Please, I have suggested previously, that you personally stop referring to these death shots as 'vaccines'. They have never met the definition of a vaccine and referring to them as such lends a sort of credibility by association.
Dr. Banoun, and other investigators in the States, highlight important unanswered questions regarding simple facts from current molecular biology and biochemistry…
Most importantly integration into genomic DNA… and affect on breast feed infants… Unfortunately, a very large % of the world have been inoculated with a bioweapon, time will tell. Lord have mercy. God help us!
To the best of my research, the products have been described as gene therapy in SEC filings, as well as in paperwork initially submitted to the FDA. (I hesitate to use the word "therapy" as there does not seem to be anything therapeutic about them when used in this capacity). If they were classified/filed as gene therapy, would not calling them vaccines be considered fraud? Would that not have legal implications?
Pretty conservative paper as even the term 'gene therapy' has been questioned and rejected by many given the study of these drugs resulting in knowledge they are nanotechnology that can then be used for surveillance and control. Karen Kingston, with a long background in the pharma industry, has been writing about this presenting the science that describes what she says.
One definition not mentioned in this article is that of a bioweapon. The definition I have read is something that does not heal, does not prevent transmission and can cause damage. This is exactly what these drugs are. My concern/criticism is these studies that keep talking about vaccines which these drugs never were. Its focus is actually passe considering the update knowledge we have on these drugs, how they create harm and their use of nanotechnology. Even the Pfizer documents legally mandated release informs us of this information as well as the massive harm they knew would be caused by them. Naomi Wolff's group The War Room has been parsing the Pfizer data and writing summary reports for us who cannot read the 55,000 pp/month being released.
A lady i am seeing has taken 2 pfizer shots in winter/spring of 2022. I took none. Do we have any studies yet suggesting how safe the offspring would be? also, do we have test to determine the level of spike protein blood? thanks. searching for answers without 'being chicken little' calling for the sky to fall.
Please, I have suggested previously, that you personally stop referring to these death shots as 'vaccines'. They have never met the definition of a vaccine and referring to them as such lends a sort of credibility by association.
SEVENTH???? Are people still seriously buying into this?
Dr. Banoun, and other investigators in the States, highlight important unanswered questions regarding simple facts from current molecular biology and biochemistry…
Most importantly integration into genomic DNA… and affect on breast feed infants… Unfortunately, a very large % of the world have been inoculated with a bioweapon, time will tell. Lord have mercy. God help us!
Thank you, Dr. McCullough!
Thank-you for this revealing research. If the public understood what they have been injected with they would keel over from sheer fright.
To the best of my research, the products have been described as gene therapy in SEC filings, as well as in paperwork initially submitted to the FDA. (I hesitate to use the word "therapy" as there does not seem to be anything therapeutic about them when used in this capacity). If they were classified/filed as gene therapy, would not calling them vaccines be considered fraud? Would that not have legal implications?
Pretty conservative paper as even the term 'gene therapy' has been questioned and rejected by many given the study of these drugs resulting in knowledge they are nanotechnology that can then be used for surveillance and control. Karen Kingston, with a long background in the pharma industry, has been writing about this presenting the science that describes what she says.
One definition not mentioned in this article is that of a bioweapon. The definition I have read is something that does not heal, does not prevent transmission and can cause damage. This is exactly what these drugs are. My concern/criticism is these studies that keep talking about vaccines which these drugs never were. Its focus is actually passe considering the update knowledge we have on these drugs, how they create harm and their use of nanotechnology. Even the Pfizer documents legally mandated release informs us of this information as well as the massive harm they knew would be caused by them. Naomi Wolff's group The War Room has been parsing the Pfizer data and writing summary reports for us who cannot read the 55,000 pp/month being released.
A lady i am seeing has taken 2 pfizer shots in winter/spring of 2022. I took none. Do we have any studies yet suggesting how safe the offspring would be? also, do we have test to determine the level of spike protein blood? thanks. searching for answers without 'being chicken little' calling for the sky to fall.
cc: Peter
So Where Is YOUR Scientific Evidence Malone ?
Ralph Baric Said That "Gain Of Function"
Was "Poised" For Human Emergence. Seriously? Okay:
As I Stand, I Bend My Knees, And I Point To The Sky.
I Am "Poised" To Go To Mars .
-You Can Bet Your Ass I'll Get There Before Baric's
Gain Of Function Can Be Viably Sustained In Our Air.
There Is No Gain Of Function Pathogen In The Air.
That's The Hoax - And A Good One. Ain't It Bob ?