301 Comments

No science or history knowledge was required. It was simple: no long term studies, minuscule death rate, change of definition of vaccine, the body language and messaging was inauthentic. It was bizarre. Suddenly it’s ok to bribe people to take an experimental therapy? Remote workers mandated to take it? All one needs is common sense.

Expand full comment

The common sense part is hard to come by for most. Remember the mini bribes, burger and fries coupon with the vax or stuffy maybe some ice cream for the kiddies that were vaxed. To me it was bat shit crazy and hard to comprehend the compliance. Many thanks to Dr McCullough and others.

Expand full comment

For those of us coming from the left, it was especially hard to comprehend the party which had fought for respect for people's rights, including the right to body sovereignty (including female and reproductive sovereignty) and to be free from coercion, suddenly saw nothing wrong with forced injection of an experimental substance into others' bodies!

Expand full comment

Yes. And coming down hard on free speech. It has been eye opening.

Sinclair Lewis warned in 1936 in his book, “It Can’t Happen Here,” that totalitarianism would come from the left, not the right, in America. He was a liberal Democrat.

Expand full comment

And then there is Jonah Goldberg's "Liberal Fascism."

Expand full comment

It always does!

Expand full comment

It's consistent. They also saw nothing wrong with forcing a baby to go through an abortion procedure. (They were advocating death for babies that were so advanced in the womb that they could have lived outside the womb, so yeah, these were definitely babies.)

Expand full comment

Yes, it’s consistent. Their ultimate goal always is DEATH. They may package it as Freedom or Safety but in reality the end’s the same.

Expand full comment

Neither the first nor the last time you'll see that.

Both "sides" do it.

[The concept of sides is a fabrication they trot out for election cycles]

Expand full comment

It was astounding. It truly was astounding.

Expand full comment

I would be very hesitant to invoke the past tense here. This may be a mere situational maneuvre to disguise the enemy.

Expand full comment

I still don't understand why the party of theadamantly? easily and quickly took that position...What convinced "all" the Democrats to feel that way, and defend it so adamently? Many groups were given lots of money, but why did the "regular" people of the Democrats defend it so quickly and adamently (because they did and still do)?

Expand full comment

trot out trump , and anything he's saying the left had to automatically do the opposite , it worked probably even better than they hoped

Expand full comment

divide and conquer for 1000 , oh look it's the daily double ...

Expand full comment

In terms of what we consume as political party "news",

these issues can be summarily identified as utilizing sanctioned dis-information,

also known as "propaganda".

But how a particular "party" - and more accurately - ideology, comes into power needs to be examined by each of us

desperately!

Easzy peazy to simply watch the newly released CHD movie series [Never Again is Now Global,]

It illustrates in great detail how the sheer scale of murderous & unthinkable atrocities committed by all those complicit w the certain political infamous party of the 1930's - all began with "accepted" dis-information for a decade plus.

The same type of "scientific" propaganda, or at least utilizing the same types of resources of prestige and power: universities, FDA/CDC - people losing their careers/jobs NOT for differing in opinion so much as giving voice to contradictory evidence.

People like my loved ones who say that I am "exaggerating."

Who believe the masks and injections they've committed to MUST have a benevolent intention - despite weakness of evidence.

They don't appreciate that we would all still be wearing masks in grocery stores or worse (look at Asia) were it not for some individuals that have been standing up against the unlawfulness while we still can.

Expand full comment

I think it's their "belief in science". They really have no clue how science is full of occultism.

Expand full comment

Years of prep: making the use of Round Up a point of pride; making mult-billion dollar media platforms seem like local news; making "us" against "them"; making fake reasons to invade a country and kill a million of them; making academic journal editors/reviewers seem like scientists, making questioning injections pejorative; making supporters of anyone not lock-stepping w supra-national agendas (deep state )"ignorant"; making your diet addictive and disease supporting; making flu shots "mandatory" for the prior 5 years (by your corporate employer); making PizzaGate about a restaurant; making belief in a prime creator an intellect-Scarlet Letter; on & on & on

Expand full comment

I remember when the Republicans were the party representing big business, like pharmaceuticals, Roundup, etc. It has changed from the time of "true" liberalism like Robert Kennedy, Jr. is today, suing Big Pharma. I was always an independent.

Expand full comment

Party discipline has been intensified ever since Obama such that it doesn't take more than an instant for the minions to feel which way the wind is blowing and align themselves accordingly. It is true that we do not understand either the depth of psychological control possible among human organizations, nor the role of fear in making that control possible.

Expand full comment

They are corrupted

Expand full comment

You said it!

Expand full comment

But look on the bright side, the stolen cells of our Preborn Brothers and Sisters were used in the creation and/or testing of the shots.

Expand full comment

I am absolutely for female bodily sovereignty, and that means HER choice on continuing a pregnancy, or not. But I am appalled by the medical industry profiting from abortion. Or placental tissue after a woman gives birth -- said to bring a lot of money, which she never sees, though it's HER tissue being sold off!

Expand full comment

Baby boomer women aborted 50 million children, so they could have it all!

Expand full comment

Remember the 70s Virginia Slims commercials?

I can bring bring home the bacon

Fry it up in the pan

Cause I'm a Woman,

W-O-M-A-N.

Yep. I came of age then. We were supposed to earn the bacon AND fry it. 😆

Expand full comment

How about the tissues and organs of her aborted child being sold for steep profits? More concerning than her placenta.

Expand full comment

“though it’s HER tissue being sold off!” Do you mean the placenta itself or the placenta and the Baby?

Actually, we know the Baby’s body with it’s separate, unique DNA is also being sold off. (Even the placenta pertains to the sustenance of the Child, not the Mother though shared, as no Woman spontaneously grows one on her own, regardless what’s done with it afterward.) Science proves all of this. Pregnancy involves at least two people: The Mother and the Child, unless there’s multiple Babies in utero. Ask an Obstetrician (or an Embryologist) why they say they have two Patients in a pregnancy.

Think about this: If the slaughtered Preborn Human Child is a boy, for example, he has male DNA. Are you claiming he’s merely the Mother’s body? If that’s what you’re saying, that’s absurd.

Expand full comment

Bridget, not sure if your reply was to my comment or this post, but I was referring to the tissues of the unborn infant, who is killed, and his or her organs and tissues are sold for profit. THAT is the true concern. But beyond that, the placenta is the mother's and her consent for its use for anything needs to be obtained.

Expand full comment

Nope. It's her body until the baby is viable, general born. Yes, the fetus is a part of the mother's body. We do not commandeer bodies other than those of pregnant female people, but perhaps we should, by your logic: IF I need a kidney to function, I should be able to just get your spare taken out and put into me, right? Or I could tether myself to you and use yours for my filtration purposes, that should be fine! But we don't do that. Body sovereignty. Simple concept. Whether anyone likes it or not, they have no right to tell another what to do with their own body.

I grew two ultimately-independent beings within my skin. It was awe-inspiring every step of the way. And it made me realize that no way in hell (it would be hell) should any woman or girl ever be forced to carry a fetus to term against her will. During two very wanted pregnancies is when I became the fierce defender of female human body sovereignty!

I eat meat, the most humane I can find, but it still involves death. I kill bacteria without remorse. Heck, I even eat whole carrots, the greens and the root, with never a thought about the end of that being's lineage. Life involves death.

Life involves death. Let it not be needless, of course. And if a woman is pregnant against her will, against her health, against her own very basic needs and wishes, she has every right to end the life of the being inside her as she needs to. Her sisters and wise women around her will help her. As it should be. Women's bodily sovereignty, period.

Expand full comment

Everything gets corrupted which is why we need morals. It is morally wrong to kill....a baby

Expand full comment

Same with blood donations...plasma being sold off

Expand full comment

Dr. McCullough has been a shining lighthouse of competence, compassion, and sanity. Thank you to you also, John Leake.

Expand full comment

and just sheer knowing , unfaltering , unwavering , just brilliant

Expand full comment

Thank you Transcriber B for posting your profoundly informative transcriptions that capture the actual human exchanges that provide valuable evidence in exposing the truth that is our mission.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your kind comment, and I am so glad that you read them.

Expand full comment

sending Love & Hugs along with my deep gratitude for all that you do for our brothers and sisters who are suffering that their voices will be heard..

Expand full comment

It was like a Happy Meal, featuring an experimental medical treatment as the main course.

Expand full comment

Did you perhaps mean to write experimental 'maniacal' treatment?

Expand full comment

😄

I don't eat McDonald's, and the ONLY reason I'd participate in a clinical trial would be that I'd run out of options.

Expand full comment

Remember the Happy Meal toys? The shots were the "free" toys. Nothing's free.

Expand full comment

BCS for short. Oh yeah.

Expand full comment

Let us recall also other definition changes, including that previously done to 'pandemic' in making even a common cold useful to a collection of banksters and billionaires, long infiltrating governments with trained agents and purchasing power over media and other influences, all toward exerting global totalitarian control under a new definition of the WEF, et al - via the money-hungry WHO - as 'Global Governance'.

All while destroying global public and ecological health, under the claim of 'saving' it.

Expand full comment

Thank you for mentioning "public health". It was this COVID fiasco that convinced me that (1) there is no public health in America and (2) this is by design.

Expand full comment

MC

With respect, your comment indicates that you used more than common sense.

Edit: But it seems to be the case that the more educated people are the more willing they were to accept what the government and medical establishment were claiming rather than using their common sense.

Expand full comment

Discernment is different than common sense and I do think it was more discernment than common sense but I’m not sure how widely know discernment is... both for sure.

Expand full comment

Mass formation was a critical part of this nightmare 

Expand full comment

You got that right. I’m not buying I didn’t know. They knew but they chose to push the snake oil and be on the invite list.

Expand full comment

Wasn't John Leake speaking of 2020 before the vaccine? When a few doctors (Zev Zelenko, RIP, McCullough, and others) realized that "Covid" could be successfully treated with Hydroxychloriquine, and Ivermectin?

Expand full comment

Agree. And lack of the kind of education one gets these days may actually be advantageous. No indoctrination please.

Expand full comment

They disregarded natural immunity! It wasn’t hard to see!!!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Feb 1, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I've read that they insist that people have the first two 'platform' shots for the 'extinct variants' prior to the 'boosters', which I therefore suspect ARE/have been the next phase.

Although there have been so many differences between/within batches, that the secret ingredients in each jab seem very difficult to sort out, in those 'illegally' attempting to study these tech transfer gene-jabs.

And, at the nano-level, all kinds of unintended genetic and other material is also GOING to be incorporated with any genetic material intended to be genetically-engineered into our cells, this being an ongoing issue with 'new and improved' crispr-types, as well as all other attempts at sneaking genetic sand into the works of Life's time-tested-and-true functionality, for each individual of each species.

While disrupting/destroying the unmentioned symbiosis with so many other internal/external organisms on which life depends, as well as that with all of interdependent life forming the natural self-sustaining life support system.

They seemingly want to 'increase human performance' in converting any human survivors into (cheaper than immediately setting up for manufacturing enough robots, I've read somewhere, in the past) indefatigable AI-run meat-bots needing little food, rest, sleep, but we keep (luckily, considering) dying on them.

What are these predatory parasites going to do once they've finishing killing off humanity and destroyed the ability of the planet to support life, having cleared off all of the 'messy biological' stuff that formed the self-sustaining life-support system consisting of life?

Not that I think the perps'll survive to the end of that, either... they're also biological creatures making themselves entirely tech-dependent on a once-fecund world they're making inimical to Life.

Perhaps they feel that if Mars is unsurvivable, they might as well turn Earth into Mars and play-pretend with their Google-Glasses on until the whole mess starts glitching or their 'independent AI' decides they're the last bit of biological mess to clean up from the planet?

But they are deliberately destroying the entire gene pool of the entire Earth, as we speak, and soon anything still capable of reproduction will be unable to breed true or have healthy off-spring - unless we - somehow - stop this NOW.

These lunatics are RUINING the only asylum for Earth Life, playing at 'Mad Scientism' while delusionally thinking they 'play god'. And we're LETTING them?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Feb 2, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Thanks, hadn't seen this one - how would they even get an oxygen and nourishment-supplying imitation-umbilical cord into the baby, starting as an embyro? Delicate surgery - and the cord would have to grow with it?

Indeed! Can't make any of the billionaires have a sad!

Typical that the WEF, et al, bankster/billionaire delusional psychopaths insist there's a need to drastically reduce the human population, while at least one is claiming that their created drop in population is concerning to the point where synthetic replacements must be 'grown' - presenting this as the future of pregnancy and giving birth, and as 'helping' those made infertile by them, due to the damaged and perverted foreign and pathogenic genetics that they have imposed on these people, have a 'genetically theirs' genetically-engineered synthetic 'baby, while they destroy any future for humanity/natural Earth Life... Opposite Day, all the way down...

Although, apparently, their pod-carried synthetics don't have to even look human, just be 'intelligently designed by themselves to suit their own various labour or other needs; the pods are to provide their fantasy 'Brave New World'-type manufacturing facilities with synthetic, tireless slaves - and not for the convenience of human women who want to keep their figures, as was initially floated, when I first saw these pods being presented.

These are to replace us with their own synthetics/synthetic-machine composites.

At least that was the sort of thing that various of their self-experimenting techie nutters (who disappeared not long afterward, at least from my view) were discussing on some sites I was looking at, way back when, in following links supplied in articles or comments beneath those.

One of these turkeys was discoursing with relish on how whatever remained of 'the masses' (other than themselves) were to become ugly little gnomes, almost too stupid even for the most menial jobs, while they'd be tall and proud masters, updated regularly and enhanced (rather than merely used as meat-bot tools) by AI... and that seemed to be a theme on that site.

That lot and many of their brain-washed stooges seemingly think that they can actually survive (without other Earth Life forming the natural life-support system) in a mish-mash concept of sci-fi dystopia novels and try to con us into thinking that we can live as data-dots online in a virtual reality - absolute murderous insanity of the unimaginable kind...

Expand full comment

A few months before the presidential election someone said to me that if Biden wins he will make the "vaccine" mandatory - which I (internally, silently) railed against as absolute BS - fear mongering! (to get you not to vote against tRUMP) ... Back then I wasn't even considering it was/would be experimental injection either - I was just thinking in a vein of basic constitutional rights and how ignorant my Right winger associate was.

A few months into the whole "roll out" some other alt source was saying the jab will make cancers potentiate en mass, and the gene editing tech CRISPR will be the new savior in the make-em-pay to get ill and really-make-em-pay to survive. Hhmmm - dark scenario I thought (back then.)

In December 2022 I heard a Primary Care Provider MD literally say , "CRISPR is the answer to cancer"..."except it's so expensive."

Right on cue !!!!!!!!!!!!!

F' scarey !! These people are NOT scientists or health care providers - they have got to be zombies. You have to question every thing cause they sure AF will not.

Expand full comment

Exactly right. One didn't need to be a doctor or scientist to recognize that something was very wrong, if not at the outset then soon thereafter.

But you did need to know something about human nature and have at least some skepticism of government and state power. Which students of history ought to have.

Expand full comment

I was already skeptical only because of past abuse & neglect by the medical industrial complex.

Expand full comment

As soon as I got wind of a vaccine in the making (I was in the healthcare industry) my intuition said “no way”.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Feb 1, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

No......I had just put in for retirement. So many of my friends were pressured into getting the shot. Many had terrible side effects and had to visit the ER. Makes me so angry!

Expand full comment

Isn't that enough, lol? I suspect that we'd mostly already had enough... now it's well over more than enough!

Expand full comment

Exactly

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Feb 1, 2023Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

You're so right. I lived almost 30yrs in a fairly rural blue state. Maybe 15 yrs ago word was going around that the hospital was buying out all the independent practices in the larger town I was living and that it would become socialized. And that's just what's happened. I'm now living in a bigger state/city. One entity here owns 98% of ALL general practitioner offices here! Unbelievable.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Feb 1, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

👍

Expand full comment

'Shcuse me? Where's your degree in logic and epidemiology? Source for your comment?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Feb 20, 2023Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Definitely more wisdom from taxi drivers that professors, as a rule. Much more grounded in reality.

Expand full comment

I bet if challenged with the same mental flexibility test, a typical Cab Driver would outperform a typical Doctor.

Expand full comment

Thanks & sorry about your sister in law.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 31, 2023Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

You know, I am always ambivalent when people make statements like "if we don't learn from history, we will make the same mistakes over and over again".

Because, on the one hand that is true if you are talking about REAL history. But it is not true if you are talking about government's version of history. In fact, the latter is liable to make you support all sorts of crap that you never would, if you knew better.

Expand full comment

Damn good point! Thank you!

Expand full comment

So true🙁

Expand full comment

Who writes the history books used in public schools?

Expand full comment

The beloved uniparty.

Expand full comment

Progressives

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 31, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Preach!! I love it!

Expand full comment

What was communism called in 1824, before the writing of the Communist Manifesto in 1848?

Expand full comment

Lincoln freed the slaves. That’s some hate. He debated Frederick Douglass. I don’t accept your version of history.

Expand full comment

Most Americans do not know about Irish slavery, which was perpetrated by the British in N America, nor about the Irish holodomor, and the fact that Congress had to forbid the practice of having black male slaves impregnate Irish women, and girls as young as twelve, because the owner could sell mulattoes for more than the Irish.

Expand full comment

Where are my Reparations?

☘️

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jan 31, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Indeed! The lies will astound those that thought they knew history.

Expand full comment

I'm one of those white kids who picked cotton. Less fun than it looks like from the sidewalk. No regrets. My parents instilled in me a 1953 work ethic that serves me well to this day. Pleased to read some truth about NBF. Glad you know it and wrote it.

Expand full comment

I don't even have to go that far back into history. Most of the serious physical ailments I've had in my life have been IATROGENIC. A word everyone should know. One being severe repercussions from mercury poisoning from dental fillings. I could teach a course on it. Suffice it to say mercury is 2nd most toxic metal known to man. It does PERMANENT damage, it's a neurotoxin. It is also in the jab. The ADA owns the rights to silver/mercury amalgams. I've known this, and more, over 25yrs. Why would I expect the other medical institutions to be anymore trustworthy?

Expand full comment

In fact, United States' Life Expectancy has plummeted from Number 3 in 1960 to Number 46 today. How much is big pharma involved with this? Well, Dr. Barbara Starfield, MD’s article on iatrogenic disease, US Healthcare Third Leading Cause of Death is a start point. Fake news? Sorry, try another cliché -this was originally in JAMA https://ahrp.org/us-healthcare-third-leading-cause-of-death_barbara-starfield-md/

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Feb 1, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Yes, completely. Are you aware that the concept behind the IUD is to INFLAME the uterus thereby preventing pregnancy? I found that out the hard way as well.

Expand full comment

I have a titanium plate and four screws in my neck. Would hate to find out that, too, is toxic.

Expand full comment

I've read about Tuskegee, and found Dr. Mary's Monkey through the local library (SV-40 and much more). I now have Eileen Welsome's book reserved through my library system, too. Have you read The River, by Edward Hooper? Polio, AIDS, and all the inhumanity done in the name of science.

Didn't Rockefeller steal real medicine from the true healers to make his petroleum oil-based "cures"? And, I wonder, how many of our medical advancements are needed to fix the ills created by the industrial-monopoly model he ushered in?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Feb 1, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

At the risk of being told I am too literal, I will say that Trump DID listen to Navarro and Atlas. I've read both of their books. But they dodn't tell Trump to Fauci. All three of them realized that none of them had enough political power and sway to dump Fauci.

But we could have avoided the "nightmare" by reeling in Obama, or better yet, having never elected him, but "we" were too naive to do that.

Expand full comment

Oh yes..remember how we gave the pubbies the majority, and they never ever voted down Obamacare? That would have stopped a lot of this in its tracks.

Manchurian candidate indeed.

Expand full comment

Have we finally learned that Fauci was a necessary player in the development of our biowarfare country ? That the DOD and CIA would always protect him? He could not have been fired, you would have had to dismantle the years of bioweapons research the US has been doing ...we are now the number one bioterrorst entity in the world. Congratulations to US.

Expand full comment

'The River' is hard to come by as it is out of print, so is pricey, I got mine on eBay

Expand full comment

Excellent post. Thank you

Expand full comment

I suspect that these people who are suddenly changing their tune are continuing the psy-op. It’s to dampen our anger while making them look as if they still have credibility. They still lead the narrative while deflating the opposition. A stage-managed controlled revealing of some of the truth to keep the masses under control. We’ve seen a few of these lately. It seems they have their new talking points.

Expand full comment

And don't this 'reveals' serve a very important goal of keeping us all believing our lives were at stake?

I start to consider to believe the suddenly tune changers only when they mention very cleary there has not been a serious treat at all.

Or ar least that everyone with some parts of the brain functioning correctly, could have known medio 2020 that there was not a pandemic, and no more lives where at risk as with a common flu.

Furthermore I might start to trust those changers if they mention the fact that most people who could know better about the fact there was no threat at all, didn't know that because of 'trustfull people' like virologists, WHO members, etcetera who did knew better, took care of hiding the facts. And that those people didn't tell others there was not much to worry about, or the fact that well functioning save cures were present already, but instead choose to tell people horror storys about covid, as well as the effective cures were forbidden to use by doctors to cure their patients. And of course mention the fact that everyone who did their job, by telling the world about the absence of threat, was being deleted, declared officially an idiot at least and censored by an army specially working on keeping the lies real, and reality hidden

Expand full comment

They rarely get past my bs detector. I've had too many bad experiences.

Expand full comment

The author's tone was condescending. (In fact, I wonder if there is really one author or if there is some committee hiding behind the man's name.) He didn't so much apologize for what he participated in as point out that the filthy masses weren't listened to, so now we are testy and don't trust our betters. He plays the class warfare game, pitting scientists/doctors/"elites" against people he views as less educated. Even his reference to those like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya was really only meant to highlight his point about "vulnerable communities" that he looks down on. Sure, he admits other opinions should have been listened to. But people like Dr. McCullough and others have more than opinions. They have facts, and they've been right way more than they've been wrong. The author still embraces his views as orthodoxy, and as far as I can tell, hasn't admitted he was wrong about them.

Expand full comment

I agree. He is a ‘doctor in waiting’. A doctor’s registration could be checked. His can’t be. A testing of the waters on behalf of the medical community using ‘Kevin’ as cover.

Expand full comment

I wrote my own comment before I read yours. Same. I agree.

Expand full comment

I will say one thing for him, he was willing to take many truckloads of rotten tomatoes from all sides.

Expand full comment

It just felt wrong. Right from the start. There are those times when you just know something is off without being able to explain, and then the pieces start falling in place in time. Its that right-brain spidey sense that really needs to be paid attention to and is almost always right. Early 2020 was one of those times, a raging 4-alarm wake up call to let intuition lead and set the pace.

Expand full comment

Agreed. Felt too much like the ridiculous campaign to invade Iraq as a "response" to 9/11 -- and I've been completely vindicated in both cases for my opposition to the large majority of opinion at the time of these issues unfolding.

Expand full comment

And the Warren Commission.

Expand full comment

👍

Expand full comment

"Vaccines didn't save humanity and they never will." Like most doctors, I carried a blind belief for many years that vaccinations were necessary, safe, and effective. Like most doctors I never lifted a page to find some other truth for myself. But unlike most doctors, I had no interest in maintaining false paradigms and am no longer in debt to governments for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Unlike most doctors, I have the means to survive with or without my medical license because I have another career to sustain me in the event of a bad scenario.” - Dr. Suzanne Humphries with board credentials in internal medicine and nephrology.

“The Covid-19 Pandemic story makes little sense when viewed through the lens of health, safety and science. “Viewed through the lens of money, power, control, and wealth transfer, however, then all of it makes perfect sense.” - Michael Bryant in Off Guardian.

“Corporate greed vs. human life: it didn’t stop them with cigarettes, it didn’t stop them with asbestos, it didn’t stop them with Teflon, it didn’t stop them with chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), HCFCs, halons, the ozone-depleting substances (ODS)… that is, until it did. But it takes public awareness and action. And the government is no better. Think the 1932 Tuskegee Experiment – lasting up to 40 years - on 399 men with syphilis. So what did the disgusting Rochelle Walensky of the CDC say about one of the worst human rights violations of the 20th C? ¬– Anonymous web poster

The death of George Washington, Dec.1799 is also instructive. Dr. James Craik, Washington’s doctor for 40 years, along with two other doctors, did all, per History.com, that would be equivalent to the FDA today: tried bleeding him multiple times, giving him herbal teas and an enema. Washington nearly choked to death when the doctors had him drink a concoction of molasses butter and vinegar. Craik also applied a toxic tonic to Washington’s inflamed throat to cause it to further blister (another misguided “cure” at the time). They believed all of these remedies would draw the “bad humours” out of his blood, but nothing worked. Stupid? What will they say 200 years from now about our Covid antics? Will it perhaps be another chapter in Charles Mackay’s 1841 study of crowd psychology Extraordinary Popular Delusions & the Madness of Crowds? Could this generation be added to the Tulip Mania, The South Seas Bubble (where even Isaac Newton lost a bundle of money), or the Mississippi Bubble?

Expand full comment

Yes...indeed...this is what it is all about

Very good comment Thank you very much. The only question remaining is 'what 'necessary' treatments/whatever don't we need either?

Or even far better: think of us not needing anything till it is really proven. And that means in a real scientific way.

Expand full comment

Anyone know what happened to Dr Humphries? Is she still alive? Her website was still active when I was researching some things in 2021 and early 2022 but nothing on it was very current. I read excerpts from her Dissolving Illusions book and was very impressed but if she’s alive why hasn’t she spoken out?

Expand full comment