When Trump stated that famous people can have their way with women, he was right. I'm a woman and so don't think I'm being a misogynist. I'm merely stating the facts. There are women who want to be able to brag that she went to bed with a famous person. Then, there are women who want to marry a famous person and thinks that giving herself to him will win him....NOT. Then, there are smart women who know how to attract a man in the right way, not for love, but for his money and fame. These mega rich men have to deal with that all the time. These women who have no self respect who go out in public to jog in what shouldn't be worn in public don't understand what they are doing to themselves. This case against Trump was never about sex. They had to stop him any way they could. So, these women who always come out of the cobwebs to charge such deeds onto a man 30 yrs. after the fact, should be jailed. But more importantly, those who paid them to do it should be hung.
I'll be 76 next month and I think this new generation was given too much freedom to expose everything they have to the public. No one looks down on them for doing it either...except a Christian or a moral person. At the beach they call a swim suit a string....it's sickening!! I was shocked at the real bikinis when they came out but now? Dental floss is a swim suit.
Exactly! Immoral men who would hit on a woman would hit on all women thinking we are all "loose" like the ones they see wearing nearly nothing. But, women of today are all about themselves and no one else. Very vain!
I disagree but your comment is funny. The implication is that the behaviour of these men is the woman's fault - many men do not respect their spouse or their relationship and often the richer they are the worse they are- therein lies the problem!
I don’t see anything “funny” here. Politics is down stream of culture and Communists are the epitome of propagandizing culture for outcome. Corporate stock return fiduciary needs drive Corporate salaciousness unless the public agrees they have had enough of degrading women and now men under the ruse of beauty and vanity as they dilute self respect and responsibility. Corporate capitalism is not the villain here, but lack of responsibility for America as a whole, its main ideal from birth. Those who hate America love and promulgate the idea of globalism intent on striping America of its vaunted freedom and independence the Marxist/Fascists friendame’s tunnel beneath the dolts “partying hardy”.
Your comment carries water for the America haters of the world by pointing out tiny shiny objects, grains of rice that may be true but insignificant in the big picture. That is how the ruse of Marxist (Communism) inversion propaganda works.
Globalism? I did not even mention or imply globalism. I am no American hater in fact the opposite. Play it at your level if you want to but I still stand by my comment that many men do not respect their partner or their relationship. That impaired respect goes from the individual level to the national level and affects culture. I am no marxist. That issue is NOT a tiny grain of rice - maybe it is for.
You are correct in part of what you said. However, no, women are part of their problems. Nasty, disrespectful men will attack a woman no matter how morally she's dressed. However, when a woman and lots of women, present themselves as tramps, then they put a bad look on all women. They also cause a guy who normally wouldn't come on to a "lady" he now feels free to come on to the woman who presents herself as a tramp. If you have a bunch of money, would you leave it outside in plain sight for anyone to see and wonder why anyone would take it? Same thing. But again, you are right about the mega rich men not respecting women...so true. I'm sure Trump has had his share of women like we are talking about. But, this wasn't about sex or women...this was about stopping Trump even if it means ruining our nation. You are also right about many men not respecting their own wives. But, can't we see that if we can improve things, maybe less and less women will be harmed? They will always be attacked or come on to, but that's because many men have no self control of their "sex drive".
A combination of accepted social norms and a desire to display advantages might be the driver of the behaviors you deplore. Remember, once it was and for some still is totally normal and accepted for men and women of all ages to spend their lives effectively naked - together.
I am sure these people have their social issues but I would suggest nakedness is not a big issue for them. We make nakedness or exposure of any kind a major issue when we plaster supposedly moral 'standards' uniformly on all the people in our community.
The bible tells us to show modesty. Our society's norms and laws were build on biblical standards. When we threw those out, we have the totally disgusting society we have now. Nudest camps are not normal, it's perverse. I do understand what you are getting at. However, I'm speaking from a moral perspective. If we had morals again, perhaps we could have less perversion. ???
Allowing that perhaps 1.5 billion people can be considered Christian, what about the rest? Are they automatically immoral beings due to their lifestyles because they are not followers of Christian norms as laid down in the Christian Bible?
i have a problem with that idea, in part because of the history of that bible itself. Are you referring to the Old Testament or the New? And which version as there are more versions than I can count, all subtly or majorly different from each other? Some like the Ethiopian Christian Bible totally rejected by other Christians. There is not ONE book, never has been.
Most important of all, who are the ones, the people, who will dictate what is moral or not? The bible is specific in some things depending upon which text version you are referring to, and many times the wording is vague, perhaps deliberately so. So who decides?
My problem is that too many people have no Ethical core on which to build their own Moral Code - no book of dogma, no interpretal religious text or moral control committee required.
You speak like a man who has never studied the bible. One's moral code is not built upon what they think is moral. It's built on biblical principals because God's ways are always the best way. When mankind follows God's ways, mankind progresses and prospers. When they don't, then their prosperity is gone and their way of life is a mess. If you were honest with youself, you can look back into history and see this is true. It doesn't matter which translation, but for your question, I'm talking about all of them....they all boil down to the same meaning. No, it's not confusing at all. It's only confusing to those who have a closed mind and no ears to hear. God loves you and wants you to be happy, and happiness comes when we follow His will. Please read the book of Proverbs and you will see that all the things that King Solomon writes there is common sense and true. If you are honest, you will see that without a doubt. I won't try to teach you about the bible here. I've said enough. God be with you.
When you speak of God, whose God are you referring to? The people of this earth have many gods and even in the Christian bible there are more than one in some versions. You are suggesting that I may not be honest yet you know me not - you do know that one versions is part of English Law since the 18th century, the whole bible?. You are also assuming that I have never read the bible, yet you have no idea about this - why do I know about differences? And I do not find any of this confusing so why assume that I do? Again you suggest I have a closed mind and no ears to hear and I wonder how do you know this when you know me not? Have you studied other religious and spiritual writings? i have, have you?
While you suggest that it doesn't matter which translation, oh but it does, most definitely, as all of them are translations of translations or translations from an original sources assuming there was only one which is also in question. This leaves me wondering again which bible you are referring to as your true text, as not all versions of the Christian bible are the same. And how you read them depends upon whether you are reading as a literal text or an ecclesiastical one, the difference is profound.
I maintain that an adopted 'moral code' from elsewhere can easily be discarded, bypassed or ignored as inconvenient. My ethical code and moral values must be my own though they may be the same or similar to those of others. My ethical code I will not give up as it is the essence of me, it is who and what I am. Without my ethical core I am nothing, a reflection of something or someone else and not me. History has thousands of examples of those who preach morals, would impose their demands upon others, and yet by their own deeds are seen to have none. Thank you for your blessings
I know you. You show me who you are. I know people like you. I say there is only one true God all the others are just things or make believe but God of the universe is the great I Am. As for the rest of what you say, I see you want to argue. I figured that from the start but just wanted to make sure you weren't really reaching out for real knowledge. I'll just say to you, just continue on the path you are on and one day, you will see which God I'm talking about.
The bible was written by a pack of old men wanting social control. The book has some good parts but men (and women) have to learn from our society - that is not happening too well at all
What you said is straight from the enemy's mouth and I will have to pray for you. Did you know that it was decided by science that mere men could not have written the bible? None of these men knew one another and it was written over 2000 years of time. The Holy Spirit was the author and men were the tool/pen. Did you know that the future has been told and has come to pass over 300 times exactly as it was told? Did you know that no man could have done that? You really need to study before you open your mouth and show the world your ignorance. God be with you.
Thank you for your honesty. It is always important to look at outcome. Most people know this as they move into adolescence, yet like so many selfish people in America, self respect is quickly traded off for servitude under the guise of cultural freedom and liberty.
Marketing from Hollywood to Wall Street put women on pedi stools for long term profit, rather than promoting values within, celebrating looks over ability. The fake Evangelicals honor prostitution and salacious conduct as if they were Christ themselves at the alter of forgiveness and the American capitalist hating Marxists and Fascist use the fails to bludgeon America into conscious guilted slavery by abortion of all responsibility.
Corporations should be viewed as one notch below Communists, Fascists, and other notorious religious beliefs that brutalize women, yet for six decades my Boomer generation, born in the bosom of freedom and security post WWII, in this bipolar/schizophrenic like culture thought themselves the “chosen generation” that had to change the world and Obama was designed for them to, “fundamentally change America”.
As long as America continues allowing the 8- 30% to reap stock returns from corporate denigration of America, America will decline for the rest.
That is all Trump, the imperfect man has ever tried to say.
You missed a big one with Pres. Kennedy’s affairs..
But to address WGON’s comment. I own & operate a live event video company. I act as floor director, on stage with every major music performer, rock, country, alternative. It’s obviously exciting to be involved in these concerts & festivals, but I’m also witness to the disgusting groupies, willing to do anything to be with a star! Think they will not drop to their knees, behind a road case, just in between songs? Nope! Too many times I’ve turned away, wanting to kick the botch in her head! No class, no self-respect & as sleazy as your wildest imagination. Over my 30 years, I seen it all.. That was what Trump was referencing & you don’t know how much I wish his observations were not accurate!
Omg!! My life & brain would have been so very much better, if I had never searched his name!! WARNING: Do not look, unless you want to read about horrific, evil Depravity of a monster!
Hey Mike. Please be so gracious to offer a slight warning, of the horrendousness of the name you’re sharing, k?
If the states can bring down a would be President on such thin ground then its legal system needs re thinking. I would find it very scary living in the US if the legal system was so bent. The two sides are so wrapped up in their playground squabbles (albeit costly ones) they forget they have a country to run, a country that is facing many real perils.
She was sued by Trump for defamation and lost her case. I think she was ordered to pay something like $150,000. She said she would never pay him. But she got pay back with her allegations that she previously denied in writing.
Does any evidence exist Trump cavorted with S. Daniel’s? It seems that Cohen cavorted with her and paid her hush money. Daniel’s publicly admitted this as did her lawyer. I’m sure Trump has has affairs with several women but Daniel’s or E. Jean Carroll do not seem to be among them.
Trump has denied it from jump, and so did "Stormy" once upon a time. I believe this probably fictitious hookup supposedly occurred after he was married to the breathtakingly beautiful Melania, so ... I'm thinking it didn't happen. And not because I think Trump is infallible, either, but if he was going to stray, I'm sure he had his pick of stunners.
I am continually amazed at the credulity of many commenters. Does it seem likely that a notorious germaphobe who described his past sexual peccadillos as ‘dodging STDs’ had unprotected sex with a past-her-prime porn star in a one night stand? In the time of AIDS? It sure doesn’t to me. Does the narrative recounted by ‘Stormy’ seem credible? Does her past service as a porn star and porn director suggest a possible source of her improbable tale. It sure does to me. Does her obvious interest in conducting a shake down during the run-up to the election and concern that she would lose leverage afterward cause any doubt as to her veracity? Yes. I do not hold that Trump was in any way a Saint. He’s obviously been with several women, and had affairs even while married. On the other hand he’s not particularly unusual in that regard. And it is not just politicians or CEOs or Generals that find young women desirable. It’s just that they stand a better chance with the women. And isn’t the outrage against him in this particular matter mostly that women don’t want the be reminded that many of them have rather mercenary interest in older richer men.
Exactly. Men don't become rich and powerful so they can have women that anyone could buy at their local massage parlor for less than the cost of a cart of groceries.
Politicians & cheating - only matters when it happens with Republicans.
In summer 2020, articles like this one in the NY Post, https://nypost.com/2020/08/17/jill-bidens-ex-husband-accuses-her-of-having-affair-with-joe-biden/ detailing Jill Biden’s affair with then newly elected Senator Biden, while she was still married to her first husband, was summarily dismissed by the hypocrites at CNN & MSNBC. The Biden Family Crime Syndicate was launched in 1974 & has been growing in strength ever since.
"I suppose that someday, men with high levels of energy, ambition, and drive will learn to resist the temptation of cavorting with beautiful young women, and remain focused on the affairs of state."
Oh really? I want some of that shxt you're smokin'.
There's an old, tried-and-true saying: A hard dixk has no conscience.
The only way it's ever possibly going to get better, is if we elect exclusively eunuchs.
What rock have you been living under? In case you didn't get the memo, adultery and fornication are not exactly rare. Besides, I'm in no way advocating for those sins, but only a fool would argue that they aren't as common as the day is long. In other words: They are normal. Note: I did not say those behaviors are "good" or "right".
I do want to make a correction to my remarks: The only way it will get better is when Christ returns and those blessed to make the cut "learn' to be perfect over the millennia.
I often feel sorry for my son, who makes it obvious by his body language that he is trying to resist temptation, because at church (Catholic) there are significant numbers of tight-jean wearing young women with the outline of their bubble like bottoms on full display.
Who is responsible for all this attention seeking behaviour that now even early elementary school girls follow, with painted on clothing? It’s not difficult to guess: the advertising industry that works for big corporations who have to make sure that young girls get hooked on shopping as soon as they can determine fashion trends…
All these *problems* would cease to be problematic if people would just pull their heads out of their rear ends and realize that it's human nature for high status men to be constantly bombarded with sexual advances from young, beautiful women. Why should they resist, and why should we expect them to?
A basketball player or glamrock bassist who writes about diddling several thousand women becomes a cultural icon. What's the difference? The only reason there's any chance of sexual dalliances leading to blackmail or extortion is that people have the ridiculous expectation that the power hungry sleazebags they elect to office should behave like choirboys in their private lives.
Besides, I don't believe for a second that a germophobe like Trump would have anything to do with a skank like Stormy Daniels.
I keep coming back to the germaphobe angle myself, with regard to "Stormy." Makes no sense. And one of Trump's things was beauty pageants, wasn't it? As good-looking women go, I'm thinking he had his pick, if philandering was his thing. But "Stormy"?? Doubtful.
If he even knew about the hush money, it wouldn't have been to cover up anything he did, it would have been to avoid the embarrassment of anyone even thinking that he might.
Another wonderful scandal is recorded by Samuel Peyps in his famous diary of 10 years, c 1660 to 1669.
King Charles II brother, James duke of York started an affair with the Duke of Buckinghams wife ( think Buckingham Palace). The Duke could not stop them so he deliberately visited lots of whores across London to get infected with the pox and then infected his straying wife. So that she would infect James and he would be revenged on James. Later James became King James II, until the parliament threw him out of the country during the Glorious Revolution of 1688. James was replaced by his daughter Queen Mary and her co regient/ husband King William of Orange. They had no children and were succeeded by her sister Queen Anne. She had 16 children, all of whom died as children.
It would be interesting to know if Mary and Anne both suffered because they inherited the pox from their Father, no children and all unhealthy children that died!
When Trump stated that famous people can have their way with women, he was right. I'm a woman and so don't think I'm being a misogynist. I'm merely stating the facts. There are women who want to be able to brag that she went to bed with a famous person. Then, there are women who want to marry a famous person and thinks that giving herself to him will win him....NOT. Then, there are smart women who know how to attract a man in the right way, not for love, but for his money and fame. These mega rich men have to deal with that all the time. These women who have no self respect who go out in public to jog in what shouldn't be worn in public don't understand what they are doing to themselves. This case against Trump was never about sex. They had to stop him any way they could. So, these women who always come out of the cobwebs to charge such deeds onto a man 30 yrs. after the fact, should be jailed. But more importantly, those who paid them to do it should be hung.
I am in my 80s and agree wholeheartedly.
I'll be 76 next month and I think this new generation was given too much freedom to expose everything they have to the public. No one looks down on them for doing it either...except a Christian or a moral person. At the beach they call a swim suit a string....it's sickening!! I was shocked at the real bikinis when they came out but now? Dental floss is a swim suit.
So true! They degrade us all with their wanton behaviors!
Exactly! Immoral men who would hit on a woman would hit on all women thinking we are all "loose" like the ones they see wearing nearly nothing. But, women of today are all about themselves and no one else. Very vain!
Indeed, and they do! You are correct in that assessment as well; that's the whole reason for feticide and infanticide "on demand"!
I disagree but your comment is funny. The implication is that the behaviour of these men is the woman's fault - many men do not respect their spouse or their relationship and often the richer they are the worse they are- therein lies the problem!
I don’t see anything “funny” here. Politics is down stream of culture and Communists are the epitome of propagandizing culture for outcome. Corporate stock return fiduciary needs drive Corporate salaciousness unless the public agrees they have had enough of degrading women and now men under the ruse of beauty and vanity as they dilute self respect and responsibility. Corporate capitalism is not the villain here, but lack of responsibility for America as a whole, its main ideal from birth. Those who hate America love and promulgate the idea of globalism intent on striping America of its vaunted freedom and independence the Marxist/Fascists friendame’s tunnel beneath the dolts “partying hardy”.
Your comment carries water for the America haters of the world by pointing out tiny shiny objects, grains of rice that may be true but insignificant in the big picture. That is how the ruse of Marxist (Communism) inversion propaganda works.
Globalism? I did not even mention or imply globalism. I am no American hater in fact the opposite. Play it at your level if you want to but I still stand by my comment that many men do not respect their partner or their relationship. That impaired respect goes from the individual level to the national level and affects culture. I am no marxist. That issue is NOT a tiny grain of rice - maybe it is for.
You are correct in part of what you said. However, no, women are part of their problems. Nasty, disrespectful men will attack a woman no matter how morally she's dressed. However, when a woman and lots of women, present themselves as tramps, then they put a bad look on all women. They also cause a guy who normally wouldn't come on to a "lady" he now feels free to come on to the woman who presents herself as a tramp. If you have a bunch of money, would you leave it outside in plain sight for anyone to see and wonder why anyone would take it? Same thing. But again, you are right about the mega rich men not respecting women...so true. I'm sure Trump has had his share of women like we are talking about. But, this wasn't about sex or women...this was about stopping Trump even if it means ruining our nation. You are also right about many men not respecting their own wives. But, can't we see that if we can improve things, maybe less and less women will be harmed? They will always be attacked or come on to, but that's because many men have no self control of their "sex drive".
Well said, and oh the profound irony of the Trump conviction when you consider what goes on inside Washington DC, every single day.
A combination of accepted social norms and a desire to display advantages might be the driver of the behaviors you deplore. Remember, once it was and for some still is totally normal and accepted for men and women of all ages to spend their lives effectively naked - together.
I am sure these people have their social issues but I would suggest nakedness is not a big issue for them. We make nakedness or exposure of any kind a major issue when we plaster supposedly moral 'standards' uniformly on all the people in our community.
The bible tells us to show modesty. Our society's norms and laws were build on biblical standards. When we threw those out, we have the totally disgusting society we have now. Nudest camps are not normal, it's perverse. I do understand what you are getting at. However, I'm speaking from a moral perspective. If we had morals again, perhaps we could have less perversion. ???
Allowing that perhaps 1.5 billion people can be considered Christian, what about the rest? Are they automatically immoral beings due to their lifestyles because they are not followers of Christian norms as laid down in the Christian Bible?
i have a problem with that idea, in part because of the history of that bible itself. Are you referring to the Old Testament or the New? And which version as there are more versions than I can count, all subtly or majorly different from each other? Some like the Ethiopian Christian Bible totally rejected by other Christians. There is not ONE book, never has been.
Most important of all, who are the ones, the people, who will dictate what is moral or not? The bible is specific in some things depending upon which text version you are referring to, and many times the wording is vague, perhaps deliberately so. So who decides?
My problem is that too many people have no Ethical core on which to build their own Moral Code - no book of dogma, no interpretal religious text or moral control committee required.
You speak like a man who has never studied the bible. One's moral code is not built upon what they think is moral. It's built on biblical principals because God's ways are always the best way. When mankind follows God's ways, mankind progresses and prospers. When they don't, then their prosperity is gone and their way of life is a mess. If you were honest with youself, you can look back into history and see this is true. It doesn't matter which translation, but for your question, I'm talking about all of them....they all boil down to the same meaning. No, it's not confusing at all. It's only confusing to those who have a closed mind and no ears to hear. God loves you and wants you to be happy, and happiness comes when we follow His will. Please read the book of Proverbs and you will see that all the things that King Solomon writes there is common sense and true. If you are honest, you will see that without a doubt. I won't try to teach you about the bible here. I've said enough. God be with you.
When you speak of God, whose God are you referring to? The people of this earth have many gods and even in the Christian bible there are more than one in some versions. You are suggesting that I may not be honest yet you know me not - you do know that one versions is part of English Law since the 18th century, the whole bible?. You are also assuming that I have never read the bible, yet you have no idea about this - why do I know about differences? And I do not find any of this confusing so why assume that I do? Again you suggest I have a closed mind and no ears to hear and I wonder how do you know this when you know me not? Have you studied other religious and spiritual writings? i have, have you?
While you suggest that it doesn't matter which translation, oh but it does, most definitely, as all of them are translations of translations or translations from an original sources assuming there was only one which is also in question. This leaves me wondering again which bible you are referring to as your true text, as not all versions of the Christian bible are the same. And how you read them depends upon whether you are reading as a literal text or an ecclesiastical one, the difference is profound.
I maintain that an adopted 'moral code' from elsewhere can easily be discarded, bypassed or ignored as inconvenient. My ethical code and moral values must be my own though they may be the same or similar to those of others. My ethical code I will not give up as it is the essence of me, it is who and what I am. Without my ethical core I am nothing, a reflection of something or someone else and not me. History has thousands of examples of those who preach morals, would impose their demands upon others, and yet by their own deeds are seen to have none. Thank you for your blessings
I know you. You show me who you are. I know people like you. I say there is only one true God all the others are just things or make believe but God of the universe is the great I Am. As for the rest of what you say, I see you want to argue. I figured that from the start but just wanted to make sure you weren't really reaching out for real knowledge. I'll just say to you, just continue on the path you are on and one day, you will see which God I'm talking about.
The bible was written by a pack of old men wanting social control. The book has some good parts but men (and women) have to learn from our society - that is not happening too well at all
What you said is straight from the enemy's mouth and I will have to pray for you. Did you know that it was decided by science that mere men could not have written the bible? None of these men knew one another and it was written over 2000 years of time. The Holy Spirit was the author and men were the tool/pen. Did you know that the future has been told and has come to pass over 300 times exactly as it was told? Did you know that no man could have done that? You really need to study before you open your mouth and show the world your ignorance. God be with you.
Thank you for your honesty. It is always important to look at outcome. Most people know this as they move into adolescence, yet like so many selfish people in America, self respect is quickly traded off for servitude under the guise of cultural freedom and liberty.
Marketing from Hollywood to Wall Street put women on pedi stools for long term profit, rather than promoting values within, celebrating looks over ability. The fake Evangelicals honor prostitution and salacious conduct as if they were Christ themselves at the alter of forgiveness and the American capitalist hating Marxists and Fascist use the fails to bludgeon America into conscious guilted slavery by abortion of all responsibility.
Corporations should be viewed as one notch below Communists, Fascists, and other notorious religious beliefs that brutalize women, yet for six decades my Boomer generation, born in the bosom of freedom and security post WWII, in this bipolar/schizophrenic like culture thought themselves the “chosen generation” that had to change the world and Obama was designed for them to, “fundamentally change America”.
As long as America continues allowing the 8- 30% to reap stock returns from corporate denigration of America, America will decline for the rest.
That is all Trump, the imperfect man has ever tried to say.
Beautifully said!!
You’re so right, WGON,
Great comment. I agree %100.
You missed a big one with Pres. Kennedy’s affairs..
But to address WGON’s comment. I own & operate a live event video company. I act as floor director, on stage with every major music performer, rock, country, alternative. It’s obviously exciting to be involved in these concerts & festivals, but I’m also witness to the disgusting groupies, willing to do anything to be with a star! Think they will not drop to their knees, behind a road case, just in between songs? Nope! Too many times I’ve turned away, wanting to kick the botch in her head! No class, no self-respect & as sleazy as your wildest imagination. Over my 30 years, I seen it all.. That was what Trump was referencing & you don’t know how much I wish his observations were not accurate!
You know about the lead singer from the band, Lost Prophets? What he was caught and jailed for?
Omg!! My life & brain would have been so very much better, if I had never searched his name!! WARNING: Do not look, unless you want to read about horrific, evil Depravity of a monster!
Hey Mike. Please be so gracious to offer a slight warning, of the horrendousness of the name you’re sharing, k?
I have no idea.
Yes!.
Oh these poor men like Trump being taken advantage of - we must excuse them! What a load of nonesense.
If the states can bring down a would be President on such thin ground then its legal system needs re thinking. I would find it very scary living in the US if the legal system was so bent. The two sides are so wrapped up in their playground squabbles (albeit costly ones) they forget they have a country to run, a country that is facing many real perils.
Maybe I’ve missed any reporting on this in the news, but why WASN’T Stormy Daniels charged with blackmail and extortion? Anyone know?
She was sued by Trump for defamation and lost her case. I think she was ordered to pay something like $150,000. She said she would never pay him. But she got pay back with her allegations that she previously denied in writing.
No, I don't think you missed anything, and she should've been!
Those “affairs” pale in comparison to what occurred on Epstein Island.
Does any evidence exist Trump cavorted with S. Daniel’s? It seems that Cohen cavorted with her and paid her hush money. Daniel’s publicly admitted this as did her lawyer. I’m sure Trump has has affairs with several women but Daniel’s or E. Jean Carroll do not seem to be among them.
Trump has denied it from jump, and so did "Stormy" once upon a time. I believe this probably fictitious hookup supposedly occurred after he was married to the breathtakingly beautiful Melania, so ... I'm thinking it didn't happen. And not because I think Trump is infallible, either, but if he was going to stray, I'm sure he had his pick of stunners.
I 100% agree and did my own research!
I am continually amazed at the credulity of many commenters. Does it seem likely that a notorious germaphobe who described his past sexual peccadillos as ‘dodging STDs’ had unprotected sex with a past-her-prime porn star in a one night stand? In the time of AIDS? It sure doesn’t to me. Does the narrative recounted by ‘Stormy’ seem credible? Does her past service as a porn star and porn director suggest a possible source of her improbable tale. It sure does to me. Does her obvious interest in conducting a shake down during the run-up to the election and concern that she would lose leverage afterward cause any doubt as to her veracity? Yes. I do not hold that Trump was in any way a Saint. He’s obviously been with several women, and had affairs even while married. On the other hand he’s not particularly unusual in that regard. And it is not just politicians or CEOs or Generals that find young women desirable. It’s just that they stand a better chance with the women. And isn’t the outrage against him in this particular matter mostly that women don’t want the be reminded that many of them have rather mercenary interest in older richer men.
Exactly. Men don't become rich and powerful so they can have women that anyone could buy at their local massage parlor for less than the cost of a cart of groceries.
Politicians & cheating - only matters when it happens with Republicans.
In summer 2020, articles like this one in the NY Post, https://nypost.com/2020/08/17/jill-bidens-ex-husband-accuses-her-of-having-affair-with-joe-biden/ detailing Jill Biden’s affair with then newly elected Senator Biden, while she was still married to her first husband, was summarily dismissed by the hypocrites at CNN & MSNBC. The Biden Family Crime Syndicate was launched in 1974 & has been growing in strength ever since.
I recall seeing a very young-looking Jill sitting on old creepy's lap back in the day. The whole family ... ugh.
"I suppose that someday, men with high levels of energy, ambition, and drive will learn to resist the temptation of cavorting with beautiful young women, and remain focused on the affairs of state."
Oh really? I want some of that shxt you're smokin'.
There's an old, tried-and-true saying: A hard dixk has no conscience.
The only way it's ever possibly going to get better, is if we elect exclusively eunuchs.
Your understanding of sex is blatantly poor. The hard one you are referring to is coming from your head and all it's attitudes
LOL!!!
What rock have you been living under? In case you didn't get the memo, adultery and fornication are not exactly rare. Besides, I'm in no way advocating for those sins, but only a fool would argue that they aren't as common as the day is long. In other words: They are normal. Note: I did not say those behaviors are "good" or "right".
I do want to make a correction to my remarks: The only way it will get better is when Christ returns and those blessed to make the cut "learn' to be perfect over the millennia.
Considering planks in most ppls eyes..just look at divorces. An NDA is a legal expense bc it requires legal paperwork
I often feel sorry for my son, who makes it obvious by his body language that he is trying to resist temptation, because at church (Catholic) there are significant numbers of tight-jean wearing young women with the outline of their bubble like bottoms on full display.
They're led by Satan
Who is responsible for all this attention seeking behaviour that now even early elementary school girls follow, with painted on clothing? It’s not difficult to guess: the advertising industry that works for big corporations who have to make sure that young girls get hooked on shopping as soon as they can determine fashion trends…
Ask any detective what’s involved in a crime usually… money and monkey 😉.. started with Adam and Eve , minus the money.
All these *problems* would cease to be problematic if people would just pull their heads out of their rear ends and realize that it's human nature for high status men to be constantly bombarded with sexual advances from young, beautiful women. Why should they resist, and why should we expect them to?
A basketball player or glamrock bassist who writes about diddling several thousand women becomes a cultural icon. What's the difference? The only reason there's any chance of sexual dalliances leading to blackmail or extortion is that people have the ridiculous expectation that the power hungry sleazebags they elect to office should behave like choirboys in their private lives.
Besides, I don't believe for a second that a germophobe like Trump would have anything to do with a skank like Stormy Daniels.
I keep coming back to the germaphobe angle myself, with regard to "Stormy." Makes no sense. And one of Trump's things was beauty pageants, wasn't it? As good-looking women go, I'm thinking he had his pick, if philandering was his thing. But "Stormy"?? Doubtful.
If he even knew about the hush money, it wouldn't have been to cover up anything he did, it would have been to avoid the embarrassment of anyone even thinking that he might.
The Profumo story has a redemption feature in that John Profumo spent most of the rest of his life working for a charity.
Another wonderful scandal is recorded by Samuel Peyps in his famous diary of 10 years, c 1660 to 1669.
King Charles II brother, James duke of York started an affair with the Duke of Buckinghams wife ( think Buckingham Palace). The Duke could not stop them so he deliberately visited lots of whores across London to get infected with the pox and then infected his straying wife. So that she would infect James and he would be revenged on James. Later James became King James II, until the parliament threw him out of the country during the Glorious Revolution of 1688. James was replaced by his daughter Queen Mary and her co regient/ husband King William of Orange. They had no children and were succeeded by her sister Queen Anne. She had 16 children, all of whom died as children.
It would be interesting to know if Mary and Anne both suffered because they inherited the pox from their Father, no children and all unhealthy children that died!