Follow the Money
Follow the Money
Quirky billionaires have an outsized influence on public policy.
By JOHN LEAKE
According to Wikipedia:
“Follow the money" is a catchphrase popularized by the 1976 docudrama film All the President's Men, which suggests political corruption can be brought to light by examining money transfers between parties.
Because human affairs are complex, we may be inclined to think that such a rudimentary investigative principle is of limited practical utility, but in recent years I have found it infallible.
The world is full of would be activists—people who are fervently interested in promoting a program. Many of these programs are eccentric at best, and as long as no money is available to fund them, they will remain in obscurity. However, if a program’s activists are energetic and backed with massive funding, they may rapidly exercise major influence on public policy.
Money has always been used to propagate new ideas and beliefs. In a true liberal democracy with a free marketplace of ideas, such propaganda will be challenged and circumscribed by competing points of view. Its influence becomes pernicious when the marketplace of ideas ceases being free because competing opinions are censored and vilified.
Many now marvel at how propositions that no one believed in or even talked about just a few years ago may, virtually overnight, become vociferously supported by governments, corporations, and celebrities.
It’s important to understand that such movements don’t emerge organically at the grassroots level. They fire up and rapidly gather steam only when they are backed by significant capital.
Thus, anytime you are confronted with the seemingly widespread embrace of an irrational or even destructive doctrine, it’s likely that a quirky billionaire and his foundation are generously funding its propagation and the election campaigns of politicians who will endorse it.
It’s the masons, dummy!
In 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations was founded, to infiltrate and control democracy, by freemasons David Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Herbert Hoover, Allen Dulles, Walter Lippmann and Edward M. House. The impressive 10-thousand members list proves the power grab was successful.1 Since 1921, the CFR has chosen every single Secretary of State. Similar mason institutions, most with similar names, were founded in over 100 countries, including Britain's Royal Institute of International Affairs and the European Council on Foreign Relations2: practically, there’s no war where the CFR isn’t involved on both sides. 3 Their magazine Foreign Affairs is one way they send orders to all members.
In 2018, Wikileaks proved the CFR controlled all mainstream media.4
Hoover, Truman, Eisenhower, Bush father and son, Carter, Clinton, Obama 5 ... some argue that, with few exceptions like JFK and Trump, at least since WWII, all US presidents were freemasons and many CFR,. All administrations were filled with thousands of CFR members. 6 The Trump administration was no exception. 7 It’s not a coincidence that Neil M. Gorsuch, CFR Supreme Court Justice appointed by Trump, betrayed conservatives by ruling in favour of homosexual marriage and other New World Order “progressive” agenda.
Another proof of grooming for infiltration: 28 Jun 2019 Democrat Tulsi Gabbard wasn’t renewed 5 CFR year membership. 8 Because she wouldn’t obey all orders? In 2020, she was still pro-homo-marriage9 and pro-abortion (a basic CFR request) and pro-Biden, but wanted paper ballots, Electoral College, supported Trump in breaking up Big Tech and removing their censorship through section 23010, Glass-Steagall, pro-natalism paid family and medical leave plans up to 12 weeks, less public and defense spending, drug patent breaking, no war.11 That’s probably why she was defamed by Kamala12, Hillary Clinton and mason Mitt Romney.13 In 2021, she questioned Fauci on COVID origin and masks.14 Tulsi was groomed by WEF in the "Forum of Young Global Leaders" but suddenly was disappeared, and not because she turned 38 (41 in 2023), the WEF cut-off limit for “young”, freemason Macron (45) is still in the search results. Fremason Trudeau, 51, isn’t, but is listed in weforum.org15, while Tulsi has been erased from there, in Apr 2022 (she independized from the Democratic party in Oct 2022).16 Maybe this was the drop that filled the cup: she’s against CBDCs and social scoring.17
https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community
Idiocy, conspiracy or idiotic conspiracy?
15 Feb 2022. Christofer Cole, FDA Executive Officer of Countermeasures Initiative: “The drug companies, the food companies, the vaccine companies.... so they pay us hundreds of millions dollars a year to hire and keep the reviewers to approve their product.” “If they can get every person required to get an annual vaccine that is a recurring return of money going into their company.”1 By focusing on one tree (money), people miss the way out of the woods.
Any crime detective must ask the whys, "what is there to be gained, and who and how is going to gain it?", “what’s the real motivation when there’s nothing to gain”? And here’s where most fail: they can’t explain the motive behind international coordination without a money trail. Some even fail to acknowledge it even if it’s in their face because it implies changing their world model upside-down:
How was it possible that mainstream media in different countries would cover news with the same scripted template, being the only difference the inclusion of local comments from the same pre-approved pool each time?
Why were all dissident scientific and medical voices ignored, censored and prosecuted by all levels of power, even universities and medical associations?
Can you rationally explain why those politicians who didn’t receive a cent from vaccine manufacturers have supported blatant constitutional violations?: quarantining the healthy, shutting schools and churches, vaxxing pregnants and children, nano-chipping the population, etc.
Is there a pandemic of a very contagious stupidity virus? Or is it a lunacy pathogen?
Is there a pre-requirement of being a sociopath or a psycho-path to occupy any level of authority?
Why do secret societies of satanists and luciferian masons need secrecy and impose obedience on their members under the threat of losing their easy jobs, easy money, livelihoods or lives?
What do they have to hide in secret?
Why are they freely allowed to benefit fellow accomplices with power seats, especially within Government, infiltrating all places of power?
Why are they allowed to act as one man in controlling central banks, supposedly opposing political parties, supreme courts, listed corporations, supposedly antagonist media, etc.?
Occam’s razor leaves only one logical answer: the global coup is run by masons.
When there's a confession of a crime, you need no more proofs. They expose their devious plans out loud and they put their money where their mouth is. The money trail proves they walk their talk with billions.
Yet, when there’s no money trail/profits, what else than freemasonry could explain precise coordination in 100+ countries (government agencies, politicians, judges, corporations, media, military, police, secret services)?:
• Why did the freemason President of France and freemason Fauci fund gain-of-function in Wuhan, supposedly being China THE enemy?
• Considering they control almost all listed corporations, they lost trillions with the lockdowns (they don’t care, they forge money).
• Unlike previous PLANdemics, it wasn't about selling billion$ of snake oil to governments, but about shoving it through your veins. This was most obvious with child and pregnancy haccination:
The PLANdemic wasn’t about the rich getting richer but about a global power grab. Only freemasonry can explain infiltration and coordination of all positions of power, especially, where there was no money trail. Why else do they need to be a secret society?
The more you study, the more smoke you can find from the smoking gun, not gun, cannons. Conspiracy-skeptics and cabal-deniers can't explain why those powers are spending billions in de-carbonisation, injected Bluetooth nano-routers, 5G, chemtrails, toxics, war-on-meat, gender ideology, paedophilia, robot-philia, human rights for the non-human persons (animals, AI robots), etc. Even if they admit the de-population progrom, they can’t explain the push for in-vitro fertilization, which contradicts depopulation.2
If they just took time to read, they’d find it is proven beyond any doubt that the satanic digi-tatoship wants to murder 95% of mankind, while there's no democracy, when all parties are under freemasonic orders and pockets (n.b. democrats and RINOs).
A school mate confessed: “Your argument looks all right but if I go that way, I won’t be able to enjoy life.” Some are unwilling to enter the rabbit's hole because they know that they won’t find wonderland at the other end, just nightmare-land, THE end of our world. Just as Cypher in Matrix movie, they’d rather forget all of it and live the good life (good lie) rather than join the resistance in a painful David-Goliath war “doomed to be lost”, as if being in denial would prevent their own extermination: better be a happy self-uninformed skeptic, than a responsible realist.
The next threats and the solution:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
In that substack, free ebooks and... something huge !
Why is Klaus Schwab wearing a Romulan uniform?