41 Comments
May 13·edited May 13

I just have to wonder whether the scientists and doctors making these kinds of biased statements still have confidence to take more shots themselves. It's one thing to wave a flag for a cause you want to believe in, it's another thing to sacrifice your own life for that cause.

For myself, early on when the vaccine was being rolled out, I was keenly interested to see what side effects it would have, since it was a new, and not thoroughly tested treatment. Then I read some of the horror stories, such as the tragedy of Simone Scott, a young college student: https://covidvaccinereactions.com/portfolio/2844/

My comment to that story was as follows:

"This is, to date, the worst Vaccine death I’ve read about, and having a daughter of her age, who is also in college, makes it very real to me. If I ever have the slightest tendency to flag about my commitment to not being vaccinated, I just remember Simone and my mind is made up. The CDC has the audacity to claim that there are “no deaths” from the vaccines. Just remember people, if you die from the vaccine, they count you as a “nobody,” and if you are injured, you are on your own. That’s how much they care about your health. Let it sink in."

Expand full comment

The authors had to include some of these misleading comments in order to be published. Did they hope we could read between the lines? Hope so...

Expand full comment

Science is dead and buried - in its place we have Regime propaganda.

Expand full comment

Spirituality has been buried in the name of the State

Expand full comment

Thanks for insights on vax papers that say glowing things yet report horrible things, and how the positive conclusions are not supported by evidence.

I wonder how many of those scientists knowingly do this so their adverse events findings will be able to be published.

It is time to end the organized crime cartel that runs science and medicine.

Expand full comment

The net effect is cultivating doublethink. The propaganda/official narrative must never stop, as we can't believe our lying eyes taking in the evidence. Holding contradictory thoughts is a sign of allegiance to the regime.

Expand full comment

Harks back to the Flexner Report and the crimes of 1913.

Expand full comment

They won't get their data published if they don't say these things. Perhaps they hope we can see through the idiocy and not be taken in and fall for the dangers of these 'state-controlled, state-required state-ments.'

Expand full comment

This is such a great point! I’ve been seeing these obligatory nods to the vaccines in papers where the evidence actually shows harm from them for a while now. What a great point you make here that these are not scientific statements (as nothing in their research backs it up), but are simply propaganda pure and simple. Thanks for pointing that out.

In the not too distant future I think these comments will age poorly, and will be thought to be absurdly comical if not for the cruel iatrogenicide it is complicit in.

Expand full comment

I suspect the authors are putting in the pro-vaccine boilerplate at the beginning and end of their research papers and the truth in the middle in order to get published. That has been a way to get published in climate change for the last 30 years or so.

Expand full comment

I totally believe that and I also wonder if they do as you describe to defeat AI driven censors.

Expand full comment

As the proud owner of a row in the VAERS database, I can confidently disagree. It is not hard at all to argue that case away and encourage more shots. You just have to be a despicable medical sociopath. We could put Mayorkas on the case. He has a unit in Homeland Security for Misinformation. Wait a minute. He's the biggest perpetrator. That's why he was impeached. Or was he? I watched the articles of impeachment being read on the House floor. Is that the end of the process? I need a vaccine that protects me from the truth because it is too painful. But why risk more adverse events. Real truth is dissipating wirh such rapidity that it is nearing full evaporation. Might as well hold off. It sickens me that so many institutions and highly credentialled people can't wait to get in line to protect a poisonous product (alliteration). "Hey, that's my spot. I was here first."

I have several income-producing skills that have been nèutralized by my vax injury. Writing is the only one left. Medical expenses are signifiçant. I publish on Substack but that has an adverse event too. The function that allows me to set up for paid subscribers doesn't work, but they're working on it, for weeks, while A.I. thanks me for my patience. Just put me in a medically-induced coma and bring me out when it's safe.

Expand full comment

Ever so many thanks for all you do, dear Dr McCullough. The problem is that doctors are busy. Usually they just read headlines, if we are lucky they might read the abstract and even, occasionally, the conclusion. That is why we so appreciate that you keep us informed.

Expand full comment

I have been told this by nurses as well. With the current doctor shortage in Canada and the US the doctors are overwhelmed by sick patients and imposed government and insurance paperwork so they have even less time to read journals.

Expand full comment

The doctor shortage in Canada and the US was a result of the intentional RIF (Reduction In Force). They can keep their crocodile tears.

Expand full comment

Who would want to be a doctor or nurse in Canada (and many other places)? Many still face vax mandates, at least for flu if not Covid. A shocking number died after Covid vax mandates started. They are not allowed to express any opinion that goes against pharma. They are expected to act as glorified pharmaceutical sales reps. Even praising cod liver oil or an off-patent cheap drug can result in disciplinary action.

Expand full comment

Yep! “There is no association between the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and the risk for new-onset seizure, data from a new meta-analysis of six randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) showed.”

Rafati A, Jameie M, Amanollahi M, et al. Association of New-Onset Seizures With SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Neurol. Published online April 29, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0967

“Conclusions and Relevance  According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of new-onset seizure incidence between vaccinated individuals and placebo recipients.”

However, even the admitted results were concerning, and you need to ask why they only looked at 28 days: (9 events [0.014%] in vaccine and 1 event [0.002%] in placebo recipients.

Expand full comment

Thank you Dr McCullough. Definitely cult like language. Perhaps "promotional materials" might be better than "journal papers" to describe what these have become.

Expand full comment

I hope they feel as strongly about how efficacious it was when they are on trial.

Expand full comment

I came to the conclusion that journals were captured in 2021 when I was desperately looking for information after sustaining a vaccine injury. I thought it was odd that they all prefaced their journal with obsequious lauding of the shots prior to writing about what ever injury they were researching. This is a huge problem and dangerous to our health. Pharma is like an invasive species insidiously inserting themselves in all of our health institutions. Ceding our health autonomy over to the WHO is just another power play by big pharma.

Expand full comment

The only way to be published...not an excuse, but maybe better than nothing? IDK.

Expand full comment

Once again thank you for this free of charge advice on how to dissect the doublespeak and propaganda in pro-vaccine or vax injury studies.

Sage Hana likes to paint you as some kind of drug pusher but I never get any solutions from people like her. She likes to tear down and point fingers but where is solution?

Thanks to the Covid mandates I can’t trust ANY vaccines. I’m now regretting the entire childhood schedule on my daughters even though they appear to be healthy. Who knows how long their health will continue? I had them get gardasil so maybe they’re infertile but we won’t know until they start trying to have babies.

It’s such a dirty business. Drugs

Expand full comment

Him - Derrick Blanton

Expand full comment

Thanks! I’m unfollowing HIM

Expand full comment

Just watched "Epidemic of Fraud" it has been known prior to 2020 that journals are nothing more than mouth pieces for pharma and that the editors of these journals are paid handsomely for the lies they push. Just when I thought I couldn't learn anymore the Epidemic of Fraud showed that we have just scratched the surface.

Expand full comment

Although. my vaxxed friends won't admit it, I sense a feeling of betrayal in their thoughts - that hey just maybe the people I knew who dropped dead and/or developed cancer might have been victims of that shot - they are angry and of course worried - what everyone needs to know is, it's not just that covid jab as they are trying to use this mRNA technology in other vaccines so IF you decide to take any shot OR GIVE IT TO YOUR CHILDREN - you'd better make damn sure in the years to come that it doesn't contain mRNA.

Expand full comment

A lot of the highlighted statements sound merely descriptive to me: yes, vaccination with a negatively effective mRNA product *is* a cornerstone to our generally poor plans for dealing with COVID, etc. If that gets you past the censors, so be it. But making up a risk/benefit analysis they never did is indeed lying.

Expand full comment

Keep in mind that the puppet masters of this betrayal of the people are always two steps ahead of us. This is not over now that more people and a few politicians have figured out the superficial parts of the ruse. Look for the clues to what is to come next. Australia has disarmed the public to some extent as has Canada. Canada just passed a major censorship law. Canada's liberal party just boosted the Newsroom subsidy for bankrupt Canadian MSM to $30,000 per employee per annum last fall (it lasts until the next election in 2025). The WHO is attempting to pass a universal agreement and pandemic treaty that allows them to take control of any pandemic THEY declare and force vaccinate populations. Despite opposition they still might pass the treaty and agreement. So they hang out Daszak as sacrificial lamb, their plan will continue on other fronts. Read "A Midwestern Doctors" substack article of May 12th for more enlightenment of what has happened and what may be coming on the Covid Front.

Expand full comment