"We Can't Force the Human Body to Accept Foreign Genetic Code"
"We Can't Force the Human Body to Accept Foreign Genetic Code"
Dr. McCullough challenges the most basic and beloved premise of the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex.
A few days ago the Epoch Times published a long feature about Dr. Peter McCullough’s three-year investigation of mRNA vaccines and his bold challenge of the most basic and beloved premise of the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex. The occasion of the feature was the awarding of the 2023 Nobel Prize for medicine to two scientists for their work on mRNA technology for COVID-19 vaccines.
Soon after Operation Warp Speed was announced, Dr. McCullough correctly perceived the program was a high stakes gamble with the health of mankind. While the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex stood to make hundreds of billions (liability free) from the global rollout of their experimental technology, it was far from clear that it would benefit humanity, and it could imperil the human race if Bill Gates’s ambition to inject “the entire world” with it was achieved.
Dr. McCullough was the first major academic doctor in the United States (and possibly in the world) to warn (on August 17, 2020) that Operation Warp Speed was “a great gamble.” As he put it in an opinion piece in The Hill (The great gamble of COVID-19 vaccine development):
[Many unanswered] questions have set up one of the greatest gambles in modern history with billions of dollars spent, hundreds of thousands of lives lost, and unimaginable misery, heartbreak and human suffering by foregoing early medical treatment and waiting for the advent of the vaccine. The allure of a definitive solution for the large population still at risk for infection and the potential windfall for stakeholders have converged into a single inexorable force.
Eighteen months after he published this piece, he declared in a U.S. Senate hearing (on January 23, 2022) that the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex had lost its great gamble. The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were, he declared, unacceptably dangerous to human health and should be taken off the market at once.
The story of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is, in its essence, the story of Dr. Frankenstein. Mary Shelley’s novel is far easier for us to understand because it’s not encumbered with vast technical terminology that bewilders and bores the reader. Her book was not banned and its meaning wasn’t obscured by a propaganda campaign waged with the awesome power of the Death Star obliterating the planet Alderaan.
Nevertheless, the story of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is no different from Dr. Frankenstein’s failed effort to reanimate the dead. As Dr. McCullough put it in his interview, “We can't force the human body to accept foreign genetic code.”
Readers of our (recently banned and then later reinstated) book are aware that I have long admired Dr. McCullough for his willingness to take on the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex. And although he has been relentlessly punished for daring to speak out against its implacable power—fired twice, sued, stripped of his professorships and editorial positions—every day brings fresh evidence that he is right.
About a week ago, a screenwriter asked me to name a popular film that features the same moral and dramatic situation as our book.
“Star Wars: A New Hope,” I replied. The Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex (an offshoot of what President Eisenhower called “the Military-industrial Complex) has erected an Empire for exerting dominion over all mankind. Peter McCullough and other bold doctors such as Didier Raoult, Zev Zelenko, Ivette Lozano, Tess Lawrie, George Fareed, Harvey Risch, Paul Marik, Pierre Kory, James Thorp, Richard Urso (to name a few) formed a ragtag rebel alliance to oppose it. The Empire is vastly more powerful and well-capitalized, but the rebel alliance has true grit.
This rebel alliance is engaged in an ongoing conflict to ascertain and tell the truth of the matter. They are up against a formidably powerful organization that is constantly flooding the media zone with propaganda, and censoring and punishing those who challenge its assertions.
The outcome of the struggle will determine not only whether the truth is suppressed or told, but whether our Constitutional Republic—based on precisely defined and limited government power—can survive, or whether we will ultimately live under a Global Health Dictatorship.
I can’t say that I’m altogether optimistic, but I take satisfaction in the reality that the rebel alliance is still alive and hasn’t lost its fighting spirit. And occasionally we do see glimmers of hope, such as the fact that no one but true vaccine fetishists are still getting the COVID-19 boosters. On Friday, Pfizer issued an abysmal earnings report and its stock continues to sell off. Maybe the Empire isn’t invincible after all.
Fans of the first Star Wars film will recognize the following still of Grand Moff Tarkin, which strikes me as the most wonderfully expressive photograph in the entire film.
Roman history buffs may recognize that Tarkin’s name and character are an allusion to the last Roman King (before the advent of the Republic) Lucius Tarquinius Superbus—a proud tyrant who was ultimately overthrown and sent into exile.
Speaking of film, please check out the the trailer I produced last year. Though NOT the official trailer of the forthcoming film (now in pre-production) it visually presents our basic concept for the narrative and dramatic situation. To view, please click on the image below and scroll down down half a page to embedded film.
Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times
‘We Can't Force the Human Body to Accept Foreign Genetic Code': Dr. McCullough on mRNA Technology
The doctor called mRNA vaccines a ‘failed concept’ and something that the government and military have been testing for quite a long time.
By Naveen Athrappully
10/11/2023
Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough warned that messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines inject “foreign genetic code” into human beings, which the body fails to break down or expel for a prolonged period of time.
Research on mRNA “has been going on for decades,” Dr. McCullough said during an Oct. 5 interview. The 2023 Nobel Prize for medicine was awarded to two scientists for making “messenger RNA long-lasting in the human body,” he said. “I mean, it has been tested in multiple applications … It's an absolute bust. It was just the worst idea ever to install the genetic code for a lethal protein without being able to shut it off. It wasn't the fact that it was rushed; it's just ill-conceived from the very beginning.”
“We can't force the human body to accept foreign genetic code and produce a foreign protein … Messenger RNA for vaccines is a completely failed concept. It’s a dangerous concept, and the U.S. government wasn't honest. They should have been honest. Trump should have come out and said, ‘Listen, it's on our website; our military's been working on this since 2012.’”
During a testimony at the European Parliament last month, Dr. McCullough said, “There's not a single study showing that the messenger RNA is broken down” in the human body once it is injected.
“There's not a study showing it leaves the body.” Since the vaccines are “made synthetically, they cannot be broken down. He added that the lethal protein from the [COVID-19] vaccines found in the human body after vaccination was found to be circulating “at least for six months, if not longer.”
In the case of seasonal jabs, that is, taking an injection or booster at the end of six months as recommended by the authorities, “there's another installation in more circulating potentially lethal protein.”
Scientist Drew Weissman, who won the 2023 Nobel Prize in Medicine for his role in developing mRNA technology, warned in a 2018 paper that not only did clinical trials of mRNA vaccines produce “more modest [results] in humans than was expected based on animal models,” but that the “side effects were not trivial.”
Dr. Mccullough’s comments come as the Gates Foundation is spending $40 million on countries in Africa and other economically backward nations to produce new mRNA vaccines in efforts to prevent diseases like tuberculosis and malaria.
Concealing a ‘Global Security Threat’
In the Steve Deace interview, Dr. McCullough said that the ineffectiveness of the technology was not unknown to the government since they’ve been testing it for nearly 40 years. He referred to a February 2023 paper published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ), which cited that the U.S. government has been investing billions of dollars in developing messenger RNA technology since 1985.
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) began investing in mRNA tech in 2011. DARPA then launched the Pandemic Prevention Platform (P3) program in 2016 that sought to produce “relevant numbers of doses” against infections within 60 days of identifying them.
The ADEPT P3 was a program by the U.S. military “to end pandemics in 60 days.” There is no other technology “that our government has invested more in,” Dr. McCullough said.
Dr. McCullough cited another paper that stated there were “over 9,000 patents on messenger RNA. And all the patent assignees are big entities. At the top is Sanofi, then Cervavac, BioNTech, Moderna, and the U.S. government. No single person invented messenger RNA. Someone who comes up in 2021 and says, ‘You know I invented it’. That's impossible. This has been going on for decades.”
Dr. McCullough pointed out that the United States and China have been in “collaboration for years” in their research on infectious and lethal coronavirus.
However, officials like Anthony Fauci, the former head of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Francis Collins, the former head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and “a whole cadre of scientists, they collaborated to conceal this global security threat.”
“They actually intentionally lied to the world and said the virus came out of nature. They knew it came out of the Wuhan lab,” he said, citing a research paper by Ralph Baric and Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi that was published in the Nature journal in 2015.
Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi is affiliated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, while Mr. Baric is from the Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
“They said they created SARS-CoV-2 virus. They called it the Wuhan Institute of Virology 1 virus. That was the prototype SARS-CoV-2. So, that's in 2015. Instead of bringing Ralph Baric out [and asking] ‘Dr. Baric, how do we get ourselves out of this disaster,’ you masterminded this virus funded by the US.”
‘Pull All COVID-19 Vaccines Off the Market’
In his interview, Dr. McCullough made three recommendations. “I say number one, I've called in the US Senate [and] now the European Parliament [to] pull all COVID-19 vaccines off the market before anyone else is harmed.”
“Number two, US, EU and all westernized Nations [should] pull out of the WHO. They're not trustable. And number three, I'm following the World Council for Health. I am recommending a halt on all childhood vaccines, the entire vaccine schedule until this is clarified since messenger RNA is now on the schedule without any concerns for safety.
While some studies related to the safety of COVID-19 vaccines have shown the jabs to be safe, others have raised concerns about the safety of the shots.
A December 2022 study analyzed trials comparing vaccine recipients with individuals who did not receive a vaccine or were given a placebo.
It concluded that “compared to placebo, most vaccines reduce, or likely reduce, the proportion of participants with confirmed symptomatic COVID-19, and for some, there is high-certainty evidence that they reduce severe or critical disease.”
However, a June 2022 study that looked at mRNA vaccinations found that “Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest (AESI).”
“The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials.”
‘Shedding’ the Infection
During the interview, Mr. Deace asked about hearing issues that he and his colleague suffered and whether they had any ties with the vaccines. While he did not take a COVID-19 shot, the colleague was vaccinated. Mr. Deace asked if this was “further proof that basically the last few years Peter everybody was a lab rat whether you took the vaccine or not.”
“It's true, nearly all of us have been exposed to the Wuhan spike protein,” Dr. McCullough replied. “When I see patients in the office, we check antibodies against the spike protein. Invariably, they're elevated. Rarely, I'll find somebody who hasn't been exposed.”
Dr. McCullough pointed out that there are “clear-cut papers” showing individuals suffering hearing loss after taking COVID-19 jabs. “It's all related to the spike protein,” he said. mRNA vaccines work by instructing cells in the body to produce the spike protein found on the surface of the COVID-19 virus.
Once vaccinated, an individual’s muscle cells begin producing spike protein pieces, displaying them on cell surfaces, which end up triggering the immune system to create antibodies. When such an individual gets infected with the COVID-19 virus, these antibodies will then fight the virus.
Dr. McCullough warned that even people who have not received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can eventually get affected by messenger RNA through a vaccinated individual via “shedding.”
“Shedding means that one has been exposed to the spike protein or to the messenger RNA from close contact with another individual. We know both of them can travel via exosomes which are small phospholipid packets that can be exhaled [via] breath, through sweat, [and] various forms of body fluid, typically you know very close contact.”
“There was a big project called the Eva project in the UK showing 78 percent of women who take a vaccine—they actually have menstrual abnormalities. And those who even didn't take a vaccine, they end up having menstrual abnormalities. There's been plenty of these reports that have occurred.”
Dr. McCullough cited an interview he did with scientist Helene Banoun, an expert on shedding, who believes such things “clearly happens, for sure, in people who've taken the vaccine within 30 days, close contact.”
“Now, two studies—one in the United States, one in Japan—[show] the messenger RNA comes through breast milk. The spike protein may be shedded potentially for a much longer duration of time. It's been shown in the human body now for months, maybe even years afterward. And that's the rationale for what our recent proposal to actually undergo spike protein detoxification.”
The cardiologist pointed out that “every signal” related to cardiovascular disease, neurologic disease, blood clots, immune disease, and cancer “is up.”
“There can be debates on why all these chronic diseases are up, all-cause mortality up in every single area of the world,” he said. “The two big exposures we've had are COVID-19 infection and now COVID-19 vaccines, and I think both mechanisms have led to this wave of disease.”
“I think more powerfully with the vaccines since the vaccines are largely genetic, they're given every six months, and they install the genetic code for the disease-promoting and lethal Wuhan spike protein.”
One of the benefits of a healthy digestive system, is that when functioning properly, it dissolves the coding of the matter we are consuming BEFORE allowing it into our bloodstreams. Vaccines bypass this system.
"Leaky gut" (caused by vaccination, bad diet, and other toxins/assaults) results in complete DNA chains/coding making it's way into the bloodstream. Hence, FOOD ALLERGIES.
Of course, with vaccination, all manner of complete DNA chains go directly into the bloodstream. And a healthy (or even partially-functional) immune system will ATTACK, (leading to inflammation, and health issues). So the primary "bragging-points" seen in all of the mRNA patents is that they've found ways to "trick" (code for DISABLE) our immune systems, such that the new coding WILL enter the nucleus of our cells and therein REPLICATE.
You see, their argument is basically that it's CHEAPER to mass-produce the vaccine antigens, (bugs) inside of the human body, than it is to mass-produce them in a lab. And as far as they are concerned, the more of the disease-causing agents the human body reproduces, the more "immune" we will become to them. They've just never demonstrated that ENDLESS reproduction of that which makes us SICK is beneficial;-)
So this is the new standard for how to "eradicate" disease-causing agents;-) They will turn all of us into perpetual disease-producing agents, "cuz it stimulates the immune system." ;-) Injecting FECES will also cause an immune reaction. Injecting aluminum or ANY toxin will "trigger" an immune response. And as far as these "scientists" are concerned, it is ALWAYS a good thing to trigger the immune system, in any and all ways possible, EXCEPT via any natural exposures. We must wear masks, spray and spread toxic disinfectants all over ourselves, etc., WHILE directly injecting the so-called "disease causing agents" (along with myriad toxins) directly into our bloodstreams.
This is worse than watching a snake chasing it's tail. NONE of their arguments for injecting us make ANY sense.
Andrew Bridgen, member of Parliament in the U.K. has managed to secure a debate on excess deaths this Friday 20th of October.
Excess deaths need to be looked at. Likely multifactorial causes, however vaccine cause should be included.
People in the U.K. are writing to their MPs, asking them to attend this debate. Last time mr. Bridgen spoke to an empty Parliament.