11 Comments

I have been reading a lot about the history of vaccines and it has been a real eye opener. It seems that history has, on the whole, been presented as evidence for how wonderful vaccines are and yet digging beneath the surface shows an entirely different narrative. How many diseases had all but disappeared after living conditions improved and the use of deadly chemicals on crops and people decreased or stopped. It is a very interesting topic and I am grateful that you are throwing some light into the darkness.

Expand full comment

One must not forget that the vaccine is an intent to sell. Epidemiology does not cover unintended consequences when these consequences are willfully ignored. Pregnant women have aborted spontaneously and birthed autistic children whose baby teeth were loaded with mercury. The mercury may have been taken out later from some products “to please consumers” but never an admission that something happened. You probably know the exchange between RFK, Jr. and Paul Offit on methyl mercury. Offit was caught prevaricating as doctors do ... they trade on the ignorance of patients to sell services or avoid legitimate conflict

Vaccinated folks can come down with the flu, including the strain targeted by the shot. And transmit it to others. Because the shot made them MORE vulnerable, not less. These infections are almost NEVER reported to anyone. So how can epidemiology speak to effectiveness of the shots?

I will assert that the effect of these shots on the microbiome and on immune suppression with the various problems that can follow are never discussed because nobody knows. Telling us that deaths, cancers and chronic neurological damage from yearly shots ... know that people who complain of these things took the shots at work in stride ... are rare is not much consolation. Nor is it truthful when nobody knows how rare or prevalent they really are. Like DPT, MMR and autism, doctors say “I never heard of that.” That is a direct quote. And they don’t know ... if they know what’s good for them. Nor do they EVER read the package insert. It’s the COVID story on a smaller scale of incidence with NO benefit when there is destruction to the gut flora. This phenomenon is never measured or followed up for the consequences on health, especially long term. It is the profile of chronic disease in America.

An illustration: Hep B shots given in the hospital have a monitoring period of a week. So babies that score a 10 at birth but who die on day 12 must have had something else. That’s how the reporting works. But what if the shot wiped out the bifidobacteria the baby was born with? What did that do ... what new vulnerability was introduced? The CDC has not a clue. Sound familiar?

No confidence, no credibility for the CDC. Attention to the science of immune fitness must be given. Citizens have to focus on it themselves and/or seek health coaches and caregivers who know something about it. There is a litany of lifestyle improvements that have to be taken seriously. The COVID experience has already gotten the message across to many.

To say that the shots are the ONLY way to ameliorate the symptoms of flu is propaganda, as are claims that there are negligible side effects. “No shot is perfect” is a dismissal, not an admission. The shots are pollution. Period.

The real problem is the power to force citizens to take the shots. The right to “take your chances” is attacked when the government and insurance companies create a cascade of liability for employers and institutions that prompts them to mandate the shots with health board recommendations. This is a “trust the government” mandate. It is the heart of Jacobsen versus Massachusetts, a SCOTUS”. decision that must be overturned because “credentials are no longer enough” to quote Scott Atlas. Are you aware that the smallpox shots are a total fraud but they are still forced in the military?

Health freedom codified in a Constitutional Amendment, as envisioned by Benjamin Rush, is long overdue.

Expand full comment
founding

Thank you for your work, Dr. McCullough!

Expand full comment

Thank you, Dr McCullough for bringing this previously undisclosed and very interesting information out in the open with this article. It seems more and more that "the emperor has fewer and fewer clothes on" so to speak. The " sacred cow" is coming down.

Expand full comment

What, exactly, are you trying to tell us?

Expand full comment
founding

The incidence of the serotype that the vaccine will protect against (serotype b) is 1.8%. So over 98% of patients with H. Influenzae were NOT protected by this vaccine. It’s ineffective and should be removed from the schedule. Yet children will get 5 doses. $$$$$$$$$$$

Expand full comment

Basically, the vaccines doesn't work. All the risk is in the form of side effects.

Expand full comment
founding

I think the vaccine did its job, the type B was a killer for infant meningitis in my early years. If we stop it does it reoccur? Hard to know the side effects on the children. When does immune tolerance occur,? Possibly in first 6 mo, not 2 months

Expand full comment

Pediatrician since 1980. Routinely saw 3-5 cases of invasive H. flu meningitis or epiglottitis per year prior to H.Flu vaccine coming out. Life threatening disease. You had a very short window of time to get the child in treatment. Saw septc hips with H. flu, deafness. Watching children die was real.

I absolutely NEVER gave mRNA "vax" or recommended it.Looked at mechanism of action. Left a job because I would not go along with the "script."Never had adverse reaction to H. FLU vax. Have seen thousands of children in practice per year since 1980. I NEVER want to see H. Flu disease again. Last case I had was 11/1984 meningitis. By the grace of God and antibiotics, the child was saved, and is now an adult doing well.

Expand full comment
founding

Dr. McCullough: Is there some reliable source that covers epidemiology, adverse events, and manufacturing information on all the vaccines?

Expand full comment

Have the risks for this vaccine been studied, fairly, or is it just assumed it is safe and not generally effective?

Expand full comment