Hang in there, Dr. McCullough. You've done so much to educate people -- and yourself -- during this incredibly painful time in history. Of course, many still do not know the truth (due to censorship) or believe the truth (due to mental blindness).
Thank you for making a difference and encouraging others to do so as well!
Thanks for posting and hoping seniors and those who care for them take notice. My 92 year old father had covid (with 3 days of mild symptoms) and the assisted living nurse advised the shot afterward. He declined and asked if I believed they (the larger medical establishment) were trying to kill the elderly. I responded that yes, they are.
One of the many reasons I declined the shot after recovering from Covid. Lost my job anyway, declined my religious exemption, ignored my doctor who told them this shot was unnecessary due to my natural immunity. We need to fight back.
The finding discussed by a few embalmers of the rubbery clots is terribly worrisome, but I would have expected this to be a problem EVERY embalmer would be discussing by now, given the large percentage of the population who subjected themselves to this vaccine. If only a couple of embalmers are talking about this, I have to regard this reporting to be "fake news".
Sadly, not fake news. Suppressed news. Fear of being persecuted upon speaking out. Fear of losing one’s job. Just like doctors who fear speaking out even though they know and can see what’s happening.
Check out John O’Looney (embalmer), Dr. Ryan Cole (pathologist), and A Midwestern Doctor substack on medical blindness. Many more are starting to speak out, but these are a good start for anyone who wishes to explore.
I know each of these sources. They are all in my same echo chamber. I've heard O'Looney's testimony. I follow Dr. Cole closely and subscribe to "A Midwestern Doctor" Substack. Please make a point of asking any embalmer you know whether he is seeing anything like this. The embalmers do NOT have to say this is due to vaccination. They could plead ignorance but just report their findings. Do you really believe that there wouldn't be murmuring about this within those circles such that it wouldn't eventually reach the public?
The analogy to the experience of physicians is not illuminating. I am a physician. I have watched as my colleagues see events but make no connection to the vaccine because, unless one does very specific testing to try to implicate the spike protein, the case before the physician is just another ill patient. There are SO MANY different ways that a patient can be ill from the vaccine (neurological, hematological, immunological, etc), and all those different clinical presentations are plausibly connected to the vaccine but might not be. In the case of the embalmers, we are talking about ONE VERY SPECIFIC FINDING and we are asking whether embalmers have seen this finding and whether they ever saw it before or whether they are seeing more of it.
With this kind of logic, EVERY doctor should be honestly discussing potential deadly side effects in the best interest of patients instead of worrying about losing their job.
EVERY big pharma exec should finally just admit they lied or covered up the fact that they knew these shots wouldn’t stop transmission.
EVERY politician should apologize and provide redress to all the citizens that were killed, lost jobs, or were ostracized by their peers due to bad, lying public policy.
EVERY biased reported who allowed themselves to be manipulated by their elite big tech overlords should be discredited and fired.
And EVERY person that blindly defended the narrative to the detriment of the rest of us should admit they were wrong already
Justice will not arrive without a battle, and thankfully we have more and more brave ones willing to speak up. More and more WILL be exposed ... in time.
No. I don't have to adjust my expectations. I have seen events that I believe are vaccine-related but have no way to prove it. As Dr. Cole has pointed out, the testing one would need to do on autopsy or in evaluation are not generally available and are prohibitively expensive. Moreover, in the case of those who survive the injury, the test provides no useful way forward given the drug company's liability protection and our relative ignorance about how to treat spike-protein-related disease. As a physician, making the claim that an injury is due to the COVID-19 jab is speculative and professionally risky, and there are many different illness presentations that prompt those of us who are attuned to this issue to view as vaccine related.
The situation for the embalmer is very different. An embalmer can report the finding that the embalming fluid is more difficult to inject or that rubbery clots are found without having to stipulate it is related to vaccination. They can plead ignorance. Who is going to stop them? And why?
Why do you regard as "logical" the assertion that you make? Did embalmers mandate that you get a COVID-19 vaccine? Did embalmers incorrectly advise you about the risks to your health that accompany this jab? Did embalmers make money from the jab and are invested in your continuing to get boosted? Without those incentives, embalmers are much freer to speak. We should be hearing from them.
The funeral industry is doing well. Funerals are up by 15% compared to the same quarter in 2019. This isn't expected, given that we are no longer in the worst part of the pandemic. These industry watchers are free to share their findings. The embalmers should do the same.
Some thought provoking comments and it seems we are largely on the same side yet have some different perspectives. Why do you so easily accept that the burden of proof need be on the vaccine injured when common sense and data, including excess death rates, indicate that the so called vaccines are to blame? The ones who pushed this on people never had to prove it was actually safe and effective; they just repeated it enough so people believed it was true. What other major world event happened that could explain these phenomena?
I also disagree that it is more ‘speculative and professionally risky’ for physicians to speak out. Although I can’t say for certain because i am not part of either of these professions, an online search reveals that the average embalmer makes only $45k per year and typically works for funeral homes, which are small family businesses. The embalmers may very well be afraid of losing their jobs and being blacklisted in a very tight knit industry. Likewise, as a small business owner, i can tell you that many of my counterparts do not want to make waves for fear of losing licenses, customers, goodwill, or for just being labelled as a “conspiracy theorist”. Even small businesses that did well over the last few years have been through a lot of upheaval. It’s often easier to just keep quiet.
I will double down on "speculative and risky" for physicians to speak out. The exception is a cardiac event temporally close to receiving the vaccine, but even that situation can be regarded as speculative. A 53 year-old friend just had a major heart attack, and he was zealous about the vaccine. He was also overweight and diabetic, so he had underlying risk factors that could account for his event. We can't distinguish that the vaccine was the cause because most medical events are multi-factorial. Those who study the data at the level of the population are in a much better position to point us in the right direction. Until it is established from population studies, any individual case can be endlessly adjudicated to inconclusiveness.
If the person dies, we can do a highly specialized autopsy that could potentially identify the vaccination as a major causal factor, but those autopsies are not getting done. Without that proof, a physician claiming vaccine injury to a surviving family member is making an irresponsibly provocative and alarmist statement to a person who probably received the same vaccine. What clinical utility resides in that?
I have a neighbor who was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis recently. I know she was vaccinated. Initially, the diagnosis was transverse myelitis, which is a known adverse event from the vaccine. Naturally, she and her physician don't link the vaccine with her diagnosis. The subject never comes up. Sure, I'm suspicious they are linked, but I have no proof, and it would be worse than irresponsible to suggest to her that her vaccine was in any way related to this event.
The absence of autopsy data is why the claims by the embalmers could be so important. Did the few embalmers who spoke out about their experience provide any rationale as to why they are able to freely speak while their colleagues are not? If they did, please remind me what they said. They should say why they are more at liberty to speak, and we should hear them nevertheless calling on their embalmer colleagues to back them up in what they are saying. Embalmers might hide behind how they never talk about their profession, but I suspect more would come to believe it is important that we learn the truth about these vaccines.
The chilling effect that "promoting vaccine hesitancy" has had on small businesses is noted. Perhaps it plays a role with the embalmers. We need to know that is true.
I hear what you are saying and agree it is both “speculative and risky” but even without autopsies I believe it is time to cast doubt in order to jolt people awake already.
Far from being “irresponsibly provocative” for a physician to merely question the vaccine as a possible contributing factor to families that are losing loved ones so ‘mysteriously’, it could save them from subjecting themselves to further injections. Perhaps exactly what they need is a little bit of alarm! At this point, it is irresponsible to NOT question these death jabs. That only accomplishes one thing: protecting big pharma and it’s shareholders.
I agree we need the truth, but by playing nice we are not going to get it. Dr. McCullough has it right… we have arrived at the moment in time where we should be saying that many of these deaths especially in formerly healthy and younger people are the C19 vaccines “until proven otherwise.” https://rumble.com/v1rcdjm-until-proven-otherwise-two-of-the-top-cardiologists-in-the-world.html
The deaths Dr. McCullough speaks about are deaths in healthy young people with no known co-morbidities, especially young athletes while they are being active. Given that the FDA and CDC already recognize that myocarditis is a risk of these COVID-19 jabs, there is good reason to believe that these episodes are related to the vaccine until proven otherwise. That's not at all controversial. There are MANY OTHER potential adverse events that are being discussed that I believe are ALSO related to these jabs (increasing incidence of cancer and more aggressive cancers, unusual infections usually seen only in immunocompromised people, neurological events, increased incidence of stroke and myocardial infarction, hematological disorders, etc.). For those incidents that are within a few short days of the vaccination, few of my colleagues would protest if I suggested the vaccine might be related to the injury. As the time between the vaccination and the event grows further apart, the chance that the event is related to the vaccination grows smaller. It is going to be particularly difficult to make a case, for example, that an aggressive form of cancer is related to a vaccine taken a year earlier. It might be true, but making the case is much more difficult. Dr. Ryan Cole argues that there is a clear path from COVID-19 vaccination to the disabling of certain important cells that are involved in immune surveillance against cancer, but proving that this mechanism was involved in a particular patient's presentation is much more difficult to do. Again, faced with an individual patient who is presenting with a recurrence of a cancer that had been treated and contained, it would be deeply irresponsible to tell the patient that it was the vaccine that caused this recurrence to happen. The cancer recurrence could be unrelated to having taken the vaccine, though we might never know. The argument can be strengthened in two separate ways: 1) specialized tests showing the predicted reduction in immune surveillance and 2) large population studies that firm up the claim that there is a link between vaccination and increased incidence of cancer recurrence. No one will currently do the specialized tests because they are expensive and only research centers might be equipped to do them, and they don't open the way to a therapeutic avenue. The population studies raise a suspicion but, again, for any individual case one cannot be certain.
I resisted getting the jabs and was waiting for more than 2 months worth of data in December 2020 when they were first administered to the public. Sure glad I did. I got covid from a triple jabbed doctor and his wife who got sicker than I did. I have IVM but never needed it as the nebulizer treatment hourly after symptoms first showed for the first couple of days did the trick! My symptoms were very light (cold-like symptoms and low energy for 5 days). A number of my triple jabbed friends have since been reinfected, some more than once.
What everyone I ask who took the jab what they know about how their immune systems says is they know nothing - they took the jab because the government told them to. No one I have asked understands that the vaccines basically disable the innate immune system and specifically that NK (natural killer) cells and M1 macrophages that attack any unknown pathogens. And for cancers, it is looking increasingly likely that jabs also disable the toll like receptors that are crucial for protecting us from cancers. A few doctors have surmised that eliminating our immune systems toll-like receptors that fight cancer in the jabbed is at least a contribuing factor!
Like you and most of us, I have experienced a jump in people in my circle getting cancers - our next door neighbour got leukemia as did his brother , another neighbour was diagnosed with a brain tumor (both jabbed) and my sister has just been diagnosed with an intestinal tumor (hopefully benign) and has felt rotten since the jabs.
I appreciate your thoughtful commentary! I also very much appreciate that as a physician you have a healthy skepticism of the vaccines and all of their potential implications. Even though it is completely unjust that the burden of proof is on the victim when it should have been on big pharma and our "trusted" health agencies before this sh*tstorm was released on the public, I completely understand your explanation of the rock and hard place we find ourselves between. Let's hope for the sake of all the vaccine-injured past, present, and future that with time, testing, and persistence, the truth may eventually come to light.
Hang in there, Dr. McCullough. You've done so much to educate people -- and yourself -- during this incredibly painful time in history. Of course, many still do not know the truth (due to censorship) or believe the truth (due to mental blindness).
Thank you for making a difference and encouraging others to do so as well!
Thanks for posting and hoping seniors and those who care for them take notice. My 92 year old father had covid (with 3 days of mild symptoms) and the assisted living nurse advised the shot afterward. He declined and asked if I believed they (the larger medical establishment) were trying to kill the elderly. I responded that yes, they are.
One of the many reasons I declined the shot after recovering from Covid. Lost my job anyway, declined my religious exemption, ignored my doctor who told them this shot was unnecessary due to my natural immunity. We need to fight back.
The finding discussed by a few embalmers of the rubbery clots is terribly worrisome, but I would have expected this to be a problem EVERY embalmer would be discussing by now, given the large percentage of the population who subjected themselves to this vaccine. If only a couple of embalmers are talking about this, I have to regard this reporting to be "fake news".
Sadly, not fake news. Suppressed news. Fear of being persecuted upon speaking out. Fear of losing one’s job. Just like doctors who fear speaking out even though they know and can see what’s happening.
Check out John O’Looney (embalmer), Dr. Ryan Cole (pathologist), and A Midwestern Doctor substack on medical blindness. Many more are starting to speak out, but these are a good start for anyone who wishes to explore.
O’Looney https://rumble.com/v1oden2-this-is-genocide-with-john-olooney-good-morning-chd-ep-156.html
Cole: https://www.rcolemd.com/post/embalmers-find-giant-rubbery-blood-clots-a-pathologist-s-view
A Midwestern Doctor: https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/
I know each of these sources. They are all in my same echo chamber. I've heard O'Looney's testimony. I follow Dr. Cole closely and subscribe to "A Midwestern Doctor" Substack. Please make a point of asking any embalmer you know whether he is seeing anything like this. The embalmers do NOT have to say this is due to vaccination. They could plead ignorance but just report their findings. Do you really believe that there wouldn't be murmuring about this within those circles such that it wouldn't eventually reach the public?
The analogy to the experience of physicians is not illuminating. I am a physician. I have watched as my colleagues see events but make no connection to the vaccine because, unless one does very specific testing to try to implicate the spike protein, the case before the physician is just another ill patient. There are SO MANY different ways that a patient can be ill from the vaccine (neurological, hematological, immunological, etc), and all those different clinical presentations are plausibly connected to the vaccine but might not be. In the case of the embalmers, we are talking about ONE VERY SPECIFIC FINDING and we are asking whether embalmers have seen this finding and whether they ever saw it before or whether they are seeing more of it.
Perhaps you have to adjust your expectations.
With this kind of logic, EVERY doctor should be honestly discussing potential deadly side effects in the best interest of patients instead of worrying about losing their job.
EVERY big pharma exec should finally just admit they lied or covered up the fact that they knew these shots wouldn’t stop transmission.
EVERY politician should apologize and provide redress to all the citizens that were killed, lost jobs, or were ostracized by their peers due to bad, lying public policy.
EVERY biased reported who allowed themselves to be manipulated by their elite big tech overlords should be discredited and fired.
And EVERY person that blindly defended the narrative to the detriment of the rest of us should admit they were wrong already
Justice will not arrive without a battle, and thankfully we have more and more brave ones willing to speak up. More and more WILL be exposed ... in time.
No. I don't have to adjust my expectations. I have seen events that I believe are vaccine-related but have no way to prove it. As Dr. Cole has pointed out, the testing one would need to do on autopsy or in evaluation are not generally available and are prohibitively expensive. Moreover, in the case of those who survive the injury, the test provides no useful way forward given the drug company's liability protection and our relative ignorance about how to treat spike-protein-related disease. As a physician, making the claim that an injury is due to the COVID-19 jab is speculative and professionally risky, and there are many different illness presentations that prompt those of us who are attuned to this issue to view as vaccine related.
The situation for the embalmer is very different. An embalmer can report the finding that the embalming fluid is more difficult to inject or that rubbery clots are found without having to stipulate it is related to vaccination. They can plead ignorance. Who is going to stop them? And why?
Why do you regard as "logical" the assertion that you make? Did embalmers mandate that you get a COVID-19 vaccine? Did embalmers incorrectly advise you about the risks to your health that accompany this jab? Did embalmers make money from the jab and are invested in your continuing to get boosted? Without those incentives, embalmers are much freer to speak. We should be hearing from them.
The funeral industry is doing well. Funerals are up by 15% compared to the same quarter in 2019. This isn't expected, given that we are no longer in the worst part of the pandemic. These industry watchers are free to share their findings. The embalmers should do the same.
Some thought provoking comments and it seems we are largely on the same side yet have some different perspectives. Why do you so easily accept that the burden of proof need be on the vaccine injured when common sense and data, including excess death rates, indicate that the so called vaccines are to blame? The ones who pushed this on people never had to prove it was actually safe and effective; they just repeated it enough so people believed it was true. What other major world event happened that could explain these phenomena?
I also disagree that it is more ‘speculative and professionally risky’ for physicians to speak out. Although I can’t say for certain because i am not part of either of these professions, an online search reveals that the average embalmer makes only $45k per year and typically works for funeral homes, which are small family businesses. The embalmers may very well be afraid of losing their jobs and being blacklisted in a very tight knit industry. Likewise, as a small business owner, i can tell you that many of my counterparts do not want to make waves for fear of losing licenses, customers, goodwill, or for just being labelled as a “conspiracy theorist”. Even small businesses that did well over the last few years have been through a lot of upheaval. It’s often easier to just keep quiet.
I will double down on "speculative and risky" for physicians to speak out. The exception is a cardiac event temporally close to receiving the vaccine, but even that situation can be regarded as speculative. A 53 year-old friend just had a major heart attack, and he was zealous about the vaccine. He was also overweight and diabetic, so he had underlying risk factors that could account for his event. We can't distinguish that the vaccine was the cause because most medical events are multi-factorial. Those who study the data at the level of the population are in a much better position to point us in the right direction. Until it is established from population studies, any individual case can be endlessly adjudicated to inconclusiveness.
If the person dies, we can do a highly specialized autopsy that could potentially identify the vaccination as a major causal factor, but those autopsies are not getting done. Without that proof, a physician claiming vaccine injury to a surviving family member is making an irresponsibly provocative and alarmist statement to a person who probably received the same vaccine. What clinical utility resides in that?
I have a neighbor who was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis recently. I know she was vaccinated. Initially, the diagnosis was transverse myelitis, which is a known adverse event from the vaccine. Naturally, she and her physician don't link the vaccine with her diagnosis. The subject never comes up. Sure, I'm suspicious they are linked, but I have no proof, and it would be worse than irresponsible to suggest to her that her vaccine was in any way related to this event.
The absence of autopsy data is why the claims by the embalmers could be so important. Did the few embalmers who spoke out about their experience provide any rationale as to why they are able to freely speak while their colleagues are not? If they did, please remind me what they said. They should say why they are more at liberty to speak, and we should hear them nevertheless calling on their embalmer colleagues to back them up in what they are saying. Embalmers might hide behind how they never talk about their profession, but I suspect more would come to believe it is important that we learn the truth about these vaccines.
The chilling effect that "promoting vaccine hesitancy" has had on small businesses is noted. Perhaps it plays a role with the embalmers. We need to know that is true.
I hear what you are saying and agree it is both “speculative and risky” but even without autopsies I believe it is time to cast doubt in order to jolt people awake already.
Far from being “irresponsibly provocative” for a physician to merely question the vaccine as a possible contributing factor to families that are losing loved ones so ‘mysteriously’, it could save them from subjecting themselves to further injections. Perhaps exactly what they need is a little bit of alarm! At this point, it is irresponsible to NOT question these death jabs. That only accomplishes one thing: protecting big pharma and it’s shareholders.
I agree we need the truth, but by playing nice we are not going to get it. Dr. McCullough has it right… we have arrived at the moment in time where we should be saying that many of these deaths especially in formerly healthy and younger people are the C19 vaccines “until proven otherwise.” https://rumble.com/v1rcdjm-until-proven-otherwise-two-of-the-top-cardiologists-in-the-world.html
The deaths Dr. McCullough speaks about are deaths in healthy young people with no known co-morbidities, especially young athletes while they are being active. Given that the FDA and CDC already recognize that myocarditis is a risk of these COVID-19 jabs, there is good reason to believe that these episodes are related to the vaccine until proven otherwise. That's not at all controversial. There are MANY OTHER potential adverse events that are being discussed that I believe are ALSO related to these jabs (increasing incidence of cancer and more aggressive cancers, unusual infections usually seen only in immunocompromised people, neurological events, increased incidence of stroke and myocardial infarction, hematological disorders, etc.). For those incidents that are within a few short days of the vaccination, few of my colleagues would protest if I suggested the vaccine might be related to the injury. As the time between the vaccination and the event grows further apart, the chance that the event is related to the vaccination grows smaller. It is going to be particularly difficult to make a case, for example, that an aggressive form of cancer is related to a vaccine taken a year earlier. It might be true, but making the case is much more difficult. Dr. Ryan Cole argues that there is a clear path from COVID-19 vaccination to the disabling of certain important cells that are involved in immune surveillance against cancer, but proving that this mechanism was involved in a particular patient's presentation is much more difficult to do. Again, faced with an individual patient who is presenting with a recurrence of a cancer that had been treated and contained, it would be deeply irresponsible to tell the patient that it was the vaccine that caused this recurrence to happen. The cancer recurrence could be unrelated to having taken the vaccine, though we might never know. The argument can be strengthened in two separate ways: 1) specialized tests showing the predicted reduction in immune surveillance and 2) large population studies that firm up the claim that there is a link between vaccination and increased incidence of cancer recurrence. No one will currently do the specialized tests because they are expensive and only research centers might be equipped to do them, and they don't open the way to a therapeutic avenue. The population studies raise a suspicion but, again, for any individual case one cannot be certain.
Nebulizer works great!
I resisted getting the jabs and was waiting for more than 2 months worth of data in December 2020 when they were first administered to the public. Sure glad I did. I got covid from a triple jabbed doctor and his wife who got sicker than I did. I have IVM but never needed it as the nebulizer treatment hourly after symptoms first showed for the first couple of days did the trick! My symptoms were very light (cold-like symptoms and low energy for 5 days). A number of my triple jabbed friends have since been reinfected, some more than once.
What everyone I ask who took the jab what they know about how their immune systems says is they know nothing - they took the jab because the government told them to. No one I have asked understands that the vaccines basically disable the innate immune system and specifically that NK (natural killer) cells and M1 macrophages that attack any unknown pathogens. And for cancers, it is looking increasingly likely that jabs also disable the toll like receptors that are crucial for protecting us from cancers. A few doctors have surmised that eliminating our immune systems toll-like receptors that fight cancer in the jabbed is at least a contribuing factor!
Like you and most of us, I have experienced a jump in people in my circle getting cancers - our next door neighbour got leukemia as did his brother , another neighbour was diagnosed with a brain tumor (both jabbed) and my sister has just been diagnosed with an intestinal tumor (hopefully benign) and has felt rotten since the jabs.
GOoD work men!
I appreciate your thoughtful commentary! I also very much appreciate that as a physician you have a healthy skepticism of the vaccines and all of their potential implications. Even though it is completely unjust that the burden of proof is on the victim when it should have been on big pharma and our "trusted" health agencies before this sh*tstorm was released on the public, I completely understand your explanation of the rock and hard place we find ourselves between. Let's hope for the sake of all the vaccine-injured past, present, and future that with time, testing, and persistence, the truth may eventually come to light.
Some people simply don’t get it - Darwin Award contenders for sure....
I am absolutely loving hearing from you Dr. McCullough, and Mr. Leake nearly every single day on Substack! Thank you.