A warning issued by the FDA in November 2022. And yet people will continue to play vaccine roulette when there are safer and more effective alternatives to deal with a virus that does not pose a serious threat to healthy people. This is 3rd world stuff, but what can you expect when the President is cognitively impaired. The "vaccine" mandates are a bloody outrage.
Thank you. For those of us who succumbed to pressure and opted for single shot J&J (April 2021) is there any set of tests or checks we can do to see if we are back to a reasonable baseline health? I started suffering arthritis in June timeframe of 2021 - not debilitating but general inflammation of the joints - this has not really subsided so I’m concerned about some sudden problem coming as well. My former doc told me it’s because Im getting old. But I’ve been healthy and athletic all my life, only 49 and low resting heart rate of 50 BPM, etc so the fact that he would not even consider any possible issue from the shot was discouraging. Thanks for any insights from you or other commenters and readers here!
When forced to take the vax for work I personally chose to go the Janssen route because I felt (a) I was not at elevated risk for clotting issues, (b) I could mitigate them somewhat (making sure I was active, well hydrated and took low dose aspirin after) and (c) that the Janssen risks were "front loaded" and more known, ie. that so long as I did not have a short term problem, I would be avoiding the long term likely and unknown off-target effects of the mRNA vaccines.
I still think that for most, who are not at high risk of blood clots this is the best "Plan B" (Plan A being not to take the vaccine).
And, at this point, I am taking no more of these. As another "PS" it was infuriating to hear Marty Makary of Johns Hopkins being interviewed on Brett Baier last night. He started complaining about how he just hasn't gotten enough information during the process, and is NOW questioning whether we should have taken natural immunity more into account, and stratified risk factors by age, etc.
Really? Now? More information? I'm sorry but whining two years after the fact is not good enough, and doesn't now make you one of the Good Guys. It is obvious they (many establishment figures) are now trying to quietly walk back their prior Quisling behavior and revise history. It was clear to anyone remotely familiar with science and medicine that we (Western governments) were on a monstrously immoral course two years ago: mandating a leaky vaccine that had no benefit (even theoretical) outside the individual, actively harming low or no-Covid-risk children both medically and socially, suppressing reasonable off label use of therapeutics, and generally inverting the normal rules of prudence (not to undertake huge undefined risks for no or marginal benefits).
I see all these deaths, all this information every single day pointing to the deathly effects of the “vaccine”. I’m waiting for an article that points us to what to do about it? If you were forced to get it “or else” what direction should a person go to make sure that they are not going to go into cardiac arrest and die before they had an opportunity to try and help themselves?
The benefits from the cheap HCQ and ivermectin continues to be suppressed by the WH and Media while still selling snake oil “vaccine” which like too much lead or cadmium in the water kills you or makes you disabled...yet we expect the Govt to be “honest” and “accurate” on water data....but not vaccine effects?! If the Govt openly distorts climate data and then says the sky is falling...and then condemns HCQ/ivermectin is bad(when it worked very well in India and is cheap) and saved many lives...what does that tell us about “Our” Govt? They do NOT wish us well...but do you see the politicians in Washington DC being affected...they have access to the meds that work.
Igor Chudov reports today on a study from Germany that compares mRNA vax with adenovirus vax, found mRNA is significantly worse in IgG4 antibodies that cause immune tolerance, thus more illness in the vaxed. The report shows a lot of variance between test subjects, indicating big differences in individual responses or big variation in vax lots. These mysteries will remain until we stop the prohibitions.
Dr. McCullough's analysis provides solid undesputable reasons why proper informed consent never met the threshold of proving any of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines "safe" for use by anyone. The vaccine manufacturers, the FDA, the CDC, the healthcare agencies, the various governments, the institutions, all failed systemically to carefully consider the risks vs benefits of these drugs. As the doctor says, "it's buyer beware". However, could we expect any different an outcome in a marketplace where first to market through the approval proccesses gaunlet is richly rewarded?
"Clots going from the ankle to the groin, shooting to both lungs, and killing the victim is a description out of a science fiction horror movie" These long blood clots have not been seen before in living humans, correct? This needs a lot more investigation. Can COVID be the cause, or are the shots the cause?
When it comes to the dead, and the blood clots are pulled out by an embalmer, there is some question as to whether this is caused by the shots. According to one embalmer long blood clots are often seen, and he dismissed the concerns. On the other hand embalmers in the "Died Suddenly" documentary say this is new and not seen before.
Massive Clot Burden Days after Taking Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine
A warning issued by the FDA in November 2022. And yet people will continue to play vaccine roulette when there are safer and more effective alternatives to deal with a virus that does not pose a serious threat to healthy people. This is 3rd world stuff, but what can you expect when the President is cognitively impaired. The "vaccine" mandates are a bloody outrage.
Thank you. For those of us who succumbed to pressure and opted for single shot J&J (April 2021) is there any set of tests or checks we can do to see if we are back to a reasonable baseline health? I started suffering arthritis in June timeframe of 2021 - not debilitating but general inflammation of the joints - this has not really subsided so I’m concerned about some sudden problem coming as well. My former doc told me it’s because Im getting old. But I’ve been healthy and athletic all my life, only 49 and low resting heart rate of 50 BPM, etc so the fact that he would not even consider any possible issue from the shot was discouraging. Thanks for any insights from you or other commenters and readers here!
When forced to take the vax for work I personally chose to go the Janssen route because I felt (a) I was not at elevated risk for clotting issues, (b) I could mitigate them somewhat (making sure I was active, well hydrated and took low dose aspirin after) and (c) that the Janssen risks were "front loaded" and more known, ie. that so long as I did not have a short term problem, I would be avoiding the long term likely and unknown off-target effects of the mRNA vaccines.
I still think that for most, who are not at high risk of blood clots this is the best "Plan B" (Plan A being not to take the vaccine).
And, at this point, I am taking no more of these. As another "PS" it was infuriating to hear Marty Makary of Johns Hopkins being interviewed on Brett Baier last night. He started complaining about how he just hasn't gotten enough information during the process, and is NOW questioning whether we should have taken natural immunity more into account, and stratified risk factors by age, etc.
Really? Now? More information? I'm sorry but whining two years after the fact is not good enough, and doesn't now make you one of the Good Guys. It is obvious they (many establishment figures) are now trying to quietly walk back their prior Quisling behavior and revise history. It was clear to anyone remotely familiar with science and medicine that we (Western governments) were on a monstrously immoral course two years ago: mandating a leaky vaccine that had no benefit (even theoretical) outside the individual, actively harming low or no-Covid-risk children both medically and socially, suppressing reasonable off label use of therapeutics, and generally inverting the normal rules of prudence (not to undertake huge undefined risks for no or marginal benefits).
I see all these deaths, all this information every single day pointing to the deathly effects of the “vaccine”. I’m waiting for an article that points us to what to do about it? If you were forced to get it “or else” what direction should a person go to make sure that they are not going to go into cardiac arrest and die before they had an opportunity to try and help themselves?
Question - my son in law took the J & J almost two years ago - what do we do to make sure he is safe?
Great reports and reminders Peter,
are the legacy's of fact finding missions we all must hold dear if we are to thwart such madness.
Those once trusted names of purity/integrity/leadership/ is gone into the captured Abyss 20/20.
They have lost such vision and their own mission statement via greed of profits to the few.
Remind me please Dr. McCullough, how many deaths occurred when the 1976 flu vaccine was pulled off the market?
The benefits from the cheap HCQ and ivermectin continues to be suppressed by the WH and Media while still selling snake oil “vaccine” which like too much lead or cadmium in the water kills you or makes you disabled...yet we expect the Govt to be “honest” and “accurate” on water data....but not vaccine effects?! If the Govt openly distorts climate data and then says the sky is falling...and then condemns HCQ/ivermectin is bad(when it worked very well in India and is cheap) and saved many lives...what does that tell us about “Our” Govt? They do NOT wish us well...but do you see the politicians in Washington DC being affected...they have access to the meds that work.
Igor Chudov reports today on a study from Germany that compares mRNA vax with adenovirus vax, found mRNA is significantly worse in IgG4 antibodies that cause immune tolerance, thus more illness in the vaxed. The report shows a lot of variance between test subjects, indicating big differences in individual responses or big variation in vax lots. These mysteries will remain until we stop the prohibitions.
Dr. McCullough's analysis provides solid undesputable reasons why proper informed consent never met the threshold of proving any of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines "safe" for use by anyone. The vaccine manufacturers, the FDA, the CDC, the healthcare agencies, the various governments, the institutions, all failed systemically to carefully consider the risks vs benefits of these drugs. As the doctor says, "it's buyer beware". However, could we expect any different an outcome in a marketplace where first to market through the approval proccesses gaunlet is richly rewarded?
Do you think everyone who received one or more of any of the Covid “vaccines” should, ideally, have a cardiac MRI performed?
"Clots going from the ankle to the groin, shooting to both lungs, and killing the victim is a description out of a science fiction horror movie" These long blood clots have not been seen before in living humans, correct? This needs a lot more investigation. Can COVID be the cause, or are the shots the cause?
When it comes to the dead, and the blood clots are pulled out by an embalmer, there is some question as to whether this is caused by the shots. According to one embalmer long blood clots are often seen, and he dismissed the concerns. On the other hand embalmers in the "Died Suddenly" documentary say this is new and not seen before.