State of California Found Guilty of Gross Human Rights Violations
State of California Found Guilty of Gross Human Rights Violations
Lack of informed consent a key element of culpability for administrators of state eugenics program.
By JOHN LEAKE
As I noted in my last post, the California state Reparations Task Force recently convened and published a document titled Meeting Materials. Chapter 16 of this document addresses California’s notorious eugenics program. As is noted on page 2 of the Chapter:
In 2003, the Legislature, Governor Gray Davis, and Attorney General Bill Lockyer all issued formal apologies for the 1909-1979 eugenics sterilization program that forcibly sterilized patients in state hospitals and homes without true consent.
On page three, the Task Force states that the State of California is responsible “for the perpetration of gross human rights violations” by performing thousands of forced sterilizations. A key element of the State’s culpability is, according to the Task Force, the lack of informed consent of the victims of the eugenics program.
It seems to me that the Task Force’s findings provide a precedent for a civil action against the State of California for mandating that health care workers receive the COVID-19 injections in order to retain their jobs.
Plaintiffs attorneys practicing in California should also investigate the likelihood that thousands of California residents were pressured to get the injections without informed consent.
Of special interest is the FDA’s approval document for the Pfizer-BioNTech Cormirnaty vaccine, issued on November 8, 2021, which (on page 23) explicitly warns about the elevated risk of myocarditis-pericarditis as follows.
Post-EUA safety surveillance reports received by FDA and CDC identified serious risks for myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY. Reporting rates for medical chart-confirmed myocarditis/pericarditis in VAERS have been higher among males under 40 years of age than among females and older males and have been highest in males 12-17 years of age (65 cases per million doses administered as per CDC communication on August 20, 2021), particularly following the second dose, and onset of symptoms within 7 days following vaccination. Although some cases of vaccine associated myocarditis/pericarditis required intensive care support, available data from short-term follow up suggest that most individuals have had resolution of symptoms with conservative management. Information is not yet available about potential long-term sequelae and outcomes in affected individuals. A mechanism of action by which the vaccine could cause myocarditis and pericarditis has not been established. These safety findings of increased risk for myocarditis/pericarditis led to warning in section 5.2 Warning and Precautions of the PI.
I suspect that VERY FEW people in California who were pressured to receive the shots (in order to retain their jobs) were informed of this warning in the regulatory approval document.
I've been reading about Pfizer release 69 as covered by Dr. Naomi Wolf, which laid out that Rochelle Walensky et al knew about the risks to pregnant mothers and those who wished to conceive and directly lied about it. I'd say that ties into a forced sterilization lawsuit...
And how many recipients were informed that the ONLY FDA "approved" COVID shot is COMIRNATY but that it is not available in the United States. Some vials in the U.S. are labeled Comirnaty but they were not manufactured in the approved facilities so they do not qualify as approved drugs. Therefore, NO COVID shots in the U.S. were FDA approved, which makes ALL of them only administered under the EUA. And legally, NO ONE can be forced, mandated, coerced, or incentivized IN ANY WAY to take ANY unapproved drug. Period! Including the military. Which means that ALL the mandates were ILLEGAL!!!!!!