RFK Jr has too much ethics & intelligence for politics. I would love to see him flip the switch on politics, it could be a really positive change for the US, and the West in general. He is a once off chance to clean the political scene, but that kind of progress will see powerful people challenged & they aren’t going to relinquish it easily.
On the contrary, the political aim of the Ukraine war is to funnel US dollars through an unaccountable, untraceable black box. Those who instigated the war are achieving their ends. It is in the belief that the imperial city denizens care one whit for the lives lost in the process of laundering tens of billions of dollars that you are mistaken. As Trump found out the hard way, the one unspoken rule of Washington DC is that you are never, ever allowed to ask questions about where the money goes once it is sent overseas.
Ukraine never applied to be a Sovereign National after the 2014 Obama/Soros coup. Putin is actually President of Ukraine. He is destroying the US Biolabs, the money laundering, rescuing children from being experimented on, rescuing children from child traffickers and taking down the Nazi’s. Zelensky is an actor and a porn star. Biden , etc would love to start WW3. That will be unsuccessful as he does not have the nuclear codes. Thank goodness for the US Military ( White Hat’s) and President Trump.
RFK Jr, and , Ramaswamy are both receiving the Tucker treatment across the UniParty. Ironic, given the lousy candidates hosted across the duplicitous , duopololous UniParty aisle. Publicly calling out the false flag Ukraine/ Russia debacle designed to distract, siphon more taxpayer dollars to redistribute amongst the corrosive, corrupt godless psychopathic WEF “Great Reset”,globalism, Kleptocorporate multinational monopolistic ruling class totalitarian tyranny. Including Techno-Pharma transnhumanism, Schwab,Gates, Bloomberg,Soros,Faustus,Gergen,Harari,Wray,Collins,Xi,Bourla,Bancel,Kerry,Dimon, Burns Yellen,Gutierres,BlackRock/Vanguard/StateStreet ( who own EVERYTHING and each other and what we believed were free and fair elections. Note the absolute silence emanating from our “ vaunted representative government”.
We have no borders, no freedom, no expectation of privacy, no free speech,forced masking, lockdowns, social distancing, clot shots for a Plandemic created in a lab funded by “We The People(likely in the US), our families are being torn apart, our children brainwashed and mutilated , our food supply is toxic and will soon be controlled , our energy sources deliberately depleted, the very peculiar pattern of fires and explosions where food is processed,fuel is stored,chemicals,train derailments carrying toxic substances,a dairy farm “ explodes” killing fifteen thousand cows…. But this is not only happening in the US, it is global and wherever the horrors are accruing, WEF “ Young Global Leaders” are pervasive Tulsi, Musk, Ramaswamy , RFK Jr DeSantis , Dr Joseph Ladapo are the few who still have a public platform( albeit shrinking). Tucker was going full bore at 8:00 pm nightly with a tremendous audience.And he was taken out by the UniParty globalists
That's great news, because other contenders (I'm thinking of DeSantis) do not have a realistic grip on U.S. foreign policy. MacGregor is a welcome breath of sanity in a world full of psychotic, imperialistic neocons; the fact that RFK Jr. sees him as a credible, knowledgeable source is very encouraging.
There has always existed a strategy. The strategy has several levels. You have to keep in mind we are talking about the post WWII era, and up to now, but there have been different conditions at play, but those conditions really don't matter as far as the strategy goes.
The strategy is, one, to simply destabilize potential around the world, eliminating places of competition, start small and move up, during the post WWII era, decolonization, Cold War, aka post colonial land grab, the wars and coups and covert ops were simply means to continue control over these territories, thats why fascist dictators thrived after the war.
The second level of the strategy is that war supports armaments development and the huge industries behind it employing residents in every congressional district in America.
This isn't new. This is old hat. The war itself, whatever war, needs no strategy, focusing on the strategy of the war is shooting a wooden duck, the war is a variable in another strategy.
Thats the issue.
And that has always been the case and MacGregor should know that.
"Appeasement" has been used as a negative synonym for diplomacy or negotiations. We don't want to look 'weak' or 'Putin will take over the world.'
‘We didn’t stop Hitler early, we must stop Putin.’ But remember, Western democracies created Hitler's rise to power by the harsh reparations that everyone knew could not be paid by Germany after WWI. When Hitler focused on that sense of injustice among Germans, and also used some innovative monetary strategies, Germany rose from the ashes and became, as everyone could see too late, a war-hungry and vengeful nation. Hitler was elected, after all.
Similarly, we created the Russian invasion of Ukraine by pushing for expansion of NATO. Our Covid spending, our military support of Israel so out of proportion to its size, and now our billions going to Ukraine (talk about organize crime!) with no end in sight.
For decades, PR has been used by the CIA (and by the Mafia and arms producers, and other transnationals going back to IBM and Standard Oil actively supporting Nazi Germany) in hundreds of incidents of American military interventions to justify our war mongering, and the CIA probably had a hand in JFK's assassination because he threatened the spy agency's existence.
The Pentagon has long placed military installations and supported military contractors in areas of the country that provided important support in Congress for ever larger military budgets. Then they justify the jobs these places create, although studies show that the return on investment for military dollars is lower than most other government spending— duh, war is a dead end, no one wins (except war contractors). In contrast, upkeep of infrastructure and protection of environmental 'services' (forests, wetlands, organic farming, carbon-sequestering grazing) multiply the economic benefit of wise government spending. But now, for example, bees are dying at an unsustainable rate, the base of both oceanic and terrestrial food chains (i.e. plankton and insects) is drastically failing (without any headlines warning of impending collapse).
If we dropped those billions from planes over the Middle East, Ukraine, etc. it would get better results, sort of instant micro-lending and a vastly improved image abroad.
The military in the US is our worst enemy. They appear to be a major origin of geoengineering (which is the real source of forest death), drought-flood weather catastrophes, the 15-minute city notion that is pretty words for mass surveillance, and it's the economic sector that, along with Big Pharma, sucks the viability out of the middle class. Wake up, America, we’ve been conned long enough.
I now like John even more after reading this. Does this mean that he's in my sane, libertarian, anti-war corner? I don't know but he certainly sounds more rational, reasonable, and willing to listen, read, and think that anyone on your television claiming to be a journalist
In the year 1945, my great-great grandfather, serving in the army, wondered when he’d get to go home to his wife and the son he’d never seen. He got his wish when the US ended World War II by dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The World awaited Armageddon; instead, something miraculous happened. We began to use atomic energy not as a weapon, but as a nearly limitless source of power.
People enjoyed luxuries once thought the realm of science fiction. Domestic robots, fusion-powered cars, portable computers. But then, in the 21st century, people awoke from the American dream.
Years of consumption lead to shortages of every major resource. The entire world unraveled. Peace became a distant memory. It is now the year 2023*. We stand on the brink of total war, and I am afraid. For myself, for my wife, for my infant son – because if my time in the army taught me one thing: it’s that war, war never changes.”
Most, if not all, wars launched by the US have been money laundering schemes, very much like the official Covid narrative.
Carl von Clausewitz may not have factored the above into his treatise on wars and their objectives.
Surely anyone with an iota of common sense can see the pattern.
That's probably the reason the WHO has downgraded the status of the pandemic: to puncture the momentum of RFK Jr.'s campaign.
Winning public support was an essential ingredient in Carl von Clausewitz's protocol for waging war, and this was more or less achieved with Covid, while Ukraine still fails to catch the fancy of the average American.
Missing from this discussion was that China, despite its intention of world power, is in a very unstable economic state which could alter the trajectory of geopolitics.
We have all seen, during these past three years, that the global elite can cause governments to act in lockstep, against the interests of their own citizens, when it suits their purposes. It is not much of a logical leap, for me, to conclude that the same power elite can cause nations to go to war when that is what suits their intentions. (I don't need to use logic, actually - books have been written.) I would argue that, in our current environment, it makes no sense to analyze war as a strategy for furthering national interests because, if we do, all the decision makers will look like idiots. They are not idiots. They are simply doing what they are being told to do.
Is this difficult to see? Imagine we were of the opinion that immigration policy is designed to attract the best and the brightest to enhance our national capabilities. Using this as our analytical framework, we would examine what is taking place at our border today and conclude that the people in charge are insane. The problem is obvious - those in charge have no intention of using immigration to enhance our national capabilities. They are not stupid, nor are they without a strategy. The problem is ours, in failing to understand what the real strategy is. Am I supposed to believe that these same people, who are so anxious to destroy our country from within, are now going to pursue a strategy of national defense to further our interests?
Is it any secret that the global elite want to destroy nations and their peoples? What better tool to use (Covid and the associated injections aside) than war? In fact, the globalists do not simply want to destroy nations in general, they want to destroy the United States in particular, because we have the strongest remnants left, anywhere, of individual liberty and a religious conscience. Our leaders are not without a strategy, they are following one that we are loathe to acknowledge.
Paul Craig Roberts has expressed great admiration for Putin, but one day even he wrote a piece saying, in effect, that if Putin keeps acting the way he does, in such an indecisive manner, his strategy will lead to WWIII. Yes, exactly. But it's the same trap of using the wrong paradigm. Putin is no angel and the intent IS to lead to WWIII. Putin is working very hard to maintain the moral high ground, but is everyone completely unaware that moral high ground is nothing more than another tool that can be used to enhance one's competitive position? Putin has made his hostility toward the West abundantly clear, and I see his protestations about his interests being limited to Ukraine as nothing more than short-term political cover. The entire situation is like two bullies in a bar who want to get into a knock-down, drag-out fight, taunting each other without end, but stopping short of throwing the definitive first punch. Each wants the other to take that first morally indefensible move of being the aggressor. Neither side in this conflict is behaving as though it wants to claim a definitive victory. Both sides are behaving as though they want to push this conflict to the point of no return, while waiting patiently for the other side to start it.
Ed Slavsquat writes tirelessly about the ways in which Putin's behavior furthers the agenda of the WEF. So does the behavior of our own leaders - just consider what we are doing with the WHO. When I see behavior like this, I think of football (no, I don't watch the games). The whole idea behind the sport is to fight. The teams don't go out into the street to fight against each other, they follow the rules of the NFL. People assume that it is impossible for two nations to fight each other to the point of mutual destruction while operating under the same global umbrella. That is naive. You feign distance from the WEF (in the case of Putin), so that the battle looks real. It's not just football. Lawyers do the same thing. They compete within the system. We have a global system in place now. Nobody is acting outside of it, not even Putin.
Having said all that, I am unable to end without expressing my own position. I might examine what is going on, and take a conceptual position, but I would never fight. I would never pick up a weapon and use it to kill another human being.
How is he running for president when Biden won't even debate him, or I should say, can't debate him? He can't run as a Democrat so how is this going to work? And the neocons, big pharma, they will never let him on the ballot. Problem with RFK is, he is a Democrat and will never be anything else and his party is so very corrupt that he doesn't stand a chance. If he really wants to fix it, he needs to team up with Trump - make a deal for him to be in his administration to clean up the corruption - I see no other path.
RFK Jr has too much ethics & intelligence for politics. I would love to see him flip the switch on politics, it could be a really positive change for the US, and the West in general. He is a once off chance to clean the political scene, but that kind of progress will see powerful people challenged & they aren’t going to relinquish it easily.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention, John. $Billions being spent on a war with no end in sight. A travesty! Follow the money!!
On the contrary, the political aim of the Ukraine war is to funnel US dollars through an unaccountable, untraceable black box. Those who instigated the war are achieving their ends. It is in the belief that the imperial city denizens care one whit for the lives lost in the process of laundering tens of billions of dollars that you are mistaken. As Trump found out the hard way, the one unspoken rule of Washington DC is that you are never, ever allowed to ask questions about where the money goes once it is sent overseas.
Excellent interview with Col. MacGregor. I'm going to post this on social media.
I despise the Democrat party, but love RFK, Jr.
I respect you Dr.
Ukraine never applied to be a Sovereign National after the 2014 Obama/Soros coup. Putin is actually President of Ukraine. He is destroying the US Biolabs, the money laundering, rescuing children from being experimented on, rescuing children from child traffickers and taking down the Nazi’s. Zelensky is an actor and a porn star. Biden , etc would love to start WW3. That will be unsuccessful as he does not have the nuclear codes. Thank goodness for the US Military ( White Hat’s) and President Trump.
https://youtu.be/8x0oOzohQUQ
RFK Jr, and , Ramaswamy are both receiving the Tucker treatment across the UniParty. Ironic, given the lousy candidates hosted across the duplicitous , duopololous UniParty aisle. Publicly calling out the false flag Ukraine/ Russia debacle designed to distract, siphon more taxpayer dollars to redistribute amongst the corrosive, corrupt godless psychopathic WEF “Great Reset”,globalism, Kleptocorporate multinational monopolistic ruling class totalitarian tyranny. Including Techno-Pharma transnhumanism, Schwab,Gates, Bloomberg,Soros,Faustus,Gergen,Harari,Wray,Collins,Xi,Bourla,Bancel,Kerry,Dimon, Burns Yellen,Gutierres,BlackRock/Vanguard/StateStreet ( who own EVERYTHING and each other and what we believed were free and fair elections. Note the absolute silence emanating from our “ vaunted representative government”.
We have no borders, no freedom, no expectation of privacy, no free speech,forced masking, lockdowns, social distancing, clot shots for a Plandemic created in a lab funded by “We The People(likely in the US), our families are being torn apart, our children brainwashed and mutilated , our food supply is toxic and will soon be controlled , our energy sources deliberately depleted, the very peculiar pattern of fires and explosions where food is processed,fuel is stored,chemicals,train derailments carrying toxic substances,a dairy farm “ explodes” killing fifteen thousand cows…. But this is not only happening in the US, it is global and wherever the horrors are accruing, WEF “ Young Global Leaders” are pervasive Tulsi, Musk, Ramaswamy , RFK Jr DeSantis , Dr Joseph Ladapo are the few who still have a public platform( albeit shrinking). Tucker was going full bore at 8:00 pm nightly with a tremendous audience.And he was taken out by the UniParty globalists
That's great news, because other contenders (I'm thinking of DeSantis) do not have a realistic grip on U.S. foreign policy. MacGregor is a welcome breath of sanity in a world full of psychotic, imperialistic neocons; the fact that RFK Jr. sees him as a credible, knowledgeable source is very encouraging.
Well, I disagree.
There has always existed a strategy. The strategy has several levels. You have to keep in mind we are talking about the post WWII era, and up to now, but there have been different conditions at play, but those conditions really don't matter as far as the strategy goes.
The strategy is, one, to simply destabilize potential around the world, eliminating places of competition, start small and move up, during the post WWII era, decolonization, Cold War, aka post colonial land grab, the wars and coups and covert ops were simply means to continue control over these territories, thats why fascist dictators thrived after the war.
The second level of the strategy is that war supports armaments development and the huge industries behind it employing residents in every congressional district in America.
This isn't new. This is old hat. The war itself, whatever war, needs no strategy, focusing on the strategy of the war is shooting a wooden duck, the war is a variable in another strategy.
Thats the issue.
And that has always been the case and MacGregor should know that.
"Appeasement" has been used as a negative synonym for diplomacy or negotiations. We don't want to look 'weak' or 'Putin will take over the world.'
‘We didn’t stop Hitler early, we must stop Putin.’ But remember, Western democracies created Hitler's rise to power by the harsh reparations that everyone knew could not be paid by Germany after WWI. When Hitler focused on that sense of injustice among Germans, and also used some innovative monetary strategies, Germany rose from the ashes and became, as everyone could see too late, a war-hungry and vengeful nation. Hitler was elected, after all.
Similarly, we created the Russian invasion of Ukraine by pushing for expansion of NATO. Our Covid spending, our military support of Israel so out of proportion to its size, and now our billions going to Ukraine (talk about organize crime!) with no end in sight.
For decades, PR has been used by the CIA (and by the Mafia and arms producers, and other transnationals going back to IBM and Standard Oil actively supporting Nazi Germany) in hundreds of incidents of American military interventions to justify our war mongering, and the CIA probably had a hand in JFK's assassination because he threatened the spy agency's existence.
The Pentagon has long placed military installations and supported military contractors in areas of the country that provided important support in Congress for ever larger military budgets. Then they justify the jobs these places create, although studies show that the return on investment for military dollars is lower than most other government spending— duh, war is a dead end, no one wins (except war contractors). In contrast, upkeep of infrastructure and protection of environmental 'services' (forests, wetlands, organic farming, carbon-sequestering grazing) multiply the economic benefit of wise government spending. But now, for example, bees are dying at an unsustainable rate, the base of both oceanic and terrestrial food chains (i.e. plankton and insects) is drastically failing (without any headlines warning of impending collapse).
If we dropped those billions from planes over the Middle East, Ukraine, etc. it would get better results, sort of instant micro-lending and a vastly improved image abroad.
The military in the US is our worst enemy. They appear to be a major origin of geoengineering (which is the real source of forest death), drought-flood weather catastrophes, the 15-minute city notion that is pretty words for mass surveillance, and it's the economic sector that, along with Big Pharma, sucks the viability out of the middle class. Wake up, America, we’ve been conned long enough.
I now like John even more after reading this. Does this mean that he's in my sane, libertarian, anti-war corner? I don't know but he certainly sounds more rational, reasonable, and willing to listen, read, and think that anyone on your television claiming to be a journalist
“War. War never changes.
In the year 1945, my great-great grandfather, serving in the army, wondered when he’d get to go home to his wife and the son he’d never seen. He got his wish when the US ended World War II by dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The World awaited Armageddon; instead, something miraculous happened. We began to use atomic energy not as a weapon, but as a nearly limitless source of power.
People enjoyed luxuries once thought the realm of science fiction. Domestic robots, fusion-powered cars, portable computers. But then, in the 21st century, people awoke from the American dream.
Years of consumption lead to shortages of every major resource. The entire world unraveled. Peace became a distant memory. It is now the year 2023*. We stand on the brink of total war, and I am afraid. For myself, for my wife, for my infant son – because if my time in the army taught me one thing: it’s that war, war never changes.”
Most, if not all, wars launched by the US have been money laundering schemes, very much like the official Covid narrative.
Carl von Clausewitz may not have factored the above into his treatise on wars and their objectives.
Surely anyone with an iota of common sense can see the pattern.
That's probably the reason the WHO has downgraded the status of the pandemic: to puncture the momentum of RFK Jr.'s campaign.
Winning public support was an essential ingredient in Carl von Clausewitz's protocol for waging war, and this was more or less achieved with Covid, while Ukraine still fails to catch the fancy of the average American.
Missing from this discussion was that China, despite its intention of world power, is in a very unstable economic state which could alter the trajectory of geopolitics.
We have all seen, during these past three years, that the global elite can cause governments to act in lockstep, against the interests of their own citizens, when it suits their purposes. It is not much of a logical leap, for me, to conclude that the same power elite can cause nations to go to war when that is what suits their intentions. (I don't need to use logic, actually - books have been written.) I would argue that, in our current environment, it makes no sense to analyze war as a strategy for furthering national interests because, if we do, all the decision makers will look like idiots. They are not idiots. They are simply doing what they are being told to do.
Is this difficult to see? Imagine we were of the opinion that immigration policy is designed to attract the best and the brightest to enhance our national capabilities. Using this as our analytical framework, we would examine what is taking place at our border today and conclude that the people in charge are insane. The problem is obvious - those in charge have no intention of using immigration to enhance our national capabilities. They are not stupid, nor are they without a strategy. The problem is ours, in failing to understand what the real strategy is. Am I supposed to believe that these same people, who are so anxious to destroy our country from within, are now going to pursue a strategy of national defense to further our interests?
Is it any secret that the global elite want to destroy nations and their peoples? What better tool to use (Covid and the associated injections aside) than war? In fact, the globalists do not simply want to destroy nations in general, they want to destroy the United States in particular, because we have the strongest remnants left, anywhere, of individual liberty and a religious conscience. Our leaders are not without a strategy, they are following one that we are loathe to acknowledge.
Paul Craig Roberts has expressed great admiration for Putin, but one day even he wrote a piece saying, in effect, that if Putin keeps acting the way he does, in such an indecisive manner, his strategy will lead to WWIII. Yes, exactly. But it's the same trap of using the wrong paradigm. Putin is no angel and the intent IS to lead to WWIII. Putin is working very hard to maintain the moral high ground, but is everyone completely unaware that moral high ground is nothing more than another tool that can be used to enhance one's competitive position? Putin has made his hostility toward the West abundantly clear, and I see his protestations about his interests being limited to Ukraine as nothing more than short-term political cover. The entire situation is like two bullies in a bar who want to get into a knock-down, drag-out fight, taunting each other without end, but stopping short of throwing the definitive first punch. Each wants the other to take that first morally indefensible move of being the aggressor. Neither side in this conflict is behaving as though it wants to claim a definitive victory. Both sides are behaving as though they want to push this conflict to the point of no return, while waiting patiently for the other side to start it.
Ed Slavsquat writes tirelessly about the ways in which Putin's behavior furthers the agenda of the WEF. So does the behavior of our own leaders - just consider what we are doing with the WHO. When I see behavior like this, I think of football (no, I don't watch the games). The whole idea behind the sport is to fight. The teams don't go out into the street to fight against each other, they follow the rules of the NFL. People assume that it is impossible for two nations to fight each other to the point of mutual destruction while operating under the same global umbrella. That is naive. You feign distance from the WEF (in the case of Putin), so that the battle looks real. It's not just football. Lawyers do the same thing. They compete within the system. We have a global system in place now. Nobody is acting outside of it, not even Putin.
Having said all that, I am unable to end without expressing my own position. I might examine what is going on, and take a conceptual position, but I would never fight. I would never pick up a weapon and use it to kill another human being.
How is he running for president when Biden won't even debate him, or I should say, can't debate him? He can't run as a Democrat so how is this going to work? And the neocons, big pharma, they will never let him on the ballot. Problem with RFK is, he is a Democrat and will never be anything else and his party is so very corrupt that he doesn't stand a chance. If he really wants to fix it, he needs to team up with Trump - make a deal for him to be in his administration to clean up the corruption - I see no other path.
Actually sounds very much like my life. Sad, isn’t?