From your vantage point, can you describe the nuts, bolts and gears of the apparatus that has so successfully choreographed the medical community into a school of fish?
The obvious conclusion (if it would have been stated) would have negated acceptance of this paper. Perhaps this is an example of how to get the truth (the data) published in this cancel culture.
Yes, the level of censorship seems even higher than before the data showed how vaccination increased the risk of disease, hospitalization and death. I am still looking for the paper by Dr Christian Muller et al on 777 health care workers 18-39 years old that demonstrated elevated troponin levels in 100% of the cases indicating heart damage in everyone in the study. Seems the search engines have eliminated it from the record. If anyone finds the study, would love to get the link. Thanks!
I find it baffling that the authors can get away with lying in their conclusions. They must be assuming that no one will look at the actual data and therefore their false conclusion can be in line with the narrative. They do know they are lying and one has to wonder why they are willing to do so.
This is reminiscent of what happened when Andrew Hill did the same thing with his conclusions about ivermectin.
Thank you for this! It is crucial to have alternative sources of expert data, opinion and interpretation, especially given today’s environment.
Thank You to Dr. McCullough !!!
From your vantage point, can you describe the nuts, bolts and gears of the apparatus that has so successfully choreographed the medical community into a school of fish?
You know what they say about data. It can be spun to the gullible but this is a dangerous game with lives in the balance. Great article.
The obvious conclusion (if it would have been stated) would have negated acceptance of this paper. Perhaps this is an example of how to get the truth (the data) published in this cancel culture.
Yes, the level of censorship seems even higher than before the data showed how vaccination increased the risk of disease, hospitalization and death. I am still looking for the paper by Dr Christian Muller et al on 777 health care workers 18-39 years old that demonstrated elevated troponin levels in 100% of the cases indicating heart damage in everyone in the study. Seems the search engines have eliminated it from the record. If anyone finds the study, would love to get the link. Thanks!
Thank you for your clear analysis of this study.
I find it baffling that the authors can get away with lying in their conclusions. They must be assuming that no one will look at the actual data and therefore their false conclusion can be in line with the narrative. They do know they are lying and one has to wonder why they are willing to do so.
This is reminiscent of what happened when Andrew Hill did the same thing with his conclusions about ivermectin.