No way to know. Apparently a bunch of execs were being accused of insider trading and that they hadn’t revealed a govt investigation to shareholders. Maybe someone was worried about what Thompson may say under oath. Who knows? I’m just saying that writing those words on bullet casings seems like such an obvious way to get everyone thinking it was a disgruntled customer. That may be true. Or it may not be. But when I watched video of the actual shooting, the suspect appeared to be VERY comfortable with his gun and VERY calm in the way I’d imagine a professional hitman would be. If it was some one-off angry customer, I’d expect the video to look more like the anxiety-ridden shooter vids I’ve seen online.
Misdirect from what? If this murder was NOT motivated by denial of an insurance claim, what was the motive? It the murderer was a professional hit-man hired by someone else, what was the motive of that someone else? What was the victim doing -- besides denying insurance claims -- that brought forth such a calculated and apparently professional murder?
Misdirect suspicion of the motive. Some time ago… maybe ten now… there was a slew of suspicious doctor and scientist deaths… ie., found dead in river w knife wounds immediately labeled suicide. So no investigation. I found about three hundred suspicious deaths. Sure some of them may not have been murders. But, some of these scientists and docs were also researching highly profitable diseases. There are many cases of the pharmas to also just destroy careers or have research stolen and researchers arrested. There was a Merck case in Australia over a pain killer that was eventually taken off the market … it was basically killing people… some doc was publicly critical of the drug, vioxx. The execs were caught plotting on how to destroy his career. It was explained to me by a door who left allopathy for homeopathy, that the ins cos are in bed w the pharmas. At any rate, the industry operates like a 1980’s mafia movie. So it could be that this guy pissed off one of his cronies or was about to sing or something. And since these people are all about deception and covering up their crimes… they can set it up to make it look like the murder was conducted by a disgruntled customer or some group or point to some patsy. Happens all the time. If the police investigators don’t consider this… they should be fired. But there’s nothing we can do about it except look for clues and point them out. If you don’t understand just how criminal these people are. I suggest you begin to look for evidence. But if you want to dismiss my findings. Hopefully you will take care of your health and avoid playing Russian roulette with the allopathic snake oil industry. Good luck!
Potentially plausible, subject to further investigation. About the mafia-like nature of the drug industry, no doubt. Perhaps we will learn the song that the victim was prepared to sing, if that was the cause of his demise.
Probably the gun did not jam. More likely it failed to cycle in between shots. And most likely the reason for that was he had equipped it with a suppressor. This is a common side effect of suppressors. So when the gun did not cycle on it own, he had to cycle the action manually by pulling back on the slide in order to put another round in the chamber. He had clearly practiced using this gun with a suppressor and knew that would happen and was prepared for it.
The CEO who he shot is reported to have been using AI to deny claims for over a year to boost bottom line profits. Lawsuits in process. Seems to fit that it was pay back! Nothing new. BCBS didn't pay for the birth of my first two children because of the tight rules of how long you needed to be pregnant before delivery. Scamming the policy holder with rules that favor the medical insurance behemoth is not new! Just more sophisticated so they don't have to hire more medical reviewers! That's why his salary was 10 million per year. Overachiever that was clever. My view!
why would a "pro" not change to a higher pressure ammo?
seems odd to me like he picked up some subsonic ammo. but then shot the guy right in front of a witness, so what was the point in running sub ammo suppressed?
of course it could have just been a stolen gun and a piece of junk.
Subsonic ammo with a suppressor is extremely quiet and it will not cycle the gun so it becomes single action. I think, but have no experience, that regular ammo with a suppressor would cycle normally. But I noted that some "experts" claimed that the guy was collecting the casings as he was firing, so surprised that he supposedly left these 3.
Not everyone who can be hired to do a thing is a pro. Also, even if they are, not all pros are equally capable.
While admittedly, one would think someone with these concerns to set a higher bar for professionalism, there's also the need for deniability and likely more than a couple of Fixers acting as go-betweens. And with each degree of separation, the tier of skill/ability is bound to downgrade.
Agreed. The other possibility is that he's not a pro at all, but rather someone blaming the CEO for a personal injury and carrying out his personal sense of justice. Personally, I'm surprised Pfizer buildings/staff aren't being targeted by aggrieved victims from all the jab injuries.
A slower moving projectile will probably do more internal damage as it will deviate on its course through a body while a higher velocity bullet is more likely to go straight through and actually cause less damage. For example a .22 short will do more damage on a human brain than a .22 long rifle. Again the higher velocity bullet is likely to pass right through while the short will ricochet off the inside of the skull and bounce around causing more damage.
Apology in advance for the length, but necessary to illustrate a point.
I work in a place open 24/7 with high public traffic with patrons aged 21+ that is upon rare occasion targeted for robbery. Our security dept. is staffed by RDC's (Retired Donut Cops) who are further hampered by the (mostly woke) corporate owners being intensely adverse to litigation of any sort. So anyone non-white gets a lot more leeway than they deserve, either as patron or employee.
Even so, the State law states when someone is wearing a hood on site and **interacting with employees of any sort** (I stress this part because if they aren't interacting with employees, they are to be left alone) , we are to ask them to pull it back. If we catch any flak, we explain its State Law, and if that doesn't settle them down we immediately remand them to Security. State law also states, any employee at any time may stop and ask for a ID, failure to provide one, regardless of age, results in the person being escorted off property. This is all in case of violence or crime for the security cameras have ample opportunity to capture a image that can be used to identify the individual.
During the Plandemic, my State had a mask mandate, ranging from the mass face diapers to dust masks, bandanas, etc. And people wondered why I lampooned the mandate and refused to comply except at work (I also did my research about masks and plenty of facts on hand to debate the matter). We got a lot of strange looks from patrons wearing ski masks being asked to roll them back enough to expose their ears.
When the property opened for business again, I was transitioned into management and in a meeting I brought up the question of how do we comply with the state law if everyone is wearing a mask? And also, how do we protect ourselves against violence and crime if we can't identify a individual? I pointed out, that with the mandate, the normal public awareness of what to be suspicious of was going to be flipped off, and paired with a hood, makes the possibility of crime much greater as such "camo" will embolden those with predatory dispositions. I also pointed out (label me as you will, but the fact stands), a greater proportion of Black male patrons, particularly of the 20-45 age bracket, wear hoodies than any other demo. I caught flak from the HR rep for saying that, till the two Metro Detectives shut her up by backing me up confirming I'm merely stating a cultural norm of the demo.
We were told, the DHS issued a memo to all businesses that while the mask mandate was in place, *anything* that covered the ears was to be removed, and the staff is supposed to prioritize approaching anyone wearing any ear covering articles, including anything that complied with the mandate, and instruct them to remove it or leave. If we have a event, to do the usual non-resistance policy and contact Metro. I found that interesting. I have a friend in the local DHS office, so I called him and asked why that memo allayed Corp's concerns. He informed me that ears are as unique as a face, and is easily captured by surveillance software.
We had a total of 11 events while the mask mandate was in place (compared to the 1 every 18 months or so), because a mask and hood were now deemed no longer suspicious by the public conscious. They came "in camo", regular patrons ignored such signs and though the staff was diligent, the moment such individuals were approached about lowering their hoodies, out came the guns. There were a few shooting incidents, though most were threatening gun waving with Metro pouncing on them as they exited or cornered by the upgraded *real* security in the form of moonlighting cops. None of these incidents made it in the news because that's how business is done here. Of note, draw whatever conclusion you wish, but **every** event was perpetrated by a Black male wearing a deep hoodie.
My point in sharing my little story is, the mask mandate was not only a farce, it has dumbed down the public's danger sense, situational awareness, and I dare say, "public intelligence" (both of which in my cynic's opinion is on the low end to begin with). I *still* see people wearing them here and there. The only good thing about it is they're flagging themselves as NPCs to be avoided, and depending on how much of their head they're covering, alerting me to loosen my concealed carry.
It is a civil right - a Human Right! - to see free faces in public! International courts have ruled this! As recently as August, 2019, the expectation to see unmasked faces was declared a Human Right by the European Court of Human Rights...just months before they were mandated by pandemic insanity. ECHR declared that it is a human right to look people in the face in public, not hidden under cloth or piece of clothing, not even under a mask. Because of crime, public safety concerns. Yes, the ECHR said that wearing masks in public was ILLEGAL! But that was then. And another example of the purely political nature of "science"-based law. Changeable at the whim and caprice of a ruler. We didn't realize that human rights are that easily disposable until 2020. Had they adhered to their prior rulings crime wouldn't be high, and victims wouldn't be dead.
"Judges at the European court of human rights (ECHR) have upheld France's burqa ban, accepting Paris's argument that it encouraged citizens to "live together". The law, introduced in 2010, makes it illegal for anyone to cover their face in a public place...the law was not aimed at the burqa or veil but any covering of the face in a public place... ...The European judges decided...that the preservation of a certain idea of "living together" was the "legitimate aim" of the French authorities. Isabelle Niedlispacher, representing the Belgian government, which introduced a similar ban in 2011 and which was party to the French defence, declared both the burqa and niqab "incompatible" with the rule of law. Aside from questions of security and equality, she added: "It's about social communication, the right to interact with someone by looking them in the face and about not disappearing under a piece of clothing." The French and Belgian laws were aimed at "helping everyone to integrate", Niedlispacher added."
Burqa bans, headscarves and veils: a timeline of legislation in the west
"On August 1, 2019, the “Act Partially Prohibiting Face-Covering Clothing,”also known as the “Burqa Ban,” entered into force in the Netherlands. The Act prohibits the wearing of clothing that completely or partially conceals the face in spaces where people are expected to communicate with each other. Thus, face-covering clothing is banned on public transportation and in educational, governmental, and nursing care institutions, but is still allowed in such public spaces as on train platforms. The ban applies to burqas, niqabs, full-face helmets, balaclavas, and masks, but not to headscarves."
I can always count on you FF to have thoughtful and informative input into a discussion =) Thank for expanding my education, I didn't know about any of that.
I will keep my opinions of Burqas and what they are mostly intended for to myself. But all the above is telling about the steps that were necessary resulting from a mass "migration" (planned invasion IMO to destroy national identity).
Very interesting and informative Comment -- premeditated murder of an insurance executive enabled in part by ill-advised masking, thereby obscuring public awareness of suspicious behavior. Another of the many unintended consequences of allowing public health morons to run amuck with our civil liberties.
IMO good intentions often pave the road to hell. I'm always highly suspicious of any who laud the good they will achieve without discussing the details of how or why a thing is done and its permutations. *Especially* if their answer is "its too complicated to go into now", that's almost always been a signal that they either don't know what they're truly doing, or that I won't like the answers and expose them.
This guy that was murdered was ONE person. What about the millions of people big pharma and the medical system have murdered over the last few years? They count just as much as this guy does. A professional hit man? The same thing could be said of big pharma CEOs and many doctors as well as government employees.
All true. If criminal charges are not taken out on the Medical Licensing Colleges, and the unelected health policy makers for truth and Justice in the Supreme Courts, for the mandated masks, and mandated Covid-19 mRNA or DNA jabs, not yet with a Moratorium on all six or seven Covid-19 vaccine makers and suppliers, can we expect lone wolf vigilantes?
They would be unprofessionally trained, and their life may be not joyful, if living without their mate, or children, who may have been killed by a drug or an injection...that would not heal or cure Covid-19 or prevent it, or the spread of it.
Silent complicit politicians will be on their list, too. Example, Crooks had on his list both Trump and Biden. Both were his enemies, for whatever reason Crooks made them his targeted enemies.
The added weight of the suppressor lessons recoil, negatively affecting the ability of the weapon to cycle. The shooter understood this, and was prepared to manually recycle.
After 9-11 the city was blanketed with full spectrum street surveillance cameras with live feed to command centers.. it's impossible to believe they can't back track the guy for at least an hour before the event.. in key areas around City Hall - Wall Street - Times Square etc there are both DHS and NYPD cameras so footage is captured by FEDs too.
I do find it odd though, that someone who seemed to be so well prepared on various levels, walked into a Starbucks to get a coffee and took his mask down on top of that. Did he pay with his credit card or his registered Starbucks card so he gets his points? Something doesn't seem right with this...
…it will probably come to light that he left his passport behind too. That seems to happen far too often, especially in scenes of destruction where intact passports or personal IDs are miraculously found…intact and unblemished…
New York City is a place with many weird people. I say this as having grown up and lived much of my adult life there. Wearing a face mask is not going to draw any scrutiny at all.
The differences in the various photos appear enough to cast doubt these are the same person. Until suspect(s) are in custody and interrogated, speculation runs rampant. Seems if the perpetrator escaped on an e-bike into Central Park, there must be some surrveilence or video or clues that can lead to an arrest? solid evidence is the key to confirming the who. The why remains unknown
I agree with the red herring. It’s the wife. CEO was under investigation by the DOJ and had recently dumped 30% of his stock. She’s richer when he’s dead than when he’s alive. How is that for a stretch?
It's the question that must be asked first: Who benefits from his death?
The (estranged) wife was reported as saying her husband had received (unspecified) "threats." She speculated the murder may have been motivated by a denial of benefits, if I recall correctly. That sounds like a redirection to me. Why would she even speculate at this point or speak to reporters?
The reason the gun appears to jam is probably because the shells had lower power loads to deduce the noise, and I suspect the assailant might be already dead if it was a order hit...... They probably get rid of the hit man...... it looked like he got into a car to me....
If I were a professional hit man hired by the Deep State, I’d write “deny, delay, defend” on bullet casings to throw the public off my scent.
I was just about to comment a similar suggestion. A woman pretending to be a man pretending to be a woman. Ref… the film ‘Victor Victoria’
What was the motivation then?
No way to know. Apparently a bunch of execs were being accused of insider trading and that they hadn’t revealed a govt investigation to shareholders. Maybe someone was worried about what Thompson may say under oath. Who knows? I’m just saying that writing those words on bullet casings seems like such an obvious way to get everyone thinking it was a disgruntled customer. That may be true. Or it may not be. But when I watched video of the actual shooting, the suspect appeared to be VERY comfortable with his gun and VERY calm in the way I’d imagine a professional hitman would be. If it was some one-off angry customer, I’d expect the video to look more like the anxiety-ridden shooter vids I’ve seen online.
Makes sense.
The motivation to misdirect.
Misdirect from what? If this murder was NOT motivated by denial of an insurance claim, what was the motive? It the murderer was a professional hit-man hired by someone else, what was the motive of that someone else? What was the victim doing -- besides denying insurance claims -- that brought forth such a calculated and apparently professional murder?
Misdirect suspicion of the motive. Some time ago… maybe ten now… there was a slew of suspicious doctor and scientist deaths… ie., found dead in river w knife wounds immediately labeled suicide. So no investigation. I found about three hundred suspicious deaths. Sure some of them may not have been murders. But, some of these scientists and docs were also researching highly profitable diseases. There are many cases of the pharmas to also just destroy careers or have research stolen and researchers arrested. There was a Merck case in Australia over a pain killer that was eventually taken off the market … it was basically killing people… some doc was publicly critical of the drug, vioxx. The execs were caught plotting on how to destroy his career. It was explained to me by a door who left allopathy for homeopathy, that the ins cos are in bed w the pharmas. At any rate, the industry operates like a 1980’s mafia movie. So it could be that this guy pissed off one of his cronies or was about to sing or something. And since these people are all about deception and covering up their crimes… they can set it up to make it look like the murder was conducted by a disgruntled customer or some group or point to some patsy. Happens all the time. If the police investigators don’t consider this… they should be fired. But there’s nothing we can do about it except look for clues and point them out. If you don’t understand just how criminal these people are. I suggest you begin to look for evidence. But if you want to dismiss my findings. Hopefully you will take care of your health and avoid playing Russian roulette with the allopathic snake oil industry. Good luck!
Potentially plausible, subject to further investigation. About the mafia-like nature of the drug industry, no doubt. Perhaps we will learn the song that the victim was prepared to sing, if that was the cause of his demise.
We may never know.
Probably the gun did not jam. More likely it failed to cycle in between shots. And most likely the reason for that was he had equipped it with a suppressor. This is a common side effect of suppressors. So when the gun did not cycle on it own, he had to cycle the action manually by pulling back on the slide in order to put another round in the chamber. He had clearly practiced using this gun with a suppressor and knew that would happen and was prepared for it.
Thanks for this, Nina! Very plausible explanation! Regards, John Leake
The CEO who he shot is reported to have been using AI to deny claims for over a year to boost bottom line profits. Lawsuits in process. Seems to fit that it was pay back! Nothing new. BCBS didn't pay for the birth of my first two children because of the tight rules of how long you needed to be pregnant before delivery. Scamming the policy holder with rules that favor the medical insurance behemoth is not new! Just more sophisticated so they don't have to hire more medical reviewers! That's why his salary was 10 million per year. Overachiever that was clever. My view!
why would a "pro" not change to a higher pressure ammo?
seems odd to me like he picked up some subsonic ammo. but then shot the guy right in front of a witness, so what was the point in running sub ammo suppressed?
of course it could have just been a stolen gun and a piece of junk.
Subsonic ammo with a suppressor is extremely quiet and it will not cycle the gun so it becomes single action. I think, but have no experience, that regular ammo with a suppressor would cycle normally. But I noted that some "experts" claimed that the guy was collecting the casings as he was firing, so surprised that he supposedly left these 3.
Not everyone who can be hired to do a thing is a pro. Also, even if they are, not all pros are equally capable.
While admittedly, one would think someone with these concerns to set a higher bar for professionalism, there's also the need for deniability and likely more than a couple of Fixers acting as go-betweens. And with each degree of separation, the tier of skill/ability is bound to downgrade.
Which brings up the possibility that he's a patsy, not a real pro, and the folks who hired him might have planned to do away with him.
Agreed. The other possibility is that he's not a pro at all, but rather someone blaming the CEO for a personal injury and carrying out his personal sense of justice. Personally, I'm surprised Pfizer buildings/staff aren't being targeted by aggrieved victims from all the jab injuries.
as is the norm
A slower moving projectile will probably do more internal damage as it will deviate on its course through a body while a higher velocity bullet is more likely to go straight through and actually cause less damage. For example a .22 short will do more damage on a human brain than a .22 long rifle. Again the higher velocity bullet is likely to pass right through while the short will ricochet off the inside of the skull and bounce around causing more damage.
Oh yeah - waaaay too easy in my opinion. Shell casings with three words? I'm sorry this screams "plant".
they did track him to the park. park is big...!
Apology in advance for the length, but necessary to illustrate a point.
I work in a place open 24/7 with high public traffic with patrons aged 21+ that is upon rare occasion targeted for robbery. Our security dept. is staffed by RDC's (Retired Donut Cops) who are further hampered by the (mostly woke) corporate owners being intensely adverse to litigation of any sort. So anyone non-white gets a lot more leeway than they deserve, either as patron or employee.
Even so, the State law states when someone is wearing a hood on site and **interacting with employees of any sort** (I stress this part because if they aren't interacting with employees, they are to be left alone) , we are to ask them to pull it back. If we catch any flak, we explain its State Law, and if that doesn't settle them down we immediately remand them to Security. State law also states, any employee at any time may stop and ask for a ID, failure to provide one, regardless of age, results in the person being escorted off property. This is all in case of violence or crime for the security cameras have ample opportunity to capture a image that can be used to identify the individual.
During the Plandemic, my State had a mask mandate, ranging from the mass face diapers to dust masks, bandanas, etc. And people wondered why I lampooned the mandate and refused to comply except at work (I also did my research about masks and plenty of facts on hand to debate the matter). We got a lot of strange looks from patrons wearing ski masks being asked to roll them back enough to expose their ears.
When the property opened for business again, I was transitioned into management and in a meeting I brought up the question of how do we comply with the state law if everyone is wearing a mask? And also, how do we protect ourselves against violence and crime if we can't identify a individual? I pointed out, that with the mandate, the normal public awareness of what to be suspicious of was going to be flipped off, and paired with a hood, makes the possibility of crime much greater as such "camo" will embolden those with predatory dispositions. I also pointed out (label me as you will, but the fact stands), a greater proportion of Black male patrons, particularly of the 20-45 age bracket, wear hoodies than any other demo. I caught flak from the HR rep for saying that, till the two Metro Detectives shut her up by backing me up confirming I'm merely stating a cultural norm of the demo.
We were told, the DHS issued a memo to all businesses that while the mask mandate was in place, *anything* that covered the ears was to be removed, and the staff is supposed to prioritize approaching anyone wearing any ear covering articles, including anything that complied with the mandate, and instruct them to remove it or leave. If we have a event, to do the usual non-resistance policy and contact Metro. I found that interesting. I have a friend in the local DHS office, so I called him and asked why that memo allayed Corp's concerns. He informed me that ears are as unique as a face, and is easily captured by surveillance software.
We had a total of 11 events while the mask mandate was in place (compared to the 1 every 18 months or so), because a mask and hood were now deemed no longer suspicious by the public conscious. They came "in camo", regular patrons ignored such signs and though the staff was diligent, the moment such individuals were approached about lowering their hoodies, out came the guns. There were a few shooting incidents, though most were threatening gun waving with Metro pouncing on them as they exited or cornered by the upgraded *real* security in the form of moonlighting cops. None of these incidents made it in the news because that's how business is done here. Of note, draw whatever conclusion you wish, but **every** event was perpetrated by a Black male wearing a deep hoodie.
My point in sharing my little story is, the mask mandate was not only a farce, it has dumbed down the public's danger sense, situational awareness, and I dare say, "public intelligence" (both of which in my cynic's opinion is on the low end to begin with). I *still* see people wearing them here and there. The only good thing about it is they're flagging themselves as NPCs to be avoided, and depending on how much of their head they're covering, alerting me to loosen my concealed carry.
It is a civil right - a Human Right! - to see free faces in public! International courts have ruled this! As recently as August, 2019, the expectation to see unmasked faces was declared a Human Right by the European Court of Human Rights...just months before they were mandated by pandemic insanity. ECHR declared that it is a human right to look people in the face in public, not hidden under cloth or piece of clothing, not even under a mask. Because of crime, public safety concerns. Yes, the ECHR said that wearing masks in public was ILLEGAL! But that was then. And another example of the purely political nature of "science"-based law. Changeable at the whim and caprice of a ruler. We didn't realize that human rights are that easily disposable until 2020. Had they adhered to their prior rulings crime wouldn't be high, and victims wouldn't be dead.
France's burqa ban upheld by human rights court
The UK Guardian, July 1, 2014
https://archive.fo/Eg2vw
"Judges at the European court of human rights (ECHR) have upheld France's burqa ban, accepting Paris's argument that it encouraged citizens to "live together". The law, introduced in 2010, makes it illegal for anyone to cover their face in a public place...the law was not aimed at the burqa or veil but any covering of the face in a public place... ...The European judges decided...that the preservation of a certain idea of "living together" was the "legitimate aim" of the French authorities. Isabelle Niedlispacher, representing the Belgian government, which introduced a similar ban in 2011 and which was party to the French defence, declared both the burqa and niqab "incompatible" with the rule of law. Aside from questions of security and equality, she added: "It's about social communication, the right to interact with someone by looking them in the face and about not disappearing under a piece of clothing." The French and Belgian laws were aimed at "helping everyone to integrate", Niedlispacher added."
Burqa bans, headscarves and veils: a timeline of legislation in the west
UK Guardian, May 31, 2018
https://archive.fo/WinLY
Netherlands: Burqa Ban Enters into Force
Library of Congress, August 27, 2019
https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2019-08-27/netherlands-burqa-ban-enters-into-force/
"On August 1, 2019, the “Act Partially Prohibiting Face-Covering Clothing,”also known as the “Burqa Ban,” entered into force in the Netherlands. The Act prohibits the wearing of clothing that completely or partially conceals the face in spaces where people are expected to communicate with each other. Thus, face-covering clothing is banned on public transportation and in educational, governmental, and nursing care institutions, but is still allowed in such public spaces as on train platforms. The ban applies to burqas, niqabs, full-face helmets, balaclavas, and masks, but not to headscarves."
I can always count on you FF to have thoughtful and informative input into a discussion =) Thank for expanding my education, I didn't know about any of that.
I will keep my opinions of Burqas and what they are mostly intended for to myself. But all the above is telling about the steps that were necessary resulting from a mass "migration" (planned invasion IMO to destroy national identity).
Very interesting and informative Comment -- premeditated murder of an insurance executive enabled in part by ill-advised masking, thereby obscuring public awareness of suspicious behavior. Another of the many unintended consequences of allowing public health morons to run amuck with our civil liberties.
Perhaps not "unintended."
IMO good intentions often pave the road to hell. I'm always highly suspicious of any who laud the good they will achieve without discussing the details of how or why a thing is done and its permutations. *Especially* if their answer is "its too complicated to go into now", that's almost always been a signal that they either don't know what they're truly doing, or that I won't like the answers and expose them.
Utilitarianism. Utilitarian ethics. The noble lie. "For a greater good" is the eternal siren call for tyrants the world over,
And the npc’s probably have head phones in too.
This guy that was murdered was ONE person. What about the millions of people big pharma and the medical system have murdered over the last few years? They count just as much as this guy does. A professional hit man? The same thing could be said of big pharma CEOs and many doctors as well as government employees.
All true. If criminal charges are not taken out on the Medical Licensing Colleges, and the unelected health policy makers for truth and Justice in the Supreme Courts, for the mandated masks, and mandated Covid-19 mRNA or DNA jabs, not yet with a Moratorium on all six or seven Covid-19 vaccine makers and suppliers, can we expect lone wolf vigilantes?
They would be unprofessionally trained, and their life may be not joyful, if living without their mate, or children, who may have been killed by a drug or an injection...that would not heal or cure Covid-19 or prevent it, or the spread of it.
Silent complicit politicians will be on their list, too. Example, Crooks had on his list both Trump and Biden. Both were his enemies, for whatever reason Crooks made them his targeted enemies.
I think this was a professional hit man. He was too calm and collected to be an impassioned person out to avenge a wrong.
yeah but what’s with the leg shot? pros don’t hit you in the leg
That’s a good question. Did he want to look like an amateur or was he one? I am still thinking it was a professional hit man. We’ll see!
yeah so many layers of deception
He could have simply been your run-of-the-mill psychopath.
psychopaths enjoy their freedom too much
with all the inside knowledge on the meeting time and path of the target?
It was a shareholder's meeting, which was widely-known.
The "path of the target" the shooter knew about was within sight of the hotel where the meeting was held.
(Had he zapped the guy at the hotel he spent the night in, it would be hard to argue it wasn't an inside job.)
It seemed to be a deliberate targeted hit. While you may be correct, it doesn’t seem like the work of a psychopath to me. We’ll see. 🙂
The photo on the right looks like a woman
Does United Healthcare reimburse for Sex-reassignment surgery?
I thought it was a woman too.
Or trans
Wouldn't that be a switch, transgender murders CEO of insurance company that refused to cover something.
Yep..
That ‘yep’ 🔝 Was to a different post!
I thought red herring too-a paid hit with the 3 casings meant to make us think unhappy citizen.
The added weight of the suppressor lessons recoil, negatively affecting the ability of the weapon to cycle. The shooter understood this, and was prepared to manually recycle.
After 9-11 the city was blanketed with full spectrum street surveillance cameras with live feed to command centers.. it's impossible to believe they can't back track the guy for at least an hour before the event.. in key areas around City Hall - Wall Street - Times Square etc there are both DHS and NYPD cameras so footage is captured by FEDs too.
I do find it odd though, that someone who seemed to be so well prepared on various levels, walked into a Starbucks to get a coffee and took his mask down on top of that. Did he pay with his credit card or his registered Starbucks card so he gets his points? Something doesn't seem right with this...
…it will probably come to light that he left his passport behind too. That seems to happen far too often, especially in scenes of destruction where intact passports or personal IDs are miraculously found…intact and unblemished…
New York City is a place with many weird people. I say this as having grown up and lived much of my adult life there. Wearing a face mask is not going to draw any scrutiny at all.
The differences in the various photos appear enough to cast doubt these are the same person. Until suspect(s) are in custody and interrogated, speculation runs rampant. Seems if the perpetrator escaped on an e-bike into Central Park, there must be some surrveilence or video or clues that can lead to an arrest? solid evidence is the key to confirming the who. The why remains unknown
The differences could also be due to the lighting.
Interesting that UHC has the highest rate of denying claims of any company in the industry. A badge of dishonour?
I agree with the red herring. It’s the wife. CEO was under investigation by the DOJ and had recently dumped 30% of his stock. She’s richer when he’s dead than when he’s alive. How is that for a stretch?
It's the question that must be asked first: Who benefits from his death?
The (estranged) wife was reported as saying her husband had received (unspecified) "threats." She speculated the murder may have been motivated by a denial of benefits, if I recall correctly. That sounds like a redirection to me. Why would she even speculate at this point or speak to reporters?
The reason the gun appears to jam is probably because the shells had lower power loads to deduce the noise, and I suspect the assailant might be already dead if it was a order hit...... They probably get rid of the hit man...... it looked like he got into a car to me....