I tell everyone I can, so long as it doesn’t feel cruel, that the reason so many people have had unpleasant side effects from these speedy jabs is that they were designed intentionally to cause harm.
I THANK ALMIGHTY GOD for raising up a COURAGEOUS, SACRIFICIAL WARRIOR like YOU! I have watched many of your videos and because of your expertise, you helped me know I was sane in rejecting what was being mandated as "truth" by the "bio-pharmaceutical complex." You have helped save INNUMERABLE lives and UNNECESSARY suffering.
May ALMIGHTY GOD rain His RICHEST BLESSINGS upon you.
Thank you Dr. Yeadon You have performed a herculean task. and have opposed the richest and the most powerfully linked "elites" on the planet. You are very like the small boy who brought down a giant with his sling shot. They may be BIG and they may be RICH...but they are fools and liars and murderers.....and thanks to you and others like you-- everyone can see this now.
Please be careful, Dr. Yeadon....I am sure there is a target on your back. We must all fight to get Dr. Reiner Fuellmich released from jail and keep our world for our children....We must continue to expose these crimes everywhere and in every way we can.
Dr Mike - are there specialist scientific reasons why you favour option 1 explanation below, rather than option 2:
1) a group of insane people instructed a bunch of scientists to carefully design a product that would kill and crippled patients; or
2) aa happens frequently in business, a scientifically almost-plausible idea is used to suck in tens of billions in VC funding over several years. When the music began to stop, they decided to sell the faulty profuct to govts to inject hapless patirnts - instead of facing their onvestors and telling them that all the billions of R&D had been a failure.
As a complete non-expert, option 2) kindof seems to satisfy occam's razor better. But I agree that the extremity of the harms - coupled with the extraordinary frenzied excesses of insisting to get repeated jabs into every adult and child on earth with unprecedented coercion - does seem very weird and it is very hard to reconcile this in a rational explanation. Except maybe some kind of bizarre fit of societal self-harming mass hysteria.
I've been following all this since first mention of these substances in 2020 - grateful for the efforts of yourself and others. I still can't figure out an explanation to any of this that feels intuitively solid and complete in my mind. Maybe it's a coming together of a variety of different factors in a perfect storm?
Yes. I can exclude 2, because it’s absolutely obvious that ANY product of this technology will be toxic.
That may be ok for it’s original clinical indication, which was inoperable cancer.
There, the directed killing is the advantage.
In a mass market application, it can only cause harms. It’s “immunology 101”..
Also, I believe some of the venture investors, the one who lead my B round, knew enough about Moderna to be knowingly investing in a scam presumably involving spook finance. He probably didn’t know details, but even I knew Moderna looked like Theranos. I was in the same room as Elizabeth Holmes and I think she even got Kissinger on her board. I listened to her 10 minute pitch and realised it was fraud.
Same experience watching Stefan Bancel. He knows nothing of the highly technical field of his company. That never happens in biotech companies. Pretty much never.
Thanks for your reply. Am I right in understanding that:
Even if spike itself was non-toxic - using RNA to cause our cells to grow ANY non-human viral protein on theur surface would immediately cause auto-immune destruction of those cells. I.e. the focus on toxicity of spike itself is a bit of a red herring. It is toxic - but even if it wasn't- u cannot use this tech for any vax for ANY antigen of ANY virus without causing auto-immune cell destruction causing myocarditis, blood clots, neurological damage, immune damage via destruction of lymphocytes - explaining pretty much all the horrible stuff we have been seeing?
This often seems to get skimmed over. (I'm an engineer and been trying to understand this biology stuff the best I can...)
So grateful for your taking time to reply... can I push my luck and ask one more question? (It's an important one):
With all the focus on mRNA, I have so far never ever seen any clear/explicit explanation of how the Oxford-AZ DNA-based jab is really supposed to work - can you explain?
Many Drs incorrectly call it a "traditional attenuated virus vax" or a dead virus vax.
One description I saw is something like:
1) They stick two spike mRNA single strands together to make an informationally equivalent double-strand of DNA.
2) That gets bolted on tail end of a Chimp cold virus DNA strand (fully dead or live-attenuated??).
3) The cold virus delivers it to your cell (instead of Pfizer lipid bubble)
4) Inside your cell it goes to nucleus where enzymes split apart the DNA (and/or transcribe?) to turn it back into spike mRNA.
5) From here on it works exactly same as Pfizer mRNA.
Have I got that correct? If not, could you explain?
Is it just me - or has this AZ mechanism really not been discussed much or explained clearly? (Even in the alt/medical-freedom community).
Thanks for indulging the questions of an engineering Prof who hasn't had a biology lesson since age 13 and has spent three years trying to catch up...
PS also...Any athlete who ever stuck a testosterone needle in their backside knows that intra-muscular injections are systemic and not localised - otherwise they wouldnt work. How could anyone who got through medical school possibly believe that the covid jab "stays local to the deltoid site of injection"? It was always an obviously absurd claim - drs have been giving intramuscular injections for at least 200-ish years right?
I absolutely agree Dr Yeadon. There seem to be so many different mechanisms of potential harm. That these mechanisms were already known to the select few and deliberately hidden suggest a gigantic public health fraud. A fraud with intent to cause as much damage as possible over time. The variation in toxicity of vials cover for plausible deniability.
The variability was the first macro signal that brought me, Sasha Latypova and first observer, Craig Paardekooper together.
Craig had pulled lot numbers v number of entries to VAERS & saw huge variations.
That cannot happen if a properly manufactured product is what’s deployed.
At first, I thought “This is the inevitable consequence of rushed manufacturing”.
That at least would be human.
What I now believe is that these have been intentionally made to vary in toxicity. I say that because of new relationships Craig has recently uncovered, which vary with way too much precision for it to be entirely accidental and inadvertent. This, of course, is diabolical.
Fitting, given the overall tenor of the terror unleashed upon the world.
People do not want to hear this at all.
Intentionality is just too much to handle. I’m way past expecting good behaviour from devils.
Thank you for that Dr Yeadon. It is certainly not beyond the realm of intent. The variation being too extreme between batches from the same manufacturer?
On my daily walk yesterday I met someone I hadn’t seen in a few weeks. He said he had Covid but was getting better and his wife was home sick with Covid. Everyone I know who has become infected with Covid was vaccinated beforehand. I am not vaccinated because I learned about 50 years ago that it takes decades to develop safe and effective vaccines.
I like this couple, whom I have seen most weeks for the past 2 years on my daily walks. I decided to do something I have never done before. I told him that everyone I knew who has become infected with Covid was vaccinated beforehand. Not surprisingly, he wouldn’t listen. I told him I think the vaccine weakens immunity. He reacted as I thought he would. He dismissed my opinion and walked away. His wife is more reasonable and perhaps we can have a discussion. Or perhaps, I’ve made two enemies.
I respect your bravery, I never feel there is a place where I can discuss this unless it is with a good friend who has come around. Otherwise, people appear set on believing what they hear on television.
I often wonder if what you have just stated, was all mapped out as probability from the psychological blueprinted effects on humanity? And then horribly reinforced by the social distancing and lockdowns, as part of the mandated ideology that from now on, all unvaxxed are the deadly poison spreaders. Thus forever stuck in the minds of the doomed jab junkies.
Think of it this way, in every emergency situation except this one the first thing responders have always told people is to stay calm.
In this case they did the exact opposite and went out of their way to impart fear and alarm. That’s unprecedented and flies in the face of logic and reason.
Unless the goal is to trigger the fight or flight reptilian portion of the brain.
Once triggered everyone will run blindly for the exits. In this case the exits were the authoritarian protocols, mandates, and ultimately the injection.
Once people accept being penetrated it becomes a social contract. No different than being initiated in a gang or cult.
Once initiated they become loyal, blind to criticism even in the face of mounting evidence. Skepticism feels like betrayal.
It is crystal clear people were, and still are, deliberately being led. Psychologically owned. Emergency situations are never handled this way. This was something else entirely.
The younger healthier cohorts gave little to do with clinicians. The mandates were designed to reel them in. Without them the vaccination drive would have fizzled miserably. “No one is safe until everyone is safe”meme came much later when in general people had been exposed 12 months or more to this pathogen and were fine. The Authorities had to tie the jabs to “freedom to go about your normal business” to get any real purchase. They had to employ the “killing granny” meme to bounce the hold outs with limited success. Still 30% said up yours. Pretty amazing when you think of it.
I've been trying to listen to both pro and anti vax proponents. Everyone tends to exaggerate the threats of not following their position. It seems half of us will die from getting vaccinated. And the other half will die because we are not. Informed consent doesn't exist. I myself remain unvaccinated and believe the THREAT of Covid is exaggerated. I believe I can rely on treating Covid should I happen to become infected. It's not either/or. It's maybe have fewer symptoms but a fair risk of heart damage (30%?). Or stay unvaccinated. Or treat Covid if it occurs with Ivermectin and other repurposed drugs/supplements. Or (if I'm wealthy and can work from home) stay quarantined and avoid all human contact.
Mass Formation Psychosis theory answers the question of what mechanism was used to brainwash over 2/3 of the nation (and larger % of Europe and other western-aligned nations). The author of that theory, Dr. Mattias Desmet, was excoriated by the Globalist Establishment media and (self-proclaimed) "intelligentsia" when he went public wit his theory of how so many have been thoroughly brainwashed into believing what the government and Deep State-controlled media told them about covid and the covid Quackcines. Here is a short video of his answer on how to avoid being brainwashed: https://youtu.be/UeY8loWj9y8
Good for you to try Terence, we all need to do a better job with getting all this new information out , something legacy media will never do, All it takes is little seeds of info and it will grow , I have done this with my daughter. The toughest is her mom , whom doesn't see any antidotes all around her , I continue to print up all these papers in hopes of someday her mind will open to them. I am a believer of physical proof to hand to someone and also afraid the controllers of the internet will someday make the truth disappear!
I agree but proof is useless against certainty. And a trust in Covid policy is essentially a political belief which is incredibly resilient. And since the believers blindly follow half baked news reporting and blatantly false claims of our healthcare arbiters, there is little chance of anyone being honest enough to question their beliefs.
The human psyche has been hijacked by scum. Once bought into the program it takes a very unusual individual to admit they were misled. Akin to leaving a cult. I saw it coming because I’ve read enough books on how influence works. I knew they were scaring people on purpose because once they ran to the needle they’d be committed and their minds would be owned. Few are ever going to leave the cult now. Usually it takes a traumatic event to ignite an epiphany to break the spell. I hated everything that went on because I could see exactly what they were doing to people. The WEF’s Harari said, people are hackable animals. I’m sorry to say he wasn’t entirely wrong.
Great to have had Dr McCullough come to Alberta, Canada and deliver some truth bombs. His keynote speech to the Association of Physicians and Surgeons called 'House of Medicine on Fire' is worth every single minute of the one hour talk. #ExitTheWHO
I remember my father criticizing Troodeau father, now I'm doing the same with the son. Uh oh, I think the same spirit took them over, got worse for the son who is completing the communist agenda so embraced by PET.
I hope this holds true...because the rest of us who haven't taken the jabs have been sick with worry about our friends and family...so if they get through 5 years they might be okay?
I think if you are careful...you are not at much risk. Don't have direct skin contact or sleep in the same room....you should be alright....But I could be wrong. I understand the "shedding' mostly occurs in the first few weeks after the "vaccinations"....but I am not a scientist. Are there studies being done? What do others think?
You may want to look at Dr Ana. On the other hand you may not. This woman is the stuff of nightmares. I think sometimes she’s a bit gooky, but on some stuff she seems spot on.
I did look at her stuff. My husband took two shots....I never took any. I usually sleep in another room. He is blind and totally disabled and I am his caregiver. I am 73 years old had blood drawn recently for something and the doctor came out and said "That is not your blood"...so I said "what do you mean?" The doctor said my blood looked too clean and undamaged to belong to a 73 year old. He took another sample and saw that it was indeed my own.
So based on my experience, if you are careful you can maintain your "blood integrity" with a little extra effort and also if you eat well etc. But who knows....a single case means very little.
Well done! My wife and I sleep in separate rooms. She’s had 1 shot, but it’s not the vax. It’s because I snore. I had 3 blood clots and undiagnosed pneumonia for a week in Kenya. I was put on the blood thinner Rivaroxaban. It knocks out the fibrin blood clotting enzyme. You bleed like a stuffed pig.
With the help of a fantastic doctor from the US I came off Rivaroxaban slowly, taking Nattokinase and K2. I’ve been off for around 5 years now.
I had 15 blood checks every month. My bigPharma doctor was ecstatic, saying my blood was fantastic. She wasn’t so pleased when I told her I was taking a powder containing vitamins and various supplements. She was even less pleased when I told her I was not taking any more of her blood thinners. She screamed at me and stopped the appointments.
PS There is a large number of people who have had the clot shot and even the boosters with no I’ll effects. No one fully understands why. It may well be that your husband and my wife belong to this category and so don’t shed. The science is far from settled on this.
Dr Ana gives great instructions on clearing up contaminated blood. And she’s proven it with microscope analysis.
I think worrying if everyone is going to drop dead from the vax distracts from the fact that even if the shots are safe as saline (for many they will be) the big picture is handing our rights over to non elected bureaucrats who we’ve willingly allowed to tell us how to live. We, the citizens of the so-called free world were so afraid of the invisible menace we laid our freedom, liberty and personal sovereignty at their feet and said, take it! Just please save us from the invisible killer germ!! Soldiers buried at Arlington are turning over in their graves.
Well said. True. and I hope you are right. Everyone I know who has had the jabs is not doing as well as before...little things piling up, once big one (turbo cancer re-occurence).
And I am in a blue state. The deadly lots were sent to red states.
The people who had a choice but are now actually shot damaged, that’s on them. It didn’t take any special genius to be a skeptic and pull back.
In 1976 they tried to panic me into taking the swine flu vaccine. I said, no. I was 20 years old. I smelled bullshit then and bullshit now.
Realistically, however, if hundreds of thousands of people are dropping like flies how come there isn’t a funeral procession everywhere, every day?
I live in Ohio. My neighbors haven’t dropped dead. Nor do any of my family or acquaintances in-state or out-of-state seem particularly concerned or have they encountered mega illness/deaths. Extrapolate that to their acquaintances, and so forth.
I really think a lot more than usual had adverse side effects from the covid shots. But what we have to be careful of is falling prey to residual neuroticism from the covid panic that Substack feeds into.
The way these people talk of genocide entire neighborhoods should’ve thinned out by now. But, I know, I know, any…day…now I’ll be waking up to empty streets. Sigh.
Meanwhile, back here in Reality, nobody addresses the actual elephant in the room where globalists run roughshod over the American Republic and trample the whole of Western Democracy.
"There are none so blind as those who will not see," as the saying goes. People who have been vax'd continue to suffer: first from their fear of death from the Covid flu due to the year (2020) of rampant fearmongering; from their fear of death they were driven to the deadly experimental jab that has resulted in what will likely be life-long physical problems. Doctors everywhere seem to refuse to connect the horrible adverse effects and deaths to the vax adding greater harm to these already injured people for whom death might be a blessing.
I have one friend who finally came around and admitted she and her family should not have gotten the jab, but that it was fear of death from the Covid flu that drove them to it. I have steered her to Dr. McCullough's blog and his help with treatments. I hope she has started listening to him. But there are few people who will truly see what is happening.
The good news is that vaccine uptake (with many types of vaccines) is on the wane so we can only hope people are starting to get the message.
Oh yeah, like my husband a week prior to his death, said he regretted having being influenced to get 2 shots. He realised his heart had been damaged by those shots. Too late... Many people I know get jabs still. Yesterday a pregnant woman at work. I'm in Montreal, and it's still very "cultural" to still be injected by this poison.
Dr. McCullough has been fond of quoting the "4.2%" from the Schmeling report since it was released, but it raises more questions than it answers. This specifically was referencing the primary series of shots in Denmark, and a handful of batch numbers nearly three years ago.
This does not address the very different geographic distribution in the US, different manufacturing plants and processes, perhaps different 'intentions' in their makeup.
Most importantly, this paper does not address the potency of the many (6?) 'boosters' introduced over the subsequent years. We can assume the formulations are being constantly 'adjusted', and the frequent, often immediate, SAEs of the primary series may have been reason to tone-down the initial damaging effects of future formulations to minimize 'vaccine hesitancy.'
Have there been ANY studies on the SAEs of the 'boosters', of how their effects compare to the primary series?? I realize any 'boosters' must include the longer-term effects of the primary series, but all those who keep taking 'boosters' must be increasing their risks of a 'bad batch' with every subsequent dose, and increasing their likelihood of a SAE. Yet, vicariously, I see few people dropping after taking yet another 'booster', but more people dying many months or years after their last injection.
Dr. McCullough suggests his experience parallels Schmeling's percentages, and has seen no ill effects come from his patients who have no arm soreness. I wish he would go into further detail about his observations of his many patients and peers about the makeup of the now-many boosters. Seems nobody else is deep-diving the subsequent 'boosters' either.
If any in this audience can provide me information, it would be very much appreciated.
Wouldn't the now faster arising heart issue facts coincide with the variations and adulterations of all the batch vials of the mRNA manufacturing/storage/and delivery problems in evidence be the greatest "CULPRIT" to bolster the marketing nonsense of the "Safe and Effective" continued claims by Big pHARMA? Who was watching the watchers in all this subcontracting of Jab Juice? No one?
Dr. Michael Yeadon has spoken volumes on this subject since he used to work in the field regarding safe manufacturing processes. He is a frequent guest on podcasts that you can download from AmericaOutloud.com/news
I first saw the chart included in this piece about 3-4 months ago. It was discussed in a Kim Iverson podcast. I tracked down the academic paper and skimmed it.
To me it raises all kinds of damning questions.
1) It appears the Denmark regulators were aware some batches of doses were less potent, as evidenced by them running far fewer tests on the less potent batches. They may even have known these batches were placebos. What really did these regulators know, and what did they think about it?
2) The varying potency of different batches appears to be intentional by the manufacturers. Was it deliberate? Why did they do that? Were they experimenting on the public without informing them?
3) Was the practice of varying batch potencies carried out in other countries?
4) If some of the batches were placebos, weren't the pharma companies carrying out a fraud on the public? If they knowingly committed fraud, doesn't that puncture pharma's legal immunity?
Maybe these questions have been answered and I'm unaware. If that's the case, someone please let me know
Edit- This was written in this substack: "The good news is that Schmeling et al have shown that about one third of vaccine recipients have zero side effects and in my experience this tends to remain the case during the period of time we have for observation thus far." This doesn't make sense. If one-third of the vaccines are placebos/less potent as was reported, and with multiple doses, the number of unaffected people should be fewer than one-third. If someone had two shots, and a single non-placebo shot causes adverse effects, that person's odds of being unaffected would be 1/3 squared = 1/9.
"4) If some of the batches were placebos, weren't the pharma companies carrying out a fraud on the public? If they knowingly committed fraud, doesn't that puncture pharma's legal immunity?"
excellent point....I am sure Albert Bourla knew exactly what his company was doing. He just thought they could get away with it. Which is very strange because I read somewhere that his family narrowly escaped from the Nazis....
I tell everyone I can, so long as it doesn’t feel cruel, that the reason so many people have had unpleasant side effects from these speedy jabs is that they were designed intentionally to cause harm.
Dear Dr. Yeadon,
I THANK ALMIGHTY GOD for raising up a COURAGEOUS, SACRIFICIAL WARRIOR like YOU! I have watched many of your videos and because of your expertise, you helped me know I was sane in rejecting what was being mandated as "truth" by the "bio-pharmaceutical complex." You have helped save INNUMERABLE lives and UNNECESSARY suffering.
May ALMIGHTY GOD rain His RICHEST BLESSINGS upon you.
I’m honoured to have helped!
Thank you
Thank you Dr. Yeadon You have performed a herculean task. and have opposed the richest and the most powerfully linked "elites" on the planet. You are very like the small boy who brought down a giant with his sling shot. They may be BIG and they may be RICH...but they are fools and liars and murderers.....and thanks to you and others like you-- everyone can see this now.
Please be careful, Dr. Yeadon....I am sure there is a target on your back. We must all fight to get Dr. Reiner Fuellmich released from jail and keep our world for our children....We must continue to expose these crimes everywhere and in every way we can.
If I am arrested, far more people Will subsequently search what I’ve been saying!
While I definitely don’t want that, I’d comfort myself with that upside,
Spoken like a TRUE HERO....
PRAYING for ALMIGHTY GOD to guard your heart, mind and body, dear Dr. Yeadon.
Kathleen Nathan - BEAUTIFULLY stated!
Dr Mike - are there specialist scientific reasons why you favour option 1 explanation below, rather than option 2:
1) a group of insane people instructed a bunch of scientists to carefully design a product that would kill and crippled patients; or
2) aa happens frequently in business, a scientifically almost-plausible idea is used to suck in tens of billions in VC funding over several years. When the music began to stop, they decided to sell the faulty profuct to govts to inject hapless patirnts - instead of facing their onvestors and telling them that all the billions of R&D had been a failure.
As a complete non-expert, option 2) kindof seems to satisfy occam's razor better. But I agree that the extremity of the harms - coupled with the extraordinary frenzied excesses of insisting to get repeated jabs into every adult and child on earth with unprecedented coercion - does seem very weird and it is very hard to reconcile this in a rational explanation. Except maybe some kind of bizarre fit of societal self-harming mass hysteria.
I've been following all this since first mention of these substances in 2020 - grateful for the efforts of yourself and others. I still can't figure out an explanation to any of this that feels intuitively solid and complete in my mind. Maybe it's a coming together of a variety of different factors in a perfect storm?
Yes. I can exclude 2, because it’s absolutely obvious that ANY product of this technology will be toxic.
That may be ok for it’s original clinical indication, which was inoperable cancer.
There, the directed killing is the advantage.
In a mass market application, it can only cause harms. It’s “immunology 101”..
Also, I believe some of the venture investors, the one who lead my B round, knew enough about Moderna to be knowingly investing in a scam presumably involving spook finance. He probably didn’t know details, but even I knew Moderna looked like Theranos. I was in the same room as Elizabeth Holmes and I think she even got Kissinger on her board. I listened to her 10 minute pitch and realised it was fraud.
Same experience watching Stefan Bancel. He knows nothing of the highly technical field of his company. That never happens in biotech companies. Pretty much never.
Thanks for your reply. Am I right in understanding that:
Even if spike itself was non-toxic - using RNA to cause our cells to grow ANY non-human viral protein on theur surface would immediately cause auto-immune destruction of those cells. I.e. the focus on toxicity of spike itself is a bit of a red herring. It is toxic - but even if it wasn't- u cannot use this tech for any vax for ANY antigen of ANY virus without causing auto-immune cell destruction causing myocarditis, blood clots, neurological damage, immune damage via destruction of lymphocytes - explaining pretty much all the horrible stuff we have been seeing?
This often seems to get skimmed over. (I'm an engineer and been trying to understand this biology stuff the best I can...)
Yes to your opening & key question.
Being a toxic protein is an added hell but for those who say “I’m not convinced spike protein is even made”, I say “It doesn’t matter”.
So grateful for your taking time to reply... can I push my luck and ask one more question? (It's an important one):
With all the focus on mRNA, I have so far never ever seen any clear/explicit explanation of how the Oxford-AZ DNA-based jab is really supposed to work - can you explain?
Many Drs incorrectly call it a "traditional attenuated virus vax" or a dead virus vax.
One description I saw is something like:
1) They stick two spike mRNA single strands together to make an informationally equivalent double-strand of DNA.
2) That gets bolted on tail end of a Chimp cold virus DNA strand (fully dead or live-attenuated??).
3) The cold virus delivers it to your cell (instead of Pfizer lipid bubble)
4) Inside your cell it goes to nucleus where enzymes split apart the DNA (and/or transcribe?) to turn it back into spike mRNA.
5) From here on it works exactly same as Pfizer mRNA.
Have I got that correct? If not, could you explain?
Is it just me - or has this AZ mechanism really not been discussed much or explained clearly? (Even in the alt/medical-freedom community).
Thanks for indulging the questions of an engineering Prof who hasn't had a biology lesson since age 13 and has spent three years trying to catch up...
PS also...Any athlete who ever stuck a testosterone needle in their backside knows that intra-muscular injections are systemic and not localised - otherwise they wouldnt work. How could anyone who got through medical school possibly believe that the covid jab "stays local to the deltoid site of injection"? It was always an obviously absurd claim - drs have been giving intramuscular injections for at least 200-ish years right?
I absolutely agree Dr Yeadon. There seem to be so many different mechanisms of potential harm. That these mechanisms were already known to the select few and deliberately hidden suggest a gigantic public health fraud. A fraud with intent to cause as much damage as possible over time. The variation in toxicity of vials cover for plausible deniability.
The variability was the first macro signal that brought me, Sasha Latypova and first observer, Craig Paardekooper together.
Craig had pulled lot numbers v number of entries to VAERS & saw huge variations.
That cannot happen if a properly manufactured product is what’s deployed.
At first, I thought “This is the inevitable consequence of rushed manufacturing”.
That at least would be human.
What I now believe is that these have been intentionally made to vary in toxicity. I say that because of new relationships Craig has recently uncovered, which vary with way too much precision for it to be entirely accidental and inadvertent. This, of course, is diabolical.
Fitting, given the overall tenor of the terror unleashed upon the world.
People do not want to hear this at all.
Intentionality is just too much to handle. I’m way past expecting good behaviour from devils.
Thank you for that Dr Yeadon. It is certainly not beyond the realm of intent. The variation being too extreme between batches from the same manufacturer?
On my daily walk yesterday I met someone I hadn’t seen in a few weeks. He said he had Covid but was getting better and his wife was home sick with Covid. Everyone I know who has become infected with Covid was vaccinated beforehand. I am not vaccinated because I learned about 50 years ago that it takes decades to develop safe and effective vaccines.
I like this couple, whom I have seen most weeks for the past 2 years on my daily walks. I decided to do something I have never done before. I told him that everyone I knew who has become infected with Covid was vaccinated beforehand. Not surprisingly, he wouldn’t listen. I told him I think the vaccine weakens immunity. He reacted as I thought he would. He dismissed my opinion and walked away. His wife is more reasonable and perhaps we can have a discussion. Or perhaps, I’ve made two enemies.
I am tired of seeing people harming themselves.
I respect your bravery, I never feel there is a place where I can discuss this unless it is with a good friend who has come around. Otherwise, people appear set on believing what they hear on television.
I often wonder if what you have just stated, was all mapped out as probability from the psychological blueprinted effects on humanity? And then horribly reinforced by the social distancing and lockdowns, as part of the mandated ideology that from now on, all unvaxxed are the deadly poison spreaders. Thus forever stuck in the minds of the doomed jab junkies.
Think of it this way, in every emergency situation except this one the first thing responders have always told people is to stay calm.
In this case they did the exact opposite and went out of their way to impart fear and alarm. That’s unprecedented and flies in the face of logic and reason.
Unless the goal is to trigger the fight or flight reptilian portion of the brain.
Once triggered everyone will run blindly for the exits. In this case the exits were the authoritarian protocols, mandates, and ultimately the injection.
Once people accept being penetrated it becomes a social contract. No different than being initiated in a gang or cult.
Once initiated they become loyal, blind to criticism even in the face of mounting evidence. Skepticism feels like betrayal.
It is crystal clear people were, and still are, deliberately being led. Psychologically owned. Emergency situations are never handled this way. This was something else entirely.
The younger healthier cohorts gave little to do with clinicians. The mandates were designed to reel them in. Without them the vaccination drive would have fizzled miserably. “No one is safe until everyone is safe”meme came much later when in general people had been exposed 12 months or more to this pathogen and were fine. The Authorities had to tie the jabs to “freedom to go about your normal business” to get any real purchase. They had to employ the “killing granny” meme to bounce the hold outs with limited success. Still 30% said up yours. Pretty amazing when you think of it.
Agree with all your points but was it 30%? Feels more like 5-10%.
YUP.... You Nailed it!
People are awful creatures of odd learned habits.
Rarely do folks have an original calm thought when smack-dabbed by crisis.
I've been trying to listen to both pro and anti vax proponents. Everyone tends to exaggerate the threats of not following their position. It seems half of us will die from getting vaccinated. And the other half will die because we are not. Informed consent doesn't exist. I myself remain unvaccinated and believe the THREAT of Covid is exaggerated. I believe I can rely on treating Covid should I happen to become infected. It's not either/or. It's maybe have fewer symptoms but a fair risk of heart damage (30%?). Or stay unvaccinated. Or treat Covid if it occurs with Ivermectin and other repurposed drugs/supplements. Or (if I'm wealthy and can work from home) stay quarantined and avoid all human contact.
On an uncertain long enough time line it all ends in "0" future breaths taken.
Mass Formation Psychosis theory answers the question of what mechanism was used to brainwash over 2/3 of the nation (and larger % of Europe and other western-aligned nations). The author of that theory, Dr. Mattias Desmet, was excoriated by the Globalist Establishment media and (self-proclaimed) "intelligentsia" when he went public wit his theory of how so many have been thoroughly brainwashed into believing what the government and Deep State-controlled media told them about covid and the covid Quackcines. Here is a short video of his answer on how to avoid being brainwashed: https://youtu.be/UeY8loWj9y8
I read his substack items. Malone introduced him into my reading folds.
Heavy stuff!
All you can do is tell the truth. They have to digest it themselves. That is out of your control.
Good for you to try Terence, we all need to do a better job with getting all this new information out , something legacy media will never do, All it takes is little seeds of info and it will grow , I have done this with my daughter. The toughest is her mom , whom doesn't see any antidotes all around her , I continue to print up all these papers in hopes of someday her mind will open to them. I am a believer of physical proof to hand to someone and also afraid the controllers of the internet will someday make the truth disappear!
I agree but proof is useless against certainty. And a trust in Covid policy is essentially a political belief which is incredibly resilient. And since the believers blindly follow half baked news reporting and blatantly false claims of our healthcare arbiters, there is little chance of anyone being honest enough to question their beliefs.
The human psyche has been hijacked by scum. Once bought into the program it takes a very unusual individual to admit they were misled. Akin to leaving a cult. I saw it coming because I’ve read enough books on how influence works. I knew they were scaring people on purpose because once they ran to the needle they’d be committed and their minds would be owned. Few are ever going to leave the cult now. Usually it takes a traumatic event to ignite an epiphany to break the spell. I hated everything that went on because I could see exactly what they were doing to people. The WEF’s Harari said, people are hackable animals. I’m sorry to say he wasn’t entirely wrong.
Great to have had Dr McCullough come to Alberta, Canada and deliver some truth bombs. His keynote speech to the Association of Physicians and Surgeons called 'House of Medicine on Fire' is worth every single minute of the one hour talk. #ExitTheWHO
I'm afraid he would be stoned if he'd ever decide to come to Montreal Quebec to speak against the jabs.
Ya, well WEXIT would solve that...and another plus - NO MORE Trudeaus - EVER!!
I remember my father criticizing Troodeau father, now I'm doing the same with the son. Uh oh, I think the same spirit took them over, got worse for the son who is completing the communist agenda so embraced by PET.
Pierre gives canucks a Charter of Rights and Freedoms and then his idiot, bastard son uses it as toilet paper...
Yeah, well, also: NO Charter of Rights will prevail soon if the WHO papers get signed by participating countries :-(
😔
I hope this holds true...because the rest of us who haven't taken the jabs have been sick with worry about our friends and family...so if they get through 5 years they might be okay?
I’m afraid it’s not just our vaxed friends and loved ones at risk. It would seem they can shed this filth into us and give us contaminated blood.
I think if you are careful...you are not at much risk. Don't have direct skin contact or sleep in the same room....you should be alright....But I could be wrong. I understand the "shedding' mostly occurs in the first few weeks after the "vaccinations"....but I am not a scientist. Are there studies being done? What do others think?
You may want to look at Dr Ana. On the other hand you may not. This woman is the stuff of nightmares. I think sometimes she’s a bit gooky, but on some stuff she seems spot on.
https://open.substack.com/pub/lionessofjudah/p/cv19-bioweaponvax-an-extinction-level?r=llw32&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
I did look at her stuff. My husband took two shots....I never took any. I usually sleep in another room. He is blind and totally disabled and I am his caregiver. I am 73 years old had blood drawn recently for something and the doctor came out and said "That is not your blood"...so I said "what do you mean?" The doctor said my blood looked too clean and undamaged to belong to a 73 year old. He took another sample and saw that it was indeed my own.
So based on my experience, if you are careful you can maintain your "blood integrity" with a little extra effort and also if you eat well etc. But who knows....a single case means very little.
Well done! My wife and I sleep in separate rooms. She’s had 1 shot, but it’s not the vax. It’s because I snore. I had 3 blood clots and undiagnosed pneumonia for a week in Kenya. I was put on the blood thinner Rivaroxaban. It knocks out the fibrin blood clotting enzyme. You bleed like a stuffed pig.
With the help of a fantastic doctor from the US I came off Rivaroxaban slowly, taking Nattokinase and K2. I’ve been off for around 5 years now.
I had 15 blood checks every month. My bigPharma doctor was ecstatic, saying my blood was fantastic. She wasn’t so pleased when I told her I was taking a powder containing vitamins and various supplements. She was even less pleased when I told her I was not taking any more of her blood thinners. She screamed at me and stopped the appointments.
I’m 75 in March.
PS There is a large number of people who have had the clot shot and even the boosters with no I’ll effects. No one fully understands why. It may well be that your husband and my wife belong to this category and so don’t shed. The science is far from settled on this.
Dr Ana gives great instructions on clearing up contaminated blood. And she’s proven it with microscope analysis.
Yes indeed, seems like we have all been given nano stuff. Pure blood don't exist it seems.
I think worrying if everyone is going to drop dead from the vax distracts from the fact that even if the shots are safe as saline (for many they will be) the big picture is handing our rights over to non elected bureaucrats who we’ve willingly allowed to tell us how to live. We, the citizens of the so-called free world were so afraid of the invisible menace we laid our freedom, liberty and personal sovereignty at their feet and said, take it! Just please save us from the invisible killer germ!! Soldiers buried at Arlington are turning over in their graves.
Well said. True. and I hope you are right. Everyone I know who has had the jabs is not doing as well as before...little things piling up, once big one (turbo cancer re-occurence).
And I am in a blue state. The deadly lots were sent to red states.
The people who had a choice but are now actually shot damaged, that’s on them. It didn’t take any special genius to be a skeptic and pull back.
In 1976 they tried to panic me into taking the swine flu vaccine. I said, no. I was 20 years old. I smelled bullshit then and bullshit now.
Realistically, however, if hundreds of thousands of people are dropping like flies how come there isn’t a funeral procession everywhere, every day?
I live in Ohio. My neighbors haven’t dropped dead. Nor do any of my family or acquaintances in-state or out-of-state seem particularly concerned or have they encountered mega illness/deaths. Extrapolate that to their acquaintances, and so forth.
I really think a lot more than usual had adverse side effects from the covid shots. But what we have to be careful of is falling prey to residual neuroticism from the covid panic that Substack feeds into.
The way these people talk of genocide entire neighborhoods should’ve thinned out by now. But, I know, I know, any…day…now I’ll be waking up to empty streets. Sigh.
Meanwhile, back here in Reality, nobody addresses the actual elephant in the room where globalists run roughshod over the American Republic and trample the whole of Western Democracy.
Dr. McCullough is a SuperHero who has spoken out in the face of an unprecedented adversity...Proud to $upport Dr. McCullough's Substack..
"There are none so blind as those who will not see," as the saying goes. People who have been vax'd continue to suffer: first from their fear of death from the Covid flu due to the year (2020) of rampant fearmongering; from their fear of death they were driven to the deadly experimental jab that has resulted in what will likely be life-long physical problems. Doctors everywhere seem to refuse to connect the horrible adverse effects and deaths to the vax adding greater harm to these already injured people for whom death might be a blessing.
I have one friend who finally came around and admitted she and her family should not have gotten the jab, but that it was fear of death from the Covid flu that drove them to it. I have steered her to Dr. McCullough's blog and his help with treatments. I hope she has started listening to him. But there are few people who will truly see what is happening.
The good news is that vaccine uptake (with many types of vaccines) is on the wane so we can only hope people are starting to get the message.
Oh yeah, like my husband a week prior to his death, said he regretted having being influenced to get 2 shots. He realised his heart had been damaged by those shots. Too late... Many people I know get jabs still. Yesterday a pregnant woman at work. I'm in Montreal, and it's still very "cultural" to still be injected by this poison.
Dr. McCullough has been fond of quoting the "4.2%" from the Schmeling report since it was released, but it raises more questions than it answers. This specifically was referencing the primary series of shots in Denmark, and a handful of batch numbers nearly three years ago.
This does not address the very different geographic distribution in the US, different manufacturing plants and processes, perhaps different 'intentions' in their makeup.
Most importantly, this paper does not address the potency of the many (6?) 'boosters' introduced over the subsequent years. We can assume the formulations are being constantly 'adjusted', and the frequent, often immediate, SAEs of the primary series may have been reason to tone-down the initial damaging effects of future formulations to minimize 'vaccine hesitancy.'
Have there been ANY studies on the SAEs of the 'boosters', of how their effects compare to the primary series?? I realize any 'boosters' must include the longer-term effects of the primary series, but all those who keep taking 'boosters' must be increasing their risks of a 'bad batch' with every subsequent dose, and increasing their likelihood of a SAE. Yet, vicariously, I see few people dropping after taking yet another 'booster', but more people dying many months or years after their last injection.
Dr. McCullough suggests his experience parallels Schmeling's percentages, and has seen no ill effects come from his patients who have no arm soreness. I wish he would go into further detail about his observations of his many patients and peers about the makeup of the now-many boosters. Seems nobody else is deep-diving the subsequent 'boosters' either.
If any in this audience can provide me information, it would be very much appreciated.
Wouldn't the now faster arising heart issue facts coincide with the variations and adulterations of all the batch vials of the mRNA manufacturing/storage/and delivery problems in evidence be the greatest "CULPRIT" to bolster the marketing nonsense of the "Safe and Effective" continued claims by Big pHARMA? Who was watching the watchers in all this subcontracting of Jab Juice? No one?
Dr. Michael Yeadon has spoken volumes on this subject since he used to work in the field regarding safe manufacturing processes. He is a frequent guest on podcasts that you can download from AmericaOutloud.com/news
Yup, I have followed Mike from day one. Very informative he is.
Actually, the web address was changes slightly. Go to americaoutloud.news
I first saw the chart included in this piece about 3-4 months ago. It was discussed in a Kim Iverson podcast. I tracked down the academic paper and skimmed it.
To me it raises all kinds of damning questions.
1) It appears the Denmark regulators were aware some batches of doses were less potent, as evidenced by them running far fewer tests on the less potent batches. They may even have known these batches were placebos. What really did these regulators know, and what did they think about it?
2) The varying potency of different batches appears to be intentional by the manufacturers. Was it deliberate? Why did they do that? Were they experimenting on the public without informing them?
3) Was the practice of varying batch potencies carried out in other countries?
4) If some of the batches were placebos, weren't the pharma companies carrying out a fraud on the public? If they knowingly committed fraud, doesn't that puncture pharma's legal immunity?
Maybe these questions have been answered and I'm unaware. If that's the case, someone please let me know
Edit- This was written in this substack: "The good news is that Schmeling et al have shown that about one third of vaccine recipients have zero side effects and in my experience this tends to remain the case during the period of time we have for observation thus far." This doesn't make sense. If one-third of the vaccines are placebos/less potent as was reported, and with multiple doses, the number of unaffected people should be fewer than one-third. If someone had two shots, and a single non-placebo shot causes adverse effects, that person's odds of being unaffected would be 1/3 squared = 1/9.
"4) If some of the batches were placebos, weren't the pharma companies carrying out a fraud on the public? If they knowingly committed fraud, doesn't that puncture pharma's legal immunity?"
excellent point....I am sure Albert Bourla knew exactly what his company was doing. He just thought they could get away with it. Which is very strange because I read somewhere that his family narrowly escaped from the Nazis....
Very early in the rollout a site was tracking the incidents according to batches. It was known a long time ago.
that was Paardekooper....."how bad is my batch"....
but I haven't followed what happened with that...
By the way many people do not admit to being unvaccinated. NHS was 10% that they admitted to. It was certainly higher for them to drop the mandate.
Actually I had 27%. Must have come from Prof Norman Fenton who challenged the ONS through the Ombudsman and won.
Were 1/3 of batches “placebo”?
Its like rolling the Dice with 1/3 odds of no problems. I wouldn't take those odds, would you?
The only vaccine cattle need is the black-leg vaccine.