Stanford, TGA and dozens of other like-minded organizations don’t want the truth to get in the way of their agendas - even when they KNOW it’s the truth. They must be getting some serious corruption money to knowingly push a deadly product on people.
Strange how everyone I’ve met who is full into the idea of one or more covid jabs for every person on the planet is horrified that everyone on the planet would be forced to eat a teaspoon of peanut butter, or a slice of full-gluten toast, or drink a glass of whole cows milk. The average person can understand that some antibiotics will cure most and the same medicine will kill some. But the blinders go on when it comes to the covid jabs. Strange. Very strange.
This is a new era of a “scientific” dark age where scientific principles are not applied to for “science” to be accepted as truth. We are no longer operating under the burden of proof to be put forward for something to be accepted as truth. It is now whatever you want it to be as long as other “scientists” and “experts” chime in with you in belief. This is a faith based religion, no longer centered around the hypothesis, methodology, reproducibility. How many times in history has just agreeing with everyone else around you rather than asking questions has this moved the dial for scientific knowledge. Never.
Hesitancy is a weird description for avoiding something that you perceive as likely more harmful than beneficial. Prudence is the word we used to use for that.
War has been declared, whether we like it not. When someone else decides if your death or health is a necessary sacrifice, for the alleged benefit of others, and you have no choice in the matter, I would say that is a declaration of war on the people. Acknowledging this undeclared war may be the only way to stop the sacrifices.
So silly. As if my family and most I know will ever take another vaccine again. The damage they’ve done by trying to hide the truth. They don’t seem to understand that these things usually make things worse and achieve the opposite of what they desire. As a long time nurse... I’m embarrassed of them.
Stanford University should be ashamed. This is not independent free thinking. It is buckling under to the government message. Appaarently Stanford now embraces censorship! Their reputation is toast!
By the Virality Project's logic, “true content which might promote Russian roulette hesitancy” is “malinformation (exaggerated or misleading)” because five of the six cylinders don’t have bullets in them.
“The content is not clearly mis or disinformation but mal-information.” OMG, they actually had to come up with a new word to cover up their lies and debase the patients and families of those deceased after the vaccine. Why are they so adamant about protecting something that can seriously harm them?
I was a nurse at Stanford for 33 years...this is beyond sad.
Stanford, TGA and dozens of other like-minded organizations don’t want the truth to get in the way of their agendas - even when they KNOW it’s the truth. They must be getting some serious corruption money to knowingly push a deadly product on people.
Strange how everyone I’ve met who is full into the idea of one or more covid jabs for every person on the planet is horrified that everyone on the planet would be forced to eat a teaspoon of peanut butter, or a slice of full-gluten toast, or drink a glass of whole cows milk. The average person can understand that some antibiotics will cure most and the same medicine will kill some. But the blinders go on when it comes to the covid jabs. Strange. Very strange.
This is a new era of a “scientific” dark age where scientific principles are not applied to for “science” to be accepted as truth. We are no longer operating under the burden of proof to be put forward for something to be accepted as truth. It is now whatever you want it to be as long as other “scientists” and “experts” chime in with you in belief. This is a faith based religion, no longer centered around the hypothesis, methodology, reproducibility. How many times in history has just agreeing with everyone else around you rather than asking questions has this moved the dial for scientific knowledge. Never.
Hesitancy is a weird description for avoiding something that you perceive as likely more harmful than beneficial. Prudence is the word we used to use for that.
"We Stand Strong: NO SILENCING & NO CENSORSHIP. #VaxInjuredSpaces"
War has been declared, whether we like it not. When someone else decides if your death or health is a necessary sacrifice, for the alleged benefit of others, and you have no choice in the matter, I would say that is a declaration of war on the people. Acknowledging this undeclared war may be the only way to stop the sacrifices.
Horrifying.
So silly. As if my family and most I know will ever take another vaccine again. The damage they’ve done by trying to hide the truth. They don’t seem to understand that these things usually make things worse and achieve the opposite of what they desire. As a long time nurse... I’m embarrassed of them.
Would someone please tell Californians that the pandemic is over.
it's like everybody went crazy all at once
"In other words, the proposition that that the COVID-19 injections are safe and effective is not a matter of debate, but an article of faith."
I think that sums up this whole covid mess.
Stanford University should be ashamed. This is not independent free thinking. It is buckling under to the government message. Appaarently Stanford now embraces censorship! Their reputation is toast!
It seems vaccine hesitancy can also been considered thinking for yourself. This is what they are most afraid of.
By the Virality Project's logic, “true content which might promote Russian roulette hesitancy” is “malinformation (exaggerated or misleading)” because five of the six cylinders don’t have bullets in them.
“The content is not clearly mis or disinformation but mal-information.” OMG, they actually had to come up with a new word to cover up their lies and debase the patients and families of those deceased after the vaccine. Why are they so adamant about protecting something that can seriously harm them?