George Floyd is a PSYOP sideshow meant to distract, divide, and program the populace to not only despise each other but to react to future George Floyd-esq events like Pavlov's dogs.
Mission accomplished.
The real question you should be asking is not how he died, but who is using his death as a means to rip this country in half and radicalize people with hate filled minds against each other on either side of the contrived divide.
It's far past time we stopped dancing to the NWO tune.
It is pathetic to see how Australia jumps on the bandwagon of 'the latest thing' that takes place in the USA. I am Australian born, yet live in the USA, so I keenly observe what happens in both countries. Aussies were protesting and chanting black lives matter in the streets of Australia, just days after GF's death, as if something similar had happened IN Australia. It was absurd! It's as if Aussies just can't resist being a part of the drama- FOMO.
This is what I'm saying though - it's a political movement that is present in Australia as well as in the US - some call it "post-modernist cultural marxism". They were pro-SSM, pro-blacklivesmatter, pro-lockdown, pro-vaccine, pro-ukraine, pro-the-latest-thing.
Seeing "Tracy C"s comment below, they were also pro-Yes on our referendum. They will also be pro-DigitalID, pro-CBDC, pro-SmartCities, pro-ClimateLockdown. It's a thing happening, and to some extent it sweeps up other Australians.
Oh yes Madeleine, I hear you and see it! I agree with you 100%. I see friends caught up in the perceived virtuousness of being pro all of these things you covered. The main point I was really trying to make is that in living in the US, yet still being in close contact with Aussies friends and family, I tend to see Australians jump on the band wagon AFTER the trend started somewhere else. Which isn't a crime, because all trends start somewhere. I just somehow wish my beloved homeland wasn't so suseptible to the lies. The depth to which so many Aussies were hypnotized by the lies during the scamdemic was a true shock to me. The willingness of so many to comply and support the tyranny of the government was so sad to see. That said, I did see a small portion of fighters. That was beautiful to see.
Thank you, I see your point. We'd all wish for a return to national relevance but our reality is an increasing global capture.
The interesting thing I've only recently noticed about we people on the left in Australia, particularly in Victoria, particularly in Melbourne, is how much we are taken advantage of on our collective virtue of kindness.
I was very pro-lockdown, to be kind to the elderly. Although it looked horrific to you, almost all of us were in favour of it - people were very distressed by the protesters as we worked to get down to Covid Zero, like the rest of Australia - all the state borders were shut to us. If I didn't happen to have a particular research history in the mess of genetic inventions, corporate fraud, and regulatory malfeasance, I probably would've been pro-vaccine.
"Being kind" to the elderly was paramount - what they didn't bring into the discussion was the cost of lockdown, the banning of drugs that could've obviated any need for concern over the pandemic, and some ethical questions on agency.
The poor kids... they were encouraged to lockdown for a virus of no risk to them, 'to be kind to the elderly', without discussion of the debt that would hamper their lives.
They were encouraged/forced to take the vaccine for a virus of risk to them, 'to be kind to the elderly', for a vaccine that didn't stop transmission.
On our recent Referendum, they were cajoled to vote Yes to be kind to the indigenous, for goodness knows what undefined end!
They must be 'kind to trans', where kindness in this case is defined as fully supporting the chemical and surgical mutilation of their friends.
Ps. I was damn impressed that the yes vote led to a 'no'. Yet I do see that individual states are now trying to push forward with their agenda. Do you think these states will manage to get away with this?
Well, good for you Madeleine, because you are WAY ahead of most on the left! At least you now see that the masses on the left are directed into this corner of supporting all of the causes because, 'that is what a kind person does'. I voted on the left for years in Australia and here in the USA, when I first got my citizenship in 2011. Yet I eventually realized that the whole shtick of the left is to claim to be the party of virtue--while pointing at 'the others' and labelling them as the uncaring, opposite (with zero substantive evidence to support their claims). The eletist left claim to be the party of the people, the needy, the minorities etc. But they are not. They never change anything for these groups. It's no coincidence that many known 'lefties' such as Russell Brand, Joe Rogan, Elon Musk, Matt Taibbi, Glenn Greenwald and more have been notably moving away from their former party- because they are amongst many waking up to the lies of the left. Now don't get me wrong, I'm no blind slave to the right! Both parties are full of devious, self serving individuals. But the reason I see the left as worse is because the left are the party who are working with this whole WEF agenda. In every government around the world it is the left who are anti-nationlist, pro-one world, climate change fear mongering, digital ID governance.
Regarding the Convid debarcle. Please tell me that you eventually realised that this pushing of the mantra, "you gotta save grandma by locking her in her home alone, while you do the same", was nothing but manipulation? You eventually realised that was a lie, didn't you? They didn't give a damn about the elderly and lonely and willingly let them die without loved ones nearby. They terrified them with lies. Yeah, I know that Melbourne is very left. My extended family is all in Melbourne. Although I grew up in Sydney. So did you eventually learn about the with holding of Ivermectin, HCQ et al, despite them being harmless drugs with shown efficacy? So many lies. I started piecing the bits of the puzzle together early, from May 2020 onwards. So by the time Australia was pushing for this zero Covid notion I knew that Australia had lost in's collective mind. In just listening to some of the dissenting virologists and epidemiologists, it became very clear to me that all Australia would do would be to delay the inevitable. And now, sadly, Australia has become a clear case study country, showing that yes, excess deaths due to Covid were minimal, yet suddenly rocketed in 2021, after the supposed life saving, wonder vaccine was implemented.
Yes on the trans. I'm not completely sure on the Hamas, though I think it would certainly be pro-distraction. Although a large part of Australian politics (Left + business right) is captured by the pro-movement, I would say that the Australian parliament is Israel-captured. Only the Greens will support Hamas. And although the Greens are captured in the "pro" movement the Israel-Palestine question has so much history for them.
It's almost an argument that the pro-movement engineered the strike on Israel.
Happy to hear you observations on it - haven't been watching closely.
they are also the same people who are pro-palestine and are defacing the streets with “free gaza” posters and waving paper palestinian flags in your face at the train stations.... they were the first to strap on a muzzle and yell at you for not wearing one; they were the first to get jabbed up and call you selfish for not getting jabbed; they were the first to start trans rights protests and call you a trans-phobe for not doing the same; they were the first to start carrying “yes” placards and calling you a racist for not doing the same.... and it appears that it really is a voting class rather than individuals thinking for themselves that are driving it. if (doesn’t-know-his-arse-from-his-elbow) Albo tells them to like it/hate it/vilify it/support it, they do, without questioning and without thinking
Except... the Australian parliament, including the ALP is completely captured by Israel. And I find that so interesting, given the ALP is also completely captured by the ESG/everything-WEF-wants that a lot of the Greens are caught up in as well (smart cities, lock it all down for climate). And that's when I wonder if the Zionists are behind all of that, but that the Greens/socialists have this long standing support of Palestine.
Certainly voting blocks - don't have a clue in their heads.
Canada does the same. When claims of systemic racism were made in the States, Canadians were quick to claim "We're racist too . . . We're racist too." Then we have our PM out there "taking a knee" at some BLM event. I think it is a form of insanity.
Mary, I agree with you and do feel it is a form of insanity, initiated by brainwashing. The cliche' of critical thinking may have been over used during Covid, and for good reason; because the masses don't use it! Instead they just kind of zone into what the media and governments are pushing and take that as 'gospel'. And as the majority of media are left leaning (which I once bought into myself) people get sucked into supporting all of these supposed virtuous causes. The masses don't get that it is complete and utter manipulation- and the despicable Trudeau is but one of many masters of manipulation cranked out by WEF's Young Leaders program.
Not at all. If they were sympathising with the Indigenous of Australia they would be doing something about the drug problems and neglect from parents and the Indigenous Industrial Complex that hoovers the money up and doesn't distribute it to regional and remote areas. Mental health problems exacerbated by cargo cult treatment for decades. It does NOT help here on the ground in remote Australia (where I live)
We all see that now, thanks to the referendum and Jacinta Nampijinpa-Price.
Audit is the most important thing on the money angle, imo, but the ALP and the Greens shut it down. Also, an urgent consideration motion to investigate Indigenous Child Sexual Abuse was made in the senate, but the ALP and the Greens shut that down as well.
At the National Press Club Jacinta talked about tribal violence, giving the example... if someone gets sick their family thinks it the consequence of sorcery, decide who the sorcerer was and enact retributory violence, and then it's returned.
I remember this discussion decades ago, in Australia, asking whether Indigenous people should be able to conduct their own tribal law without being put into prison for every assault. The general feeling was, yes, out of respect for their culture and agency. But here we are today.
Unfortunately, there is no real will to give Indigenous people "agency". Indeed, there is no real will to give ANY group agency. "Little emperors" don't GIVE anything to anybody, they TAKE. It's all just distraction while taxpayers get shaken down for greater and greater amounts, and covert grabs of land, resources, and power continue.
As was also said decades ago, the concocted "Aboriginal flag" was always upside down, with red over black being more realistic.
But even the "Commie Red" is a distraction... lots of false issues, lots of set-ups to provoke outrage and distract from the main game. What entities REALLY control these big frauds, given that politicians are just overpaid puppets who respond to what the wealthy parasite class wants?
Ohhhh pleeeeaze Tracey. Your drawing an association between Floyd and Australian Aboriginals is nonsensical- a black guy in the USA, with a criminal history, ends up dying as he resists arrest and that somehow becomes a reason for Aussies to start protesting on behalf of aboriginals? Ummm, any specific thing/event pertaining to aboriginals? Or just a perceived association between Floyd and Australian Aboriginals due to skin color?
Your comment supports my very point- that there was no real or substantive association and therefore, reason for Australians to jump on the Floyd drama bandwagon- but the sheeple just couldn't resist.
See my reply to Danielle (same thread). It's part of a general political movement that imo cares almost nothing about its subjects. Certainly, in Melbourne, some of the people in the June 6 BlackLivesMatter protest, in the middle of lockdown, pressed the indigenous "deaths in custody" case. I decided to investigate... In fact, non-Indigenous prisoners suffer higher rates of suicide and murder in Australian prisons.
And the sad part is so many folks fall for this again and again. At this same time- thousands of innocent people were being killed by hospital protocols - whole communities disrupted with shut downs - children deprived an education - orders on what you could do and where you could be- all freedoms subject to government control - yet virtual silence from mainstream media- but an individual who just stole from a store, had a history of domestic abuse and crime- was active in the drug scene becomes a martyr - nothing happens by accident. Uprisings are funded for a purpose and it is not a benevolent one.
According to Catherine Austin Fitts, 34 of the 37 areas destroyed by riots in 2020 were in cities that have a federal reserve bank branch and most were in opportunity zones. She states that the point is that now that real estate can be bought on the cheap, and be rebuilt with smart technology - a necessity for a well-functioning technocratic system - built in. "This makes building out the smart cities around the federal reserve banks much cheaper," Fitts explains, "which I assume you'll want to do if you're going to come out with a [central bank] crypto system. "When I first saw how all the buildings and businesses destroyed ... were right at the bottom of the opportunity zone... I said That's not a riot pattern, that's a real estate acquisition plan." Essentially, by shutting down private businesses in the opportunity zones, and then looting and literally burning them to the ground in some cases, those businesses and buildings can be bought up for next to nothing. "It's called disaster capitalism."
I used to closely follow the BLM ~leader "deray", and there is certainly a momentum to not wanting your attention and energy to be spent in a vain -- on a conceptual framework that may not always match real life events neatly. After the Michael Brown case, the resolution was treated as a confirmation bias that justice is impossible on a state level, no alternatives accepted. The fervor can continue because readjusting your life's purpose requires taking a step back, a different route to "achieve equity/parity" in a giant ship where the leakage could be somewhere else.
Wow Jaq, your comment and thoughts are tremendously insightful. I'm really impressed that you could have that turn around in your thinking. That you could open your mind and reconsider, when there is much 'safety' in sticking with 'the crowd you know', says a lot about you- all good things that is!
I assume you’re suggesting that this “real question”should become the main question in every homicide investigation? (After all, there’s no reason why this case should be singled out, right?) In other words, you (and those who upvoted your comment) propose a sociopolitical discourse of some sort in place of the pursuit of justice for the victims?
And how is this approach even remotely reasonable? And why would so many people upvote this? Honestly, this is the first time I’m deeply disappointed in the commenters of this Substack.
Just to form an independent opinion of my own, I watched some of the videos of the incident. There’s no question in my mind that Chauvin should have done something during the 9 minutes his knee was pressing against Floyd’s neck. Removed his knee perhaps? What was the point of keeping his knee on the neck for 9 minutes anyway? Floyd was clearly not a flight risk after he ended up prone on the ground. But Chauvin didn’t budge, not once. For that reason, the 2nd degree murder charge was 100% justified.
It’s irrelevant that the exact cause of death was not asphyxiation. What matters is that the detainee died while while being detained in an unnecessarily brutal manner.
Your understanding does not take into account the legal definition of murder accepted in most states. 1st degree murder is premeditated. But 2nd degree murder is not. Chauvin was found guilty of 2nd degree murder (and manslaughter.)
I agree. There is a statute for negligently killing a person, as opposed to intentionally killing him. I don't know what that would be called in Minnesota.
It very much can be difficult. That's the job the prosecutor has to undertake. Often they try to smoothly BS the jury but a sharp defense attorney can spot it and raise objections to conjecture /opinion vs. verifiable fact.... That's why previous statements and actions of the defendant are looked at "with a microscope", to try and divine "intent' due to previous aggravated statements, threats, or actions. In this case, as has been done for 60+ years, the left simply resorted to charges of "racism" because of the race of the victim versus the cop.
The Left ALWAYS screams racism to create division and chaos in the establishment. The tactic would seem to imply they believe it, but actually only the brainwashed minions think the accusations are real. The strategy from the Commie Left leaders is simply based on creating a narrative to shame the law enforcement in order to remove focus from the lawbreakers, thus weakening law enforcement and the society’s feeling of security and stability. For several decades the Left tried dividing us via wealth disparity but too many low income people used the American system to improve their economic status. So the left then focused on resurrecting the racism that had been mostly resolved in the 90s and early 2000s. Barack Ozero made race a big part of his campaign and led the Left’s movement to throw charges of racism against everyone possible.
The circumstances are so complex and we are asking the police officers to take into account all of these factors, most of which they did not know about at the time, and act appropriately to control the individual yet prevent a "cardiopulmonary event". We are asking the impossible and then sentencing them to prison for many years. Not right, justice was not served. I hope we can make this "right" at the end of the day.
Employment of that hold and similar neck holds are part of my military background (many years ago, but necks haven't changed). The holds are designed to constrict carotid arteries, which blacks the subject out remarkably quickly, not the airway. When properly employed the holds are not lethal, in fact they do no lasting harm at all. And I could tell from the video that the officer wasn't even applying enough pressure to constrict the artery, he was just positioned to do so if needed. So when I heard Floyd, who had a bad heart, ingested an extraordinarily toxic substance which kills huge numbers of substance abusers every year and saw him complaining of difficulty breathing before he was restrained (on body cam video) a fatal fentanyl overdose became the rather obvious likelihood. Getting into a physical altercation with police may well have aggravated Floyd's condition but he is the one who initiated that. The officer was obviously wrongly convicted since overdose is the likelihood and far beyond reasonable doubt.
He would NOT have died if not subjected to that pressure…. But I digress. Do you know that SV40 promoter and enhancers were found in the vaccines and that they have effectively poisoned the world?
He was a dead man walking when he took the fentanyl pills. Only he was capable of alerting the officers that he had ingested dangerous drugs and all he managed to tell them was "I can't breathe". If you can speak, you are able to breath. Had he said, "Hey, when you walked up I swallowed my stash of fentanyl" they could have given him narcan before he lost consciousness and died. Without that knowledge, they were incapable of doing anything to prevent the events he set in motion.
They would’ve done no such thing. They kneeled on his neck and basically pinned him to the ground so that he couldn’t breathe. They would not have been interested in his overdose.
But I digress. Do you know that the SV 40 enhancer and promoter were both found in Covid vaccines? These are oncogenic pieces of code that will kill millions.
They wouldn't have given him narcan? I beg to differ. Most police departments have all officers trained in administration of narcan and because any possible overdose call gets a police first response, they are constantly giving narcan. How much do they give? On the ambulance we got narcan 2 years before the police did. During those 2 years ambulance crews were giving it before the police, we would run through a case per month at each station. After the police started giving it we frequently have it expire before we get a chance to use it. They don't do 100% of administrations but they are doing in the high 90% range of all administrations. And they have better results with it than we had because they arrive before we do in every single case. When a person is not breathing, seconds count.
Trust me, if he had told them he swallowed his stash to keep from being caught with it, they would have given him narcan and they couldn't even charge him with possession at that point.
It is an interesting thing to watch, cops are frequently giving life saving treatment to people they have arrested before or will arrest in the future. But they will give it every single time and start CPR as well. If cops really hated criminals and specifically black criminals they wouldn't administer life saving treatment to them, now would they?
It has NOTHING to do with Floyd. That's the point. FOCUS! Revisiting this in the midst of an existential apocalyptic crisis is STUPID! They have POISONED the world and any other topic is BAIT! Do you think the people on the Titanic were worried about who won the world series???
Do you think that there were people on the Titanic, or could it be that an old over-insured ship was sunk and that the bankers made a LOT of money off it?
Have a look at various photos. Look at the names of the people involved. Look at the conflicting news reports at the time. Look at who told lies then...the relatives of the same people who tell lies now.
Comparing deep concern and anger that an innocent man was convicted by a court proceeding likely compromised by threats of thugs with the people on the Titanic wondering who won the world series is just an IDIOTIC distraction of a comparison. You're the one who needs to focus!
pathetic. the question should be whether floyd would have been alive today had he not been brutalized and terrorized by those cops. jesus people. do your best to look for fleas and find some technicality that can justify your racism but the guy was murdered
GF, He shouldn’t have resisted arrest (& prior to that, he shouldn’t have passed a counterfeit bill to a small business establishment. & prior to that, he shouldn’t have been doing speedballs, they have a way of interfering with your judgment I am told (no personal experience).
How much did GF weigh? How much does DC weigh?
Morris, sir, are you arguing that when he resisted arrest, he should have been let to go his own way?
What would you then say to his next victim (likely a black person, given the neighborhood) say the pedestrian that he could well have run down, or the child riding in the car that he well could have T-boned when he ran a red light?--again, likely a POC.
Next time you post, please consider making the post something more than a brain stem or spinal reflex & more than rote regurgitation of a BLM or Ilian Omar slogan.
Think, man, think for yourself and think several move down the chessboard, or at least down the checkers board.
Oooooo. I'm being called racist. Are you a bleeding heart??
Perhaps you think he should have just been let back out onto the street on personal recognizance or just let go without even being placed under arrest in the first place....because, melanin?
This was always obvious from day one, it certainly didn’t require a trial and the entire episode is a terrible stain on this countries justice system, which no one can still pretend is impartial and blind.
After reading Tucker & Dr. Kory (both of whom I respect) I am so glad to hear your opinion on this. I agree with your comments, and think what you have said sounds most likely. Thank you for taking time to share your thoughts on this.
For the definitive answer to ‘who killed George Floyd’, please read Liz Collin’s highly suppressed book “They’re Lying”. She was an investigative reporter in Mpls, and happened to be married to the head of the police union at the time. The police officers’ body cameras clearly showed that Floyd complained three times that he couldn’t breathe before any police officer had even touched him. The coroner’s report said yes, he died from heart disease, complicated by all the drugs in his system.
So why was all this suppressed? A woman at the scene filmed the whole thing on her camera phone, and put the video of the cop with his knee on Floyd’s neck on the Internet. The mayor of Mpls saw the video, called the head of the police Union (the author’s husband), and told him that those four officers were to be off the force that very day - without first reviewing the body camera footage! Mistake! The mayor and his political cronies had to cover up their lack of due process and turn the whole disaster into a politically-correct win. There’s more to the story - please read her book!
I’m sorry to sound so callous, but he’s dead, and I don’t care. He is in a better place hopefully. I am sorry for his demise and his addiction. I am also sorry for the officers who have to deal with people like Floyd.
I read that that particular method of restraint had been used 22 times already that year by other officers in that department, and that it was part of their current protocol at the time. First of all, I believe that George Floyd died of a drug overdose and other issues from a dangerous lifestyle, and I don’t believe the police officer should be accused of a crime using a maneuver he was trained to use, a maneuver that was approved and taught by his employer, the police department .
Way back when, when I used to arrest people like Mr. Floyd, it was very common for them to tell me they couldn't comply because they were diabetic. They weren't but they would say they were in hopes of special treatment. It was so common that I figured they had briefed each other about the claim's efficacy during previous stints in jail. I wonder if criminal fashion had changed in the intervening years; instead of saying they were diabetic they would beillow that they can't breathe. That is germane to this case. How many times had the arresting officers heard a false claim that "I can't breathe."?
I am not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that Chauvin is guilty. However, I admire Dr. Kory, I read his Ivermectin book and also his report on Floyd's death and it is persuasive but I still have doubts.
You bring up another twist to the question of what killed George Floyd. America has suffered a great deal over this question and it is still not convincing the the police officers were at fault.
As a hospitalist of almost 20 years, its no joke when people present high and agitated or become so from ingestions while hospitalized. They can easily become violent, so I can see why they had him in that hold after he had REFUSED to get into the police car. While I have the utmost admiration for Dr. Kory, I have a hard time that he didn't mention in his response to Tucker Carlson the other drugs Floyd had in his body. Exogenous methamphetamine & amphetamines along with the natural release of epinephrine in a fight/flight scenario can lead to fatal vasospasm/vasoconstriction and death especially in light of severe multi vessel coronary artery disease. I believe his death was multifactorial...I have not watched all the tape or testimony so its hard for me to comment on Chauvin's lack of response to Floyd's change in level of consciousness.
George Floyd is a PSYOP sideshow meant to distract, divide, and program the populace to not only despise each other but to react to future George Floyd-esq events like Pavlov's dogs.
Mission accomplished.
The real question you should be asking is not how he died, but who is using his death as a means to rip this country in half and radicalize people with hate filled minds against each other on either side of the contrived divide.
It's far past time we stopped dancing to the NWO tune.
Agree that the question is about who is using his death. Elite sportspeople were 'taking the knee' in Australia.
It is pathetic to see how Australia jumps on the bandwagon of 'the latest thing' that takes place in the USA. I am Australian born, yet live in the USA, so I keenly observe what happens in both countries. Aussies were protesting and chanting black lives matter in the streets of Australia, just days after GF's death, as if something similar had happened IN Australia. It was absurd! It's as if Aussies just can't resist being a part of the drama- FOMO.
This is what I'm saying though - it's a political movement that is present in Australia as well as in the US - some call it "post-modernist cultural marxism". They were pro-SSM, pro-blacklivesmatter, pro-lockdown, pro-vaccine, pro-ukraine, pro-the-latest-thing.
Seeing "Tracy C"s comment below, they were also pro-Yes on our referendum. They will also be pro-DigitalID, pro-CBDC, pro-SmartCities, pro-ClimateLockdown. It's a thing happening, and to some extent it sweeps up other Australians.
Oh yes Madeleine, I hear you and see it! I agree with you 100%. I see friends caught up in the perceived virtuousness of being pro all of these things you covered. The main point I was really trying to make is that in living in the US, yet still being in close contact with Aussies friends and family, I tend to see Australians jump on the band wagon AFTER the trend started somewhere else. Which isn't a crime, because all trends start somewhere. I just somehow wish my beloved homeland wasn't so suseptible to the lies. The depth to which so many Aussies were hypnotized by the lies during the scamdemic was a true shock to me. The willingness of so many to comply and support the tyranny of the government was so sad to see. That said, I did see a small portion of fighters. That was beautiful to see.
Thank you, I see your point. We'd all wish for a return to national relevance but our reality is an increasing global capture.
The interesting thing I've only recently noticed about we people on the left in Australia, particularly in Victoria, particularly in Melbourne, is how much we are taken advantage of on our collective virtue of kindness.
I was very pro-lockdown, to be kind to the elderly. Although it looked horrific to you, almost all of us were in favour of it - people were very distressed by the protesters as we worked to get down to Covid Zero, like the rest of Australia - all the state borders were shut to us. If I didn't happen to have a particular research history in the mess of genetic inventions, corporate fraud, and regulatory malfeasance, I probably would've been pro-vaccine.
"Being kind" to the elderly was paramount - what they didn't bring into the discussion was the cost of lockdown, the banning of drugs that could've obviated any need for concern over the pandemic, and some ethical questions on agency.
The poor kids... they were encouraged to lockdown for a virus of no risk to them, 'to be kind to the elderly', without discussion of the debt that would hamper their lives.
They were encouraged/forced to take the vaccine for a virus of risk to them, 'to be kind to the elderly', for a vaccine that didn't stop transmission.
On our recent Referendum, they were cajoled to vote Yes to be kind to the indigenous, for goodness knows what undefined end!
They must be 'kind to trans', where kindness in this case is defined as fully supporting the chemical and surgical mutilation of their friends.
Ps. I was damn impressed that the yes vote led to a 'no'. Yet I do see that individual states are now trying to push forward with their agenda. Do you think these states will manage to get away with this?
Well, good for you Madeleine, because you are WAY ahead of most on the left! At least you now see that the masses on the left are directed into this corner of supporting all of the causes because, 'that is what a kind person does'. I voted on the left for years in Australia and here in the USA, when I first got my citizenship in 2011. Yet I eventually realized that the whole shtick of the left is to claim to be the party of virtue--while pointing at 'the others' and labelling them as the uncaring, opposite (with zero substantive evidence to support their claims). The eletist left claim to be the party of the people, the needy, the minorities etc. But they are not. They never change anything for these groups. It's no coincidence that many known 'lefties' such as Russell Brand, Joe Rogan, Elon Musk, Matt Taibbi, Glenn Greenwald and more have been notably moving away from their former party- because they are amongst many waking up to the lies of the left. Now don't get me wrong, I'm no blind slave to the right! Both parties are full of devious, self serving individuals. But the reason I see the left as worse is because the left are the party who are working with this whole WEF agenda. In every government around the world it is the left who are anti-nationlist, pro-one world, climate change fear mongering, digital ID governance.
Regarding the Convid debarcle. Please tell me that you eventually realised that this pushing of the mantra, "you gotta save grandma by locking her in her home alone, while you do the same", was nothing but manipulation? You eventually realised that was a lie, didn't you? They didn't give a damn about the elderly and lonely and willingly let them die without loved ones nearby. They terrified them with lies. Yeah, I know that Melbourne is very left. My extended family is all in Melbourne. Although I grew up in Sydney. So did you eventually learn about the with holding of Ivermectin, HCQ et al, despite them being harmless drugs with shown efficacy? So many lies. I started piecing the bits of the puzzle together early, from May 2020 onwards. So by the time Australia was pushing for this zero Covid notion I knew that Australia had lost in's collective mind. In just listening to some of the dissenting virologists and epidemiologists, it became very clear to me that all Australia would do would be to delay the inevitable. And now, sadly, Australia has become a clear case study country, showing that yes, excess deaths due to Covid were minimal, yet suddenly rocketed in 2021, after the supposed life saving, wonder vaccine was implemented.
Pro transgenderism, pro Hamas
Yes on the trans. I'm not completely sure on the Hamas, though I think it would certainly be pro-distraction. Although a large part of Australian politics (Left + business right) is captured by the pro-movement, I would say that the Australian parliament is Israel-captured. Only the Greens will support Hamas. And although the Greens are captured in the "pro" movement the Israel-Palestine question has so much history for them.
It's almost an argument that the pro-movement engineered the strike on Israel.
Happy to hear you observations on it - haven't been watching closely.
they are also the same people who are pro-palestine and are defacing the streets with “free gaza” posters and waving paper palestinian flags in your face at the train stations.... they were the first to strap on a muzzle and yell at you for not wearing one; they were the first to get jabbed up and call you selfish for not getting jabbed; they were the first to start trans rights protests and call you a trans-phobe for not doing the same; they were the first to start carrying “yes” placards and calling you a racist for not doing the same.... and it appears that it really is a voting class rather than individuals thinking for themselves that are driving it. if (doesn’t-know-his-arse-from-his-elbow) Albo tells them to like it/hate it/vilify it/support it, they do, without questioning and without thinking
Except... the Australian parliament, including the ALP is completely captured by Israel. And I find that so interesting, given the ALP is also completely captured by the ESG/everything-WEF-wants that a lot of the Greens are caught up in as well (smart cities, lock it all down for climate). And that's when I wonder if the Zionists are behind all of that, but that the Greens/socialists have this long standing support of Palestine.
Certainly voting blocks - don't have a clue in their heads.
Canada does the same. When claims of systemic racism were made in the States, Canadians were quick to claim "We're racist too . . . We're racist too." Then we have our PM out there "taking a knee" at some BLM event. I think it is a form of insanity.
Mary, I agree with you and do feel it is a form of insanity, initiated by brainwashing. The cliche' of critical thinking may have been over used during Covid, and for good reason; because the masses don't use it! Instead they just kind of zone into what the media and governments are pushing and take that as 'gospel'. And as the majority of media are left leaning (which I once bought into myself) people get sucked into supporting all of these supposed virtuous causes. The masses don't get that it is complete and utter manipulation- and the despicable Trudeau is but one of many masters of manipulation cranked out by WEF's Young Leaders program.
No. Those Aussies were sympathizing with the aboriginals…
Not at all. If they were sympathising with the Indigenous of Australia they would be doing something about the drug problems and neglect from parents and the Indigenous Industrial Complex that hoovers the money up and doesn't distribute it to regional and remote areas. Mental health problems exacerbated by cargo cult treatment for decades. It does NOT help here on the ground in remote Australia (where I live)
We all see that now, thanks to the referendum and Jacinta Nampijinpa-Price.
Audit is the most important thing on the money angle, imo, but the ALP and the Greens shut it down. Also, an urgent consideration motion to investigate Indigenous Child Sexual Abuse was made in the senate, but the ALP and the Greens shut that down as well.
At the National Press Club Jacinta talked about tribal violence, giving the example... if someone gets sick their family thinks it the consequence of sorcery, decide who the sorcerer was and enact retributory violence, and then it's returned.
I remember this discussion decades ago, in Australia, asking whether Indigenous people should be able to conduct their own tribal law without being put into prison for every assault. The general feeling was, yes, out of respect for their culture and agency. But here we are today.
Unfortunately, there is no real will to give Indigenous people "agency". Indeed, there is no real will to give ANY group agency. "Little emperors" don't GIVE anything to anybody, they TAKE. It's all just distraction while taxpayers get shaken down for greater and greater amounts, and covert grabs of land, resources, and power continue.
As was also said decades ago, the concocted "Aboriginal flag" was always upside down, with red over black being more realistic.
But even the "Commie Red" is a distraction... lots of false issues, lots of set-ups to provoke outrage and distract from the main game. What entities REALLY control these big frauds, given that politicians are just overpaid puppets who respond to what the wealthy parasite class wants?
Ohhhh pleeeeaze Tracey. Your drawing an association between Floyd and Australian Aboriginals is nonsensical- a black guy in the USA, with a criminal history, ends up dying as he resists arrest and that somehow becomes a reason for Aussies to start protesting on behalf of aboriginals? Ummm, any specific thing/event pertaining to aboriginals? Or just a perceived association between Floyd and Australian Aboriginals due to skin color?
Your comment supports my very point- that there was no real or substantive association and therefore, reason for Australians to jump on the Floyd drama bandwagon- but the sheeple just couldn't resist.
and guess what is being pushed her in Aus now? aboriginal ONLY laws and courts that are totally seperate from the rest of the judicial system....
and bail laws that ONLY apply to aboriginals (ie: they automatically always get bail for everything except murder and it’s at a very low cost)....
rather than addressing the real actual problems affecting ALL communities... the controlled demolition of Australia is perfectly on track, thanks Albo
See my reply to Danielle (same thread). It's part of a general political movement that imo cares almost nothing about its subjects. Certainly, in Melbourne, some of the people in the June 6 BlackLivesMatter protest, in the middle of lockdown, pressed the indigenous "deaths in custody" case. I decided to investigate... In fact, non-Indigenous prisoners suffer higher rates of suicide and murder in Australian prisons.
And the sad part is so many folks fall for this again and again. At this same time- thousands of innocent people were being killed by hospital protocols - whole communities disrupted with shut downs - children deprived an education - orders on what you could do and where you could be- all freedoms subject to government control - yet virtual silence from mainstream media- but an individual who just stole from a store, had a history of domestic abuse and crime- was active in the drug scene becomes a martyr - nothing happens by accident. Uprisings are funded for a purpose and it is not a benevolent one.
According to Catherine Austin Fitts, 34 of the 37 areas destroyed by riots in 2020 were in cities that have a federal reserve bank branch and most were in opportunity zones. She states that the point is that now that real estate can be bought on the cheap, and be rebuilt with smart technology - a necessity for a well-functioning technocratic system - built in. "This makes building out the smart cities around the federal reserve banks much cheaper," Fitts explains, "which I assume you'll want to do if you're going to come out with a [central bank] crypto system. "When I first saw how all the buildings and businesses destroyed ... were right at the bottom of the opportunity zone... I said That's not a riot pattern, that's a real estate acquisition plan." Essentially, by shutting down private businesses in the opportunity zones, and then looting and literally burning them to the ground in some cases, those businesses and buildings can be bought up for next to nothing. "It's called disaster capitalism."
Reminds me of Lahaina, Hawaii.
You are 🎯! KAF is a interesting wealth of information: The Solari Report
Exactly! And well said.
Absolutely True!!
100%
Puppeteers 🧐Tritorch … what a topic that would be !!
Without question BB, thanks for the inspiration!
I used to closely follow the BLM ~leader "deray", and there is certainly a momentum to not wanting your attention and energy to be spent in a vain -- on a conceptual framework that may not always match real life events neatly. After the Michael Brown case, the resolution was treated as a confirmation bias that justice is impossible on a state level, no alternatives accepted. The fervor can continue because readjusting your life's purpose requires taking a step back, a different route to "achieve equity/parity" in a giant ship where the leakage could be somewhere else.
Wow Jaq, your comment and thoughts are tremendously insightful. I'm really impressed that you could have that turn around in your thinking. That you could open your mind and reconsider, when there is much 'safety' in sticking with 'the crowd you know', says a lot about you- all good things that is!
100%
I assume you’re suggesting that this “real question”should become the main question in every homicide investigation? (After all, there’s no reason why this case should be singled out, right?) In other words, you (and those who upvoted your comment) propose a sociopolitical discourse of some sort in place of the pursuit of justice for the victims?
And how is this approach even remotely reasonable? And why would so many people upvote this? Honestly, this is the first time I’m deeply disappointed in the commenters of this Substack.
Just to form an independent opinion of my own, I watched some of the videos of the incident. There’s no question in my mind that Chauvin should have done something during the 9 minutes his knee was pressing against Floyd’s neck. Removed his knee perhaps? What was the point of keeping his knee on the neck for 9 minutes anyway? Floyd was clearly not a flight risk after he ended up prone on the ground. But Chauvin didn’t budge, not once. For that reason, the 2nd degree murder charge was 100% justified.
It’s irrelevant that the exact cause of death was not asphyxiation. What matters is that the detainee died while while being detained in an unnecessarily brutal manner.
My understanding of murder is it is premeditated, hence my choice of not guilty. Manslaughter possibly, murder no.
Exactly Karen 🎯
Your understanding does not take into account the legal definition of murder accepted in most states. 1st degree murder is premeditated. But 2nd degree murder is not. Chauvin was found guilty of 2nd degree murder (and manslaughter.)
I agree. There is a statute for negligently killing a person, as opposed to intentionally killing him. I don't know what that would be called in Minnesota.
Here's a very good explanation of the different terms by a Houston TX law firm. Npt sure if it's defined differently in MN.
https://houstoncriminalfirm.com/whats-the-difference-between-manslaughter-and-negligent-homicide/
Thank you! I had no idea killing was so complicated. Seems like it would be hard to prove what was in the killer's mind.
It very much can be difficult. That's the job the prosecutor has to undertake. Often they try to smoothly BS the jury but a sharp defense attorney can spot it and raise objections to conjecture /opinion vs. verifiable fact.... That's why previous statements and actions of the defendant are looked at "with a microscope", to try and divine "intent' due to previous aggravated statements, threats, or actions. In this case, as has been done for 60+ years, the left simply resorted to charges of "racism" because of the race of the victim versus the cop.
There seems to be an assumption of racism. Maybe that's prevalent in big Democrat cities. I've never met a racist. It baffles me.
The Left ALWAYS screams racism to create division and chaos in the establishment. The tactic would seem to imply they believe it, but actually only the brainwashed minions think the accusations are real. The strategy from the Commie Left leaders is simply based on creating a narrative to shame the law enforcement in order to remove focus from the lawbreakers, thus weakening law enforcement and the society’s feeling of security and stability. For several decades the Left tried dividing us via wealth disparity but too many low income people used the American system to improve their economic status. So the left then focused on resurrecting the racism that had been mostly resolved in the 90s and early 2000s. Barack Ozero made race a big part of his campaign and led the Left’s movement to throw charges of racism against everyone possible.
The circumstances are so complex and we are asking the police officers to take into account all of these factors, most of which they did not know about at the time, and act appropriately to control the individual yet prevent a "cardiopulmonary event". We are asking the impossible and then sentencing them to prison for many years. Not right, justice was not served. I hope we can make this "right" at the end of the day.
Agree 100%.
Employment of that hold and similar neck holds are part of my military background (many years ago, but necks haven't changed). The holds are designed to constrict carotid arteries, which blacks the subject out remarkably quickly, not the airway. When properly employed the holds are not lethal, in fact they do no lasting harm at all. And I could tell from the video that the officer wasn't even applying enough pressure to constrict the artery, he was just positioned to do so if needed. So when I heard Floyd, who had a bad heart, ingested an extraordinarily toxic substance which kills huge numbers of substance abusers every year and saw him complaining of difficulty breathing before he was restrained (on body cam video) a fatal fentanyl overdose became the rather obvious likelihood. Getting into a physical altercation with police may well have aggravated Floyd's condition but he is the one who initiated that. The officer was obviously wrongly convicted since overdose is the likelihood and far beyond reasonable doubt.
He would NOT have died if not subjected to that pressure…. But I digress. Do you know that SV40 promoter and enhancers were found in the vaccines and that they have effectively poisoned the world?
He was a dead man walking when he took the fentanyl pills. Only he was capable of alerting the officers that he had ingested dangerous drugs and all he managed to tell them was "I can't breathe". If you can speak, you are able to breath. Had he said, "Hey, when you walked up I swallowed my stash of fentanyl" they could have given him narcan before he lost consciousness and died. Without that knowledge, they were incapable of doing anything to prevent the events he set in motion.
They would’ve done no such thing. They kneeled on his neck and basically pinned him to the ground so that he couldn’t breathe. They would not have been interested in his overdose.
But I digress. Do you know that the SV 40 enhancer and promoter were both found in Covid vaccines? These are oncogenic pieces of code that will kill millions.
They wouldn't have given him narcan? I beg to differ. Most police departments have all officers trained in administration of narcan and because any possible overdose call gets a police first response, they are constantly giving narcan. How much do they give? On the ambulance we got narcan 2 years before the police did. During those 2 years ambulance crews were giving it before the police, we would run through a case per month at each station. After the police started giving it we frequently have it expire before we get a chance to use it. They don't do 100% of administrations but they are doing in the high 90% range of all administrations. And they have better results with it than we had because they arrive before we do in every single case. When a person is not breathing, seconds count.
Trust me, if he had told them he swallowed his stash to keep from being caught with it, they would have given him narcan and they couldn't even charge him with possession at that point.
It is an interesting thing to watch, cops are frequently giving life saving treatment to people they have arrested before or will arrest in the future. But they will give it every single time and start CPR as well. If cops really hated criminals and specifically black criminals they wouldn't administer life saving treatment to them, now would they?
It has NOTHING to do with Floyd. That's the point. FOCUS! Revisiting this in the midst of an existential apocalyptic crisis is STUPID! They have POISONED the world and any other topic is BAIT! Do you think the people on the Titanic were worried about who won the world series???
Do you think that there were people on the Titanic, or could it be that an old over-insured ship was sunk and that the bankers made a LOT of money off it?
The Titanic was on its maiden voyage when it sank after hitting an iceberg.
I don't think so.
Have a look at various photos. Look at the names of the people involved. Look at the conflicting news reports at the time. Look at who told lies then...the relatives of the same people who tell lies now.
Comparing deep concern and anger that an innocent man was convicted by a court proceeding likely compromised by threats of thugs with the people on the Titanic wondering who won the world series is just an IDIOTIC distraction of a comparison. You're the one who needs to focus!
pathetic. the question should be whether floyd would have been alive today had he not been brutalized and terrorized by those cops. jesus people. do your best to look for fleas and find some technicality that can justify your racism but the guy was murdered
GF, He shouldn’t have resisted arrest (& prior to that, he shouldn’t have passed a counterfeit bill to a small business establishment. & prior to that, he shouldn’t have been doing speedballs, they have a way of interfering with your judgment I am told (no personal experience).
How much did GF weigh? How much does DC weigh?
Morris, sir, are you arguing that when he resisted arrest, he should have been let to go his own way?
What would you then say to his next victim (likely a black person, given the neighborhood) say the pedestrian that he could well have run down, or the child riding in the car that he well could have T-boned when he ran a red light?--again, likely a POC.
Next time you post, please consider making the post something more than a brain stem or spinal reflex & more than rote regurgitation of a BLM or Ilian Omar slogan.
Think, man, think for yourself and think several move down the chessboard, or at least down the checkers board.
Floyd was a convicted lifelong criminal who took an overdose of several drugs. Clearly a suicide. Floyd's own actions killed him.
Not to mention resisting arrest.
Oooooo. I'm being called racist. Are you a bleeding heart??
Perhaps you think he should have just been let back out onto the street on personal recognizance or just let go without even being placed under arrest in the first place....because, melanin?
GF died of an overdose
This was always obvious from day one, it certainly didn’t require a trial and the entire episode is a terrible stain on this countries justice system, which no one can still pretend is impartial and blind.
The Jury pool is fool of ungrateful entitled victims who push DEI CRT
Yes indeed that trial was an eye opener, all right. Beyond shameful. Compromised
John,
After reading Tucker & Dr. Kory (both of whom I respect) I am so glad to hear your opinion on this. I agree with your comments, and think what you have said sounds most likely. Thank you for taking time to share your thoughts on this.
Well said.
Why do these fallen black heroes all have substantial criminal records and drugs in their system? Asking for a friend
For the definitive answer to ‘who killed George Floyd’, please read Liz Collin’s highly suppressed book “They’re Lying”. She was an investigative reporter in Mpls, and happened to be married to the head of the police union at the time. The police officers’ body cameras clearly showed that Floyd complained three times that he couldn’t breathe before any police officer had even touched him. The coroner’s report said yes, he died from heart disease, complicated by all the drugs in his system.
So why was all this suppressed? A woman at the scene filmed the whole thing on her camera phone, and put the video of the cop with his knee on Floyd’s neck on the Internet. The mayor of Mpls saw the video, called the head of the police Union (the author’s husband), and told him that those four officers were to be off the force that very day - without first reviewing the body camera footage! Mistake! The mayor and his political cronies had to cover up their lack of due process and turn the whole disaster into a politically-correct win. There’s more to the story - please read her book!
Chauvin did exactly what his police manual said to do ,and it is terribly wrong that he was convicted.
I hope that this conviction can be reversed soon and that Chauvin can be freed and reimbursed for this unspeakable injustice.
I’m sorry to sound so callous, but he’s dead, and I don’t care. He is in a better place hopefully. I am sorry for his demise and his addiction. I am also sorry for the officers who have to deal with people like Floyd.
I read that that particular method of restraint had been used 22 times already that year by other officers in that department, and that it was part of their current protocol at the time. First of all, I believe that George Floyd died of a drug overdose and other issues from a dangerous lifestyle, and I don’t believe the police officer should be accused of a crime using a maneuver he was trained to use, a maneuver that was approved and taught by his employer, the police department .
A billion likes for this comment
Way back when, when I used to arrest people like Mr. Floyd, it was very common for them to tell me they couldn't comply because they were diabetic. They weren't but they would say they were in hopes of special treatment. It was so common that I figured they had briefed each other about the claim's efficacy during previous stints in jail. I wonder if criminal fashion had changed in the intervening years; instead of saying they were diabetic they would beillow that they can't breathe. That is germane to this case. How many times had the arresting officers heard a false claim that "I can't breathe."?
My thoughts exactly.
I am not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that Chauvin is guilty. However, I admire Dr. Kory, I read his Ivermectin book and also his report on Floyd's death and it is persuasive but I still have doubts.
You bring up another twist to the question of what killed George Floyd. America has suffered a great deal over this question and it is still not convincing the the police officers were at fault.
We knew this then.
It was presented in court, stay far away for these people. No way I would want a Jury full of BLM to decide guilt
Yes and yes
As a hospitalist of almost 20 years, its no joke when people present high and agitated or become so from ingestions while hospitalized. They can easily become violent, so I can see why they had him in that hold after he had REFUSED to get into the police car. While I have the utmost admiration for Dr. Kory, I have a hard time that he didn't mention in his response to Tucker Carlson the other drugs Floyd had in his body. Exogenous methamphetamine & amphetamines along with the natural release of epinephrine in a fight/flight scenario can lead to fatal vasospasm/vasoconstriction and death especially in light of severe multi vessel coronary artery disease. I believe his death was multifactorial...I have not watched all the tape or testimony so its hard for me to comment on Chauvin's lack of response to Floyd's change in level of consciousness.