In Australia we had a terrible event back on the 28th of April 1996, A lone gunman killed 35 people and injured 23 with a Military grade weapon at a local tourist site called Port Arthur in Tasmania where I live.
This event was the catalyst for sweeping gun control law changed across the country - banning automatic and semi automatic weapons, more stringent background checks and training, restrictions on firearm ownership.
This also caused a large degree of firearm hesitancy in the community and rightly so given the needless loss of human life that could of been avoided.
Are these people who are hesitant now suffering a disease? No of course they’re not. Is someone who was mauled by a savage dog and now scared of all dogs suffering a disease? No they aren’t.
Yet people like myself who have had their lives ruined and put a risk by a product that was marketed as “Safe and Effective” had the side effects hidden, refused medical care once the side effects presented & the find out these Vaccines were in fact “Gene Therapy” never used before in humans (in-fact outlawed), There are over 770 known adverse events & I have to live with life long scarring on my heart & adverse effects after being the fittest and healthiest I had ever been at 37 years old who followed the Govt advice and did the right thing to ensure others were protected (but now we know the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission) are considered to be suffering some kind of medical disease? The thousands of vaccine deaths and injuries in Australia go unnoticed & we’re silenced and shamed when 35 can change the whole country? Something is very wrong
Dr McCullough -- you have heroically stood up against government tyranny to advocate early treatment, expose the dangers of the Covid shots, and generally educate people around the world about the Covid fiasco, probably saving millions of lives in the process. Here you helpfully expose how the usual suspects abuse the idea of "vaccine hesitancy" to manipulate people into taking the dangerous injections. The arguments you make here also could be made about the statin narrative. One of your recent articles talks about people being "hesitant" to take statins, erroneously arguing it is only hubris that keeps people from taking the drugs. As with the Covid injections, however, it isn't hubris at all -- it's knowledge about statin dangers and a long list of severe adverse effects coupled with little to no offsetting benefit that have caused many to refuse them. Substitute "statins" for "vaccines" in one sentence of this article and you would have a good explanation for why many refuse statins: "In summary, there is an entire vein in the medical literature that treats statin hesitancy like a disease but does not get to the root cause of the issue, which is appropriate concern over statin safety."
From the study: “Therefore, unwillingness to take a vaccine will be more likely when excessive mistrust is an individual's default position.”. In America, excessive mistrust of government should be the default position of EVERY American. It is precisely the foundation of the establishment of our country. And THAT is why the goverment has dumbed down our public education. Precisely to indoctrinate generations to blindly and uncritically accept government as truth.
This just shows how little they care about informed consent. Even if this injection were generally safe and effective (it is most certainly not), it is not a healthcare provider’s duty to talk a patient into accepting or declining any medical intervention. You provide accurate information: risks and benefits and the patient decides. THAT is informed consent.
All it takes is you or a close family member or friend to be injured by a vaccine to create hesitancy. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. After being injured by the shingles vaccine, I will never take another.
Vaccine hesitancy...why wouldn't people be hesitant to have vaccination against diseases which aren't a serious problem for most people?
For instance, why was there ever a 'vaccine solution' for 'Covid-19'? A disease it was known from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people?
What was the process to evaluate this 'vaccine solution'? Who approved it?
Why were people not at serious threat of disease included in vaccine trials?
Peter McCullough was copied on my correspondence on this matter, my email to Andrew Pollard, the Chief Investigator on the Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine trials, and also Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI)...that's quite a conflict of interest...
There should be a similar scale for practices and public health authorities:
1) No vaccines offered, vaccines actively discouraged
2) No vaccines offered, some vaccines actively discouraged some mildly
3) No vaccines offered, some mildly discouraged
4) No vaccines offered, no comment either way
5) vaccines mildly discouraged
6) some vaccines offered and some encouraged
7) all vaccines offered and encouraged
8) all vaccines offered, some recommended
9) all vaccines offered, some required
10) all vaccines offered and required
11) all vaccines offered and required, discharge from practice if refused
12) all vaccines required, discharge from practice and report to child protection services if refused— kinda like Spinal Tap’s turn it up to 11.
Only half joking, & with the idea that parents should seek out the lower rated practices. I was horrified several years ago when I learned that several pediatricians in the community were discharging families from their practice for vaccine refusal!!
My pregnant daughter was told by her OB/GYN that there are seeing a record number of cases of still births and miscarriages - he claims it's both from the virus itself and the shot. Not sure how he can say that but my daughter who is unvaxed is having issues who her BP and did have covid - she treated herself with the FLCCC protocol as I'd stock piled Ivermectin for my entire family - so even the virus itself, there should be criminal charges brought against Varik and Fauci who continued to channel funds to that lab -And the agencies who lied about the safety of the vax and it's lack of efficacy in prevention and spread.
Excellent post that shines a light on the mind control (propaganda) uses of "science" in a Big Brother world. Your post is properly tactful. I wonder, however, if the cure is not significant public ridicule of those whose names appear on the work.
Medicine is consistent in that it NEVER looks for cause. Finding the cause ends the profit stream. Very consistent. In fact, not pointing out and attacking them with the profit motive is a major mistake. Always go after them about the money cause that’s what it’s all about for the pharm machine. Health ends profits and that’s why they can’t be trusted.
Love how the word "mutable" is used when describing hesitancy, essentially as a treatable disorder, not only of the hesitant public but apparently of dubious health professionals as well. The gaslighting propaganda playbook is so obvious and in one's face, that "they" will never give up is equally obvious.
In Australia we had a terrible event back on the 28th of April 1996, A lone gunman killed 35 people and injured 23 with a Military grade weapon at a local tourist site called Port Arthur in Tasmania where I live.
This event was the catalyst for sweeping gun control law changed across the country - banning automatic and semi automatic weapons, more stringent background checks and training, restrictions on firearm ownership.
This also caused a large degree of firearm hesitancy in the community and rightly so given the needless loss of human life that could of been avoided.
Are these people who are hesitant now suffering a disease? No of course they’re not. Is someone who was mauled by a savage dog and now scared of all dogs suffering a disease? No they aren’t.
Yet people like myself who have had their lives ruined and put a risk by a product that was marketed as “Safe and Effective” had the side effects hidden, refused medical care once the side effects presented & the find out these Vaccines were in fact “Gene Therapy” never used before in humans (in-fact outlawed), There are over 770 known adverse events & I have to live with life long scarring on my heart & adverse effects after being the fittest and healthiest I had ever been at 37 years old who followed the Govt advice and did the right thing to ensure others were protected (but now we know the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission) are considered to be suffering some kind of medical disease? The thousands of vaccine deaths and injuries in Australia go unnoticed & we’re silenced and shamed when 35 can change the whole country? Something is very wrong
Dr McCullough -- you have heroically stood up against government tyranny to advocate early treatment, expose the dangers of the Covid shots, and generally educate people around the world about the Covid fiasco, probably saving millions of lives in the process. Here you helpfully expose how the usual suspects abuse the idea of "vaccine hesitancy" to manipulate people into taking the dangerous injections. The arguments you make here also could be made about the statin narrative. One of your recent articles talks about people being "hesitant" to take statins, erroneously arguing it is only hubris that keeps people from taking the drugs. As with the Covid injections, however, it isn't hubris at all -- it's knowledge about statin dangers and a long list of severe adverse effects coupled with little to no offsetting benefit that have caused many to refuse them. Substitute "statins" for "vaccines" in one sentence of this article and you would have a good explanation for why many refuse statins: "In summary, there is an entire vein in the medical literature that treats statin hesitancy like a disease but does not get to the root cause of the issue, which is appropriate concern over statin safety."
From the study: “Therefore, unwillingness to take a vaccine will be more likely when excessive mistrust is an individual's default position.”. In America, excessive mistrust of government should be the default position of EVERY American. It is precisely the foundation of the establishment of our country. And THAT is why the goverment has dumbed down our public education. Precisely to indoctrinate generations to blindly and uncritically accept government as truth.
This just shows how little they care about informed consent. Even if this injection were generally safe and effective (it is most certainly not), it is not a healthcare provider’s duty to talk a patient into accepting or declining any medical intervention. You provide accurate information: risks and benefits and the patient decides. THAT is informed consent.
All it takes is you or a close family member or friend to be injured by a vaccine to create hesitancy. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. After being injured by the shingles vaccine, I will never take another.
My goodness this is totally disgusting! Vaccinator zombies at work!!
Vaccine hesitancy...why wouldn't people be hesitant to have vaccination against diseases which aren't a serious problem for most people?
For instance, why was there ever a 'vaccine solution' for 'Covid-19'? A disease it was known from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people?
What was the process to evaluate this 'vaccine solution'? Who approved it?
Why were people not at serious threat of disease included in vaccine trials?
Peter McCullough was copied on my correspondence on this matter, my email to Andrew Pollard, the Chief Investigator on the Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine trials, and also Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI)...that's quite a conflict of interest...
See my email to Andrew Pollard, dated 30 June 2021: Who initiated the plan to vaccinate the entire global population against SARSCoV-2? https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/who-initiated-the-plan-to-vaccinate-the-entire-global-population-against-sars-cov-2.pdf
I endeavoured to discover how the vaccine trials obtained ethical approval, and did not receive a satisfactory response...
There should be a similar scale for practices and public health authorities:
1) No vaccines offered, vaccines actively discouraged
2) No vaccines offered, some vaccines actively discouraged some mildly
3) No vaccines offered, some mildly discouraged
4) No vaccines offered, no comment either way
5) vaccines mildly discouraged
6) some vaccines offered and some encouraged
7) all vaccines offered and encouraged
8) all vaccines offered, some recommended
9) all vaccines offered, some required
10) all vaccines offered and required
11) all vaccines offered and required, discharge from practice if refused
12) all vaccines required, discharge from practice and report to child protection services if refused— kinda like Spinal Tap’s turn it up to 11.
Only half joking, & with the idea that parents should seek out the lower rated practices. I was horrified several years ago when I learned that several pediatricians in the community were discharging families from their practice for vaccine refusal!!
My pregnant daughter was told by her OB/GYN that there are seeing a record number of cases of still births and miscarriages - he claims it's both from the virus itself and the shot. Not sure how he can say that but my daughter who is unvaxed is having issues who her BP and did have covid - she treated herself with the FLCCC protocol as I'd stock piled Ivermectin for my entire family - so even the virus itself, there should be criminal charges brought against Varik and Fauci who continued to channel funds to that lab -And the agencies who lied about the safety of the vax and it's lack of efficacy in prevention and spread.
Excellent post that shines a light on the mind control (propaganda) uses of "science" in a Big Brother world. Your post is properly tactful. I wonder, however, if the cure is not significant public ridicule of those whose names appear on the work.
Medicine is consistent in that it NEVER looks for cause. Finding the cause ends the profit stream. Very consistent. In fact, not pointing out and attacking them with the profit motive is a major mistake. Always go after them about the money cause that’s what it’s all about for the pharm machine. Health ends profits and that’s why they can’t be trusted.
Repeat after me.....then spank others with it.
"I WILL BE HAPPY TO TAKE PART IN THE VACCINE EXPERIMENT!" (Informed consent choice is key)
"I WILL BE IN THE NON-VACCINATED CONTROL GROUPS! "
Is that better? Cuz it works great for me.
The more the injection is pushed with no new explanation why the more distrustful I get. "It's safe and effective" is a laughable punchline now!
Excellent. Great points for this clown world we are trapped in. Thanks Dr. M!
Love how the word "mutable" is used when describing hesitancy, essentially as a treatable disorder, not only of the hesitant public but apparently of dubious health professionals as well. The gaslighting propaganda playbook is so obvious and in one's face, that "they" will never give up is equally obvious.
Great piece, Dr McCullough, I would prefer to remain unjected from this kind of inDOCtrination!