I've been reading about Pfizer release 69 as covered by Dr. Naomi Wolf, which laid out that Rochelle Walensky et al knew about the risks to pregnant mothers and those who wished to conceive and directly lied about it. I'd say that ties into a forced sterilization lawsuit...
And how many recipients were informed that the ONLY FDA "approved" COVID shot is COMIRNATY but that it is not available in the United States. Some vials in the U.S. are labeled Comirnaty but they were not manufactured in the approved facilities so they do not qualify as approved drugs. Therefore, NO COVID shots in the U.S. were FDA approved, which makes ALL of them only administered under the EUA. And legally, NO ONE can be forced, mandated, coerced, or incentivized IN ANY WAY to take ANY unapproved drug. Period! Including the military. Which means that ALL the mandates were ILLEGAL!!!!!!
California is a State in Constitutional & Financial default. It is being run by a criminal Governor and legislature that were selected, not elected. There is a very serious movement in California called New California State. It is a Constitutional split of the state. The new State will take up approximately 90% of the land mass but half of the population.
The new state already has a Constitution, a legislature (assembly & senate) that is functioning. The New California State (NCS) is in consultation with the Federal Congress in getting permission for the creation of the state. This is the only answer to saving California. You can look it up: www.newcaliforniastate.com. This has been years of very difficult work but it’s about to happen. This is deadly serious. It is covered under Article 4, Sections 3&4 of the United States Constitution.
And there it is. In black and white. As well as an admission that long-term effects are not yet known. Fascinating that they seem so mystified about the mechanisms of action. Perhaps if they'd spent less time denigrating the "anti-vaxxers" and listening to the doctors and scientists who WERE considering the reasons, they would be a little more enlightened. Guess we'll all have to wait for a few more years until perhaps, maybe, possibly, eventually they'll figure out the reasons. Or admit to knowing them, at least. They're just trying to figure out how they could eke it out into the public domain without it being noticed much. After all, the body count is getting a tad obvious, and more and more people are smelling a rat.
Very much looking forward to the coming Lawsuits, but beyond the civil suits, which will never undo the damage and death from these reckless genetic drugs, looking to see criminal charges and prison time for the persons behind this modern-day Holocaust ...
Medical procedure mandates and informed consent cannot coexist. They are diabolically opposed.
How vaccine mandates and other coerced medical procedures were allowed to happen recently or in the past is an intellectual mystery. Fear and power are the only things that could blind people to something so obvious. And it means that people do not actually understand consent. Or perhaps they understand it and they take the ‘apologize later’, approach. Either way, it’s clearly a violation of human rights. I hope lawsuits spread throughout the world to hold people in positions of power responsible. Politicians, government agencies, businesses, school districts, churches, hospitals- justice to all of them.
My job was forfeit when I refused the mandates shots. The company “intranet” information had nothing about serious side effects of any kind. I knew better, but shrugged it off as merely parroting the CDC, which I’m sure was the case, to the letter. No NI exemption, for example.
My questions relate to what the company and its medical advisors SHOULD HAVE KNOWN relevant to informed consent.
People died who had ZERO RISK from the virus. I did not die but lost a lot of salary, RSUs, bonuses. Greed aside, it’s great to be alive and free of COVID shot injuries and perpetual worry about long term injuries. Nevertheless, financial loss is my legal standing to complain.
What was reasonably hidden from
the company and from employees will be hard to pin on the company. Pfizer bad. Moderna bad. Gov’t bad. But I’m not quite satisfied.
What bothers me is the BLANK package insert. The corporate medical advisors KNEW this or SHOULD have known. According to the EUA, informed consent must be based in part on safety data that are reported by the manufacturer on the package insert. My AI Chatbot said so and I checked the online document. YES!
A BLANK insert can be easily and rightfully construed to be evidence of fraud ... a warning. The known risks of DEATH and INJURY can be said in effect, to be printed in white font or disappearing ink on the blank insert page. A ruse to claim “but we didn’t lie about it.”
There is NO EXCUSE for leveraging our jobs ... my job ... while the LEGAL standards for informed consent are unmet. In my case, I would have challenged the mandate by forcing my termination as opposed to “retiring” on the last day before the deadline for shots.
A second inexcusable omission was the DOD sourcing of the shots. The shots were not delivered by a pharmaceutical company with manufacturing practices we were all familiar with. This is another fraud the company SHOULD HAVE KNOWN. It is a bait and switch violation of consumer protection laws. It is called “affirmative misrepresentation.”
I’m interested in finding an attorney to pursue these complaints against my former employer. At a minimum I want a strong letter from a lawyer that says “I know what you did.”
What drives my irritation are company posts that brag about robust recovery from the “pandemic” ... nothing about the folks sacrificed to the naïveté and pathological risk aversion of a company that carried out a mandate that was NOT a legal requirement. No NI exemption or even testing option. And they did not satisfy informed consent under Federal Law.
For all I know there was likely a CIA agreement in the background as well as Federal business at stake. But that does not excuse violation of the EUA that resulted in death of employees.
The only people who truly had informed "consent" were those who took the time to inform themselves, and having done so, declined to consent to a harmful injection.
So if people have the right to "informed consent", why did they NOT have the right to say NO to the shots as well? Vast numbers of people were harmed in this way too.
Based on the comments so far, the general consensus out there is that everyone is going to sue everyone in a blatantly obvious corrupt system, while the global predators continue to launder our tax dollars and push policies enslaving humanity.
I’m guessing everyone here still believes that their vote is going to be counted too.
Good luck.
Our government, which includes our legal and medical system, who you continue to rely on for some reason, orchestrated this whole damn thing. Why would you expect them to resolve it?
Will the perps be punished? No. They will be allowed to do exactly the same things during the next fake pandemic. And informed consent will still be hidden deep in the basement.
We are talking about the state that makes child genital mutilation not only legal, but state mandated in some cases. The law demands that if a 5th grade teacher, many of them sadistic and not parents themselves, wants a child sexualized and mutilated all they have to do is assert the child’s parents aren’t “affirming” the teacher’s desire to have the kid sexualized and genitally mitigated snd the state will remove the child from the sex-confirming household and destroy his or her genitals. That CA has been cruel most of its history isn’t surprising. That people keep letting the state sterilize their loved ones is.
Can someone please explain how suing someone else for making an uninformed decision is productive for anyone? How is looking for a handout taking responsibility for yourself?
Are we really pushing people to not be accountable for their personal decisions? How does pointing the finger at our institutions prevent you from making the same uninformed decisions moving forward?
The only ones who should be suing for damages from the jab are minors or those who are incapable of making decisions for themselves. And they should be suing their parents and/or guardians for making uninformed decisions on their behalf.
If you lost your job because you made an informed decision, then sue your employer for lost wages.
How about showing some integrity here people?
No one is coming to save you but yourself. Come on!
Is there any US state more psychotic, more corrupt, more anti-Constitution and more anti-Bill of Rights freedoms than CA?
Just look at all the laws they've passed the last couple of decades. Look at their extreme censorship, and their own disinformation campaigns. Look at how they operate.
Look at their crime, drug and poverty statistics. Look at how they opened their border wide, welcoming a flood of illegals and giving them money, free housing, free health care, free education, etc.
CA is the model of Democracy governance. Trump had MAGA. Democrats have MACA - Make America California.
I've been reading about Pfizer release 69 as covered by Dr. Naomi Wolf, which laid out that Rochelle Walensky et al knew about the risks to pregnant mothers and those who wished to conceive and directly lied about it. I'd say that ties into a forced sterilization lawsuit...
And how many recipients were informed that the ONLY FDA "approved" COVID shot is COMIRNATY but that it is not available in the United States. Some vials in the U.S. are labeled Comirnaty but they were not manufactured in the approved facilities so they do not qualify as approved drugs. Therefore, NO COVID shots in the U.S. were FDA approved, which makes ALL of them only administered under the EUA. And legally, NO ONE can be forced, mandated, coerced, or incentivized IN ANY WAY to take ANY unapproved drug. Period! Including the military. Which means that ALL the mandates were ILLEGAL!!!!!!
California is a State in Constitutional & Financial default. It is being run by a criminal Governor and legislature that were selected, not elected. There is a very serious movement in California called New California State. It is a Constitutional split of the state. The new State will take up approximately 90% of the land mass but half of the population.
The new state already has a Constitution, a legislature (assembly & senate) that is functioning. The New California State (NCS) is in consultation with the Federal Congress in getting permission for the creation of the state. This is the only answer to saving California. You can look it up: www.newcaliforniastate.com. This has been years of very difficult work but it’s about to happen. This is deadly serious. It is covered under Article 4, Sections 3&4 of the United States Constitution.
And there it is. In black and white. As well as an admission that long-term effects are not yet known. Fascinating that they seem so mystified about the mechanisms of action. Perhaps if they'd spent less time denigrating the "anti-vaxxers" and listening to the doctors and scientists who WERE considering the reasons, they would be a little more enlightened. Guess we'll all have to wait for a few more years until perhaps, maybe, possibly, eventually they'll figure out the reasons. Or admit to knowing them, at least. They're just trying to figure out how they could eke it out into the public domain without it being noticed much. After all, the body count is getting a tad obvious, and more and more people are smelling a rat.
Very much looking forward to the coming Lawsuits, but beyond the civil suits, which will never undo the damage and death from these reckless genetic drugs, looking to see criminal charges and prison time for the persons behind this modern-day Holocaust ...
Medical procedure mandates and informed consent cannot coexist. They are diabolically opposed.
How vaccine mandates and other coerced medical procedures were allowed to happen recently or in the past is an intellectual mystery. Fear and power are the only things that could blind people to something so obvious. And it means that people do not actually understand consent. Or perhaps they understand it and they take the ‘apologize later’, approach. Either way, it’s clearly a violation of human rights. I hope lawsuits spread throughout the world to hold people in positions of power responsible. Politicians, government agencies, businesses, school districts, churches, hospitals- justice to all of them.
My job was forfeit when I refused the mandates shots. The company “intranet” information had nothing about serious side effects of any kind. I knew better, but shrugged it off as merely parroting the CDC, which I’m sure was the case, to the letter. No NI exemption, for example.
My questions relate to what the company and its medical advisors SHOULD HAVE KNOWN relevant to informed consent.
People died who had ZERO RISK from the virus. I did not die but lost a lot of salary, RSUs, bonuses. Greed aside, it’s great to be alive and free of COVID shot injuries and perpetual worry about long term injuries. Nevertheless, financial loss is my legal standing to complain.
What was reasonably hidden from
the company and from employees will be hard to pin on the company. Pfizer bad. Moderna bad. Gov’t bad. But I’m not quite satisfied.
What bothers me is the BLANK package insert. The corporate medical advisors KNEW this or SHOULD have known. According to the EUA, informed consent must be based in part on safety data that are reported by the manufacturer on the package insert. My AI Chatbot said so and I checked the online document. YES!
A BLANK insert can be easily and rightfully construed to be evidence of fraud ... a warning. The known risks of DEATH and INJURY can be said in effect, to be printed in white font or disappearing ink on the blank insert page. A ruse to claim “but we didn’t lie about it.”
There is NO EXCUSE for leveraging our jobs ... my job ... while the LEGAL standards for informed consent are unmet. In my case, I would have challenged the mandate by forcing my termination as opposed to “retiring” on the last day before the deadline for shots.
A second inexcusable omission was the DOD sourcing of the shots. The shots were not delivered by a pharmaceutical company with manufacturing practices we were all familiar with. This is another fraud the company SHOULD HAVE KNOWN. It is a bait and switch violation of consumer protection laws. It is called “affirmative misrepresentation.”
I’m interested in finding an attorney to pursue these complaints against my former employer. At a minimum I want a strong letter from a lawyer that says “I know what you did.”
What drives my irritation are company posts that brag about robust recovery from the “pandemic” ... nothing about the folks sacrificed to the naïveté and pathological risk aversion of a company that carried out a mandate that was NOT a legal requirement. No NI exemption or even testing option. And they did not satisfy informed consent under Federal Law.
For all I know there was likely a CIA agreement in the background as well as Federal business at stake. But that does not excuse violation of the EUA that resulted in death of employees.
The only people who truly had informed "consent" were those who took the time to inform themselves, and having done so, declined to consent to a harmful injection.
So if people have the right to "informed consent", why did they NOT have the right to say NO to the shots as well? Vast numbers of people were harmed in this way too.
I suspect that most media will label all of these facts “misinformation”
thank you
Based on the comments so far, the general consensus out there is that everyone is going to sue everyone in a blatantly obvious corrupt system, while the global predators continue to launder our tax dollars and push policies enslaving humanity.
I’m guessing everyone here still believes that their vote is going to be counted too.
Good luck.
Our government, which includes our legal and medical system, who you continue to rely on for some reason, orchestrated this whole damn thing. Why would you expect them to resolve it?
Wake up people 🤦🏻♀️
Not a vaccine. Gene-therapy.
Will the perps be punished? No. They will be allowed to do exactly the same things during the next fake pandemic. And informed consent will still be hidden deep in the basement.
We are talking about the state that makes child genital mutilation not only legal, but state mandated in some cases. The law demands that if a 5th grade teacher, many of them sadistic and not parents themselves, wants a child sexualized and mutilated all they have to do is assert the child’s parents aren’t “affirming” the teacher’s desire to have the kid sexualized and genitally mitigated snd the state will remove the child from the sex-confirming household and destroy his or her genitals. That CA has been cruel most of its history isn’t surprising. That people keep letting the state sterilize their loved ones is.
Can someone please explain how suing someone else for making an uninformed decision is productive for anyone? How is looking for a handout taking responsibility for yourself?
Are we really pushing people to not be accountable for their personal decisions? How does pointing the finger at our institutions prevent you from making the same uninformed decisions moving forward?
The only ones who should be suing for damages from the jab are minors or those who are incapable of making decisions for themselves. And they should be suing their parents and/or guardians for making uninformed decisions on their behalf.
If you lost your job because you made an informed decision, then sue your employer for lost wages.
How about showing some integrity here people?
No one is coming to save you but yourself. Come on!
Is there any US state more psychotic, more corrupt, more anti-Constitution and more anti-Bill of Rights freedoms than CA?
Just look at all the laws they've passed the last couple of decades. Look at their extreme censorship, and their own disinformation campaigns. Look at how they operate.
Look at their crime, drug and poverty statistics. Look at how they opened their border wide, welcoming a flood of illegals and giving them money, free housing, free health care, free education, etc.
CA is the model of Democracy governance. Trump had MAGA. Democrats have MACA - Make America California.
No thanks.