I'm grateful to Novavax for being late to market. That made it possible to tell my doctor "I'm waiting for Novavax" in order to put off the mRNA jabs. Now that mRNA is such an obvious, catastrophic failure, it's easier to just refuse any COVID shot or any mRNA potion.
A continuation of the fools errand to make vaccines for viruses that continually mutate into other strains. HIV, Covid, Common Cold, Influenza etc. We should be talking about therapeutics like HQ and ivermectin and other potential treatments for those that may get the disease and are at risk.
Another vaccine that I would refuse to take added to my list.
Read the Comment section of this article: “The use of this vaccine could remain an important element in reducing the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.” Sadly, people read the title of an article and then go straight to the conclusion without reading and analyzing the data themselves. The data often do not match the conclusion.
Millions spent (maybe billions?) on another failed pharmaceutical trying to outsmart a virus when almost no time, effort, or money is spent on helping people improve their natural immune system. Although it is not the pharmaceutical industry’s responsibility to help people improve their health, it certainly is silly how backwards the whole system is. Silly to the point of indecent to any educated, logical person. (As long as they are not brainwashed about vaccine mythology.)
And it definitely is the public health agencies job to try and help direct people on improving their health yet they do the opposite. I will say that individuals hold most of the responsibility for their health but public health agencies are giving out false and misleading information so there is responsibility all around for the situation we find ourselves in.
Vaccines are the antithesis to a good working innate immune system. Until this truth becomes self evident within the medical community, the general health of the population is going to continue to decline. Even if there are short term benefits (like over 50% effective for a year), messing with the human immune system and stirring it up with adjuvants and fake viruses (not to mention all the other toxic ingredients and contaminations) is most likely always going to have long term negative consequences. The reason we have skin is to protect us from outside inputs but we don’t seem to respect that simple, effective natural protection because “science”.
Sometimes, even the medical community can see those negative consequences in as little as one year, like the study showing the previous years flu shot made people more susceptible to the following year’s flu. Was that 1996? I can’t remember the year they figured that out but no one learned anything from it because they keep injecting people with harmful products. Even a recent military study (2019) showed that the flu shot protected against the few flu strains it was intended for but made the recipients more susceptible to other flu-like viruses and colds (notably coronaviruses specifically). Once you know, you know. Vaccines are a fool’s errand.
Dr. McCullough, like you, I was really hoping that NOVAVAX would provide an "option" to support. What can NOVAVAX do to improve their effectiveness. Or is that impossible to know how to redesign for imporved effectiveness. Robert W. Enzenauer, MD, MPH, Pediatric Ophthalmologist
I thought novavax was on a par wth the mRNA and adenovirus genetic vaccines - couldn't have chosen between them. Spike proteins assembled around a sphere ? to resemble a virus?? Totally artificial construct, clearly not similar. It's the sort of wow-zappo assemblage that someone like Bill Gates would give money to because it seemed really cool.
I know someone who was out of work due to the mandates, doing it tough, did not want the genetic vaccines, but in service to his family, bit-the-bullet when novavax was finally approved. He was in very deep trouble - stomach problems, chest pain. For nothing. He knew it was for nothing. #satanic
Sadly, it was not "for nothing"; those profiting want all of us dead. It was for their profit, which unfortunately, benefits no one in the long run. Yhwh knows his heart, and those who unlawfully pushed him to take it; He will recompense, and, by the signs, that's coming a lot sooner than those imagine.
I don't understand why any injection for a respiratory virus is on the table? Haven't sufficient studies shown they're all essentially useless, and the best defense are non-toxic agents delivered to the nose and throat? Why would anyone roll the dice with a product laced with spike at this stage of the game?
Thank you so much Dr. McCullough for the timely updates. Your Courage under duress of cancellation and slander is as remarkable as you are resilient. As a Nam combat veteran I truly understand the exponential effect of a fearful and fickle public and how propaganda crushes truth under its cantankerous weight. Going through a losing war of vulnerable public perception. Propaganda’s deceit always disadvantages truth because propaganda and brother censorship attack not only public fear but simultaneously promulgates itself by coddling the intended victims with their own good graces to assure them. Ah, yes, Ho Chi Minh was just poor ole revolutionary hero, just like Castro and Guevara, but Nam was not just a civil war, and dozens more hate America propaganda sloganeering that targeted an unprecedentedly rebellious Boomer youth living in unprecedented security post WWII. It all went unrealized in the vacuum of a divided confused citizenry and intended chaos, propaganda’s shadow. All the domino’s have indeed fallen and the real elephants in that war are now closer than ever because “people” want to go along to get along” and that’s the advantage.
Until the effect on gut flora is determined ... wiping out the bifidibacteria will be no surprise ... the product deserves no further consideration. It is garbage. It will constitute just one more vector for chronic diseases that hobble half the population. Pharmaceuticals, including all vaccines, are a major component of the pollution landscape at the heart of the matter.
Every product has to be viewed in this light first. If is messes up the microbiome ... like some antibiotic will with certainty ... but has redeeming value that is overwhelming and utterly expedient ... then a plan to fix the damage has to be up front. If not, then all the testing trials will be missing the unanticipated harms that creep in on little cat feet.
I'm curious how the design of the Novavax clinical trial differs from the Pfizer trial, which has been shown to be more or less fraudulent with its 95% claim of efficacy.
What is the Novavax Omicron vaccine’s effectiveness against severe illness and death? This is what really matters not preventing symptomatic disease, no?
"If it came to forced COVID-19 vaccination against human will, I have said Novavax would be the choice..." Why would it come to forced vaccination and why even suggest that it might come to that?
Far fetched hypothetical, perhaps? I imagine a few people would die trying to prevent forced injection. Moreover, your updated conclusion based on new evidence rejecting the Novavax, displays, once again, the ineptness of the pharmaceutical industry. Now that we have been shown that the virus was likely a bioweapon and the genetic therapy a counter-measure designed to create more harm, (a counter measure the government continues to press upon the populace despite its lethality) it is presumptively suicidal to accept government injected/fed solutions. Unless.....we're in the mood for Russian roulette .
Sounds like Novavax shot is just as effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection as the flu shot is against the flu.
I'm grateful to Novavax for being late to market. That made it possible to tell my doctor "I'm waiting for Novavax" in order to put off the mRNA jabs. Now that mRNA is such an obvious, catastrophic failure, it's easier to just refuse any COVID shot or any mRNA potion.
A continuation of the fools errand to make vaccines for viruses that continually mutate into other strains. HIV, Covid, Common Cold, Influenza etc. We should be talking about therapeutics like HQ and ivermectin and other potential treatments for those that may get the disease and are at risk.
Another vaccine that I would refuse to take added to my list.
Keep quercitin on your list too. Works like HCQ, but natural
Read the Comment section of this article: “The use of this vaccine could remain an important element in reducing the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.” Sadly, people read the title of an article and then go straight to the conclusion without reading and analyzing the data themselves. The data often do not match the conclusion.
Millions spent (maybe billions?) on another failed pharmaceutical trying to outsmart a virus when almost no time, effort, or money is spent on helping people improve their natural immune system. Although it is not the pharmaceutical industry’s responsibility to help people improve their health, it certainly is silly how backwards the whole system is. Silly to the point of indecent to any educated, logical person. (As long as they are not brainwashed about vaccine mythology.)
And it definitely is the public health agencies job to try and help direct people on improving their health yet they do the opposite. I will say that individuals hold most of the responsibility for their health but public health agencies are giving out false and misleading information so there is responsibility all around for the situation we find ourselves in.
Vaccines are the antithesis to a good working innate immune system. Until this truth becomes self evident within the medical community, the general health of the population is going to continue to decline. Even if there are short term benefits (like over 50% effective for a year), messing with the human immune system and stirring it up with adjuvants and fake viruses (not to mention all the other toxic ingredients and contaminations) is most likely always going to have long term negative consequences. The reason we have skin is to protect us from outside inputs but we don’t seem to respect that simple, effective natural protection because “science”.
Sometimes, even the medical community can see those negative consequences in as little as one year, like the study showing the previous years flu shot made people more susceptible to the following year’s flu. Was that 1996? I can’t remember the year they figured that out but no one learned anything from it because they keep injecting people with harmful products. Even a recent military study (2019) showed that the flu shot protected against the few flu strains it was intended for but made the recipients more susceptible to other flu-like viruses and colds (notably coronaviruses specifically). Once you know, you know. Vaccines are a fool’s errand.
Dr. McCullough, like you, I was really hoping that NOVAVAX would provide an "option" to support. What can NOVAVAX do to improve their effectiveness. Or is that impossible to know how to redesign for imporved effectiveness. Robert W. Enzenauer, MD, MPH, Pediatric Ophthalmologist
I thought novavax was on a par wth the mRNA and adenovirus genetic vaccines - couldn't have chosen between them. Spike proteins assembled around a sphere ? to resemble a virus?? Totally artificial construct, clearly not similar. It's the sort of wow-zappo assemblage that someone like Bill Gates would give money to because it seemed really cool.
And only does harm...
I know someone who was out of work due to the mandates, doing it tough, did not want the genetic vaccines, but in service to his family, bit-the-bullet when novavax was finally approved. He was in very deep trouble - stomach problems, chest pain. For nothing. He knew it was for nothing. #satanic
Sadly, it was not "for nothing"; those profiting want all of us dead. It was for their profit, which unfortunately, benefits no one in the long run. Yhwh knows his heart, and those who unlawfully pushed him to take it; He will recompense, and, by the signs, that's coming a lot sooner than those imagine.
I don't understand why any injection for a respiratory virus is on the table? Haven't sufficient studies shown they're all essentially useless, and the best defense are non-toxic agents delivered to the nose and throat? Why would anyone roll the dice with a product laced with spike at this stage of the game?
Aren't there other issues with novavax - saponin based matrix-m adjuvant?
Thank you so much Dr. McCullough for the timely updates. Your Courage under duress of cancellation and slander is as remarkable as you are resilient. As a Nam combat veteran I truly understand the exponential effect of a fearful and fickle public and how propaganda crushes truth under its cantankerous weight. Going through a losing war of vulnerable public perception. Propaganda’s deceit always disadvantages truth because propaganda and brother censorship attack not only public fear but simultaneously promulgates itself by coddling the intended victims with their own good graces to assure them. Ah, yes, Ho Chi Minh was just poor ole revolutionary hero, just like Castro and Guevara, but Nam was not just a civil war, and dozens more hate America propaganda sloganeering that targeted an unprecedentedly rebellious Boomer youth living in unprecedented security post WWII. It all went unrealized in the vacuum of a divided confused citizenry and intended chaos, propaganda’s shadow. All the domino’s have indeed fallen and the real elephants in that war are now closer than ever because “people” want to go along to get along” and that’s the advantage.
Until the effect on gut flora is determined ... wiping out the bifidibacteria will be no surprise ... the product deserves no further consideration. It is garbage. It will constitute just one more vector for chronic diseases that hobble half the population. Pharmaceuticals, including all vaccines, are a major component of the pollution landscape at the heart of the matter.
Every product has to be viewed in this light first. If is messes up the microbiome ... like some antibiotic will with certainty ... but has redeeming value that is overwhelming and utterly expedient ... then a plan to fix the damage has to be up front. If not, then all the testing trials will be missing the unanticipated harms that creep in on little cat feet.
I'm curious how the design of the Novavax clinical trial differs from the Pfizer trial, which has been shown to be more or less fraudulent with its 95% claim of efficacy.
Could we perhaps get valid studies for ANY of the vaccines that are currently on the market? Until then, people are gonna pass on getting them.
What is the Novavax Omicron vaccine’s effectiveness against severe illness and death? This is what really matters not preventing symptomatic disease, no?
"If it came to forced COVID-19 vaccination against human will, I have said Novavax would be the choice..." Why would it come to forced vaccination and why even suggest that it might come to that?
Far fetched hypothetical, perhaps? I imagine a few people would die trying to prevent forced injection. Moreover, your updated conclusion based on new evidence rejecting the Novavax, displays, once again, the ineptness of the pharmaceutical industry. Now that we have been shown that the virus was likely a bioweapon and the genetic therapy a counter-measure designed to create more harm, (a counter measure the government continues to press upon the populace despite its lethality) it is presumptively suicidal to accept government injected/fed solutions. Unless.....we're in the mood for Russian roulette .
Probably used 2 legged lemon ngs called Karen this time.