38 Comments

Don't know what's up Senger's sleeve but I know Drs. McCullough and Alexander have been a BEACON for truth and ethics since the covid fiasco began. You can't overrate a BEACON in a storm like we've all been through.

Expand full comment

We were discussing this tweet by Mike Senger only a few days ago on a different Substack (The naked emperor).

You will be pleased to hear overall people were extremely supportive of Peter McCullough.

I was wondering if Senger’s tweet was another ‘divide and conquer’, ‘ad hominem’ attack....

Expand full comment
founding

If it is another "divide and conquer", he just stepped into a pile of poop. He seriously underestimates the prestige and respect Dr. McCullough has.

Expand full comment

I don't know know what's up with Attorney Senger. For a long time, he focussed obsessively about the CCP-induced lockdowns. For him to attempt to discredit, in any way, Dr. Peter McCullough, is patently absurd - he further discredits himself by doing so. I have not read any of Attorney Senger's stuff in over a year; I definitely will not now. Thank you Dr. Peter McCullough, for everything you have done and continue to do for your fellow man. May God bless you and continue to guide you.

Expand full comment

Thank you for bringing this up! Michael Senger seems to be quite knowledgeable about China, international relations, socioeconomics and such areas, but he is out of his league in the medical field. For him to make a statement regarding Dr. McCullough's stance at any particular time is not just uncalled for and disparaging, but possibly slanderous, to boot. Let's fight this thing together, people, instead of denigrating others who are working incredibly hard to wake people up from the insidiousness of medical tyranny and totalitarian control.

Expand full comment
Jan 11, 2023·edited Jan 11, 2023

There is a fairly small group of medical pros who came out early on and have not backed off one iota since when it came to voicing concerns, expressing doubts, or outright discrediting the official narratives & policies. Drs. McCullough & Alexander have earned the respect & admiration of myself and many others, not that they necessarily had everything 100% right from the outset, but they showed their courage, character, and integrity without fail and at great personal/professional risk. Michael Senger has put out some good and some not so great commentaries, though I have to say at times he seems to emphasize points that miss the mark when the real elephants in the room are hard to miss...

Expand full comment

Just search for those who have been or are being threatened with loss of professional credentials. Therein usually lies the truth.

Expand full comment

What an excellent way to phrase it. Like "follow the money" to find the fraud, but in reverse to find the truth.

Expand full comment

It's too late; the countermeasures developed by the psyops goons to discredit our war leaders in the fight for humanity can't keep the floodgates of data from getting to the public.

Expand full comment

Since the onset of the world-wide chaos as a result of the rapid spread of SARS-CoV2 (COV-19) Infection, Dr. Peter McCullough has been a voice of reason and hope. As the months have revealed his clarion call rings true consistently; in retrospect, it is prophetic. I stand in awesome respect of Dr. McCullough (and his true colleagues) for the intelligence , courage, and grace they present in the face of sneering ridicule and vitriolic disparagement . "White hats all!"

Expand full comment
founding

Surely Mr. Michael Singer, who allegedly is a lawyer, knows what the word slander means and also knows that emails, tweets, and other social media postings are discoverable.

Expand full comment

100% Perfect.

Expand full comment

We're often cautioned not to use this word but I don't care - Dr McCullough is a hero in my eyes. He was the first truth teller I followed in those early days and I'll be forever grateful to him.

Expand full comment

Same!

Expand full comment

Will circulate this on Twitter thank you. Anyone here, please follow me as well @DrBMcDH

Expand full comment

WEF school for global leaders

Political science 101

Want to be a leader and govern over others?

Change society for the better and reimagine the world that could be with our five star curriculum utilizing all the best kept secrets in political science

Classes may include the following...

Bread and circuses

Sleight of hand*

Double standards a'plenty

Heads in the sand*

Straw man arguments

Stifling of debate

Pay off the media*

Propagate hate

Divide and conquer

Rig the polls*

Shift the goalposts*

Corrupting souls

Lying through your teeth*

Woke and PC gone mad

Hurry hurry climate trouble*

Promote the latest fad

*compulsory core curriculum classes

Expand full comment

The link above goes back to here. It should go to https://palexander.substack.com/p/the-catastrophic-impact-of-covid-1ba

Expand full comment
Jan 11, 2023·edited Jan 11, 2023

Senger isn’t getting the attention he wants from his blame China for everything narrative(as if WEF, WHO, UN etc are all CCP front groups, nonsense) so he’s trying to get attention by attacking McCullough, it sounds like petty jealousy to me, or some other nefarious agenda. I get the impression he’s implying McCullough is controlled opposition yet McCullough has been kicked of twitter(back now) and his career has suffered big time, none of these things have happened to Senger that I’m aware of so who is more likely to be controlled opposition?

Expand full comment

Never heard of this Senger fellow before. Doesn’t he know that mean Tweets are very risky business? SO many find them offensive. Better to convey professional courtesy, particularly in a situation like this. Dr. McCullough has my support, 100%.

Expand full comment

Could you and Dr. McCullough look into how accurate the current generation of covid tests are? Are they as unreliable as the CPR tests, worse, or better? I can’t find any data about them. Thank you.

Expand full comment

PCR?

AFAIK, the PCR tests generate a lot of false positives, and the RAT (Rapid Antigen Test) tests generate a significant amount of false negatives.

Expand full comment

PCR does what is designed to do - match specific genetic signatures between a test reagent and a sample. Each cycle amplifies the sample by x2; so the sample grows exponentially. The PCR cannot determine if the sample contains viral particles that could cause an infection (vital, if you will). Only a culture can determine if the sample particles could grow but culture takes a lot of time. Any PCR run at cycle count higher than ~ 20-25 is meaningless and might represent floor sweepings. The misuse of PCR data has caused errors.

The RAT depends on detecting a high amount of vial shed, assumed to be viable virus. A negative means generally not much shed, likely the person is OK. If positive likely infected seek attention or could be ineffective virus as well because recovery can result in shedding for some time.

Expand full comment

Can you confirm what I read somewhere but can no longer locate: that the FDA gave EUAs to something like 181 companies/universities who developed covid tests, none of which were seriously investigated for efficacy?

Expand full comment

I don't know, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_COVID-19_tests may have information about some of these companies/universities in the text or references at the bottom of the page.

Note: I mistrust Wikipedia much more than I used to.

Expand full comment

I also don’t trust Wikipedia. But thanks for the lead or almost anything else “official “ anymore.

Expand full comment