34 Comments

In Australia we had a terrible event back on the 28th of April 1996, A lone gunman killed 35 people and injured 23 with a Military grade weapon at a local tourist site called Port Arthur in Tasmania where I live.

This event was the catalyst for sweeping gun control law changed across the country - banning automatic and semi automatic weapons, more stringent background checks and training, restrictions on firearm ownership.

This also caused a large degree of firearm hesitancy in the community and rightly so given the needless loss of human life that could of been avoided.

Are these people who are hesitant now suffering a disease? No of course they’re not. Is someone who was mauled by a savage dog and now scared of all dogs suffering a disease? No they aren’t.

Yet people like myself who have had their lives ruined and put a risk by a product that was marketed as “Safe and Effective” had the side effects hidden, refused medical care once the side effects presented & the find out these Vaccines were in fact “Gene Therapy” never used before in humans (in-fact outlawed), There are over 770 known adverse events & I have to live with life long scarring on my heart & adverse effects after being the fittest and healthiest I had ever been at 37 years old who followed the Govt advice and did the right thing to ensure others were protected (but now we know the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission) are considered to be suffering some kind of medical disease? The thousands of vaccine deaths and injuries in Australia go unnoticed & we’re silenced and shamed when 35 can change the whole country? Something is very wrong

Expand full comment

Very sorry to read of your predicament Jed.

It's appalling what has happened in Australia. I'm in gobsmacked amazement at how the entire country was bullied, and even MANDATED, into submitting to the Covid-19 injections...and that the medical 'profession' collaborated with the violation of voluntary informed consent for vaccination.

For some background, see my previous response to Jenny, and also: The destruction of voluntary informed consent via mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. "A political decision, not a health decision": https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed

Expand full comment

Jed, re being properly informed about the Covid-19 injections, what do you think about my email to Brendan Murphy, sent in February 2021? COVID-19 vaccines are NOT fully approved by the TGA: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/covid-19-vaccines-are-not-fully-approved-by-the-tga.pdf

Lots more emails on my website: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/vax-australia/

I’ve fought for the past four years for voluntary informed consent for Covid-19 vaccination. The treacherous medical ‘profession’ has completely trashed voluntary informed consent…there is no valid consent.

Expand full comment

Wrong indeed!

Emphases on the words "wrong" and even more on "indeed".

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/indeed

Expand full comment

Dr McCullough -- you have heroically stood up against government tyranny to advocate early treatment, expose the dangers of the Covid shots, and generally educate people around the world about the Covid fiasco, probably saving millions of lives in the process. Here you helpfully expose how the usual suspects abuse the idea of "vaccine hesitancy" to manipulate people into taking the dangerous injections. The arguments you make here also could be made about the statin narrative. One of your recent articles talks about people being "hesitant" to take statins, erroneously arguing it is only hubris that keeps people from taking the drugs. As with the Covid injections, however, it isn't hubris at all -- it's knowledge about statin dangers and a long list of severe adverse effects coupled with little to no offsetting benefit that have caused many to refuse them. Substitute "statins" for "vaccines" in one sentence of this article and you would have a good explanation for why many refuse statins: "In summary, there is an entire vein in the medical literature that treats statin hesitancy like a disease but does not get to the root cause of the issue, which is appropriate concern over statin safety."

Expand full comment

Yes! Thank you for referring to this! Was surprised and disappointed by his remarks on statins . Very disappointed…….

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Mar 17
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Many doctors still have a long-standing bias for medical consensus and standards of care. Dr. Pierre Kory mentioned this instilled perception about himself and how he has evolved away from those former beliefs.

Often when wanting another opinion I check out Pam Popper's videos. She established The Wellness Forum (https://wellnessforumhealth.com/) and this is a clip where he discusses statins. She has other vids on this topic as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLmW7_YqFTA

Another Go-To place for info is Green Med Info. https://greenmedinfo.com/toxic-ingredient/statin-drugs

https://greenmedinfo.com/gmi-search?text=Statins%20Alzheimers

Best to lose weight (healthfully, not shots, pills, and potions), cut the greasy foods and seed oils, eat unprocessed foods, and exercise still seem to be the best way to be healthy.

Expand full comment

From the study: “Therefore, unwillingness to take a vaccine will be more likely when excessive mistrust is an individual's default position.”. In America, excessive mistrust of government should be the default position of EVERY American. It is precisely the foundation of the establishment of our country. And THAT is why the goverment has dumbed down our public education. Precisely to indoctrinate generations to blindly and uncritically accept government as truth.

Expand full comment

Well said.

Expand full comment

This just shows how little they care about informed consent. Even if this injection were generally safe and effective (it is most certainly not), it is not a healthcare provider’s duty to talk a patient into accepting or declining any medical intervention. You provide accurate information: risks and benefits and the patient decides. THAT is informed consent.

Expand full comment

Yes indeed Jenny...

For an Australian perspective, see: Coercion, intimidation and mandates preclude voluntary informed consent for vaccination. There has been no valid consent for COVID-19 vaccination: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/coercion-intimidation-and-mandates

Expand full comment

All it takes is you or a close family member or friend to be injured by a vaccine to create hesitancy. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. After being injured by the shingles vaccine, I will never take another.

Expand full comment

One of the very impressive doctors that I follow is Russell Blaylock, MD. I subscribe to his monthly newsletter & have read one of his books. He does not recommend any vaccines, including the shingles vaccine. I am following his advice. It is also the position of the World Council for Health (Dr. Tess Laurie is a founder). I prefer to follow their advice too.

Expand full comment

Thank you for the recommendation. I am not familiar with Dr. Blaylock, but I am familiar with the World Health Council and the wonderful Dr. Tess Lawrie. I follow Drs. Kory, McCollough, Malone and A Midwestern Doctor. They are recommending much the same thing. I will check out Dr. Blaylock. Thanks, again.

Expand full comment

You are most welcome. Dr. Blaylock's monthly newsletter is The Blaylock Wellness Report. It is a treasure trove of information. Dr. Blaylock is a retired neurosurgeon. If you are interested in a subscription, you can find it at NewsmaxHealth.com.

Expand full comment

My goodness this is totally disgusting! Vaccinator zombies at work!!

Expand full comment

Vaccine hesitancy...why wouldn't people be hesitant to have vaccination against diseases which aren't a serious problem for most people?

For instance, why was there ever a 'vaccine solution' for 'Covid-19'? A disease it was known from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people?

What was the process to evaluate this 'vaccine solution'? Who approved it?

Why were people not at serious threat of disease included in vaccine trials?

Peter McCullough was copied on my correspondence on this matter, my email to Andrew Pollard, the Chief Investigator on the Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine trials, and also Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI)...that's quite a conflict of interest...

See my email to Andrew Pollard, dated 30 June 2021: Who initiated the plan to vaccinate the entire global population against SARSCoV-2? https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/who-initiated-the-plan-to-vaccinate-the-entire-global-population-against-sars-cov-2.pdf

I endeavoured to discover how the vaccine trials obtained ethical approval, and did not receive a satisfactory response...

Expand full comment

There should be a similar scale for practices and public health authorities:

1) No vaccines offered, vaccines actively discouraged

2) No vaccines offered, some vaccines actively discouraged some mildly

3) No vaccines offered, some mildly discouraged

4) No vaccines offered, no comment either way

5) vaccines mildly discouraged

6) some vaccines offered and some encouraged

7) all vaccines offered and encouraged

8) all vaccines offered, some recommended

9) all vaccines offered, some required

10) all vaccines offered and required

11) all vaccines offered and required, discharge from practice if refused

12) all vaccines required, discharge from practice and report to child protection services if refused— kinda like Spinal Tap’s turn it up to 11.

Only half joking, & with the idea that parents should seek out the lower rated practices. I was horrified several years ago when I learned that several pediatricians in the community were discharging families from their practice for vaccine refusal!!

Expand full comment

My pregnant daughter was told by her OB/GYN that there are seeing a record number of cases of still births and miscarriages - he claims it's both from the virus itself and the shot. Not sure how he can say that but my daughter who is unvaxed is having issues who her BP and did have covid - she treated herself with the FLCCC protocol as I'd stock piled Ivermectin for my entire family - so even the virus itself, there should be criminal charges brought against Varik and Fauci who continued to channel funds to that lab -And the agencies who lied about the safety of the vax and it's lack of efficacy in prevention and spread.

Expand full comment

Excellent post that shines a light on the mind control (propaganda) uses of "science" in a Big Brother world. Your post is properly tactful. I wonder, however, if the cure is not significant public ridicule of those whose names appear on the work.

Expand full comment

Medicine is consistent in that it NEVER looks for cause. Finding the cause ends the profit stream. Very consistent. In fact, not pointing out and attacking them with the profit motive is a major mistake. Always go after them about the money cause that’s what it’s all about for the pharm machine. Health ends profits and that’s why they can’t be trusted.

Expand full comment

Repeat after me.....then spank others with it.

"I WILL BE HAPPY TO TAKE PART IN THE VACCINE EXPERIMENT!" (Informed consent choice is key)

"I WILL BE IN THE NON-VACCINATED CONTROL GROUPS! "

Is that better? Cuz it works great for me.

Expand full comment

The more the injection is pushed with no new explanation why the more distrustful I get. "It's safe and effective" is a laughable punchline now!

Expand full comment

Excellent. Great points for this clown world we are trapped in. Thanks Dr. M!

Expand full comment

Love how the word "mutable" is used when describing hesitancy, essentially as a treatable disorder, not only of the hesitant public but apparently of dubious health professionals as well. The gaslighting propaganda playbook is so obvious and in one's face, that "they" will never give up is equally obvious.

Expand full comment

Great piece, Dr McCullough, I would prefer to remain unjected from this kind of inDOCtrination!

Expand full comment