The only flu shot I ever took . . . I came down with flu just a few days later!
And now with all the info out about the very PURPOSE of the adjuvants in the shots being to CAUSE inflammation (to trigger the immune system) they are nothing but trouble for the brain. Retired neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock claims that each subsequent shot causes brain inflammation that persists for more than a year, causing a continuous and unremitting inflammatory attack on the brain that significantly increases the risk for Alzheimer's Disease.
But with the advent of mRNA technology, the danger is immensely increased. Genetic manipulation that causes the body to churn out billions of foreign, non-human proteins will inevitable cause a devastating and perhaps indefinite attack on the body's own cells and tissue.
Recent research has revealed that 100% of mRNA/DNA viral-vectored COVID shots produce cardiac muscle damage. Those things are not, and never will be, safe for administering to humans and MUST BE STOPPED! It is a completely failed technology from its conception.
Anderson et al. 2020 https://sci-hub.se/10.7326/M19-3075 report that in England and Wales, between 2003 and 2012, the average rate of flu vaccination at 64 years of age was 27% and at 66 years (due to government promotions) was 57%. If these vaccines were effective at reducing severity of influenza infection, as the researchers expected to be the case, then there would have been a clearly discernible reduction in the rates of hospitalisation and of death for influenza and for respiratory diseases in general which correlated with 30% more people at 66 years being vaccinated, with respect to 64 years.
No such relationship was found. This is clear evidence that for this group of people - considered to be at high risk for influenza severe outcomes - the vaccination programme had no effect whatsoever. Maybe it reduced severity in people who were not close to needing to be hospitalised. Maybe its use, in general, reduced transmission, so for instance children and younger adults being vaccinated might have reduced the overall rate of infection in older adults.
However, this very powerful research technique, which has no confounders, showed no detectable benefits regarding hospitalisation and death - the rates rose consistently with age, without any drop around age 65.
Since we have been systematically lied to over the years about the effectiveness of influenza vaccines - probably the least controversial of all vaccines, and the most widely accepted - why should we accept, without careful analysis, *anything* the so called experts tell us about vaccines. There is so much money and professional prestige involved - and far too many people have unreasonable hope and faith that the little injection will magically protect them from whatever disease it is supposed to work against.
As with COVID-19, sepsis, cancer, Kawasaki disease, MIS-C and most or all forms of age-related neurodegeneration (Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, multiple system atrophy, dementia with Lewy bodies) by far the most important protective intervention is to supplement vitamin D3 in sufficient quantities to raise circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to at least the 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L level the immune system needs to work properly. With little or not vitamin D3 supplementation (including the very low amounts governments recommend) most people who have not had recent UV-B skin exposure on ideally white skin have only 1/10th to 1/2 of the circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D their immune systems need to work properly. Please read the research articles cited and discussed at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ .
For 70 kg (154 lb) body weight, without obesity, 0.125 mg vitamin D3 a day, on average, is sufficient. This is "5000 IUs" per day. This sounds like a lot, but it is a gram every 22 years, and pharma grade vitamin D3 costs about USD$2.50 a gram.
One of the lessons from COVID-19 was that many older people die from the flu vaccine on day one. It was a shocking statistic. Never again for me, all of them. I didn't take any of the COVID-19 jabs, but it goes way past that. I'm 61 and in all those years, two flu vaccines decades ago. Never again.
Dr. McCullough ... please know that every time you innovate like this, distancing yourself from harmful mainstream medical practices, you give us hope. ❤️
I am not a doctor, but considering that the ‘recipe’ for the current flu shot would be based on past mutations, would not deal with the current, unknown mutation, I would find the ‘efficiency’ of the flu vaccine suspect, at best. How did any of us survive, 50 or 60+ years ago, after the advent of antibiotics, when we were told to stay warm, drink plenty of fluids, etc. As many here have indicated, I took one flu shot years ago, got a horrid flu response, and never took one again. Frankly, I say the same for the ‘pneumonia’ vaccine. Vaccines and. I have parted ways. Forever.
I’ve never taken a flu shot, and I’ve never had the flu. The only people that I know that get the flu every year are those that religiously get the flu shot.
It might be interesting to know the rate of uptake of flu vax by the cachement populations of the hospitals studied in REVELAC. If overall flu vax uptake last Spring tracked with covid jabs it may have been significantly lower than 23.9% thus suggesting the vax increased the likelihood of hospitalization among vaccinated.
I encourage my patients to look at what works. Immunization that follows the natural exposures work—notably the varicella and oral polio. Immunity is long lasting. Our immune system is set up to handle outside threats and the upper airway and GI tract are technically external. If you choose this option make sure you airway defenses are optimally wet; that means breathing air with relative humidity at least 50% (see Arundel’s chart PMCID 1474709) or use a nasal spray with a sugar alcohol at least four times a day.
I’ve had the flu shot 3-4 times, last time in ‘08. The last two times (‘05 and ‘08) I got it because my wife was undergoing cancer surgeries. Got the flu both times (big help for her - NOT!). I don’t know if it was ineffective or an adjuvant hammered my immune system leaving me vulnerable. No more vax or jabs.
Even the CDC, yrs ago, on the public pages they used to publish,admitted, the flu vaccines' average efficacy is about 15-20%. Not worth the cost, if you ask me, but then, I'm just an old, hospital school trained RN, now retired.
Thank you! I’ve had 1 flu shot and that was many years ago. I won’t take another. No C jab either. Didn’t take one. Never will.
The only flu shot I ever took . . . I came down with flu just a few days later!
And now with all the info out about the very PURPOSE of the adjuvants in the shots being to CAUSE inflammation (to trigger the immune system) they are nothing but trouble for the brain. Retired neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock claims that each subsequent shot causes brain inflammation that persists for more than a year, causing a continuous and unremitting inflammatory attack on the brain that significantly increases the risk for Alzheimer's Disease.
But with the advent of mRNA technology, the danger is immensely increased. Genetic manipulation that causes the body to churn out billions of foreign, non-human proteins will inevitable cause a devastating and perhaps indefinite attack on the body's own cells and tissue.
Recent research has revealed that 100% of mRNA/DNA viral-vectored COVID shots produce cardiac muscle damage. Those things are not, and never will be, safe for administering to humans and MUST BE STOPPED! It is a completely failed technology from its conception.
Anderson et al. 2020 https://sci-hub.se/10.7326/M19-3075 report that in England and Wales, between 2003 and 2012, the average rate of flu vaccination at 64 years of age was 27% and at 66 years (due to government promotions) was 57%. If these vaccines were effective at reducing severity of influenza infection, as the researchers expected to be the case, then there would have been a clearly discernible reduction in the rates of hospitalisation and of death for influenza and for respiratory diseases in general which correlated with 30% more people at 66 years being vaccinated, with respect to 64 years.
No such relationship was found. This is clear evidence that for this group of people - considered to be at high risk for influenza severe outcomes - the vaccination programme had no effect whatsoever. Maybe it reduced severity in people who were not close to needing to be hospitalised. Maybe its use, in general, reduced transmission, so for instance children and younger adults being vaccinated might have reduced the overall rate of infection in older adults.
However, this very powerful research technique, which has no confounders, showed no detectable benefits regarding hospitalisation and death - the rates rose consistently with age, without any drop around age 65.
For discussion of this and other research which supports the findings of Anderson et al. 2020, please see https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/influenza-vaccines-do-not-reduce and https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/influenza-vaccines-do-not-reduce-1da .
Since we have been systematically lied to over the years about the effectiveness of influenza vaccines - probably the least controversial of all vaccines, and the most widely accepted - why should we accept, without careful analysis, *anything* the so called experts tell us about vaccines. There is so much money and professional prestige involved - and far too many people have unreasonable hope and faith that the little injection will magically protect them from whatever disease it is supposed to work against.
As with COVID-19, sepsis, cancer, Kawasaki disease, MIS-C and most or all forms of age-related neurodegeneration (Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, multiple system atrophy, dementia with Lewy bodies) by far the most important protective intervention is to supplement vitamin D3 in sufficient quantities to raise circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to at least the 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L level the immune system needs to work properly. With little or not vitamin D3 supplementation (including the very low amounts governments recommend) most people who have not had recent UV-B skin exposure on ideally white skin have only 1/10th to 1/2 of the circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D their immune systems need to work properly. Please read the research articles cited and discussed at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ .
For 70 kg (154 lb) body weight, without obesity, 0.125 mg vitamin D3 a day, on average, is sufficient. This is "5000 IUs" per day. This sounds like a lot, but it is a gram every 22 years, and pharma grade vitamin D3 costs about USD$2.50 a gram.
Section 13 of every Vaccine Package Insert always seems to say the same thing.....
13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY
13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
No carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, of fertility studies have been conducted.
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/vaccines-licensed-use-united-states
Maybe this one will be different.
One of the lessons from COVID-19 was that many older people die from the flu vaccine on day one. It was a shocking statistic. Never again for me, all of them. I didn't take any of the COVID-19 jabs, but it goes way past that. I'm 61 and in all those years, two flu vaccines decades ago. Never again.
Dr. McCullough ... please know that every time you innovate like this, distancing yourself from harmful mainstream medical practices, you give us hope. ❤️
I am not a doctor, but considering that the ‘recipe’ for the current flu shot would be based on past mutations, would not deal with the current, unknown mutation, I would find the ‘efficiency’ of the flu vaccine suspect, at best. How did any of us survive, 50 or 60+ years ago, after the advent of antibiotics, when we were told to stay warm, drink plenty of fluids, etc. As many here have indicated, I took one flu shot years ago, got a horrid flu response, and never took one again. Frankly, I say the same for the ‘pneumonia’ vaccine. Vaccines and. I have parted ways. Forever.
The courageous few are speaking up.
The cowardly, bought-off herd, individuals and associations, grovel along on for their Pharma paymasters.
I’ve never taken a flu shot, and I’ve never had the flu. The only people that I know that get the flu every year are those that religiously get the flu shot.
It might be interesting to know the rate of uptake of flu vax by the cachement populations of the hospitals studied in REVELAC. If overall flu vax uptake last Spring tracked with covid jabs it may have been significantly lower than 23.9% thus suggesting the vax increased the likelihood of hospitalization among vaccinated.
I encourage my patients to look at what works. Immunization that follows the natural exposures work—notably the varicella and oral polio. Immunity is long lasting. Our immune system is set up to handle outside threats and the upper airway and GI tract are technically external. If you choose this option make sure you airway defenses are optimally wet; that means breathing air with relative humidity at least 50% (see Arundel’s chart PMCID 1474709) or use a nasal spray with a sugar alcohol at least four times a day.
I’ve had the flu shot 3-4 times, last time in ‘08. The last two times (‘05 and ‘08) I got it because my wife was undergoing cancer surgeries. Got the flu both times (big help for her - NOT!). I don’t know if it was ineffective or an adjuvant hammered my immune system leaving me vulnerable. No more vax or jabs.
And don’t forget about the increased risk of stroke in those who have taken the COVID shot and flu shot together!
Has the lower bound ever met the 50 percent criteria?
I never had flu shot and never will. But I take steps to strengthen my immune system.
Even the CDC, yrs ago, on the public pages they used to publish,admitted, the flu vaccines' average efficacy is about 15-20%. Not worth the cost, if you ask me, but then, I'm just an old, hospital school trained RN, now retired.