90 Comments

I've been reading about Pfizer release 69 as covered by Dr. Naomi Wolf, which laid out that Rochelle Walensky et al knew about the risks to pregnant mothers and those who wished to conceive and directly lied about it. I'd say that ties into a forced sterilization lawsuit...

Expand full comment

Walensky was a complete fraud. Never even took the Oath of Office and just resigned after hundreds of thousands of people were disabled or murdered on her watch. I read that our military “leaders” like Milley have also not taken the Oath of Office. This is absolute fraud and democide against the citizens of the USA.

Expand full comment

That not a single flag (general/admiral) officer or colonel/captain in our services resigned over the illegal order to vaccinate the troops is disheartening. Every officer swears to obey the orders of the president and the constitution. Every officer receives training in military ethics and Nuremberg's "I was only following orders" is understood to be a coward's response to a lack of moral responsibility. Sadly, from a 20 August 2022 post:

"... suddenly, nobody in the Pentagon wants to take accountability for their legally dubious mRNA injection order.

It all began on August 24, 2021, when Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin issued a memo mandating mRNA “vaccination” for the active military, but with the stipulation that this mandate only applied to fully licensed products. This was because, as The Dossier understands, it is illegal to force service members to take an EUA vaccine. Only President Joe Biden has the authority to enforce an EUA shot on service members. And no overriding authorization from the White House ever arrived at the Pentagon. ...

Dr Terry Adirim, the woman who signed the memo, is a devoted democrat political activist and, as a medical doctor, advocates for “gender-affirming prescriptions” for “transgender” children. At the time, she was the acting assistant secretary of defense for health affairs (under a Biden political appointment). Adirim’s memo attempted to justify mandating EUA shots as if they were FDA approved. ...

Adirim remains in government as the the program executive director of the VA’s Electronic Health Record Modernization Integration Office. As a government official, both she and the Secretary of Defense are easily accessible to testify via a congressional subpoena, should congress want to investigate their controversial memos. As Adirim’s memo has come under scrutiny, she has decided to lock her social media accounts."

Jordan Schachtel (19.8.2022) Biden Admin officials scramble to escape blame for unlawful Pentagon order mandating mRNA for troops, —Former Pentagon official Terry Adirim says she was directed by the Secretary of Defense to justify the mandate, The Dossier, https://tinyurl.com/2p4te7ap

Expand full comment

And now they are handing the rusted hulk of a pentagon the keys to the Death Star of global oversights of dis-information! Illustrating this has only just begun!!

Expand full comment

OF COURSE IT WAS A FRAUD. IT WAS A SCAM-DEMIC--AND IN THE BOOK,"THE GREAT RESET"-- IT WAS STATED THAT A PANDEMIC WOULD BE USEFUL IN USHERING IN A ONE WORLD GOVT AND ONE WORLD CURRENCY. COVID WAS COVER FOR THE INITIATION INTO THE ORWELLIAN NEW WORLD ORDER AND THE CBDC. TRACKABLE HUMANS WAS THE GOAL. HOPE MORE FOLKS WILL AWAKEN TO THIS FACT--ASAP!

Expand full comment

And #54 and #37 ...

Expand full comment
May 9, 2023·edited May 9, 2023

And how many recipients were informed that the ONLY FDA "approved" COVID shot is COMIRNATY but that it is not available in the United States. Some vials in the U.S. are labeled Comirnaty but they were not manufactured in the approved facilities so they do not qualify as approved drugs. Therefore, NO COVID shots in the U.S. were FDA approved, which makes ALL of them only administered under the EUA. And legally, NO ONE can be forced, mandated, coerced, or incentivized IN ANY WAY to take ANY unapproved drug. Period! Including the military. Which means that ALL the mandates were ILLEGAL!!!!!!

Expand full comment

Anyone involved with a mandate should be jailed for Crimes Against Humanity.

Expand full comment

That assumes they consider us to be humans. Last I knew, we are nothing but useless slaves and deterrents to billy g's and the WEF's utopia on earth..otherwise known as hell.

Expand full comment

Well, the fluoride seems to be keeping legal quite passive.

Expand full comment

Why would anyone need to be forced, mandated, coerced, or incentivized to take a "SAFE and EFFECTIVE drug?

Expand full comment

... and if it works, why would you need a mask? (And if the mask works, why would you need the jab?)

So many questions, so many nonsensical answers...

Expand full comment

Double speak/word salads/gobbledegoop! What Americans can't live without!

The dumbing of America includes missing the memo on a permanent basis.

Expand full comment

Trying to follow the logic of the fake pandemic is like being trapped in a corn maze of a thousand square miles.

Expand full comment

I like the analogy. Sums the situation up very nicely.

Expand full comment

I wonder. This was outright murder and attempted murder of people all over the world. I still can’t believe so many people fell for it. And they still won’t admit that they were deceived. When they or their families get sick or die it’s “anything but the vaccine”. We live in an open air psychiatric ward.

Expand full comment
May 9, 2023·edited May 9, 2023

Well, let's see . . . how about:

the drug is very SAFE for Big Pharma because they have comprehensive liability protection and "own" the government agencies including the DOJ, so they believe they are SAFE from ever getting prosecuted, and:

EFFECTIVE at causing injury and disabilities to traumatize and bankrupt society to prepare for the "Great Reset". . . and at reducing population through outright murder, and damaging reproductive ability: causing spontaneous abortions, miscarriages, and fetal, neonatal, and maternal deaths.

Expand full comment

I’ve read in numerous places that the clot shot is a more effective form

of the abortion pill

than the abortion pill.

Expand full comment

And the Gods hath warned, beware of prophets bearing gifts and fine health!

And in the finer small print, beware of the market monsters of a captured .GOV!

Never very concise was "Safe and Effective"! As "Unavoidably Unsafe" was the law.

Expand full comment

Safe for Congress because they exempted themselves from the mandates. 👿

Expand full comment

Relatedly:

Thomas Massie et al in the US House of Representatives


"I am absolutely saying that what the Secretary of Defense is doing right now is illegal. We know it. I would characterize it as a crime in progress."

Congressman Thomas Massie 7/27/2022: "Vaccine Does Not Stop Spread of COVID"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHtRpzcm6TI

TRANSCRIPT

US CONGRESSMAN THOMAS MASSIE ET AL IN THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MR. NADLER, CHAIRMAN: Who seeks recognition? For what purpose does the gentleman from Kentucky seek recognition?

MR. MASSIE: I seek to speak on the amendment.

MR. NADLER, CHAIRMAN: The gentleman is recognized.

MR. MASSIE: There are just a few things I want to correct in the story or examples that were just given. I think it's been dispelled that the vaccine prevents the spread of covid. I mean, I don't know why we're still saying that. The CDC director has apologized for being wrong about that. The NIH Director has said that he was wrong about that. Literally everybody. Deborah Birx.

VOICE [OFF CAMERA]: Will the gentleman yield?

MR. MASSIE: I will yield.

VOICE [OFF CAMERA] : Did Dr. Fauci admit that he was wrong about that as well yet?

MR. MASSIE: I believe they've all admitted that.

VOICE [OFF CAMERA]: No way. So they got the vaccine and they got covid.

MR. MASSIE: Yes, they've all gotten covid. The President himself is contagious right now even though he's had four shots of the vaccine, and that is why he's staying away from people. So I just take a little bit of issue that we are in a congressional markup still perpetuating this falsehood that was propagated by the pharmaceutical companies that stood to profit by this. They knew it wasn't even true. Their tests with 50,000 people in the trials were designed to explicitly not show whether it did or didn't stop the spread of covid. So I'm just offended that we're still perpetuating that myth when virtually everybody has admitted it was a myth. And the reason we need to acknowledge that is that is the myth that underlies the entire rationalization for kicking somebody out of the military for not taking the vaccine.

MR. ISSA: Will the gentleman yield?

MR. MASSIE: I will yield to the gentleman from California.

MR. ISSA: I can' t wait for January 3rd, maybe the 4th, when one of our early HRs restores those those men and women, those brave men and women, who asked for and were denied their valid exemptions, and we restore them to full active duty, which, by the way, will unring the bell of any question of a general or other-than-honorable discharge. And I look forward to working with the gentlemen on that.

MR. MASSIE: I look forward to that, too. They should all be reinstated. None of them should have been given anything less than an honorable discharge at all for this.

And while I've still got time on the clock, I have to mention that the Secretary of Defense issued a statement on August 24th saying that the vaccines that were required and that would be administered, would be the FDA-approved vaccines, and not a single dose of FDA-approved vaccine, aka, Comirnaty, in the case of Pfizer, or Spikevax, in the case of Moderna, not a single dose of that has been to given a single member of the military, as the Secretary of Defense specified. And it was his only legal way to require the vaccine for members of the military was that it was FDA-approved and that the doses that they would receive would be the FDA-approved, legally distinct from the other vaccines that they would receive, and also labeled as such, labeled appropriately. None of those vaccines have been given, yet tens of thousands of members of the military have been kicked out for not taking that vaccine.

US REPRESENTATIVE FROM NORTH CAROLINA: Will the gentleman yield?

MR. MASSIE: I yield to the gentleman from North Carolina.

US REPRESENTATIVE FROM NORTH CAROLINA: Is the gentleman suggesting that the military engaged in a bait-and-switch and substituted a different vaccine than that which was approved?

MR. MASSIE: I am absolutely saying that what the Secretary of Defense is doing right now is illegal. We know it. I would characterize it as a crime in progress.

MS. LOGREN: Would the gentleman yield?

MR. MASSIE: I'm going to yield to Mr. Tiffany, who's asked—

MR. TIFFANY: I want to make sure I'm clear on this. Are you saying they received the experimental use vaccine?

MR. MASSIE: The emergency use authorization vaccine is all they've received. Not a single member of the military has received the FDA-approved version.

MR. TIFFANY: It's good you're dispelling this notion that's out there, they're getting the FDA-approved vaccines.

MR. MASSIE: There are two notions I want to dispell. And I would the gentlelady time to respond to this. The notion that vaccine stops the spread of covid. Would the gentlelady like to clarify her comments on that?

MS. LOFGREN: Does the gentlemen yield?

MR. MASSIE: I do.

MS. LOFGREN: The point I'm making is that there's activity service members can engage in that we would not find to be egregious. For example, adultery. I mean, I'm not in favor of it, I think it's a sin, but I don't think it's—

MR. MASSIE: I'm reclaiming my time, and I think the gentlelady gave valid examples, but the one that I don't, you know, with all due respect, I don't think it's valid, is to substantiate the disproven notion that the vaccine stops the spread of covid and that would be a reasonable, a reason to give somebody a discharge that's less than honorable.

And with that, I yield back.

Expand full comment

I’m posting THIS everywhere I can think of and blast texting it to all my friends and family, starting with the military branch of my

fam tree!!!! My

niece got 1 shot after begging for an exemption. She has bad reactions to childhood vaccines, including eczema, psoriasis and all the stuff people get when their body is trying to expel all the heavy metals for

vax. RIGHT after

the clot shot the Marines mandated, she went blind in one eye, got a growth in her appendix and spleen, had a WILD eczema flare with huge red, oozing welts for weeks. She may have to remove appendix & spleen. She is a marine and swore she’d go awol is they made

her take another clot shot. She was pregnant. She has the

most beautiful 18 mo old you’ve ever laid eyes on. My

nephew got one clot shot & now has cancer of the

throat. They are 27 and 28 or 29, extremely fit, and OVER this BS.

Expand full comment

This is the unbelievably enormous tragedy of the shots! And this has been repeated now literally millions of times. This is the biggest Crime Against Humanity ever in the history of the world!!!!!

Expand full comment

Good job, Transcriber B!

Expand full comment

https://tinyurl.com/2p4te7ap

Expand full comment

Thanks for your reply, but what does that link go to? As a matter of policy I never click on something if I don't have an idea what it might be.

Expand full comment

Yes. I have been trying to tell people for years that these mandates are absolutely illegal. Our entire country has become illegal.

Expand full comment

Not all of it, but the Federal government certainly is! Completely captured by Globalist interests.

Expand full comment

That is how it should work, but our DOD and HHS have different ideas and are above the law.

Expand full comment

California is a State in Constitutional & Financial default. It is being run by a criminal Governor and legislature that were selected, not elected. There is a very serious movement in California called New California State. It is a Constitutional split of the state. The new State will take up approximately 90% of the land mass but half of the population.

The new state already has a Constitution, a legislature (assembly & senate) that is functioning. The New California State (NCS) is in consultation with the Federal Congress in getting permission for the creation of the state. This is the only answer to saving California. You can look it up: www.newcaliforniastate.com. This has been years of very difficult work but it’s about to happen. This is deadly serious. It is covered under Article 4, Sections 3&4 of the United States Constitution.

Expand full comment

Wow, best of luck!

Expand full comment

Thank you 😊

Expand full comment
May 9, 2023·edited May 9, 2023

❤️ My support comes all the way from South Africa an for selfish reasons. The world has fallen into the grip of a bunch of psychopaths, judging by current world events. I follow US politics because I believe what is threatening the human race currently, will be overthrown by the actions of Americans. You are the primary target and a number of smaller regional victories may just create enough momentum for the new tower of babel that is being erected, to start toppling over.

Expand full comment

Thanks for pointing to this. Very interesting to learn there the constitutional law and the history of West Virginia as precedent.

Expand full comment

They have been threatening that for years now. It never comes to pass.

Expand full comment

Well IT IS happening now. There is not option for failure. We have not been threatening it for years it has taken years to get it set up and do it right. We only have one chance and we can't screw it up.

Expand full comment

They were talking about this in 1992 when I was living out there. It is now 2023. It won ‘t really matter though. They ruined California, moved to Colorado and now are ruining that as well. Next stop Tennessee? https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/how-flipping-colorado-blue-has-become-democrats-blueprint-for-the-rest-of-america_5286834.html

Expand full comment

California will be the place to be in a few years when it’s booming. Talk is cheap it’s the doing that’s important. And we are doing.

Expand full comment

Sneaky but true. Punches way below the belt are now highly fashionable and non punitive.

Expand full comment

And there it is. In black and white. As well as an admission that long-term effects are not yet known. Fascinating that they seem so mystified about the mechanisms of action. Perhaps if they'd spent less time denigrating the "anti-vaxxers" and listening to the doctors and scientists who WERE considering the reasons, they would be a little more enlightened. Guess we'll all have to wait for a few more years until perhaps, maybe, possibly, eventually they'll figure out the reasons. Or admit to knowing them, at least. They're just trying to figure out how they could eke it out into the public domain without it being noticed much. After all, the body count is getting a tad obvious, and more and more people are smelling a rat.

Expand full comment

Of course, further down in the document, they disingenuously make the claims about the "societal benefit" outweighing these risks. As well as the usual claim that the overall efficacy also make it worth it. What a load of bollocks. Healthy youngsters at zero risk do NOT need to take it to "protect" themselves or others, when this "protection" is not even there. Irrational and illogical.

Expand full comment

In essence, any "greater good" or collectivist argument states that some entity or group decides what some overarching good is, that all must submit to. This is fine when we all agree that on the "goods" of speed limits, not stealing, not reneging on contracts, etc.-- basic foundations for society. These are small, piecemeal goods. But an overarching good that dictates values to all of society are mistaken because we each have our own values and goals and ends-- this is in the nature of free individuals-- and to preserve this freedom, individuals must of course be self-determining within the broad constraints of the law.

Contrary to what some renegade psychologist has suggested to us, what happened during Covid wasn't that the ideology of "mechanistic thinking" took precedence over intuitive understanding, but that the single idea of "stay safe" became an obsession, driven by 24/7 broadcast fear porn. It was decided that police state conditions had to apply to force everyone to adopt this "stay safe" attitude-- this overall greater good-- although in retrospect we had little to fear. Of course, we should've simply let individuals carry on as they saw fit, based on their own understanding, without the heavy hand of state dictates.

Expand full comment

It's never fine when any group wants to impose it. Regardless of any "good" that comes from it. PSAs encouraged people to quit smoking based on evidence and many people did. It wasn't "mandatory." These same people that pushed "Covid" are worldwide and won't give up easily. They want total control and total censorship to affirm their total control. It's why AI is being touted as "great" and the Veep who barely has "I" is now the "AI czar."

Expand full comment

Precisely.

Expand full comment

Very much looking forward to the coming Lawsuits, but beyond the civil suits, which will never undo the damage and death from these reckless genetic drugs, looking to see criminal charges and prison time for the persons behind this modern-day Holocaust ...

Expand full comment

Medical procedure mandates and informed consent cannot coexist. They are diabolically opposed.

How vaccine mandates and other coerced medical procedures were allowed to happen recently or in the past is an intellectual mystery. Fear and power are the only things that could blind people to something so obvious. And it means that people do not actually understand consent. Or perhaps they understand it and they take the ‘apologize later’, approach. Either way, it’s clearly a violation of human rights. I hope lawsuits spread throughout the world to hold people in positions of power responsible. Politicians, government agencies, businesses, school districts, churches, hospitals- justice to all of them.

Expand full comment

This all hearkens back to the US Supreme Court Jacobson decision of 1905, it which it was determined that the state could coerce an individual, Henning Jacobson, into getting the smallpox vaccine during an epidemic by imposing a modest fine of $5. The reasoning was, basically, that the state had an interest in ensuring public health. Note that this did not force Jacobson to actually take the shot.

Fast forward to the Buck v Bell decision of 1927 that asserted that the state could force sterilization on misfits for the benefit of society. This of course was eugenics.

Fast forward to the Nazi regime and the extermination of "infected" members of society-- the Jews-- which actually began with euthanasia of mentally or physically unfit German citizens of any race. This is the horrible end-game of the idea that society can control bodies for the greater good. It must be noted that the Nazi laws enabling these horrors were patterned on US laws, such as the Buck v Bell decision.

We must never, ever allow emergency medical mandates to take hold. This is central. We must learn a valuable lesson: the "evil" of some individuals refusing is far outweighed by the evil of disregarding freely informed consent to medical treatment and bodily autonomy.

Expand full comment

Jacobson needs to be overturned. What has happened is so evil and the pharmaceutical companies are laughing all the way to the bank, for decades, but especially in the last three years. What kind of cognitive dissonance keeps the “intellectuals” from seeing what is obvious, still baffles me. It’s a tribute to the fact that corporate interests have infiltrated all aspects of higher learning. Thank goodness for a few independent thinkers who have risen above the fray.

Expand full comment

I think Jacobson was good-intentioned but they couldn't foresee how it would be abused. That decision actually warned against oppressive public measures.

Expand full comment

You know what they say about good intentions...

Have you read Dissolving Illusions by Humphries? After reading that book, I realized how much propaganda we have all been exposed to. I still remember the "history of vaccines" that I was taught in high school. It was complete propaganda. The scientific/research/pharmaceutical community has been teaching people that vaccines are the greatest invention of mankind and it simply isn't true. They sounds sciency but they aren't. It's no better than snake oil or worse. The science around vaccines are about as honest as when the cigarette companies and doctors said that smoking was good for people. Vaccines have always been inherently dangerous and poorly tested, intentionally.

Because people believe the propaganda (like I did for many years), the pharmaceutical industry is able to make oppressive, illogical, dangerous, medical procedures seem like a good idea, therefor forcing people into them seems well intentioned. I would wager that most people supporting the covid "vaccine" mandates of the last three years were well intentioned.

Before the pandemic, the medical community was responsible for the third leading cause of death (medical errors). This doesn't even count things like prescribing SSRIs, statins, etc. Most medical professionals probably aren't even aware that they cause death on a massive scale, but it's true. Through the pandemic, I assume they are now the top cause of death, when you combine all the former medical interventions with the covid protocols, preventing early treatments, and covid "vaccines". Are doctors good intentioned? Probably most are but that doesn't mean it leads to good outcomes. The government (or anyone) should never be allowed to force medical procedures no matter how well intentioned. It gets tricky with mental health issues but if you have to err on one side, I say freedom from medical tyranny. Jacobson was a huge mistake based on fraud and fake science. "For the good of the whole" is a drumbeat used to lead people down all sorts of tyrannical measures.

Expand full comment

Well said. Iatrogenic death is the #1 cause of early demise in America when you consider that Alzheimer's, cancer, heart attacks/stroke and diabetes are preventable metabolic illnesses that the medical profession allows to chronically progress.

Expand full comment

Yes, our medical system is an absolute mess. Honestly though, it's citizens' responsibility to choose diet and lifestyle choices that help them avoid the system. Knowledge on how to do this is abundant and free. But, it certainly wouldn't hurt if the medical community could at least encourage their patients to live healthy lifestyles. The CDC and NIH could at least pretend to care about helping prevent chronic disease in meaningful ways. Ultimately, doctors and other health professionals can't select and place nutritious food in peoples' mouth for them at every meal. That's on each individual. I don't know anyone who thinks soda is good for their body yet there are multiple isles at stores with soda in them. It's not there because people aren't buying it. The poor health we find ourselves in as industrialized nations is a two way street. Plenty of responsibility to go around to all involved.

It is really sad that our current medical system doesn't join up with the best nature has to offer and the best of technology because there is so much potential for excellent health outcomes. We should be the healthiest that humans have been in the history of mankind. Instead, corporate interests have coopted the system and have opted to implement the worst of both. And people are generally willing participants. Many doctors can testify that their patients are not interested in hearing about diet and lifestyle changes, even if that is the best course of action for their health.

There is not a lot of money in people being healthy so pharma (and hospitals and regulatory agencies and hospital systems etc) isn't interested. Healthy lifestyles are a lot of work and healthy food doesn't taste as good (and it's not addictive) so the average person isn't interested. (I taught nutrition classes for free and I can vouch for the fact that while people want to be healthy, they usually loose interest when they learn what it takes. It's not a pill or supplement or adding one or two foods to their normal diet. It's eating 90% unprocessed foods that are high in nutrients.)

Having said all of that, I will be very glad for the current medical system if I should be in a car accident or something but I definitely drive slower and more carefully since the pandemic exposed just how completely backwards the system is. I knew it was rough but this has exposed something else. And cheap, processed hospital food is definitely an insult to injury so... hopefully I can keep avoiding the system as long as possible. I'm sure I'm not alone. Lots of people can see it pretty clearly now.

Expand full comment

Like the Rising of the Phoenix myth. The ashes never cool and the watchkeepers have lost an interest to have a watchful eye. The menace in the ashes rises again and again.

Expand full comment

My job was forfeit when I refused the mandates shots. The company “intranet” information had nothing about serious side effects of any kind. I knew better, but shrugged it off as merely parroting the CDC, which I’m sure was the case, to the letter. No NI exemption, for example.

My questions relate to what the company and its medical advisors SHOULD HAVE KNOWN relevant to informed consent.

People died who had ZERO RISK from the virus. I did not die but lost a lot of salary, RSUs, bonuses. Greed aside, it’s great to be alive and free of COVID shot injuries and perpetual worry about long term injuries. Nevertheless, financial loss is my legal standing to complain.

What was reasonably hidden from

the company and from employees will be hard to pin on the company. Pfizer bad. Moderna bad. Gov’t bad. But I’m not quite satisfied.

What bothers me is the BLANK package insert. The corporate medical advisors KNEW this or SHOULD have known. According to the EUA, informed consent must be based in part on safety data that are reported by the manufacturer on the package insert. My AI Chatbot said so and I checked the online document. YES!

A BLANK insert can be easily and rightfully construed to be evidence of fraud ... a warning. The known risks of DEATH and INJURY can be said in effect, to be printed in white font or disappearing ink on the blank insert page. A ruse to claim “but we didn’t lie about it.”

There is NO EXCUSE for leveraging our jobs ... my job ... while the LEGAL standards for informed consent are unmet. In my case, I would have challenged the mandate by forcing my termination as opposed to “retiring” on the last day before the deadline for shots.

A second inexcusable omission was the DOD sourcing of the shots. The shots were not delivered by a pharmaceutical company with manufacturing practices we were all familiar with. This is another fraud the company SHOULD HAVE KNOWN. It is a bait and switch violation of consumer protection laws. It is called “affirmative misrepresentation.”

I’m interested in finding an attorney to pursue these complaints against my former employer. At a minimum I want a strong letter from a lawyer that says “I know what you did.”

What drives my irritation are company posts that brag about robust recovery from the “pandemic” ... nothing about the folks sacrificed to the naïveté and pathological risk aversion of a company that carried out a mandate that was NOT a legal requirement. No NI exemption or even testing option. And they did not satisfy informed consent under Federal Law.

For all I know there was likely a CIA agreement in the background as well as Federal business at stake. But that does not excuse violation of the EUA that resulted in death of employees.

Expand full comment

I'm not a lawyer but it seems to me you do have grounds for a lawsuit. I well remember at the time the mandates came down, thinking, the ones who are going to get creamed in due time are the businesses and institutions that, at their discretion (not federal or state) imposed mandates for the experimental injections. Ditto the ones who denied religious exemptions. The big "memo" so many business owners and CEOs / Presidents of institutions totally missed is that EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) is not the same as approved. And of course, where's the package insert? It's impossible to provide informed consent. Add to that all that has come out since about the deaths, injuries and fraud with the trials prior to the EUA (Pfizer docs, etc etc etc). So yes, in imposing experimental jab or job, your employer violated your human rights, no question about it. Plus in many cases employers grabbed what would have been these noncompliant employees' pensions.

I hope you sue, and I hope you win the stars and the moon.

My one concrete suggestion is that, if you haven't already you might have a look at attorney Jeff Childers' blog Coffee & Covid which offers a resources page:

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/s/resources

Expand full comment

Thanks! I’m not Steve Kirsch but I’m willing to invest in a consultation. I was thinking of Jeff Childers but never checked his web site! Will do. Aaron Siri is another, with offices in NYC. But everybody works over Zoom anyway. Even if all I achieve is scaring them, that would be a positive outcome. The most sensible thing would be class action ... if the law office sees big $$ for themselves, so much the better! The families of those who died likely were told it was some thing else ... I’m quite sure of it.

Expand full comment

The only people who truly had informed "consent" were those who took the time to inform themselves, and having done so, declined to consent to a harmful injection.

So if people have the right to "informed consent", why did they NOT have the right to say NO to the shots as well? Vast numbers of people were harmed in this way too.

Expand full comment

I suspect that most media will label all of these facts “misinformation”

Expand full comment

The mainstream media, they are the purveyors of misinformation, aka whoppers & crap. These days much of what they call "misinformation" I call "missed information," in other words, if these editors and journalists were the professionals they presume to be, they would have been covering it. While I never believed the mainstream media was all perfect and objective, I did have enough respect for various journalists and editors to have subscribed to a number of newspapers and magazines, New York Times, Atlantic Monthly, etc. & etc. That was another time, another world.

Expand full comment

thank you

Expand full comment

Based on the comments so far, the general consensus out there is that everyone is going to sue everyone in a blatantly obvious corrupt system, while the global predators continue to launder our tax dollars and push policies enslaving humanity.

I’m guessing everyone here still believes that their vote is going to be counted too.

Good luck.

Our government, which includes our legal and medical system, who you continue to rely on for some reason, orchestrated this whole damn thing. Why would you expect them to resolve it?

Wake up people 🤦🏻‍♀️

Expand full comment

Not a vaccine. Gene-therapy.

Expand full comment

Will the perps be punished? No. They will be allowed to do exactly the same things during the next fake pandemic. And informed consent will still be hidden deep in the basement.

Expand full comment

We are talking about the state that makes child genital mutilation not only legal, but state mandated in some cases. The law demands that if a 5th grade teacher, many of them sadistic and not parents themselves, wants a child sexualized and mutilated all they have to do is assert the child’s parents aren’t “affirming” the teacher’s desire to have the kid sexualized and genitally mitigated snd the state will remove the child from the sex-confirming household and destroy his or her genitals. That CA has been cruel most of its history isn’t surprising. That people keep letting the state sterilize their loved ones is.

Expand full comment

Can someone please explain how suing someone else for making an uninformed decision is productive for anyone? How is looking for a handout taking responsibility for yourself?

Are we really pushing people to not be accountable for their personal decisions? How does pointing the finger at our institutions prevent you from making the same uninformed decisions moving forward?

The only ones who should be suing for damages from the jab are minors or those who are incapable of making decisions for themselves. And they should be suing their parents and/or guardians for making uninformed decisions on their behalf.

If you lost your job because you made an informed decision, then sue your employer for lost wages.

How about showing some integrity here people?

No one is coming to save you but yourself. Come on!

Expand full comment

Is there any US state more psychotic, more corrupt, more anti-Constitution and more anti-Bill of Rights freedoms than CA?

Just look at all the laws they've passed the last couple of decades. Look at their extreme censorship, and their own disinformation campaigns. Look at how they operate.

Look at their crime, drug and poverty statistics. Look at how they opened their border wide, welcoming a flood of illegals and giving them money, free housing, free health care, free education, etc.

CA is the model of Democracy governance. Trump had MAGA. Democrats have MACA - Make America California.

No thanks.

Expand full comment

I like Trump, however, President Warp Speed really doesn’t have such a great record as highlighted here https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/05/no_author/qanon-trumpenstein-and-the-art-of-winning/

Expand full comment