12 Comments

Just a simple comment on giving multiple vax in ONE shot:

-- If you wanted to cover up the effects of one ingredient, inject it with lots of other stuff so the there is huge interaction between them.

-- Statistically Designed experiments in industry purposely keep the number of variables to the minimum level so "confounded variation" does not obscure the results and interpretation has more significance.

-- Having 2 or 3 vaccines + adjuvants + no controls is a recipe to make forensics impossible

ANY scientist who has EVER performed a REAL experiment KNOWS by now that the FDA does not have human interest in life at heart.

Expand full comment

Another reason why they may be given combined.

Expand full comment

My grandson(whom I have raised) got the big doses of thimerosal in vaccines as he was born in 1997.

Attemps at chelating and removing the mercury have always failed. During chelation, we have seen mega doses of other toxins come out like aluminum, cadmium, lead and even tin etc etc. The likely inference has always been that babies and toddlers given vaccines with mercury and having a genetic predisposition to not be able eliminate it quickly from the body-that after 2 weeks the mercury will corss the B/B barrier and later enter all the organs of the body where removing it has been virtually impossible. The genetic predisposition I've always read about has been low glutathione levels and thus having an effect on a good methylation system(plus the MTHFR gene)plus being born with high levels of testosterone. He was diagnosed with autism at age 2, but showed earlier signs of it prior to age 2. He's now 25 and although he is ever so much better, I have yet been unable to completely recover him. Verbal repetition has become his biggest stumbling block. (PANS, PANDAS. I know they are now doing clinical trials with suramin(Bradstreet's challenge before he died) I am still unable to get a hold of it to try). May God bless the millions with autism that our government, Pharma and most doctors have ignored for 25 years.

Expand full comment

I would be interested to know if one could volunteer as a "control" subject. I know several families who have opted to not vaccinate their child because of the vast amount of evidence that it is NOT safe (that it is in the words of Merck (Pfizer) "unavoidably unsafe". If they could volunteer their status as a control subject maybe they wouldn't have to deal with all the prejudice they are experiencing from pediatric providers. It's really a damn shame.

Expand full comment

What a GREAT avatar.

I'm Dying! Nobody can beat that. LOL, thanks for the huge belly-laugh!

Expand full comment

May ALMIGHTY GOD IMMENSELY BLESS you, Dr. McCullough, for your COURAGEOUS and SACRIFICIAL search for and pronouncements of TRUTH! You are one of the few Heroes that gave my husband and me the information we needed to stand for TRUTH during the past three years even during duress of my husband possibly losing his job IF he did not submit to receiving the COVID-19 shots. And now you are willing to start shining LIGHT upon the EVIL that has been perpetrated upon our INNOCENT, VULNERABLE children via the childhood vaccine schedule. BRAVO!

Expand full comment

Thankyou, Dr. McCullough!

Expand full comment

With more money to throw at the "DEFENSE" on this children's medical topic than a London Bank,

They will do all they can "NOW and FOREVER" to protect this guarded income stream to VAXX anything with a pulse as "GOOD" medicines. We seem to be finding this fact to be .GOV "FICTION".

Expand full comment

The number of childhood vaccines has increased exponentially over the last 25 years. An accumulation of mercury should be questioned.

Expand full comment

It's not a very good Business Model is it? Folks are ringing the ALARM BELL globally.

All the while the MIS/DIS/- informational highway is being re-routed and detoured into an up and rising abyss. This is programmed and forced Adminn Addictions into poor health.

Expand full comment

Good point. Builds up-maybe.

Expand full comment