161 Comments

Unfortunately, a debate with ABC moderators is kind of as expected. For Kamala, it’s just smoke and mirrors because we all know what she represents!! She won’t be calling the shots in the White House and things will be business as usual, keeping the border open further destabilizing the United States, Continuing foreign wars, supporting the WHO, not dismantling our bought and paid for agencies like the FBI, the FDA, And supporting agenda 2030. The list goes on and we all know it. If you were waiting for a debate to see who you’re gonna vote for you really have no idea what’s going on behind the scenes.!!

Expand full comment

Did you catch it when she referred to "Obiden"? They know who is really running the show and will continue running it should she be elected.

Expand full comment

I'm so glad you mentioned it because I heard it and asked others and they didn't notice her saying it -- but now I know for sure! She said Obiden -- she said to DJT, "You're not running against Obiden!" -- She is beyond obnoxious - whining, sniveling and full of junior high school girl wisecracks.

Expand full comment

That's funny because I heard that too but I wasn't sure.

Expand full comment

...and what about President Trump saying, "And she put out". eeeeeeeeeeeeee

Expand full comment

Yes, I heard that, and what's funny? You think it wasn't intentional. Of course she meant it. You're just too hateful to know she was referring to just your biased and racist idea that Obama is running the show. Get real, fool. Obama's long in the rear view. But it's nice for Dems that you're so lost in the past with your racial hatred toward Obama. That's why you go back to him, as if he's running the show, with such disgust. You hate it that a black man was in office. So sad to see, so obviously of the racist party, the RNC.

Expand full comment

Wow Doc, you nailed it! I can't imagine a world where everybody thinks at such a high level as you so obviously do. But you forgot to capitalize Black. Please don't forget to do it in every single one of your future comments, it makes me too sad to see it not done here. Perhaps you can edit your comment to correct this awful horrible mistake (which I pray was a mistake) and restore my faith in humanity? Thank you in advance Doc, you are amazing with an amazing heart except for that lower case "b" in a place that should contain an upper case "B"! As you know! But obviously just forgot! I hope! I really really hope! Have a great day! Just kidding! Have the Greatest Day Ever.... IF you correct this mishap.

Expand full comment

Wow. You’re obsessed with race. Pathetic.

Expand full comment

BOTH SIDES are waging the SAME "divide and conquer" strategy. By lowering expectations to near-zero, then tossing the unwashed masses a few juicy crumbs, WE THE PEOPLE are led to believe things MIGHT be ok soon.... Which ever side "wins", they are BOTH puppets controlled by the SAME puppet masters, - The GREG B.'s, - the Global Ruling elites & Global Banksters, the Billionaire Boys Club.... See, BOTH Trump & Harris aren't really THAT BAD, now are they????....

Expand full comment

I think President Trump actually loves this country and its people. Things were better for most Americans when he was president.

Expand full comment

You're out of your mind. What history are you reviewing? He was a fool who accomplished nothing except a TAX CUT FOR THE RICH.

Expand full comment

Not a supporter of trump but he did lower taxes across the board, which will expire soon. He also

Expand full comment

It's hard to effect a tax cut for the bottom half of our population because they PAY NO NET TAXES! All you're doing it repeating warmed-over leftist drivel. Say something orignal.

Expand full comment

I KNOW I heard the moderator guy slip & say "Vice President Trump", in the first minute or 2....

Expand full comment
Sep 11·edited Sep 11

Yes he did refer to President Trump as Vice President Trump.

Expand full comment

Exactly!!! When will people understand this?

Expand full comment

Sadly, thanks to decades of lies and omissions by the mainstream media, a substantial part of our population has no idea what is really going on behind the scenes. As for last night, the complicity of ABC and the "moderators" of the debate in covering up Kamala's endless lies did not help things.

Expand full comment

What lies are you referring to? The ones made by Trump?

35,000 lies counted while he was in office, or about 350 per day. And you call her a liar?

Expand full comment

I looked up a list of the Trump lies when they were at 2000 and began investigating them. I reached 11 and then stopped because it was a waste of time. Not one of the 11 was a verifiable lie. Some were true, some were opinions (which,for those in doubt, are never lies). I knew then that it was all phony. However, the list of lies about Trump is very long indeed. Kamala trotted out a lot of those.

Expand full comment

Doc, methinks you need a new brain. Your current one isn’t functioning. The only lies told in the debate were too numerous by Kameltoes and the complicit ABC dunces who never fact checked K once!! Cheer up. A brain lobotomy will do you good!

Expand full comment

I thoroughly enjoyed the play, although the book was better.

Expand full comment

Valuable comment. I agree with the smoke and mirrors. Disappointed with most of the other people’s comments.

For me…I would say that ABC did not provide Kamala with the questions. Rather…I firmly believe that SHE related to them everything she wanted to present. ABC made this possible.

Expand full comment

Her Nova H1 earbud earrings were key to her being able to sound like she knew what she was talking about, as she was being fed what to say.. also having the questions for weeks, so she was prepared for the debate.. The lies she spewed were typical..

I wish President Trump had done better instead of letting that lying

B*+€# get under his skin.. but it is what it is, she needs to be exposed and they better check Walz for earpieces…

Expand full comment

I hope someone really checks out the earring situation -- am wondering about that!

Expand full comment

I was about to point out that if there is another debate she is not allowed to wear earrings!

Expand full comment

That's so funny, Lisa.. Yes, he didn't do well. He allowed her to manipulate him into spewing cat stuff. But you make excuses for him. It wasn't her, Lisa. It was full on Trump the Chump. You got a good helping of his 5th grade intellect. You want that Chump in the Oval Office, talking about immigrants eating cats and dogs, then you have no standards for presidential acuity.

Expand full comment

Dear Doc Pruyne -- your prunes will be stewed when you learn more about Springfield's wildlife population decreasing -- maybe you should eat a helping or two -- of prunes that is. Might do you some good.

Expand full comment

Oh Nadine, you are so nice to put it in those terms.

That's what Trumpers are forced to do: attack the poster. You can't respond to the substance of my post, so you attack me. Typical lack of ability to argue the fine points of an argument or situation. But you still lack a candidate who gives a shit about Americans.

BTW, you do know that Trump was trained by Roy Cohen, legal counsel to the NJ Mafia? You know that, right? And you still vote for him? Uh ... there's something you're missing, and it's so big I'm left with the impression someone else has to tie your shoes for you, at least when discussing presidential hopefuls.

Expand full comment

You are ill with hatred -- so you can't help but spread it around hoping it will infect others. You probably can't stand peace on earth with no wars; enough affordable food and fuel for everybody to enjoy, safety in our homes, you may like boys being girls and girls being boys no matter the harm, you must really enjoy defunding the police leaving innocent people in constant jeopardy and at the hands of other evil people. Seems to me that you just want everyone to be as miserable as yourself. Do you glory in all of the Ukraine and Russian deaths? Do you thrill at the idea of the forever wars? Does it taste good to you?

None of the above was in our lives when DJT was president and it will stop again when he is re-elected. But the idea of suffering and deprivation is what you'd rather have -- doesn't make sense to individuals of normal sensitivities.

Expand full comment

🤣😂🤣

Expand full comment

From the sounds of it, you are a David Muir fan.

Trump was systemically abused by the moderators and Kamala got a free pass. Your opinion sucks.

Expand full comment

That was to be expected. Kamala won by looking coherent for a change.

Expand full comment

No, Kamala won because we got a full on helping of Trump the Crazy Cat Nut.

She didn't have to sound smart because he sounded like a blithering idiot. Immigrants eating cats? Please. That's what he would focus on while in office, stupid stuff.

You who like Trump are desperate for someone other than the Democrats. That's accepted. But Trump? You would do better with your average 5th grader.

Expand full comment

President Trump can hire people to be “genteel and restrained” as appropriate. We the People need a champion to fight like the Brooklyn Brawler he is…"genteel and restrained" will not vanquish the godless, soulless enemies…”both foreign and domestic".

Expand full comment

Could not agree more! He’s authentic and he’s a fighter…what you see is what you get. He didn’t dodge a single question. He is not a politician - he is real. And his love for our country is real. He took a bullet for his beloved country. Why can’t people see this? If he was “genteel and restrained” he could never deal with all he has had to endure. Genteel and restrained? Nope. Give me a fighter anyday.

Expand full comment

Although you are entitled to your opinion it was disappointing to read your comparative this is not a cocktail party. Although I don’t take debates seriously because MSM is controlled by the elites/globalist . It wasn’t obvious to you that she was given hall passes was not fact checked and had an earpiece in.

Expand full comment

Let’s face it, despite the 3-on-1 pile on, Trump could have done a better job. If it had been Vance, Desantis or Gabbard, Kamala would have been pulverised because she has no substance. All she does is lie.

Expand full comment

Vance has lost the centrists already, and that's who he needed to secure ... so he failed in his one big job in the election. Walz is going to make him look stupid too, just like Harris did last night. Hard to defend a whack job like Dolt45.

Expand full comment

And if you want to look at the dark reality, voter integrity will be gone completely and you may never have a conservative candidate. Come close to victory ever again.!! They’ve already usher in socialism and it will continue full speed ahead if Kamala is elected without a doubt!! Yes she will want to take your guns!!! Just another lying point for this administration!!

Expand full comment

If the moderates to conservatives in this political arena (theatre) do not wake up to the awareness that our meanstream media has been infiltrated by marxist ideologues & those that have sold their souls to demonic globa”lusts” - then we will continue to see this mess created & encouraged by the socialists agenda.

We need to quit coming into their ballpark to play an already “rigged” game!

Expand full comment

Trump was woefully unprepared. His team failed to get him ready for snake handling. It would have been better to send him to a snake handling church in the South for lessons. He knew what to expect but was sadly off his game. He allowed her to act like a wacky attack snake and appear to get him angry. He failed to simply point out her failings. Rather than become defensive, which is not his style, he should have gone on the attack with a smile and sense of humor. His prep people got him off his game. He could have visualized he was speaking to a rally crowd and he would have been fine. Once again, he is harmed by bad advisers.

Expand full comment

He screwed up like the dummy he is.

Harris didn't win that debate. Trump lost it. She manipulated him handily. The American people again saw how our enemies manipulated him into doing nothing. Kim Jung Un and Vlad are his buddies, so he did nothing to impinge on their war hawk acts.

Chump has ZERO acuity on the international stage. You just don't want to admit that.

We needed someone other than Harris or Trump. We needed someone untainted by past hatreds.. I don't know if anyone exists like that in the U.S. today. It sure aint you. YOu're blinded by hatred to where you lost touch with reality in the effort to defend the terrible performance of your guy.

Expand full comment

Because the general consensus from the Trump camp is that Kamala is a giggly incoherent dingbat, too many went in with this idea that she would be embarrassed by him. Including myself, believed her lack of media interviewing showed fear, weakness and an inability to perform. The right wing media certainly is to blame for helping to cement those beliefs. We only had to go back to her previous debates and see that she was indeed capable despite being annihilated by Tulsi Gabbard. Trump needs to play a different card at this point.

Expand full comment

It’s the economy, Stupid!

Remember that?

Expand full comment

She's happy to debate him again. Bring it on!

Unlike most commenters on here, you actually admit they all underestimated Harris. Uh ... didn't anyone remember she was the AG of California? What skills do you think a prosecutor develops? Apparently the whole Trump war machine wasn't smart enough to notice this blatant and obvious predictor of good debate skills.

Trump doesn't debate. He blathers. We saw his debate skills last night. Non-existent. You want that verbal turd machine in the Oval Office? Then you're crazy. That's why he went overseas and fawned over fat boy Kim Jung Un: he loves thugs and despots.

What did he do for the economy? Why ... he DID get a tax cut for the rich through Congress. By golly, I think that was to beenefit his own family, not yours and mine.

What you see in him is your own desperation. You don't see who he is or what he's done, including rape 16 yo girls. I read that transcript and that's what he is: a rapist.

You vote for him and you condone rape. That's as simple as it gets.

Expand full comment

That's why he is gungho for Israel and Netanyahu. And Netanyahu's son offered his girlfriend to his buddies for money.

Expand full comment

I thought Kamala was an over dramatic actress and I don’t believe much of what she said. Nor do I believe she will govern like she said last night. I predict it will be much worse than Biden.

Expand full comment

During the 1992 USA Presidential campaign, Ross Perot observed that: "a general lack of accountability among elected officials and those in the bureaucracy is the one specific reason that the people of America suffered…. and our only means of correction is to inspect their work and hold them accountable.”

Mr. Perot went on to note that this can easily be done with computer programs.

He called it: THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL.

“It is only logical that it will become our Fourth Branch of Government”, he said.

Objective reality:

the voting members of the US Congress and the State Legislatures do not have enough time to read, comprehend or debate any of the laws they vote on. They vote 100 times a day, every five minutes, while in session.

Approximate absolute facts:

Every day that the Congress and Legislatures are in session 100 new bills are introduced and distributed.

The representatives are given two weeks to review the bills before they are brought up for The Vote.

Two weeks into the session they begin voting on the Laws that were previously introduced, while newer laws are introduced.

Many of these bills are in excess of two thousand pages.

The arithmetic demonstrates that the elected representative does not have the time to even read the name of the Law much less the content of it.

Since the Representatives cannot evaluate 200 thousand pages of law speak per day, they vote the way their Party advisors tell them to vote.

This demonstrates that Representative government does not exist.

Thus, they have forfeited their delegated obligations to us, The Citizens. And the only way to prevent these over worked and fallible people from making even more tragic mistakes, from which we, and the rest of the world, might never recover is to include ourselves in the final decision-making process.

The Electronic Congress

How it works:

Before a new law, tax, or expenditure can be put on the books it must first be Ratified by the Citizens.

Existing laws can be Annulled by the same super majority required to Ratify them.

This program can be applied to every level of government and will ultimately solve every problem we have.

To prevent chaos, the basic law, our Constitution and Bill of Rights, would be exempt from review.

Mr. Perot speculated that the Founding Fathers would probably have done the same had the technology been available in their day.

Just imagine:

With a new understanding we will also be able to accommodate new proposals initiated by us, The Citizens, for program and infrastructure improvements.

We, The People, could actually direct the priorities and review the progress of the major agencies like the: CDC and NIH as well as the libraries, school boards and local police departments.

If our government truly is of the people, by the people and for the people then this is the only way forward.

Expand full comment

The Springfield Ohio situation is disgusting -- there will be more investigation into that mess, I hope.

Expand full comment

ABC fact checkers stated that killing a baby after birth occuring is not legal in the US. But I do not believe that is true -- someone, meaning ME, -- someone should check the NYS Reproductive Health Act passed in Cuomo's administration around ten years ago -- I believe that it allows a baby to die after the moment of birth (baby's head cresting through the cervix) -- it was framed in murky descriptors about things like the emotional health of the mother and what the doctor and mother think, say or feel. I think the Trump team should know about this.

Also -- nothing about her taxing unrealized or imagined gains was brought up.

Expand full comment

You're referring to partial birth abortion, where they drill a hole through the skull after the baby crowns (starts showing). It's disgusting and I do believe it is allowed in some states.

Trump may have been correct, but he's still a total dipstick.

Expand full comment

Just hit unsubscribe. Mc'ulloigh needs to free himself from Leake

Expand full comment

Yes, Leake is a b.s. artist and so so as a novelist. I know, I'm a novelist too.

Expand full comment

Why would you say that, when you are subscribed?

Expand full comment

WTF?

Expand full comment

The good war may already be lost if too many people think it is important to be genteel and restrained, rather than strong and fighting back with everything, when the demons are already knocking down the gates of our civilization. If it really is the case, that there are fence sitters who only need a low bar fake performance from an avowed evil Marxist in order to vote for them, then we may already be doomed. (Fact check - All Marxists are evil). Stupid humans are actually our worst enemies.

Expand full comment

If you had any doubts about Kamala acting for the camera- you didn’t see the “ real” Kamala last night- not ONE cackle- ( which is not her), but ALOT of 😳 and fake forced expressions on her face when Trump spoke! Remember, they had to send her to debate school for a week, and help her memorize her lines, while Trump was dealing with their political lawfare the week prior!

One other thing I noticed- the fake news commenters were saying that Kamala drew reactions from Trump- that he fell for her when she “ baited” him- I would rather see a genuine, strong reaction to an ignorant “ gotcha” comment- than a spineless one! Trump’s strong emotional responses show genuine feelings and it showed when he talked about the subject matter- he had heartfelt responses! Trump loves our country, Kamala “fake loves “ our country-to whomever she can try to convince with her acting!

Expand full comment

He should understand the basic concept of "Keep your powder dry" or in other famous words "Pick your battles". He responded like a teenager to her teenager insult about his rally attendees leaving early. He could've & should've laughed that off and gone on to answer the question posed in that moment, on which he could've devastated her. Instead he took the rally-crowd bait. That's a character flaw. I love the guy and believe that America is lost if he doesn't win. But a flaw is a flaw. We all have 'em. His just matter more than mine or yours.

Expand full comment

I think a lot of people confuse his “ correcting” her lies with responding like a teenager! “ Tit for tat”- in actuality he is correcting by pointing out that people don’t leave his rallies but she has to pay people to come to hers! He also commented on other BS she threw out- like the military, the lawfare, the illegals- he responded to her lies and “ corrected” her facts- why would he not? He needs to people to understand actual truth- not responding would allow a lie to continue or at least put doubt about Trump’s actual facts! I think he was spot on- as time will tell- plus the media pretty much ran her narrative and agenda for her - so he got hiccuping points in responding to her lies!

Expand full comment

The most devastating assassin is the one who can act with cold resolve.

Expand full comment

Cold resolve is a turn off to Americans- they want real love! Cold resolve may be calculating, but they forget when you’re a politician- the public can weed out fake from a Mike away- Kamala was about as fake as it got last night! ( not including her microphone earrings)!

Expand full comment

All I can say is I desperately hope you are right and Americans resonated with his righteous anger not her smiling lies. She is a vile disgusting monster who told lie after lie completely unchallenged by the "moderators". Immoderate moderators! I was boillng as hot as Trump was, last night. But again, for America's future he has a higher standard to meet.

Expand full comment