As an unvaxxed (and potentially uninfected) person, I wish that there was information as to how much of these risks are relevant to those of us who might be subjected to spike protein shedding from the vaxxed. The amount of information that would be relevant to shedding seems woefully sparse. At this point, most unvaxxed are spending a good deal of their time around those who are vaxxed. What are the risks? What are the consequences? Is there any scientific data that discusses this????
The hypothesis, or is this confirmed, that each exposure of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein increases the risks for cardiovascular, neurological, immune system, and hematological complications. Is there any current research that quantifies the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein increases risk with each exposure? Does the risk increase linearly, exponentially or some other function? Are the risks of exposure to the virus the same as an additional dose of vaccine? Given the vaccine introduces a large amount of mRNA (spike protein) immediately to the body versus a gradual exposure, via nose or mouth, to the spike via a natural infection, it would reasonable hypothesis to expect the vaccine has increased risk relative to a natural infection. How can this hypothesis be tested? I certainly would not participate in any trial that would require a mRNA shot and for that matter I prefer not to get a natural infection as well.
My sister in law (healthy out door tennis player skier mountain climber age 77 who we expected to live into her 90’s like her parents) died in January from cancer which was suddenly everywhere in her gut after being jabbed. The cancer docs said the cancer had beefed there 5 or 6 years before it suddenly went wild. No discussion could take place around vaccinations as I am unvaccinated which was ‘problematic’ for the family. Now friend has been diagnosed with lymphoma of the bone marrow. Again mentioning the shots would be a no no. Am I making all this up
It would be really significant if they could distinguish the long-Covid effects coming from infection, versus those coming from the vaccine. Thanks for keeping us updated!
"Only careful epidemiologic and laboratory analysis". The first item is difficult given the bias among many researchers. Labs can be expensive so without adequate funding don't get done. If the funding sources (NIH) have their minds made-up, the funding isn't there. Profits before people, right?
No matter what the vaxed will just blame the virus.
It is to be hoped that the truth will be revealed.
As an unvaxxed (and potentially uninfected) person, I wish that there was information as to how much of these risks are relevant to those of us who might be subjected to spike protein shedding from the vaxxed. The amount of information that would be relevant to shedding seems woefully sparse. At this point, most unvaxxed are spending a good deal of their time around those who are vaxxed. What are the risks? What are the consequences? Is there any scientific data that discusses this????
The hypothesis, or is this confirmed, that each exposure of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein increases the risks for cardiovascular, neurological, immune system, and hematological complications. Is there any current research that quantifies the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein increases risk with each exposure? Does the risk increase linearly, exponentially or some other function? Are the risks of exposure to the virus the same as an additional dose of vaccine? Given the vaccine introduces a large amount of mRNA (spike protein) immediately to the body versus a gradual exposure, via nose or mouth, to the spike via a natural infection, it would reasonable hypothesis to expect the vaccine has increased risk relative to a natural infection. How can this hypothesis be tested? I certainly would not participate in any trial that would require a mRNA shot and for that matter I prefer not to get a natural infection as well.
My sister in law (healthy out door tennis player skier mountain climber age 77 who we expected to live into her 90’s like her parents) died in January from cancer which was suddenly everywhere in her gut after being jabbed. The cancer docs said the cancer had beefed there 5 or 6 years before it suddenly went wild. No discussion could take place around vaccinations as I am unvaccinated which was ‘problematic’ for the family. Now friend has been diagnosed with lymphoma of the bone marrow. Again mentioning the shots would be a no no. Am I making all this up
It would be really significant if they could distinguish the long-Covid effects coming from infection, versus those coming from the vaccine. Thanks for keeping us updated!
"Only careful epidemiologic and laboratory analysis". The first item is difficult given the bias among many researchers. Labs can be expensive so without adequate funding don't get done. If the funding sources (NIH) have their minds made-up, the funding isn't there. Profits before people, right?
Bam
Onward----->