26 Comments

https://darachi.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_signed_with_Exhibits_geschwarzt.pdf

Dr Wolfgang Wodarg & I wrote one of the earliest, if not the earliest, detailed scientific critique of the gene-based treatments which claimed to be vaccines. Importantly, our petition, filed as an open letter to the European Medicines Agency, dated December 1st 2020:, predated the first Emergency Use Authorisation of any such product.

Though we did not at that time include all sources and mechanisms of toxicity (because we had not yet thought of them), we included enough that any reasonable person would know that these would inevitably express toxicity and be totally unsuitable as public health interventions.

All of the leading agents caused the recipients bodies to manufacture known-toxins, coronavirus “spike protein”, to do so in uncontrolled amounts, for unknowable amounts of time & potentially anywhere in the body. Both direct (spike protein plus nanolipids plus gene sequences) & indirect (autoimmunological) unwanted effects were inevitable, the pivotal question being to what extent & with what consequences.

This open letter was additionally filed with hundreds of news gathering organisations, using the same method I’d used a few years earlier as CEO of a biotech, *Ziarco. There was almost total suppression of this important information. Only two small, independent organisations picked this up (Highwire & Children’s Health Defense). We know that many other organisations received the letter, for smearing and personal attacks multiplied ten-fold, including by our respective national broadcasters. I for example was called a disgusting & dangerous anti-vaxxer by the BBC & in a program called Women’s Hour, the host followed these offensive remarks with an interview with a midwife from the Royal College of Midwifery, who told the audience, replete with concerned women of child-bearing potential, that these agents were completely safe for them and their developing babies. No reproductive toxicology packages had at that time been completed (they still haven’t). So those statements had no evidentiary basis. This fraudulent advice almost certainly cost young, healthy women at no risk of “Covid19”, their health, even their lives as well as that of their unborn children.

I filed a formal complaint with the BBC about their factually incorrect statements. They’d attributed to me several things I’d never said & which were reputationally damaging. I challenged them to produce authentic sources for such claims, else withdraw them & apologise. Within 24 hours, they deleted the entire segment, which had been billed as the centrepiece of this particular show. No apology was ever received. A former BBC journalist made me aware of the broadcasting code. They are required to make reasonable efforts to contact a person who they intend to malign under the right of reply. They claimed on this occasion to have “forgotten” to do so. My email address was well known & I was also reachable via professional social media (eg LinkedIn). This is not believable. Professional journalists like Emma Barnett don’t “forget” basic rules like this. No, it’s logical to infer that this was a policy decision, to enable them to damage me. Had they contacted me, the testimony I would have provided would have destroyed their deliberately & severely misleading broadcast.

A few months after this letter, an organisation of which we were both part, Doctors4CovidEthics, wrote repeatedly to Emer Cooke of the EMA & Charles Michel, President of the European Commission, this time focussing on thromboembolic toxicities. Its was already clear that these agents were causing blood clots & bleeding, sometimes fatal, across the world. Again, total repression of the filed letters. https://doctors4covidethics.org/press-release-urgent-open-letter-to-ema-from-doctors-scientists-regarding-vaccine-safety-concerns/

Nothing that’s happened was a “mistake”. The very design by all leading manufacturers could not but result in toxicity, because they cause the bodies of recipients to manufacture known-toxic coronavirus spike protein. Among other things, spike was known to initiate blood coagulation processes & the preparations were known to leave the injection site & not only disperse around the body but, in the case of the mRNA / lipid nanoparticle formulations, accumulate in various tissues including the ovaries. The pharmaceutical companies knew all this and, in the case of ovarian accumulation, a peer reviewed paper from 2012 explicitly warned about an unevaluated reproductive toxicity risk from LNP formulations. I am a scientific & career peer of those who led R&D in those companies, having myself led global respiratory new drug research at Pfizer until 2011 & subsequently was a **board level consultant to 30 biotechs as well as founded & lead to a trade sale, my own biotech. I know three of the four heads of research in the companies manufacturing these gene-based agents. They did not respond to my approaches of concern from a former professional senior colleague. I am willing at any time to give evidence under oath that these senior staff - and many others - must have known what we outlined. These are beginners’ considerations for those working in “rational drug design”. Don’t allow anyone to tell you otherwise. The absolute basic questions here included, but we’re not limited to, is the preparation plausibly likely to bring the benefits sought without unacceptable unwanted effects?

It is long passed time that the public be told that groups of individuals conspired to introduce into their bodies material purporting to be vaccines, which were inherently dangerous, being toxic-by-design, poorly developed, shoddily manufactured, essentially inactive against their original intent and coerced into billions of arms.

There’s a lot more to say. Governments & public health officials everywhere have relentlessly lied to their largely trusting populations. As a result, millions of people have died avoidable deaths & the economies of these countries seriously damaged, the repercussions of both of which are yet to be fully realised. Good luck to those taking part in the sessions in Washington.

*Here is an article describing the story of Ziarco. I did not request it. The author spontaneously proposed it. Dr John LaMattina was formerly President & head of Pfizer Global R&D. This is a board level position. I have little doubt that, had John still been at Pfizer, that company would not have involved itself in this extraordinary, global crime against humanity. Perhaps I’m a naive optimistic, but I always found Dr LaMattina to be a demanding, encouraging scientific leader who is very smart.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2017/03/15/turning-pfizer-discards-into-novartis-gold-the-story-of-ziarco/?sh=609af0d87572

**I routinely describe myself as “a recently retired former senior R&D professional scientist”. My wife disagrees vehemently, reminding me that I had several biotech clients in my consulting business as of mid-2020. Each of those CEOs terminated me “because of my controversial remarks in relation to the pandemic”. While not unexpected, those brief conversations were among the most bitterly disappointing of my life because, as I listened to people I’d previously regarded highly, I determined that they lacked insight or courage or both. For a professional biologist, it was not at all difficult to discern, from the earliest statements by politicians and officials, that we were being lied to.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Dr. Yeadon, for yet another piece in the plandemic puzzle of early suppression of well-founded concerns. Certainly, I never heard any news of your efforts in the media here in Canada. It would have been heartening and confirmed my own instincts that something was wrong with the "saviour" "vaccine" plan.

However, I am afraid to be the bearer of bad news: The link to your original letter has been blocked on your own website, with a 410 error, saying "This account is under investigation or was found in violation of the Medium Rules." I would like to read this letter. Are you able to post it in a pdf format as you did for the other one? Thank you for all of your early efforts on behalf of humanity. Now, more than ever, I believe we need to stick together and support each other.

Kind regards, HappyHomesteader (Canada)

Expand full comment

Please search using a non mainstream search engine for Wolfgang Wodarg and Michael Yeadon EMA vaccine or similar & you will find the letter hosted in several locations.

I’m fielding hundreds to thousands of messages daily so ask your indulgence to find & share if you can.

I find it this way too! I don’t have an original copy.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Dr. Yeadon. That is a LOT of emails you are getting, I appreciate your response.

By searching for the phrase "thromboembolic toxicities" along with EMA and EC and Yeadon, I was able to locate the letter. The website linked to your original posting of in on your own website, which has been blocked.

However, the website "Covid Call to Humanity" thought to post a link to a pdf, which is still active. Here is the link to that pdf: https://covidcalltohumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Urgent-Open-Letter-from-Doctors-and-Scientists-to-the-European-Medicines-Agency-regarding-COVID-19-Vaccine-Safety-Concerns.pdf

I think the fact that this was so hard to find is NOT a coincidence! Call me a conspiracy theorist if you wish.

Thank you again for your service to humanity, Dr. Yeadon.

Kind regards, Happy Homesteader

Expand full comment

Thanks for finding that early letter & for reposting it.

I agree that it’s not coincidental that it’s hard to find.

I get much wrong. That’s a consequence of making many calls at speed, there being the urgent matter of a huge crime going on. But I am satisfied that the bulk of the calls have been good. And early. As I often say, it’s not my crime & I don’t have a copy of the script.

The warnings about the “vaccines” was probably the biggest call I’d ever made & very hard for someone who’d worked an entire career in pharma (though not in the vaccine division). I don’t regret it. Turns out they were superfluous & no good. At best, inactive & at worst, they’ve killed between 1:1000 to 1:100 of those injected.

Expand full comment

You are most welcome, Dr. Yeadon.

I am personally grateful to you for taking this stand, although I am sorry that it likely has come with a steep price for you. When I read your letter, I was struck by all the signatories from around the world. I believe that history will record your stand, which was made with integrity and honesty. I believe that history will also record that those very qualities were in short supply in institutions/corporations at this time.

Regardless of what happens in the future, I believe what you did and what you are doing today does matter. I was personally delighted that you had the time to post a message to me. Many thanks!

Kind regards, HappyHomesteader

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Thank you. I needed that :)

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

My pleasure, Koki! :)

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Same question to you, Dr. Yeadon, that I've posed here to Dr. McCullough. Where's the independent, broad-spectrum analysis of the vaccine vial contents that you're using to verify that the claimed mRNA and its effects are in fact what's causing the harm? Are you not aware of numerous independent analyses that found no mRNA in the vaccines, and a lot of nano-particulate toxins, including reduced graphene oxide? And are you aware that published studies of rGO toxicity perfectly match the symptoms we're seeing, such as systemic clotting, systemic epithelial cell damage, and even the production of fibroblasts in the blood? How is it possible that you, Dr. McCullough, and all of the others who seem to be looking for truth are ignoring this elephant in the room?

I'm posing the questions to you because John and Peter are ignoring all questions here.

Expand full comment

Hi David, it’s by sheer luck that I saw your question. Yes, I’m well aware of a number of analyses. There is no one, authentic report, telling us what’s in the “vaccines”.

I agree with you that there are many vials and presumably many batches to lots which apparently do not contain mRNA. Some definitely do, or at least did, though. I was attached to a similar, small & informal effort, early on. To my surprise, the sequenced material appeared to be as expected: an RNA sequence encoding full length spike protein.

Important for me not to forget this point: unlike any prior treatment in history, there’s dreadful failure to even pretend they were manufacturing consistent product.

As for claims there is graphene oxide in these injections, the analytical evidence falls short of convincing. The claims are so longstanding yet one, crucial analytical technique is missing: transmission electron microscopy. We know what the carbon monolayer looks like under TEM: what look like pinholes of light in an hexagonal shape.

I’m concerned that this may be misdirection.

There definitely has been found physical metallic shards & presence of relatively rare & sometimes frankly toxic elements. I make no excuse for this. I speculate it is at least in part down to wholly incompetent manufacturing.

It’s certainly true that mRNA in quantity, regardless of the genetic sequence, is harmful if injected as might be components of the lipid nanoparticles.

My point is principally to point out that what they planned to do was inherently dangerous. That’s true whether it’s intentional that there is huge variability batch to batch. It’s neither better nor worse if some or all of the analytical observations are true.

How people are injured is less important than that they are being injured.

I hope this is of some use.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the reply Mike.

I too was very skeptical of the first group that reported finding rGO in the vax. But my investigative instincts were to not judge it yet, and to watch and see what other evidence comes out. Several other groups did eventually confirm the findings. And all but one of the groups found no RNA. None of that is absolutely conclusive to me.

But there's plenty of evidence to be worthy of a deeper look. When I look at the mRNA hypothesis, and consider the state of the technology, demonstrated effectiveness, extreme sensitivity and fragility of RNA, and very difficult and quantity-limited manufacturing methods, I think the hypothesis becomes ridiculous. At best there might be a small number of small lots with mRNA, or larger lots with only trace mRNA. Then there's the glaring issue of the origin of the 'spike protein' code. Did that code really come from a 'virus' that's never been isolated? So where did the code really come from, and does it have anything to do with a proven cause of any disease? The whole hypothesis is pseudo-science.

I also took a look at the rGO hypothesis, and was surprised to find that there's quite a bit of published research on rGO toxcity, and on rGO materials and manufacturing development very recently. And the more I looked, the more it perfectly fit the symptoms that we're seeing. Have you actually looked at the rGO toxicity research, and considered the fact that the material has exploded into the environment at the same time as 'covid-19'?

So the bottom line is that one hypothesis, the one that's the official narrative and everyone on the planet including the so-called dissidents are taking for granted, is highly unlikely considering the published science, and the other hypothesis fits what's actually happening including the specific symptoms of both 'covid-19' and the vax physiological effects.

Yet you and almost every other doctor seem to think it's not worth investigating. I see indoctrination at work, displacing reasoning.

My decades of research of vaccination over centuries says that the toxic metals are not incompetent manufacturing. Toxic metals have always been the active ingredients, covered by deception. There's no point in the medical history all the way back to ancient Greece when potent toxins weren't the key ingredient, and for the past century the heavy metals with long-lasting neurotoxicity have been ubiquitous, with the 'preservative' excuse being part of the con.

Your next-to-last sentence I find absolutely bizzare. If there's even a possibility that many millions of people have been poisoned and may are dying, how could 'how they are being poisoned' not be the most important question in the world? How can doctors even begin to devise a rational treatment protocol when they won't even look at the question of what's in the deadly injections?

All I can conclude is that the mass brainwashing is so advanced, and investment in the corrupt establishment so permanent, that reasoning just isn't possible.

I'm not intending to slam you personally. I just wish more people would open their eyes, and I think you're trying to do that. I wish you the best.

Expand full comment

If I was pushed. I’d offer the opinion that on the balance of probabilities, I think there is some GO in at least some of the batch vials.

Likewise, I think full length, intact spike protein encoding mRNA is present in relatively few batch vials. Many more have degraded mRNA. Others, nothing detectable l.

Separately, we know that certain lipid nanoparticle-containing formulations are not in the “Generally Recognised As Safe” category, and are toxic. They also appear to confer ovary-homing properties, with the implication that whatever is formulated in the LNPs will be preferentially concentrated in reproductive tissue of every woman and girl, potentially even babies & foetuses.

We can probably align on the contention that the LNPs contribute to the observed toxicity.

Why do I lean towards GO being present even though I’ve argued that the analytical evidence falls short of definitive (if you check the methods used in those reports, iirc they were infrared spectroscopy, chromatographical separation, micro-Raman spectroscopy. Mass spectrometry isn’t likely to be helpful because GO doesn’t have a fixed, defined molecule mass. To my knowledge, no TEM. I don’t understand why not. If the scientist has accumulated several pieces of evidence which each are “consistent with but not proof of” being GO, why not at least attempt TEM? Maybe I’m wrong about the utility of the technique?

Imagine the unstoppable power of a definitive positive finding that GO is present in the “vaccines”???

Honestly, I think it would “go viral” (sorry :)

I lean towards there being at least trace amounts of GO in at least some of the vials is very unscientific. Why not? I’m a human being as well as a scientist.

I think it might be one of very few (if not the only) molecules for which the following can be said.

Atomic carbon has molecular mass = 6.

Number of atoms in minimum unit = 6.

Number of units arranged around the minimum unit = 6.

The perpetrators apparently crave symbolism and numerology. Way over my head, but the 666 character of GO would be “an intoxicating lure” for those interested in running this global coup d’etat. This belief was told to me by a religious lady in her seventies.

For avoidance of doubt, I’m nowhere near convinced that there are self-assembling nano machines in the vaccines. Nor do I think we’ve been injected with materials that form aerials or can be used for remote mind control.

For all that, the details can be whatever. There isn’t a new disease called covid19. Even if there was, there was no unusual public health threat. A vaccine takes years to do a good job upon, and rushing it in a few months means reckless advancement of likely-toxic materials.

Our greatest problem isn’t the inability to be precise about what’s in these injections.

No, it’s an appallingly narrow “constituency” that I can reach. I’m censored even in comments section of online newspapers. Banned from reporting upon positively nLTNIAWV BBC’S

Expand full comment

From my point of view, the size of the constituency isn't a problem whatsoever. It's grown phenomenally because of the events starting in 2020, and grows more every day, so that cannot be a negative.

I just don't agree that the precise makeup of the injections isn't of primary importance. The reason it doesn't seem to be important is because virtually all of the 'experts', even those considered to be dissidents, talk of the mRNA/spike protein story as if it's scientific fact. What would happen if you and all of the other rebel doctors and scientists were candid and said "we don't know the ingredients, and therefore we can't speculate on how they're causing the symptoms we're seeing" every time you talked or wrote about the 'vaccines'?

My guess is there would be tens of thousands of agitated people yelling "why don't we know what's in the injections!", and there might be some analysis organized. It's not a major problem right now because people are still being misled by even the dissidents and the alternative media.

And again, how does a doctor treat a poisoned, injured person right now, when they have no idea what's in the injections?

I've seen the numerology angle before, and my feeling is that if I needed numerology to tell me whether something or someone is evil or not, then I'm really lost. I prefer to use my God-given senses, instincts, and reasoning ability.

And I agree that there's not self-assembling nano-bots or computer chips, nor antennas or bluetooth transmitters, in the vaccines. I think there is crystallization in the blood around the carbon and/or metal particulates, and this is misunderstood to be 'self-assembly' as if there's nano-machines at work. If there is indeed rGO in the injections, then magnetic resonance is an issue, since the particles are highly conductive and magnetic. Particle resonance with radio waves could theoretically cause tissue damage. That's another area where the 'scientific' establishment is suppressing scientific inquiry.

We're miles apart on the proposition that there's such a thing as a 'good' vaccine, and that's OK. It's a beautiful thing that no two paths are the same.

I encourage you to not get down about the suppression and censorship. That's actually a badge of courage. You probably reach more people than you know, because so many people share your articles and interviews. If you are inspired and seeking truth, you'll continue to inspire others.

Expand full comment

John, if it suits you to do so, would you kindly “pin” the long post of mine? (Not this one, unless you want to….I don’t want to hog your comments section!)

Thank you :)

I’d like as many people as possible to see it, since I cannot travel to Washington to give evidence in person.

I have been in regular contact with Senator Ron Johnson for some considerable time. I hold him in high regard. I’ve learned that it can be extraordinarily difficult to bring to the attention of those who simply do not want to hear it the kind of expert testimony I have given & continue to give. It’s very easy to evoke the “conspiracy theorist!” label. How I wish it was but a theory.

There’s a conspiracy alright, nothing theoretical about it.

Accordingly, Sen. Johnson has had copious input from me. He’s a smart person and I know he’s doing all an individual in Washington can.

Expand full comment

I only hope the truth actually moves the needle my favorite will not. I believe our government is now irredeemably corrupt and this vaccine fever is more religion than anything else. People managed to enrich themselves to the tune of a trillion dollars with this mess I don't think they're gonna voluntarily cut off the flow of money.

Expand full comment

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/open-letter-and-evidentiary-document

An excellent summary from my friend and colleague, Sasha Latypova.

Her Substack piece contains a link to an important analysis by Carlton Brown of deaths following COVID-19 “vaccination”. I don’t know this person, but their work is very detailed. He shows that COVID-19 has been markedly over-diagnosed & c19 vaccine injuries and deaths greatly under-counted.

Of course, taken to extremes, this is consistent with the position I arrived at a few months ago, that there’s been no respiratory virus pandemic & the alleged vaccines were designed to injure and to kill. That’s why the perpetrators want a needle in every arm.

Expand full comment

As an RN fired last year for refusing the jab, I am hoping that at some point congress will address the mandate for healthcare workers in any facility that accepts government money, ie Medicare and Medicaid. So many have lost their careers over this or were coerced into submission. There is not one day that I regret my decision and fortunately I am of retirement age so my choice was easier than for someone that still has a family to support. It sickens me to have watched all the unnecessary deaths from mismanaged Covid infection or from the covid shot. I cannot begin to tell you how many deaths from stroke or heart attack that I am personally aware of in just the last 3 months in all age groups. People need to wake up! My heart aches witnessing the medical tyranny and what is happening to the career that I have dedicated my life to and loved. Thank you to all who are fighting for humanity and what is right.

Expand full comment

Have Rand Paul stand with you! He’s already faced off with Fauci and knows a thing or two about our crooked government when it comes covid, mandated masks and vaccines!

Expand full comment

Senator Rand Paul is finally in the same boat as Senator Ron Johnson & both are pulling hard on the oars.

Expand full comment

It’s time to switch to a motor!

Expand full comment
Dec 6, 2022·edited Dec 6, 2022

I’m so glad to hear there will be another roundtable! I cannot watch it live, but greatly look forward to seeing it afterwards. Please extend Senator Johnson the thanks of millions of people for standing up and speaking out, and letting others speak out. He is what an elected representative should be.

Expand full comment

Fingers and toes crossed. Hoping for a miracle... But, realistically expecting the Plan to continue (that is, the Great Reset and depop agenda).

Expand full comment

If there's going to be a rational study and discussion of what the 'vaccines' are, how they work, and the mechanism of toxicity, isn't the first and foremost requirement knowing what's actually in the vials that's being injected into people? Where's the independent, thorough, and transparent broad-spectrum analysis of the vaccine contents that you're using to back up your assertion that the alleged mRNA-initiated mechanism is accurate? Are the numerous private groups around the world who've done microscopic and spectroscopic analysis and found no mRNA whatsoever in the vials all making up a story to deceive people, and you know this because the CCP, the WHO, and big pharma companies would never lie? How can your analysis be considered scientific when the beginning premise, of vaccine vial ingredients, is pure assumption, on top of the additionally-huge assumption that there can be no other explanation for the toxicity and tissue damage we're seeing?

Expand full comment

Protect yourself by doing a sage cleansing or something before you enter the den of thieves. You don’t want any of their evil rubbing off on you. They’ve even killing us for years. Until they start working for us instead of pharma and the corporate world, we will never be safe. They allow toxins in our food, water, other so-called vaccines, products, carpeting that babies crawl on, curtains. The murder of Americans has been commonplace for decades. It’s a wonder any of us are alive. #StopTheLobbying

Expand full comment