Schizophrenic Jerry Drake Varnell was encouraged and assisted by an undercover FBI agent in "foiled" plot to blow up BancFirst building in Oklahoma City
We appear to be on a precipice. The FBI has, in so many instances, gone rogue, gone criminal. But will the new administration have the bandwidth needed to rein in the criminality and restore law and order? Will Kash Patel be able to construct a picture of exactly who was directing all the illegal operations?
Nah, they're shitting their pants over the mighty Oreshnik. Mach freaking 14, 70 Km altitude. By the time they seem them, they've hit the target. Putin could take out all the US launch sites, even without using nukes.
Anyway, if they did WW3 they would no longer be able to swan about on their Yachts, watching the plebs eat bugs. And much, if not all, of their data, and therefore power, on us would be wiped out.
If anyone can, it's Kash Patel. I was thrilled to hear his name as Director of the FBI. He fits the bill: smart, tough, has insider knowledge, has been a victim of the FBI. I think he is going to be explosive.
Probably not. Police power is police power is police power is police power is police power is police power is police power is police power is police power is police power. There are NO such a thing as "good" police, and until people get that concept through their fucking dumbass concrete brains, we will continue to live in a fucking police state. Humanity needs to wake the fuck up and quit applying for fucking police jobs. And what do I mean by a police job ?? That's ANY job where upon graduation from brainwashing academy {commonly known as "police academy"} you are given a FUCKING badge and a FUCKING gun. That's a FUCKING police job. Humanity needs to STOP voluntarily joining this SHIT pile police industrial complex. If people would stop joining the mother fucker in the first place, then policing on all levels would just eventually be phased out - PEACEFULLY.
Without a police force, society would devolve into mob rule.
That said, there are police activities that occur daily that should cease to exist. Surveillance cameras that monitor mass swaths of our major cities, unwarranted mass electronic monitoring of citizens online, civil forfeiture, unmanned traffic and speed cameras, these are all gross violations of our civil rights. Yet, the judiciary allows these practices to continue and expand.
So, while I agree with you in a very minute way, I do believe that total abolishment of all police forces would be detrimental to society. A more difficult, yet much needed, approach to police reform would be to examine ALL laws, civil, local, municipal, state, and federal, and law enforcement practices and remove those which blatantly infringe upon our rights by nature of their existence and those techniques which are routinely abused by law enforcement agencies.
WOW - spoken of like a brainwashed statist. You said and I quote "without a police FORCE, society would devolve into mob rule". What a bunch of FUCKING BULLSHIT. Police FORCES have by mass psychological brainwashing, have been "granted" a monopoly of security and violence. First of all, listen to what the fuck I said - I said humanity needs to stop JOINING police forces. So you would not wake up one day and BAM there's no more police. This would be about a 15 to 30 year transition plan due to attrition The free market would recognize the trend and come up with private free market solutions for SECURITY. That's all the fuck "policing" is, a group of evil bastards {police forces} who have HIJACKED security and given their evil bastard selves a monopoly and created a DeFacto proverbial Lee Iacocca too big to fail Police Industrial Complex "Chrysler Corporation". So YES, the goal is abolishing the police, but the ship is so fucking BIG, it will take time to turn it around. But the process must start. The best way to start is STOP JOING THE FUCKING POLICE FORCES - STOP IT !!!!!!!!!!! You see an ad in the paper "we're hiring police officers, starting salary 80,000 a year", take the ad and use it for toilet paper. FUCK the police.
psychotic people usually don't seek out peaceful solutions. Why do you think I'm "psychotic" ?? Because I use STRONG language ?? Your comment is a joke and based on no logic. If we keep using "nice" language, NOBODY will take "us" seriously - of COURSE I'm not sure whose side you're on which is why I put "us" in quotes. If you disagree with me, then tell me why I'm wrong. The psychotic ones are the people who think armed men with badges and guns having a monopoly on security and violence are legit and normal. Now THAT's what I call psychotic - as well as stupid. There is ONE reason and one reason ONLY why the name Anne Frank became famous - it's because of MEN WITH GUNS AND BADGES. If you think it's "psychotic" that someone is just telling the truth - THE KING HAS NO CLOTHES, then MISTER who is the psychotic one ?? You think it's "OK" that the world is essentially a FUCKING police State ?? 12 Billion laws, rules, and regulations and codes that NO human being could possibly ever know all of them. That's by DESIGN to make EVERYONE a "lawbreaker". Seriously get the fuck out of here with this "psychotic" bullshit. If you want to debate then start debating.
I would LOVE to use "nice" and "kind" language, but I tried that for a decade. Then the fucking "pandemic" "hit" because of piece of shit Donald Trump who declared a "national emergency" and I though "wow, this will wake people up". And it did just the opposite. So the time for "nice" words are over.
Hi Brian, I understand why you feel as you do about the police. Today's "police" are not the "peace officers" that they used to be many years ago. I don't know how the title changed from "peace officers" to "police", but we here in the US had "peace officers" years ago. Many walked the beat... as they used to say and those peace officers really did keep the peace. Yes, they had guns at their waste but rarely used them. Those peace officers were able to verbally defuse conflict in a civil manner. The peace officers / police of years gone by did not look like, and were not, armed militia ready to kill anyone that walked close to them. Let's hope that we can get back to the days when police were "peace officers" and we all can disagree and still remain civil no matter the situation.
How about ABOLISH the police and the free market can come up with private solutions for SECURITY. That's all "policing" is, is a MONOPOLY on SECURITY and VIOLENCE.
I was a revolutionary socialist, and agree that the police's job is to beat down on the proletariat. Having said that, the so-called left and many on the uniparty right, as well as our so-called governments, have now been corrupted by the globalists (aka. uber capitalists/Corporation), and in a weird way the police are now in their way.
Anyone who has read up on the history of the FBI would know that it's main function has always been the police arm of the government. Some of its services to local police departments, such as databases of similar crimes, training, and investigative assistance were helpful in the past. But, due to the nature of electronic communication, even those services are no longer needed.
YES - but humanity needs to STOP applying for police jobs in the first place. ALL police jobs. If the fucking job has a badge, then don't join the organization. A cop is just as much as an evil mother fucker as the serial killer. In BOTH cases, you have a man who thinks they can CONTROL others with the threat and force of violence. Actually, the cop is WAY WAY WAY WORSE because he/she is a deceiver selling themselves as the "good" guys when inside they are satanic DEVILS.
Actually the police need to operate by using morals ethics and 6th sense. We need to be able to get rid of the criminals hurting society like during mostly peaceful protests- there should have been massive arrests instead we end up with autonomous zones:( fbi way different than police, ss and cia way different than your hometown police- but mayors and govt officials definitely can get to them:( we had a soros mayor:( husband was running guns and drugs out of their home with a 9 year old living there.
Pharmacists "run" drugs out of CVS. How come the police don't arrest those bastards ?? Big pharma kills WAY more people than "street" drugs do. A DRUG is a DRUG. Street drug - pharma drug - SAME PILE OF SHIT. So the police are piece of shit hypocrites for not arresting the drug dealers at CVS. If we're going to be anti fucking drug, then let's be ANTI drug. No fucking exceptions. Now me personally I don't give a rat's ass - I don't consume street drugs, and I don't consume prescription "legal" drugs - BOTH are from the same pile of shit. And by the fucking way, prescription "legal" drugs are fucking up our drinking water. Again, the total stupidity and hypocrisy of the FUCKING police !!!
Good thing the FBI is spending their time actively protecting us by giving mentally ill people help in blowing up buildings! But they didn't have time to see 2 Trump assassinations coming. Or that Russiagate was a hoax.
Typically, it takes 9 years for a medicine to be developed and approved. The annual Kill Shots that so many put their faith in are just one facet of the plot to cull the herd.
We will never learn the facts about what the mRNA shots were developed for or how many have died from them. In four years we haven't learned whether those were real bombs placed at the DNC and RNC on January 6, 2021. The media hid the story about Hunter's laptop, invented Russiagate, and lies to us on a daily basis. If you want truth, check out Bari Weiss' Substack THE FREE PRESS. She left WaPo to try her hand at honest writing and she is doing a great job.
Like any oversized bureaucracy apparatus, FBI has realized long ago it's easier to "invent" work then to actually do it for real out there. So, they started organizing and then foiling their own plots. It's a rather simple job - find a mentally unstable individual, groom him online, encourage his violent ideas, provide some logistical and financial help to make it look more serious... and then arrest him after a few months. Another dangerous plot foiled in the nick of time by the brave FBI agents.. who never even had to leave the office.
Exactly. Even the Washington Post and New York Times have done articles noting that a many "terrorism" plots supposedly "stopped" by the FBI were the type you describe.
Remember the plot to "kidnap" Whitmire, the governor of MI in '16. There were more FBI agents and informers than "plotters", the money all come from the FBI, the equipment from the same, all the ideas and intel from them, the "leader" of the conspiracy was a deadbeat who lived in somebody's basement and had no money or expertise, was a heavy dope user (the FBI agents made fun of him, calling Captain Stupid or some such ridicule). With all the jihadis, gangbangers, drug traffickers, human traffickers, sociopaths, psychopaths, anarchists, and general criminal types of all types running by the millions all over and everywhere in the country, law enforcement and the FBI specifically does not need to be going around provoking, financing, and supporting mentally ill individuals to commit crimes. Unless, of course, that's the whole point of their efforts. Probably easier to do than actually tracking down the real miscreants, and no doubt much safer, to create one from someone not playing with a full deck than hunting the real killers.
this also brings to mind the IBM building bombed in Nashville or somewhere in that area. Could that also be an FBI operation? Who knows. The thing is lots of stuff like this comes to mind when the populace arrives at the general conclusion their government can NOT be trusted. In the USA since 2020 we are probably JUST starting to see what the rest of the world sees as the status quo.
As for Mangione it seems clear he didn't need Insurance allegedly the ceo was about to testify with incriminating evidence against Pelosi. That's why these dark mind projects existed to create killers to protect the elite in government. There are many who had ties to cia or fbi where they were lead to the crime. "The Minds of Men" is an extensive documentary that delves deep in the players process and outcome. Most high profile cases aren't what they seem.
OMG, John, you mean to say FBI Agent Williams committed a crime? Well, yes!
How is it that many of the alphabet agencies of the federal government have employees who commit crimes and never suffer any punishment . Michael Byrd, Ashley Babbitt assassin, comes to mind as an example. Subsequently he receives an award and gets cleansed for the hero building in an interview with Lester Holt on NBC ( Never Broadcasting Correctly ). More famously are Fauci, Brix and Walinsky. There are many more. The dark face in the cover up is the compliant Pavlovian lap dog legacy media.
Nothing new! In 1979 FBI was sued in numerous cases of entrapment for 500 million dollars where innocent people went through hell! They keep burying the facts that psychotropic drugs is a major element in the school shootings!
As a fan of psychotropic drugs, I take offense at that statement. Occam's Razor would say that Iran or the DNC provided weapons and training for the two would-be assassins.
FBI was dirty from day one (see Official and Confidential, The Secret Life of J. Edgar Hoover, by Anthony Summers). But it's certainly gotten dirtier since. Entrapment and the manufacture of evidence is one of the agency's specialities (they even had an undercover informer inside the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, but still failed to stop the attack). More recently, FBI has been able to track down grandmas in Alaska who walked through the Capitol on January 6, but unable to identify the person caught on tape planting fake bombs in DC the night of January 5, 2021, or the "Scaffold Commander" who kept urging the crowd forward into the Capitol on January 6, or "Fence Cutter Bulwark" and accomplices who removed fencing and closure signs prior to the initial breech. The "bombs," discovered at just the moment needed to pull police from the Capitol, held little interest for the FBI. Of course, the DC Special Agent in charge of the Jan 6 "investigation" had only recently been promoted from the Detroit office, where he ran the Whitmer faux kidnapping operation
Why isn't Jerry Drake Varnell being treated for schizophrenia, instead of being placed in jail. Perhaps Jerry needs to be in a medical facility ? (not sure), but he certainly does need appropriate supervision until his condition can be remedied. And, why aren't all of the FBI agents who persuaded and encouraged the unstable Jerry to do malicious activity FIRED from their jobs and in JAIL???? Was there a jury trail? Or, did a judge decide to jail someone who obviously was incapable of make intellegent and proper decisions? Was this some kind of FBI training activity to find and entrap unbalanced people to do nepharious deeds? The entire situation is SHAMEFUL!!!!!! Those FBI employees should have been fired & never allowed to do any kind of work with people again; of course, after they each spent 25 years in prison!!!
The legal term is doin' fine. Here is a Q&A that I wrote for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, ("Jahar") and I also filed a RICO lawsuit. Yesterday, Biden commuted the Death Sentence of all federal prisoners except "3 terrorists" (a church shooter, a synagogue shooter, and Jahar). If they were terrorists, rather than patsies, I'll be a monkey's uncle:
How utterly gross. The FBI is an entrapment organization as much as anything else. Find a poor, rural white guy who is either very unintelligent or mentally unstable, groom him with money, direct assistance with planning an attack, possibly making the device itself, then arrest him for plotting an attack. Thanks, federal government.
In the Jury Instructions, the prosecution had probably *defined "entrapment" (that the defense counsel may have alleged) in such a *way that a number of juries might interpret as not "fitting"
the alleged crime, so that the entrapment defense was not helpful. Some attorneys forget or never learned how very, very important is the wording in the Jury Instructions. Juries will sometimes ponder those Instructions for a long time, trying to understand them. I experienced that, myself.
Fully Informed Jury Association (FIJA.org) shows that jurors do not have to accept a judge’s instructions; that such instructions are actually ILLEGAL in a real court of law. Of course, our US courts are run by British-aligned BAR lawyers and the law of the seas, not actual US law.
thanks for the link. THIS appears to be the best reason they provide which I would consider and any JURY should consider before arriving at a verdict:
"Jury nullification educators often talk about “victimless” offenses, and advocate for the idea that if there is no victim, there is no crime. A victimless offense is one in which no other person’s rights are violated, but which has legally been defined as a crime anyway, often because it offends someone else’s sensibilities. Examples of such victimless crimes include:
many marijuana and other drug offenses such as possession, use, or sale of these substances,
voluntary trade of unlicensed or banned goods such as raw milk,
peaceful possession of various weapons that run afoul of complex regulations and laws,
expressive activities that are supposed to be Constitutionally-protected, but which have been eroded through bureaucratic regulation,
gardening, building, installing alternative energy systems, collecting rainwater, or otherwise peacefully using one’s own property, but not in accordance with government regulations intended to engineer certain types of communities, etc.
Most people can fundamentally agree that people who are not harming anyone else should not themselves be harmed. This basic idea does not change simply because some busybodies who feel the need to control other people’s lives passed a law or wrote a regulation to force people to comply with their personal tastes and preferences. Many jurors either nullify in such cases or later regret failing to nullify, often having felt bullied into punishing someone who does not deserve it."
We appear to be on a precipice. The FBI has, in so many instances, gone rogue, gone criminal. But will the new administration have the bandwidth needed to rein in the criminality and restore law and order? Will Kash Patel be able to construct a picture of exactly who was directing all the illegal operations?
Let’s hope and pray they will
Maybe, but my guess is ww3 will come first
Nah, they're shitting their pants over the mighty Oreshnik. Mach freaking 14, 70 Km altitude. By the time they seem them, they've hit the target. Putin could take out all the US launch sites, even without using nukes.
Anyway, if they did WW3 they would no longer be able to swan about on their Yachts, watching the plebs eat bugs. And much, if not all, of their data, and therefore power, on us would be wiped out.
I really don't thing they want Mad Max.
If anyone can, it's Kash Patel. I was thrilled to hear his name as Director of the FBI. He fits the bill: smart, tough, has insider knowledge, has been a victim of the FBI. I think he is going to be explosive.
Probably not. Police power is police power is police power is police power is police power is police power is police power is police power is police power is police power. There are NO such a thing as "good" police, and until people get that concept through their fucking dumbass concrete brains, we will continue to live in a fucking police state. Humanity needs to wake the fuck up and quit applying for fucking police jobs. And what do I mean by a police job ?? That's ANY job where upon graduation from brainwashing academy {commonly known as "police academy"} you are given a FUCKING badge and a FUCKING gun. That's a FUCKING police job. Humanity needs to STOP voluntarily joining this SHIT pile police industrial complex. If people would stop joining the mother fucker in the first place, then policing on all levels would just eventually be phased out - PEACEFULLY.
Without a police force, society would devolve into mob rule.
That said, there are police activities that occur daily that should cease to exist. Surveillance cameras that monitor mass swaths of our major cities, unwarranted mass electronic monitoring of citizens online, civil forfeiture, unmanned traffic and speed cameras, these are all gross violations of our civil rights. Yet, the judiciary allows these practices to continue and expand.
So, while I agree with you in a very minute way, I do believe that total abolishment of all police forces would be detrimental to society. A more difficult, yet much needed, approach to police reform would be to examine ALL laws, civil, local, municipal, state, and federal, and law enforcement practices and remove those which blatantly infringe upon our rights by nature of their existence and those techniques which are routinely abused by law enforcement agencies.
WOW - spoken of like a brainwashed statist. You said and I quote "without a police FORCE, society would devolve into mob rule". What a bunch of FUCKING BULLSHIT. Police FORCES have by mass psychological brainwashing, have been "granted" a monopoly of security and violence. First of all, listen to what the fuck I said - I said humanity needs to stop JOINING police forces. So you would not wake up one day and BAM there's no more police. This would be about a 15 to 30 year transition plan due to attrition The free market would recognize the trend and come up with private free market solutions for SECURITY. That's all the fuck "policing" is, a group of evil bastards {police forces} who have HIJACKED security and given their evil bastard selves a monopoly and created a DeFacto proverbial Lee Iacocca too big to fail Police Industrial Complex "Chrysler Corporation". So YES, the goal is abolishing the police, but the ship is so fucking BIG, it will take time to turn it around. But the process must start. The best way to start is STOP JOING THE FUCKING POLICE FORCES - STOP IT !!!!!!!!!!! You see an ad in the paper "we're hiring police officers, starting salary 80,000 a year", take the ad and use it for toilet paper. FUCK the police.
You seem to be psychotic
It's cool, I put him in touch with an FBI field agent who said he could help him.
Who's "him" and who's the FBI field agent ?? Surely you aint talking about me ??
psychotic people usually don't seek out peaceful solutions. Why do you think I'm "psychotic" ?? Because I use STRONG language ?? Your comment is a joke and based on no logic. If we keep using "nice" language, NOBODY will take "us" seriously - of COURSE I'm not sure whose side you're on which is why I put "us" in quotes. If you disagree with me, then tell me why I'm wrong. The psychotic ones are the people who think armed men with badges and guns having a monopoly on security and violence are legit and normal. Now THAT's what I call psychotic - as well as stupid. There is ONE reason and one reason ONLY why the name Anne Frank became famous - it's because of MEN WITH GUNS AND BADGES. If you think it's "psychotic" that someone is just telling the truth - THE KING HAS NO CLOTHES, then MISTER who is the psychotic one ?? You think it's "OK" that the world is essentially a FUCKING police State ?? 12 Billion laws, rules, and regulations and codes that NO human being could possibly ever know all of them. That's by DESIGN to make EVERYONE a "lawbreaker". Seriously get the fuck out of here with this "psychotic" bullshit. If you want to debate then start debating.
Common vulgarity is different than "strong language". Take a few deep breaths and accept reality.
I would LOVE to use "nice" and "kind" language, but I tried that for a decade. Then the fucking "pandemic" "hit" because of piece of shit Donald Trump who declared a "national emergency" and I though "wow, this will wake people up". And it did just the opposite. So the time for "nice" words are over.
Hi Brian, I understand why you feel as you do about the police. Today's "police" are not the "peace officers" that they used to be many years ago. I don't know how the title changed from "peace officers" to "police", but we here in the US had "peace officers" years ago. Many walked the beat... as they used to say and those peace officers really did keep the peace. Yes, they had guns at their waste but rarely used them. Those peace officers were able to verbally defuse conflict in a civil manner. The peace officers / police of years gone by did not look like, and were not, armed militia ready to kill anyone that walked close to them. Let's hope that we can get back to the days when police were "peace officers" and we all can disagree and still remain civil no matter the situation.
How about ABOLISH the police and the free market can come up with private solutions for SECURITY. That's all "policing" is, is a MONOPOLY on SECURITY and VIOLENCE.
very gooood Rosa.
I was a revolutionary socialist, and agree that the police's job is to beat down on the proletariat. Having said that, the so-called left and many on the uniparty right, as well as our so-called governments, have now been corrupted by the globalists (aka. uber capitalists/Corporation), and in a weird way the police are now in their way.
https://techno-society.com/
? Yeah, I know, but still think we can use technology to the advantage of the People.
Abolish the FBI.
Anyone who has read up on the history of the FBI would know that it's main function has always been the police arm of the government. Some of its services to local police departments, such as databases of similar crimes, training, and investigative assistance were helpful in the past. But, due to the nature of electronic communication, even those services are no longer needed.
YES - but humanity needs to STOP applying for police jobs in the first place. ALL police jobs. If the fucking job has a badge, then don't join the organization. A cop is just as much as an evil mother fucker as the serial killer. In BOTH cases, you have a man who thinks they can CONTROL others with the threat and force of violence. Actually, the cop is WAY WAY WAY WORSE because he/she is a deceiver selling themselves as the "good" guys when inside they are satanic DEVILS.
What did you get busted for?
Actually the police need to operate by using morals ethics and 6th sense. We need to be able to get rid of the criminals hurting society like during mostly peaceful protests- there should have been massive arrests instead we end up with autonomous zones:( fbi way different than police, ss and cia way different than your hometown police- but mayors and govt officials definitely can get to them:( we had a soros mayor:( husband was running guns and drugs out of their home with a 9 year old living there.
Pharmacists "run" drugs out of CVS. How come the police don't arrest those bastards ?? Big pharma kills WAY more people than "street" drugs do. A DRUG is a DRUG. Street drug - pharma drug - SAME PILE OF SHIT. So the police are piece of shit hypocrites for not arresting the drug dealers at CVS. If we're going to be anti fucking drug, then let's be ANTI drug. No fucking exceptions. Now me personally I don't give a rat's ass - I don't consume street drugs, and I don't consume prescription "legal" drugs - BOTH are from the same pile of shit. And by the fucking way, prescription "legal" drugs are fucking up our drinking water. Again, the total stupidity and hypocrisy of the FUCKING police !!!
Stopping cops from being trained in Israel would be a big first step. Since they started being trained there cops have gotten more violent.
Good thing the FBI is spending their time actively protecting us by giving mentally ill people help in blowing up buildings! But they didn't have time to see 2 Trump assassinations coming. Or that Russiagate was a hoax.
The concept that the two would be Trump assassins were guided is not beyond reason.
Look at all the equipment they had.
We will NEVER get the truth. Look at the JFK files, still hidden after all these years. Why?
If you'd like a nice shockaroonie, spend 20 bucks at Amazon for a 2023 book entitled "Stolen Identity" by [the real] John F Kennedy, Jr.
Makes that day in Dallas look petty tame....
I'm still wondering how several spree killers all decided to purchase the same, high dollar, model of AR-15 and optic.
It's probably just a weird coincidence...
Neither had jobs and income that matches the sophisticated electronics and etc that they had.
Or that the mRNA poisons are killing/injuring/sterilising millions of innocent US citizens, including freaking pregnant women and babies/kids.
Oh Geez, once the masses figure that out, the perps will have no where to hide. No where, I say; they'll be strung up were they stand.
Typically, it takes 9 years for a medicine to be developed and approved. The annual Kill Shots that so many put their faith in are just one facet of the plot to cull the herd.
We will never learn the facts about what the mRNA shots were developed for or how many have died from them. In four years we haven't learned whether those were real bombs placed at the DNC and RNC on January 6, 2021. The media hid the story about Hunter's laptop, invented Russiagate, and lies to us on a daily basis. If you want truth, check out Bari Weiss' Substack THE FREE PRESS. She left WaPo to try her hand at honest writing and she is doing a great job.
lol…they knew Russia Gate was a hoax because they started it.
Like any oversized bureaucracy apparatus, FBI has realized long ago it's easier to "invent" work then to actually do it for real out there. So, they started organizing and then foiling their own plots. It's a rather simple job - find a mentally unstable individual, groom him online, encourage his violent ideas, provide some logistical and financial help to make it look more serious... and then arrest him after a few months. Another dangerous plot foiled in the nick of time by the brave FBI agents.. who never even had to leave the office.
Exactly. Even the Washington Post and New York Times have done articles noting that a many "terrorism" plots supposedly "stopped" by the FBI were the type you describe.
Remember the plot to "kidnap" Whitmire, the governor of MI in '16. There were more FBI agents and informers than "plotters", the money all come from the FBI, the equipment from the same, all the ideas and intel from them, the "leader" of the conspiracy was a deadbeat who lived in somebody's basement and had no money or expertise, was a heavy dope user (the FBI agents made fun of him, calling Captain Stupid or some such ridicule). With all the jihadis, gangbangers, drug traffickers, human traffickers, sociopaths, psychopaths, anarchists, and general criminal types of all types running by the millions all over and everywhere in the country, law enforcement and the FBI specifically does not need to be going around provoking, financing, and supporting mentally ill individuals to commit crimes. Unless, of course, that's the whole point of their efforts. Probably easier to do than actually tracking down the real miscreants, and no doubt much safer, to create one from someone not playing with a full deck than hunting the real killers.
Danny Huckabee
this also brings to mind the IBM building bombed in Nashville or somewhere in that area. Could that also be an FBI operation? Who knows. The thing is lots of stuff like this comes to mind when the populace arrives at the general conclusion their government can NOT be trusted. In the USA since 2020 we are probably JUST starting to see what the rest of the world sees as the status quo.
As for Mangione it seems clear he didn't need Insurance allegedly the ceo was about to testify with incriminating evidence against Pelosi. That's why these dark mind projects existed to create killers to protect the elite in government. There are many who had ties to cia or fbi where they were lead to the crime. "The Minds of Men" is an extensive documentary that delves deep in the players process and outcome. Most high profile cases aren't what they seem.
I don’t understand what this insurance guy has to do with Pelosi?
OMG, John, you mean to say FBI Agent Williams committed a crime? Well, yes!
How is it that many of the alphabet agencies of the federal government have employees who commit crimes and never suffer any punishment . Michael Byrd, Ashley Babbitt assassin, comes to mind as an example. Subsequently he receives an award and gets cleansed for the hero building in an interview with Lester Holt on NBC ( Never Broadcasting Correctly ). More famously are Fauci, Brix and Walinsky. There are many more. The dark face in the cover up is the compliant Pavlovian lap dog legacy media.
and the black woman cop who killed the other woman in Jan 6th protest.
Did they cremate them both? only one?
Nothing new! In 1979 FBI was sued in numerous cases of entrapment for 500 million dollars where innocent people went through hell! They keep burying the facts that psychotropic drugs is a major element in the school shootings!
As a fan of psychotropic drugs, I take offense at that statement. Occam's Razor would say that Iran or the DNC provided weapons and training for the two would-be assassins.
Why would you be a fan of drugs that are addictive and make big bucks for Big Pharma?
You misunderstand me. I only deal with Sandoz.
500 million
FBI was dirty from day one (see Official and Confidential, The Secret Life of J. Edgar Hoover, by Anthony Summers). But it's certainly gotten dirtier since. Entrapment and the manufacture of evidence is one of the agency's specialities (they even had an undercover informer inside the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, but still failed to stop the attack). More recently, FBI has been able to track down grandmas in Alaska who walked through the Capitol on January 6, but unable to identify the person caught on tape planting fake bombs in DC the night of January 5, 2021, or the "Scaffold Commander" who kept urging the crowd forward into the Capitol on January 6, or "Fence Cutter Bulwark" and accomplices who removed fencing and closure signs prior to the initial breech. The "bombs," discovered at just the moment needed to pull police from the Capitol, held little interest for the FBI. Of course, the DC Special Agent in charge of the Jan 6 "investigation" had only recently been promoted from the Detroit office, where he ran the Whitmer faux kidnapping operation
This sounds like entrapment of a vulnerable person for the sake of a political agenda … very sad 😞
Why isn't Jerry Drake Varnell being treated for schizophrenia, instead of being placed in jail. Perhaps Jerry needs to be in a medical facility ? (not sure), but he certainly does need appropriate supervision until his condition can be remedied. And, why aren't all of the FBI agents who persuaded and encouraged the unstable Jerry to do malicious activity FIRED from their jobs and in JAIL???? Was there a jury trail? Or, did a judge decide to jail someone who obviously was incapable of make intellegent and proper decisions? Was this some kind of FBI training activity to find and entrap unbalanced people to do nepharious deeds? The entire situation is SHAMEFUL!!!!!! Those FBI employees should have been fired & never allowed to do any kind of work with people again; of course, after they each spent 25 years in prison!!!
you may have hit upon it:
"a training excercise."
The FBI is Organized Crime on the Americans!
The CIA is Organized Crime on the world for their Dark Masters on Orion! Cowards, Traitors to Humanity Scum!
Corruption pays ALOT of people and keeps the lights on.
Whatever happend to the legal term "Agent Provacateur"?
The legal term is doin' fine. Here is a Q&A that I wrote for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, ("Jahar") and I also filed a RICO lawsuit. Yesterday, Biden commuted the Death Sentence of all federal prisoners except "3 terrorists" (a church shooter, a synagogue shooter, and Jahar). If they were terrorists, rather than patsies, I'll be a monkey's uncle:
https://www.jaharcompletelyinnocent.com/q-a-1
How utterly gross. The FBI is an entrapment organization as much as anything else. Find a poor, rural white guy who is either very unintelligent or mentally unstable, groom him with money, direct assistance with planning an attack, possibly making the device itself, then arrest him for plotting an attack. Thanks, federal government.
In the Jury Instructions, the prosecution had probably *defined "entrapment" (that the defense counsel may have alleged) in such a *way that a number of juries might interpret as not "fitting"
the alleged crime, so that the entrapment defense was not helpful. Some attorneys forget or never learned how very, very important is the wording in the Jury Instructions. Juries will sometimes ponder those Instructions for a long time, trying to understand them. I experienced that, myself.
Fully Informed Jury Association (FIJA.org) shows that jurors do not have to accept a judge’s instructions; that such instructions are actually ILLEGAL in a real court of law. Of course, our US courts are run by British-aligned BAR lawyers and the law of the seas, not actual US law.
Few jurors are aware of jury nullification.
Jury nullification has been VERY effective when just one juror understands that concept.
Sure, and the attorneys cannot tell the jury about it.
thanks for the link. THIS appears to be the best reason they provide which I would consider and any JURY should consider before arriving at a verdict:
"Jury nullification educators often talk about “victimless” offenses, and advocate for the idea that if there is no victim, there is no crime. A victimless offense is one in which no other person’s rights are violated, but which has legally been defined as a crime anyway, often because it offends someone else’s sensibilities. Examples of such victimless crimes include:
many marijuana and other drug offenses such as possession, use, or sale of these substances,
voluntary trade of unlicensed or banned goods such as raw milk,
peaceful possession of various weapons that run afoul of complex regulations and laws,
expressive activities that are supposed to be Constitutionally-protected, but which have been eroded through bureaucratic regulation,
gardening, building, installing alternative energy systems, collecting rainwater, or otherwise peacefully using one’s own property, but not in accordance with government regulations intended to engineer certain types of communities, etc.
Most people can fundamentally agree that people who are not harming anyone else should not themselves be harmed. This basic idea does not change simply because some busybodies who feel the need to control other people’s lives passed a law or wrote a regulation to force people to comply with their personal tastes and preferences. Many jurors either nullify in such cases or later regret failing to nullify, often having felt bullied into punishing someone who does not deserve it."