27 Comments

"Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson pressed the Louisiana attorney about instances when the government could require speech to be suppressed if there was a compelling interest"

Of course there are instances such as these! They occur constantly - daily - in communist countries.

Expand full comment

Cowardice and treachery in the John Roberts SCOTUS.

Shameful trash.

Expand full comment

When I click on the comment icon lately, it takes me to a page that says I need to update the Substack app. When I then click on the update button there, it says there is no update available. I can go to Substack.com to get the app. Once it takes me there in the App Store, I can click on update. It asks for my phone number to send me a code. After I enter the code, it then insists that I agree to share my contacts. My contact list is private. It includes my doctors and other private contacts. There is no option to not allow my contacts to be shared. What gives? Substack does not need this information.

Expand full comment

Ketanji offers sophistry, and the other members of the court remain silent. She offers a hypothetical that amounts to what are commonly known as Public Service Announcements. Yes, the government can offer Public Service Announcements, and has for generations. Usually they are a waste of taxpayers dollars. The government CAN issue PSA, but they must be truthful and accurate.

All the Covid and shot claims made by the government have been falsehoods.

Ketanji's comments were sophistry, and her mates wearing black robes remained silent. SCOTUS has only one role in modern times, to support the status quo even though it be criminal.

Expand full comment

If only Trump had used his second two choices as wisely as he did his first, although I suppose he might have had difficulty getting another conservative like Gorsuch confirmed.

Expand full comment
founding

Thanks for all you do, Dr. McCullough.

Expand full comment

I agree that a better choice than Kavanaugh could have been made. He was the one that helped Roberts concoct the scheme to get the unconstitutional Unaffordable Obaminable Care Act passed. But people sometimes judge things differently once they are on the Supreme Court. At least Trump’s choices helped to overturn Roe v Wade.

Expand full comment

YOU're such a good guy. Very powerful, brilliant, and courageous. Would you address your statin posts? Maybe answer some of the multitudinous, quite compelling critical posts? Otherwise they are a stain on your otherwise stellar record.

Expand full comment
Mar 23·edited Mar 24

I couldn't imagine a conservative court not seeing through the web of conceit that overt and covert government action to silence citizens and experts isn't forthrightly authoritarian and illegal. How could it be possible that the Court would pretend that a pandemic allows government to act as an all powerful, coercive actor, destroying liberty and forcing obeisance and forcing citizens' actions through force of law? This is revolting.

Expand full comment
Mar 23·edited Mar 23

It is extremely troubling that the scotus finds this worthy of discussion and debate rather than quick immediate judgement in favor of plaintiffs. If The Court is captured by the globalist leviathan, as it appears, they will methodically make rulings against our Constitution and rights and everything else that makes our nation and people difficult to conquer.

Expand full comment
founding

Disgusting Cowards!

Thank you Dr. McCullough!

Expand full comment

Memorable speech. Thanks for posting.

Expand full comment

Well-written article, Peter.

Expand full comment

The Royal Society expresses the scientific method of investigation by utterance of the Latin phrase "Nullius in Verba,,". In English translation this phrase is "Take nobody's word for it."

Occasionally,, it is profitable for people in power to force the members of a human population to "take somebody's word for it." This is what a minority of the members of the U.S. Supreme Court hope to accomplish by suppressing free speech for the American people on topics that include the safety of and efficacy of the mRNA vaccines for the treatment pf infections of humans by the COVID-j19 virus.

In the book entitled "The Psychology of Totalitarian Rule," the Professor of clinical psychology Mattias Dsmet reveals a situation in which this scenario sometimes plays out. Tjhis is when a "complex" physical system is mistaken for a "non-complex" physical system by the argument made by a model of this system, where a "complex" physical system exhibits one or more "emergent properties, each of which is a property of the whole system and not of the separate parts of this system Though the runs of this model provide one with no information about the outcomes of the events of the future for the physical system being modellled, these runs

cp,[;ex

Expand full comment

The Royal Society expresses the scientific method of investigation by the Latin phrase of "Nullius in Verba.". In English translation this phrases is "takei nobody's word for it.

Expand full comment

The method is abundantly clear now.

The One Party State under the Democrat banner has under the guise of diversity, equity, and inclusion has empowered itself to make any and all who for any reason, hate or loath the American ideal a party to its hierarchy of complicity. In that complicity, either nefarious or naively once a part, one can be blackmailed, captured by fear to comply further. Yet, there can be no quarter for the complicit if the nefarious are made to play and pay by their own rules, but first we must stop the bleeding of thousands of cuts over time to America, especially marking six decades ago, the era of the 1960’s that set it all in motion.

With all do respect to Dr. McCullough and his courageous tenacity, staying at his post overseeing the corruption of his beloved science of medicine, this so much greater than Covid and the Jab. Of course the American ideal has had its detractors and haters from its beginning and periodic past by connecting the dots of history, but of the past six decades the multitude of faceted attacks on America by capture to enslave Americans by expunging all sovereignty has been as insidious a method, as a slowly metastasizing cancer that has perhaps reached final stages.

Chaos manifests fear as fear manifests distrust, uncertainty, and anxiety on all levels that weakens the legs. The chaos need only be periodic but targeted to insidiously but be exponential in effect to take down the largest prey. It need not begin as a significant conspiracy, but like cancer or modified virus can become exponential by its own means of fear, man’s oldest rival or refuge.

If the method becomes captured by an intentionally nefarious faction or friendamy’s at any point, then it becomes a conspiracy that can plan a decade or more in advance, never letting a co-opted crisis or planned crisis go to waste. At that point the method becomes:

DEMORALIZE to weaken the legs.

PROPAGANDIZE the weakened.

CENSOR the survivors.

REPEAT.

Sounds absurd to the free and secure with so many rights. So much freedom, security, and rights that pride in exceptionalism becomes hubris, becomes hierarchy of the cabals that cannibalize one another in a pure democracy.

That is precisely why the brilliant Founders used dissent as the catalyst to political science and decided on a Constitutional Republic to defend the democracy of voting, without being defined as a democracy that historically cannibalizes itself with diversity, empty equity, and inclusion as a ruse of inevitable victimhood for all.

Anything that resembles the latter are not anomalies over and over or ford of modern democracy that puts the people in mass stupors, but directs attacks on the people and there can be no quarter for either the insidious or direct attackers of the Constitutional Republic.

Expand full comment