I have to admit that I have not finished reading this lengthy article, however what I have read thus far is very concerning. I do understand the ‘theory’ of vaccines….having been raised at a time when parents WANTED you to get the measles, mumps, chicken pox (and I have had them all), logically one can understand the idea of injecting a small dose of these viruses, so that the immune system responds to them in a ‘safe’ way. But the article also indicates the total corruption of the vaccine industry, government regulatory agencies, etc., as well as indicating the masked and unreported harms that these vaccines do. One sentence regarding WHO intervention stands out: “Perhaps, it would be more prudent for the WHO to state that the physical presence of a child on this planet implies consent to clean water, sanitation and a healthy diet, rather than eroding individual and parental rights for invasive medical interventions of questionable value”. You cannot but agree with this statement.
Read "Turtles All the Way Down" chilling. And RFKs Fauci book and others. Interesting to my knowledge no one mentioned in these books has yet sued nor debated the points. It is all literally sickening.
The fact that only a predatory journal would print it also could point to the fact that censorship was "alive and well" before COVID. No inconvenient truths allowed.... Read about the development of each vaccine. To my knowledge not a single one used a true placebo of saline. Instead each new vaccine is compared to another potentially dangerous vaccine. This sleight of hand minimizes the appearance of adverse effects. That tidbit alone alerts me that a whole lot of obfuscation and shady science is happening.
Thanks for this link. ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) has been pressing NIH & others for 'vaccinated vs unvaccinated' studies for years. NIH says they're unethical. Ha ha. Here's an interesting ICAN article that looked at 4 NY school districts (childhood vaccines required) where unvaccinated kids were compared to those in public schools. It was done by the parents that refused to subject their children to vaccines. We're not supposed to trust them; only the NY Health Dept & NIH.
Unfortunately this article is published in a predatory journal. "ACTA Scientific Pediatrics" is not in the PubMed list of indexed journals: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/ . Some other journals by the real ACTA (published by Karger) are, such as: https://karger.com/acy . This journal is published by "Acta Scientific" in Hyderabad: https://actascientific.com/contact.php . Since this company is trading on the name of a recognised publisher, it is surely predatory and it is not reasonable to assume that the articles in its journals have been subject to recognised standards of peer review.
This doesn't mean that the article is invalid - just that it is no good trying to cite it to mainstream researchers and clinicians as if it had been published in a journal which is indexed in PubMed.
The mainstream peer review system is full of problems, not least that it would probably not allow the publication of a perfectly realistic and correct critique of vaccine safety standards, no matter how well researched, unless, perhaps such an article was written by recognised leaders in the field.
In the 2019 article, he cites an FDA document as stating "any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation's public health objectives.". Here is the document: https://www.scribd.com/document/114089324/HHS-FDA-1984. I have not read the article beyond the first two pages, but my impression is that it is well researched.
If the mainstream medical system, with its research organizations and journals, were functioning as the public intends, there would be no problem in publishing an article such as this in a proper journal which is indexed in PubMed. However, the system has long been corrupt and inept in ways which cause it to work against public health in many respects.
If the system worked as the public intends it to, every doctor in the world would understand that the immune system can only work properly with at least 50 ng/mL circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D, which is much higher than the 20 ng/ml or perhaps 30 ng/mL which most doctors think is adequate for health. https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/. This 50 ng/mL level is essential for good health, no matter what other nutrients, vaccines, drugs etc. are used.
If everyone had this level, there would be no seasonal flu transmission. Those who contracted flu would suffer fewer symptoms, harm and death than at present with levels typically half to a tenth of this. The same applies to sepsis, COVID-19, Kawasaki disease and MIS-C.
Virology invented the virus model but has consistently failed to fulfil its own requirements. It is claimed that viruses cause disease after transmitting between hosts such as humans and yet the scientific evidence for these claims is missing. One of virology’s greatest failures has been the inability to obtain any viral particles directly from the tissues of organisms said to have “viral” diseases. In order to obfuscate this state of affairs, virologists have resorted to creating their own pseudoscientific methods to replace the longstanding scientific method, as well as changing the dictionary meaning of words in order to support their anti-scientific practices. For instance, an “isolated” isolate does not require the physical existence of the particles in order to be afforded “isolation” status.
A viral particle must fulfill defined physical and biological properties including being a replication competent intracellular parasite capable of causing disease in a host such as a human. However,
“viruses” such as SARS-CoV-2 are nothing more than phantom constructs, existing only in imaginations and computer simulations. In this paradigm, cases of invented diseases like COVID-19 are nothing more than the detection of selected genetic sequences and proteins purported to be “viral.” The existence of a virus is not required in this loop of circular reasoning and thus entire “pandemics” can be built upon digital creations and falsely sustained through in vitro (“test tube”) molecular reactions.
This essay contains three parts. Part One outlines some of the history of virology and the failures of the virologists to follow the scientific method. The many and far-reaching claims of the virologists can all be shown to be flawed due to: (a) the lack of direct evidence, and (b) the invalidation of indirect “evidence” due to the uncontrolled nature of the experiments. The examples provided cover all major aspects of the virological fraud including alleged isolation, cytopathic effects, genomics, antibodies, and animal pathogenicity studies.
Part Two examines the fraud used to propagate the COVID-19 “pandemic.” A breakdown of the
methodology relied upon by the original inventors Fan Wu et al., shows how the fictional SARS-CoV-2 was “created” through anti-scientific methods and linguistic sleights of hands. It is part of an ongoing deception where viruses are claimed to exist by templating them against previous “virus” templates. Using SARS-CoV-2 as an example, the trail of “coronavirus” genomic templates going back to the 1980s reveals that none of these genetic sequences have ever been shown to come from inside any viral particle — the phylogenetic trees are fantasies. The misapplication of the polymerase chain reaction has propagated this aspect of virology’s fraud and created the ‘cases’ to maintain the illusion of a pandemic.
Part Three provides an analysis of how some key participants, “health” institutions, and the mainstream media maintain the virus illusion through information control and narratives that parrot virology’s claims. By way of happenstance, the virological fraud now finds itself front and centre of the COVID-19 fraud. From here, however, it can be critically appraised by those outside virology and the pseudoscientific paradigm virology has built around itself can finally be dismantled and laid to rest.
People have been researching and opposing vaccines for decades. Homeopaths for over 200 yrs, since vaccine creation have been observing and opposing them. Some years (10-15) back I took some online reading courses on vaccine dangers. The woman, Serri Nakken,doing them was a nurse who became a homeopath when she was in England. The amount of material provided was overwhelming even then. Here is a bio of her and you can research her work more
One book just pulled off my shelves is by Neil Z. Miller, a critical review of 400 peer reviewed studies on vaccine dangers. He has written numerous others. I recall a mid-western doctor, now deceased, who spoke of his practice with about 30,000 children with no autism. An auditor of his records was stunned to see this fact. He did not promote vaccines and apparently his patients came to him to avoid poisoning their children.
I am glad McCullough and other Md's are coming to their senses but they need to know they are a bit late on this one. My point is they need to recognize they are joining a long struggling movement and that they understand how they need to join forces .
I will also state that Homeopathy has been quite successful in undoing vaccine damage, even years after it occurred. There is an Australian doctor, Isaac Golden, Md who has a long history of this work. While, typical, he is heavily criticized as unbelievable, he is well respected in holistic and pediatric tx of vaccine damage. He offers courses and paid newsletter but here is one of his books that provides some review information:
This article reminds me of the RFK, Jr book, The Real Anthony Fauci, where he talked about vaccine injuries. I wonder if it was included as a footnote. Additionally, Turtles All the Way Down discussed these very issues. There is no doubt in my mind that vaccines have undermined the health of our children and either killed some or left many with serious adverse events. Thanks for helping to expose this, Dr. McCollough.
Mainstream medical journals have been losing their credibility for years.
In 2009 Marcia Angell editor of JAMA wrote "It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published or to rely upon the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my 2 decades as editor."
Thank your informative comment. I completely agree with you on Vitamin D and on this journal not being respected by mainstream medical journals and authors. I think the points in the article stand on their own merits (especially in the light of September 2019 - January 2024) but I appreciate being informed that the journal is not listed in PubMed and is considered predatory by many. Thanks again.
You are a vaccine expert along with MANY aware of the harms and deaths caused by 3 years of BIOTERRORISM used against the people…
How about calling today SILENT SUNDAY because so many sit silently participating in no actionable solutions to this mess?
2024…either the reset will favor the people OR the reset will be in favor of Communist control/WEF/Klaus…SATAN!
Which is it Americans?
Where are the actionable SOLUTIONS?
NORTH AMERICAN LAW CENTER…ONLY America First Constitutional Conservative strategic planners!
P.S. Support Mike Lindell as FOX has dumped his advertising WITHOUT notice. He has supported Trump from Day 1, continuing to go after all the election fraud. He deserves EVERYONE’s support to keep his business going!
In mid 2020 a medical doctor got on-board with the Fauci modRNA promoting fear smorgasbord and declared in a self-promoting article, quote:
"Antibody production after COVID-19 takes a few weeks to ramp up but wanes fairly quickly after several weeks to months. Thus, the hope is that a vaccine could instill permanent memory in antigen-presenting T-cells that would remind the plasma cells and B-cells to proliferate and restore antibody production more quickly in the setting of re-inoculation."
"Wanes . . . quickly" ?????? That is, he starts with a lie, during a time (2020) when we needed the truth, not some bio-medical pharmaceutical complex sycophantism! Does it surprise anyone that this same medical doctor refuses to announce any forthright opposition to LIABILITY IMMUNITY? Despite being asked, at first very politely, directly by me, to do so? Despite given innumerable public forums to do so?!
I have to admit that I have not finished reading this lengthy article, however what I have read thus far is very concerning. I do understand the ‘theory’ of vaccines….having been raised at a time when parents WANTED you to get the measles, mumps, chicken pox (and I have had them all), logically one can understand the idea of injecting a small dose of these viruses, so that the immune system responds to them in a ‘safe’ way. But the article also indicates the total corruption of the vaccine industry, government regulatory agencies, etc., as well as indicating the masked and unreported harms that these vaccines do. One sentence regarding WHO intervention stands out: “Perhaps, it would be more prudent for the WHO to state that the physical presence of a child on this planet implies consent to clean water, sanitation and a healthy diet, rather than eroding individual and parental rights for invasive medical interventions of questionable value”. You cannot but agree with this statement.
Read "Turtles All the Way Down" chilling. And RFKs Fauci book and others. Interesting to my knowledge no one mentioned in these books has yet sued nor debated the points. It is all literally sickening.
Looks like everybody is slowly moving to Del Bigtree's position on vaccines in general.
The fact that only a predatory journal would print it also could point to the fact that censorship was "alive and well" before COVID. No inconvenient truths allowed.... Read about the development of each vaccine. To my knowledge not a single one used a true placebo of saline. Instead each new vaccine is compared to another potentially dangerous vaccine. This sleight of hand minimizes the appearance of adverse effects. That tidbit alone alerts me that a whole lot of obfuscation and shady science is happening.
Thanks for this link. ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) has been pressing NIH & others for 'vaccinated vs unvaccinated' studies for years. NIH says they're unethical. Ha ha. Here's an interesting ICAN article that looked at 4 NY school districts (childhood vaccines required) where unvaccinated kids were compared to those in public schools. It was done by the parents that refused to subject their children to vaccines. We're not supposed to trust them; only the NY Health Dept & NIH.
https://icandecide.org/press-release/update-on-ny-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-data/
Unfortunately this article is published in a predatory journal. "ACTA Scientific Pediatrics" is not in the PubMed list of indexed journals: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/ . Some other journals by the real ACTA (published by Karger) are, such as: https://karger.com/acy . This journal is published by "Acta Scientific" in Hyderabad: https://actascientific.com/contact.php . Since this company is trading on the name of a recognised publisher, it is surely predatory and it is not reasonable to assume that the articles in its journals have been subject to recognised standards of peer review.
This doesn't mean that the article is invalid - just that it is no good trying to cite it to mainstream researchers and clinicians as if it had been published in a journal which is indexed in PubMed.
The mainstream peer review system is full of problems, not least that it would probably not allow the publication of a perfectly realistic and correct critique of vaccine safety standards, no matter how well researched, unless, perhaps such an article was written by recognised leaders in the field.
Kenneth P. Stoller's list of publications: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kenneth-Stoller/research includes many in mainstream peer-reviewed journals, such as, in 2019: https://journals.lww.com/mgar/fulltext/2019/09010/the_national_brain_injury,_rescue_and.1.aspx . His affiliation then was listed as: "American College of Hyperbaric Medicine, San Francisco".
According to https://www.upi.com/Health_News/2005/11/14/The-Age-of-Autism-Showdown-in-Santa-Fe/93191131991302/ " Dr. Kenneth Stoller, an assistant clinical professor of pediatrics at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine" was warning that "mercury in flu shots could be harmful to children", specifically by increasing the risk of autism. This makes him an anti-vaxer from way back. In 2008 he challenged the CDC https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283523792_Complaint_to_CDC_re_their_claim_36000_Americans_die_from_the_flu_each_year about its claim that 36,000 Americans die of influenza each year.
In the 2019 article, he cites an FDA document as stating "any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation's public health objectives.". Here is the document: https://www.scribd.com/document/114089324/HHS-FDA-1984. I have not read the article beyond the first two pages, but my impression is that it is well researched.
If the mainstream medical system, with its research organizations and journals, were functioning as the public intends, there would be no problem in publishing an article such as this in a proper journal which is indexed in PubMed. However, the system has long been corrupt and inept in ways which cause it to work against public health in many respects.
If the system worked as the public intends it to, every doctor in the world would understand that the immune system can only work properly with at least 50 ng/mL circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D, which is much higher than the 20 ng/ml or perhaps 30 ng/mL which most doctors think is adequate for health. https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/. This 50 ng/mL level is essential for good health, no matter what other nutrients, vaccines, drugs etc. are used.
If everyone had this level, there would be no seasonal flu transmission. Those who contracted flu would suffer fewer symptoms, harm and death than at present with levels typically half to a tenth of this. The same applies to sepsis, COVID-19, Kawasaki disease and MIS-C.
When will the dam break?
I would be interested if Dr. McCullough or any of your readers has read "A Farewell to Virology"?https://drsambailey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/A-FAREWELL-TO-VIROLOGY-Expert-Edition-Eng.pdf
It begins:
Virology invented the virus model but has consistently failed to fulfil its own requirements. It is claimed that viruses cause disease after transmitting between hosts such as humans and yet the scientific evidence for these claims is missing. One of virology’s greatest failures has been the inability to obtain any viral particles directly from the tissues of organisms said to have “viral” diseases. In order to obfuscate this state of affairs, virologists have resorted to creating their own pseudoscientific methods to replace the longstanding scientific method, as well as changing the dictionary meaning of words in order to support their anti-scientific practices. For instance, an “isolated” isolate does not require the physical existence of the particles in order to be afforded “isolation” status.
A viral particle must fulfill defined physical and biological properties including being a replication competent intracellular parasite capable of causing disease in a host such as a human. However,
“viruses” such as SARS-CoV-2 are nothing more than phantom constructs, existing only in imaginations and computer simulations. In this paradigm, cases of invented diseases like COVID-19 are nothing more than the detection of selected genetic sequences and proteins purported to be “viral.” The existence of a virus is not required in this loop of circular reasoning and thus entire “pandemics” can be built upon digital creations and falsely sustained through in vitro (“test tube”) molecular reactions.
This essay contains three parts. Part One outlines some of the history of virology and the failures of the virologists to follow the scientific method. The many and far-reaching claims of the virologists can all be shown to be flawed due to: (a) the lack of direct evidence, and (b) the invalidation of indirect “evidence” due to the uncontrolled nature of the experiments. The examples provided cover all major aspects of the virological fraud including alleged isolation, cytopathic effects, genomics, antibodies, and animal pathogenicity studies.
Part Two examines the fraud used to propagate the COVID-19 “pandemic.” A breakdown of the
methodology relied upon by the original inventors Fan Wu et al., shows how the fictional SARS-CoV-2 was “created” through anti-scientific methods and linguistic sleights of hands. It is part of an ongoing deception where viruses are claimed to exist by templating them against previous “virus” templates. Using SARS-CoV-2 as an example, the trail of “coronavirus” genomic templates going back to the 1980s reveals that none of these genetic sequences have ever been shown to come from inside any viral particle — the phylogenetic trees are fantasies. The misapplication of the polymerase chain reaction has propagated this aspect of virology’s fraud and created the ‘cases’ to maintain the illusion of a pandemic.
Part Three provides an analysis of how some key participants, “health” institutions, and the mainstream media maintain the virus illusion through information control and narratives that parrot virology’s claims. By way of happenstance, the virological fraud now finds itself front and centre of the COVID-19 fraud. From here, however, it can be critically appraised by those outside virology and the pseudoscientific paradigm virology has built around itself can finally be dismantled and laid to rest.
People have been researching and opposing vaccines for decades. Homeopaths for over 200 yrs, since vaccine creation have been observing and opposing them. Some years (10-15) back I took some online reading courses on vaccine dangers. The woman, Serri Nakken,doing them was a nurse who became a homeopath when she was in England. The amount of material provided was overwhelming even then. Here is a bio of her and you can research her work more
http://www.wellwithin1.com/bio.htm
One book just pulled off my shelves is by Neil Z. Miller, a critical review of 400 peer reviewed studies on vaccine dangers. He has written numerous others. I recall a mid-western doctor, now deceased, who spoke of his practice with about 30,000 children with no autism. An auditor of his records was stunned to see this fact. He did not promote vaccines and apparently his patients came to him to avoid poisoning their children.
I am glad McCullough and other Md's are coming to their senses but they need to know they are a bit late on this one. My point is they need to recognize they are joining a long struggling movement and that they understand how they need to join forces .
I will also state that Homeopathy has been quite successful in undoing vaccine damage, even years after it occurred. There is an Australian doctor, Isaac Golden, Md who has a long history of this work. While, typical, he is heavily criticized as unbelievable, he is well respected in holistic and pediatric tx of vaccine damage. He offers courses and paid newsletter but here is one of his books that provides some review information:
https://www.amazon.com/Vaccination-Homoeoprophylaxis-Review-Risks-Alternatives/dp/0957872674
Hope this info is useful in expanding perspective, information and history for McCullough and others here.
This article reminds me of the RFK, Jr book, The Real Anthony Fauci, where he talked about vaccine injuries. I wonder if it was included as a footnote. Additionally, Turtles All the Way Down discussed these very issues. There is no doubt in my mind that vaccines have undermined the health of our children and either killed some or left many with serious adverse events. Thanks for helping to expose this, Dr. McCollough.
Mainstream medical journals have been losing their credibility for years.
In 2009 Marcia Angell editor of JAMA wrote "It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published or to rely upon the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my 2 decades as editor."
Thank your informative comment. I completely agree with you on Vitamin D and on this journal not being respected by mainstream medical journals and authors. I think the points in the article stand on their own merits (especially in the light of September 2019 - January 2024) but I appreciate being informed that the journal is not listed in PubMed and is considered predatory by many. Thanks again.
Peter and all,
You are a vaccine expert along with MANY aware of the harms and deaths caused by 3 years of BIOTERRORISM used against the people…
How about calling today SILENT SUNDAY because so many sit silently participating in no actionable solutions to this mess?
2024…either the reset will favor the people OR the reset will be in favor of Communist control/WEF/Klaus…SATAN!
Which is it Americans?
Where are the actionable SOLUTIONS?
NORTH AMERICAN LAW CENTER…ONLY America First Constitutional Conservative strategic planners!
P.S. Support Mike Lindell as FOX has dumped his advertising WITHOUT notice. He has supported Trump from Day 1, continuing to go after all the election fraud. He deserves EVERYONE’s support to keep his business going!
“From he whom much is given, much is expected."
Speaking of vaccine adverse events, those here will no doubt appreciate this man's testimony to the NH Senate on 1/10/24.....https://makismd.substack.com/p/video-john-beaudoin-presents-death
In mid 2020 a medical doctor got on-board with the Fauci modRNA promoting fear smorgasbord and declared in a self-promoting article, quote:
"Antibody production after COVID-19 takes a few weeks to ramp up but wanes fairly quickly after several weeks to months. Thus, the hope is that a vaccine could instill permanent memory in antigen-presenting T-cells that would remind the plasma cells and B-cells to proliferate and restore antibody production more quickly in the setting of re-inoculation."
"Wanes . . . quickly" ?????? That is, he starts with a lie, during a time (2020) when we needed the truth, not some bio-medical pharmaceutical complex sycophantism! Does it surprise anyone that this same medical doctor refuses to announce any forthright opposition to LIABILITY IMMUNITY? Despite being asked, at first very politely, directly by me, to do so? Despite given innumerable public forums to do so?!
Does anyone know if there's a thorough review of this recent-ish CDC article: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7301a4.htm?s_cid=mm7301a4_w