a Covid vaccine taken BEFORE pregnancy can also harm the baby, even if conception occurred AFTER the mother took the Covid Vaccine.
I conclude, then, that if a woman, for whatever reason, receives a Covid vaccine, and she plans to get pregnant afterwards, she should avoid having unprotected intercourse for at least SEVERAL MONTHS after having received the Covid vaccine. OB/GYNs and obstetrics nurses should be advising women of this.
I am not a doctor. Dr. McCullough will undoubtedly be able to say this more succinctly than I can, but you get the idea...
I understand from what I read that the mice born to an injected parent developed skeletal abnormalities. What else are we looking at down the road....only time will tell.
A look at https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/is-depopulation-we-are-seeing-planned. As Igor notes: "I admit that my early hope that birth rates would recover did not pan out. It is a huge disappointment for me, not only because my hope did not materialize, but most importantly because the birth rate problem is worse than I hoped, and it saddens me."
And "We have depopulation in progress: reduced births and increased deaths."
Any drug or chemical compound should be used cautiously in pregnancy. Whatever happened to that adage of safety first? Assume nothing is safe, except essential nutrients and good diet.
Even acetaminophen (paracetamol), which is quoted as a Category B item, as 'considered safe to use', has come under scrutiny in recent years as perhaps not safe at all. The following papers provide evidence that this drug is not as safe as previously thought! See:
The ignorance of safety and deriliction of duty by medical professionals is not only negligent, but criminal behaviour. Our 'oath' was 'first do no harm'. How can anyone seriosuly give any excuse (like the authorities & professional associations say it is safe) to justify this type of behaviour. The sanctioning of using an EUA (Emergency Use Authorisation) medication on any patient without informed consent is disgraceful. No wonder confidence and trust in medical and scientific community is at an all time low.
"more than a dozen papers" - Is there any recourse on those who wrote papers favorable to use of the vaccine for women in that class? And then for any of the reviewers? We see that many EU nations issued cautions particularly as harm signals arrived. I can't imagine the huge psychological damage that has happened in those women who have lost a fetus or a stillborn child.
Yeadon & Wodarg made the same recommendation in an open letter dated December 1 2020.
That was the trigger for concerted, persistent censorship, smearing and deplatforming that continues to this day.
This old, retired RN no longer has faith in the medical profession and proceeds with great caution.
One hero of mine is Dr. Mel Bruchet, who spoke out against the covid shots after seeing a huge increase of stillbirths in B.C., Canada. He was arrested and placed for 3 weeks in a Gero psych ward.
Is my observation correct that the covid shots cause increased clotting at or in the placenta and results in the death of the fetus? The covid shot was recommended to these women by their OB doctor without proper research and vetting, should they not be held legally culpable? Are there any OB doctors ready to come forward to say they were wrong in requiring the covid shot? If so, that would take great courage and INDEED, they would be another hero.
A spirit of deception has come upon the population. Any doctor or nurse should know this information. It's like everyone has gone to sleep.
My unvaxed daughter had an office visit with a rheumatologist after the birth of her son and was yelled at by the so called physician who told her she could have killed her baby had she contracted covid while pregnant. This is the garbage that’s out there. Sad to say physician confidence is gone.
At the time the “vaccine” was released, the injection had not even been tested for pregnancy. Yet thousands of OB doctors were telling their pregnant patients to get it. At a minimum, they should have not allowed a women to get it in the first trimester when teratogenicity is at its highest. That’s when all of the organs are in the process of development. At least in the 8th and 9th month, the baby is just gaining weight and the potential for harm is somewhat mitigated. These doctors knew better. All doctors took an Embryology course in medical school.
It is a no-brainer that these pharmacological products (some insist in calling them "vaccines") should be classified as Pregnancy Category X. My question is: Who actually decides and publishes these categories? My guess is that it is the infamous FDA, and that they have not made that categorization. It is a disgrace.
Right about now most OB-GYNs who pushed the jab are wishing they could crawl back into the womb.
We have entered an era of SCIENTISM.
The biggest cabal of 21 century
What has faux mRNA, transposed to DNA, done to any surviving babies? It's unlike Thalidomide, no immediate disfigurement. It awaits Manifestation. And what, pray tell, will MORE mRNA do to THAT GENERATION? Think of it as Mutant Building Blocks, we.do.not.k.n.o.w.i f.h.u.m.a.n.i.s.part.o.f.it.
There are approximately 16,000
OB/GYN doctors in traditonal doctors' offices and in hospitals, in our country.
Please check my math, but if 100 of us mailed 160 copies of a pre-written letter each, each letter containing up to 10 pages (5 pages, back and front) of this crucial Covid vaccine pregnancy information to
OB/GYNs, it would only cost $128 each for stamps. If 200 of us mailed only 80 letters each, it would cost only $64 each for stamps. If 400 of us mailed only 40 letters each, it would only cost $32 each for stamps.
Should we do a mailing? Could we check around for more of us who would do this?
So, if a woman who is thinking of having a baby, but is not yet pregnant, takes a Covid vaccine less than 28 days before sperm fertilize one of her eggs, the mRNA spike protein can still pass through the mother's body, and pass through the placental barrier into the fetus. It might not, but the point is that it CAN and MAY happen.
Why? Because we know that a the mRNA spike protein in the vaccine the mother takes BEFORE she becomes pregnant, can easily "survive" in the mother's body 28+ days (it is thought to still be circulating in the body as long as 90 days) by which time sperm may have fertilized one of her eggs, even though she waited until after she took the Covid vaccine to attempt fertilization.
For example, Mrs. A says, "Well, I'll just get that Covid vaccine over with, and then we can get pregnant without worrying, because I won't have taken the vaccine while I'm pregnant." She gets the vaccine Fenruary 1. The mRNA spike protein easily stays in her body for 28+ days, which is at least until March 1, and it may be still circulating in her body on May 1. Thus, if Mrs. A becomes pregnant anytime between March 1 and June 1, the mRNA spike protein can pass through her placenta into the fetus during the those first months of the fetus's life. It won't matter that the baby is still considered to be a fetus. As a matter of fact, I think the circulatory system of a fetus is fairly well-developed by its second month, and I believe its heart is beating by then. Its kidneys may be forming by then, too.
So, I would argue that not only can there be harm to a mother's baby from a Covid vaccine taken DURING pregnancy, which we understand, a Covid vaccine taken BEFORE pregnancy can also harm the baby, even if conception occurred AFTER the mother took the Covid Vaccine.
I conclude, then, that if a woman, for whatever reason, receives a Covid vaccine, and she plans to get pregnant afterwards, she should avoid having unprotected intercourse for at least SEVERAL MONTHS after having received the Covid vaccine. OB/GYNs and obstetrics nurses should be advising women of this.
I am not a doctor. Dr. McCullough will undoubtedly be able to say this more succinctly than I can, but you get the idea...
I understand from what I read that the mice born to an injected parent developed skeletal abnormalities. What else are we looking at down the road....only time will tell.
A look at https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/is-depopulation-we-are-seeing-planned. As Igor notes: "I admit that my early hope that birth rates would recover did not pan out. It is a huge disappointment for me, not only because my hope did not materialize, but most importantly because the birth rate problem is worse than I hoped, and it saddens me."
And "We have depopulation in progress: reduced births and increased deaths."
Any drug or chemical compound should be used cautiously in pregnancy. Whatever happened to that adage of safety first? Assume nothing is safe, except essential nutrients and good diet.
Even acetaminophen (paracetamol), which is quoted as a Category B item, as 'considered safe to use', has come under scrutiny in recent years as perhaps not safe at all. The following papers provide evidence that this drug is not as safe as previously thought! See:
https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/187/8/1817/4980325?login=false
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28986045/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29341895/
The ignorance of safety and deriliction of duty by medical professionals is not only negligent, but criminal behaviour. Our 'oath' was 'first do no harm'. How can anyone seriosuly give any excuse (like the authorities & professional associations say it is safe) to justify this type of behaviour. The sanctioning of using an EUA (Emergency Use Authorisation) medication on any patient without informed consent is disgraceful. No wonder confidence and trust in medical and scientific community is at an all time low.
"more than a dozen papers" - Is there any recourse on those who wrote papers favorable to use of the vaccine for women in that class? And then for any of the reviewers? We see that many EU nations issued cautions particularly as harm signals arrived. I can't imagine the huge psychological damage that has happened in those women who have lost a fetus or a stillborn child.