Where is the evidence that masking the immunocompromised makes a difference in infection rates or outcomes? Most people infer that if masking is good for the compromised then it will be good for them. Masking in hospital operatory settings is barrier protection for the patient from operator spittle. Masking in respiratory isolation might make the staff feel safer from an actively coughing TB case, but where is the evidence that masking hinders the spread of viral respiratory disease in the hospital setting?

Expand full comment

Dr Mccullough ... in a recent interview you refered to a study by Helen Banoun which talked about vaccine shedding. If the unvaccinated are exposed to the vacine through shedding does it equal having taken the shot? I.e. is it permenant and gene editing? Please clarify your opinion on this most important question. https://www.tmrjournals.com/public/articlePDF/20221114/483e983160eb24f1ef94bdd666603ac9.pdf

Expand full comment

I see people who've worn a mask since day one, I bet they sleep in them. One girl has rotten teeth now because of wearing her mask non stop.

Expand full comment

"masking has preoccupied the public and the (largely un) questioning media"

Expand full comment

Dr. McCullough, doesn't the study your referred to that identified igG4 prevalence after multiple injections indicate those injected are developing illness as a result of spike protein they make reaches toxic levels?

If so wouldn't that render the mask debate moot?

Expand full comment

I will begin distributing this article to anyone that offers me a mask in the future. Thank you 🙏

Expand full comment
Jan 31·edited Feb 2

I want to contribute the link to 160 studies or more all telling one story: in theory, masks are nieece, but in daily life they are horrible.


The most 2 appalling arguments against masks - for me - are:

- children suffering masked caregivers in kindergarten and elementary school are 3% dumber. IQ is based on EQ, and not being able to see the mouth deprives a child the possibility to train empathy and develop deep emotional intelligence; who may want us to be less connected…

- incubated persons wearing masks with water-binding filtration tissue will have +70% probability of severe cause, as up-concentrated viral particles get re-aerosolised and are drawn deep to alveolae and this makes a severe case.

The masks from water-repelling tissue do not suffer from this effect.

Anyways, if I‘m forced to wear a mask, I intuitively am MORE eager to prevent by


Use any inorganic antiseptic as nasal spray (has to be corrosion resistant).

We DIY nasal spray (to rim, e is 24,5ml) and use 2-6ml 0.3% CIO2 ad (ie fill up with to) 24ml dead sea or stone salt water (salt 0.5-2% depending on demand for astringating effect). This results in 250-750ppm ClO2.

Now the procedure:

„In 1 min., do 4 rounds of ‚breathing in, spray to nose and mouth to throat, and 1 under tongue‘.“

Preventively, it is enough to do this once in the evening.

Of course, after beeing sneezed at, I pull out my spray :)

We do it on any symptoms, as often as you like. Anywhere. Small wounds, herpes, tick bites (there 70% DMSO and 0.5% ClO2 we produce by diffusion is most efficient, put by cotton wool or wound patch or cloth in 1-2cm more radius than symptoms on skin variable rash, erythema; lyme is very „local“ in the first stage, kill it there. DMSO drags in CIO2 2cm deep into tissue! Also useful for dental root treatment. Also kills small caries and it heals afterwards. WHO may not want to tell you?).

In pollen season, I sprayed 1/4 puff to the eye and it lasts 1/2 hr to give me calm from pollen allergy, where allergy tablets and spray/drops did not suffice last mast year (high pollen concentration, and the year after pfi vaccination).

My intuition tells me:

IF you want to have a good protection, you NEED an element of sealing between skin and N95 mask tissue, as otherwise DROPLETS will be sucked through the slits of non-perfect fit beneath the nose eg where pressure drop is lower than through the filtrating tissue.

This sealing must be a thermo-foam that is „nearly closed-celled“, but highly vapour transmittable. I really sesrched, could not find it. Nearest was window frame foam self-expanding PU impregnated with silicone fat.

You can easily test with cold glass or bottle: if your breath through mask condenses on the glass, you can SEE the leakages quite well in the structure of the condensation fog on the cold surfaces. Better is vape vapour (use without nicotine if you are a non-smoker).

I went from arduous inventor of DIY masks and DIY hypochlorite by salt pool chlorinator electrolysis cells to critic of non-democratic interventions.

democratic := {transparent; safe efficient available cheap}.

We have a whole series of intransparent mask deals in pandemic years in DE where stately institutions bought masks for horrific prices in the worst contaminated quality possible ; waiting for catching up with, but nearly every politician seems to have gained money with them, so all are unisono perpetrating the view better not to investigate it.

(Anyone pursuing any intervention not fulfilling all 5 points is killing remnants of democracy somehow. CoV brings all to light, but my eyes are too slow to witness.)

Expand full comment

Wave your Flags!

Put signs on the lawns! (.GOV Mask Mandates Dumb)

Buttons on your lapels!

Time for common sense about the air we breath, and when to protect from hazard!

Good riddance to "BAD" rubbish!

Image the horrible cost to dump all these in landfills/waterways/ or incineration's disposals?

Expand full comment
deletedJan 31
Comment deleted
Expand full comment