Pfizer Periodic Safety Update Report Confirms Batch Variability
Schmeling et al Respond to Criticism with Powerful Source of Internal Validity
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
As an epidemiologist I am in the business of determining scientific validity of published studies. The Schmeling analysis that demonstrated the batch or lots of Pfizer mRNA vaccines seemed to have very imbalanced side effect profiles was externally consistent with VAERS data presented by Senator Ron Johnson to the CDC. This has been the major explanation of why some are fine and others are injured or dead after COVID-19 vaccination. But, was there any confirmation of what Schmeling et al found?
In a reply to a letter to the editor, Schmeling et al reveal the Pfizer Periodic Safety Update as an source of internal validity.
“Finally, after publication of our report, we have become aware of the first Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) for the BNT162b2 vaccine covering the period 19 December, 2020 to 18 June 2021 that was submitted to the European Medicines Agency on 19 August 2021 by the market authorization holder (BioNTech).11 This PSUR appears to confirm a large variation in numbers of adverse events between different BNT162b2 batches and batches with the highest number of adverse events reported here were all those represented by the blue ‘high SAE’ trendline in the figure of our published study.”
So it appears as if the “hot lot” theory is confirmed. This explains why some ~32% have virtually zero side effects and have little reason for concern. We only wish everyone could be in that group. All others have some reason for personal health vigilance for the emergency of vaccine-induced medical problems.
Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
President, McCullough Foundation
It would be helpful to get our hands on samples of each lot to determine who got what don't you think Dr. McCullough?
Unfortunately what we are left with is speculation. Was this entire event the world's largest single blind human experiment?
I know one thing for sure, it was one hell of a psychological operation and people are psychology damaged, perhaps irreparably a evidenced by what I saw yesterday while at a hospital for a cardiac stress/echo.
I still see people wearing masks, even so called educated medical personnel. I watched a doctor walking through the St. Vincent's Hospital (Worcester Masskachusetts) atrium yesterday with a mask on along side him was an unmasked female and when they sat down for what appeared to be a coffee break, he took his mask off, took a sip of his drink wiped his mouth on his sleeve. Then moments later he wiped his nose with the back of his fore finger and hand. They continued their chat as if nothing odd was happening. When they finished their break, before standing he replaced his mask then stood and they walked off chatting as if nothing odd was happening.
If the intent was to kill off a percentage of the population, then it would only make sense to have varying levels & degrees of lethality. Otherwise, their nefarious plan would be all too evident. Also, an injection disguised as a "vaccine" that produces a variety of harmful & potentially deadly adverse reactions would also fit in seamlessly with the plan to maim & kill, for they would be that much harder to pin on the "vaccine".