Understanding the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex
Directed evolution of the Military-Industrial Complex that President Eisenhower warned about in 1961.
By JOHN LEAKE
In recent days, many of our Substack readers have contacted us to recommend that we read the Substack pages of the great Katharine Watt and Sasha Latypova. Not only do we read their columns, we have corresponded with them about various subjects, and we have interviewed Ms. Latypova about her experience and expertise.
We are aware of their emphasis on the preeminent role the Department of Defense has played in this criminal fiasco, and we don’t disagree. However, it seems to me that it’s of limited utility to draw sharp distinctions between the DoD and companies like Pfizer and Moderna. Like Krupp and I.G. Farben during the Third Reich, these companies are bound to U.S. government institutions like the DoD, DARPA, NIH, HHS, and BARDA in an arrangement that strongly resembles Fascist Corporatism.
Watt and Latypova have emphasized that the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech gene injection shots are NOT pharmaceutical products, and that neither company actually manufactures these substances. Both researchers emphasize that Pfizer and Moderna (and the lower tier clowns who work for them) are mere front organizations, and as such bear no actual power or liability. They are the protected lackeys of the Department of Defense.
Defining and delineating how exactly these organizations relate to and benefit from each other strikes me as a formidable undertaking. It seems to me that in trying to understand these relationships, it is useful to consider President Eisenhower’s Farewell Address in 1961. His warning to Americans about the rise of the Military-Industrial Complex is now more relevant than ever, and all Americans should be throughly acquainted with this speech.
Two notable Hollywood depictions of dystopian Fascist Corporatism are Blade Runner (1982) and RoboCop (1987). In the former, the Tyrell Corporation makes combat androids (Replicants) to staff the military in of Off-World colonies. In the latter film, Omni Consumer Products (an adjunct to the U.S. military) builds an android law enforcement officer (RoboCop) to police dystopian Detroit, with the really fun plot twist that the company CEO (Dick Jones) is in league with gangster boss Clarence Boddicker. Their relationship reminded me of the Office of Naval Intelligence’s recruitment of jailed mafioso, Charlie “Lucky” Luciano, to assist with the Allied invasion of Sicily (Operation Husky) in 1943. Investigators of the JFK assassination twenty years later have pointed to this relationship as a notable example of a US intelligence agency using Sicilian mafiosi for various purposes.
This doesn't mean we shouldn't celebrate this exposure of Pfizer's wicked complicity. At this point, the Pfizer executives' best hope is to help provide evidence to convict the folks at the DoD who were giving them their marching orders.
And, who is the DoD taking orders from?
You are right that understanding the criminal behavior is a "formidable undertaking" and that is exactly what Latypova and Watt have done. No need to go to the movies to find insights. Their thesis is that the actions are directed by an extra-legal set of laws. Which explain why it is that the FDA is not doing its job, why Congress is silent, why the clinical trials were so skimpy and incomplete, why the results were covered-up, why there's not even an attempt at consistency from batch to batch, why Pfizer claimed in court (via DOJ lawyers) that they were ordered to do it by the USG, why Maddie deGaray was ignored and why doctors like Peter McCullough are silenced. It's a great thesis because it has great explanatory power.
It's no use simply decrying the absence of regulatory oversight or the silencing of facts. It's hard to make much progress when you treat the pandemic response as a collection of disparate parties taking disparate actions. The US pandemic response was governmental. It was preplanned, well-organized and well-executed. Understanding the nature of how the government works is important.
A word about Ike's speech. The way I read the whole speech, he was saying that innovation won the war, that the Allies had more of a bottom-up and multi-sourced system for idea generation. And that if the USG steps in during the Cold War and starts funding the University labs and projects, that will imperil the innovation, because it is single-sourced.
Well, we are way beyond that now. We passed that signpost decades ago at 60 mph. We now have a mass injection campaign developed by the government, funded by the government, purchased by the government, and covered-up by the government, and fear-mongered by the government. I don't think Ike would even recognize this as America. All done by one branch of the government with no debate. Let's try to understand what is going on, so we know how to undo it.
https://georgewford.substack.com/p/the-illusion-that-is-the-pandemic