I am not sure it is correct to say that the pandemic management was all about "vaccine ideology". This implies a belief in the vaccines as therapeutic agents. Although only peering into the minds of the corrupt public health officials and vaccine company leaders who directed the pandemic, such as Fauci, Birx, Collins, Becerra, Bancel, and Bourla is the only way of knowing, and we can't obviously do that, I believe that their intention was probably not to treat people, but to harm or kill people, and those who couldn't be disabled or murdered, would be sterilized, as part of a depopulation plan. Why else would they take all effective treatments off the market? Why would they approve only lethal treatments like remdesivir and intubation and assure that Dexamethasone could only be used at subtherapeutic doses. Why else would they recommend the vaccine for infants, children, and pregnant women, knowing it was causing massive harms and not stopping spread of the virus? The other goal I believe was probably in their minds, again unverifiable, is to get well over 90% of the population vaccinated so everyone could be put on vaccine passports. Vaccine passports would be a gateway to CBDC and to total surveillance and control over the surviving population. Although we can't fully assess the damages of the vaccine yet, the pandemic managers appear to have failed in their goals, if they were the ones I have said. Only about 70% of the population got the vaccine, if you can believe the data, and far fewer got the first booster. Even fewer got the second booster. Millions have been disabled and hundreds of thousands killed, but, according to the Rasmussen surveys, it appears that nearly half (and possibly more) of the population has become aware of the harmful nature of these vaccines. Their plan has undermined trust in the COVID-19 vaccine program and in the vaccine program in general. Now the globalists are trying to implement their plan without vaccine passports and with an ever increasingly distrustful population. They will try to foist their plan on us, but they are in for a serious fight. Let the best fighter win (we know who that will be).
“These observations suggest that the pandemic response was not all about money—it was about vaccine ideology.”
Or perhaps it was all about reducing the human population……considering that the drug companies, by virtue of their actual clinical trials, already knew the lack of efficacy and safety data with regard to the vaccine products, even before they were pushed out on to the public.
As I recall from RFK Jr.'s book The Real Anthony Fauci, the US Govt also pulled and destroyed lots of Ivermectin and HCQ, confirming the wicked motivations of our elected and appointed officials. Plandemic all the way, and it appears to have been directed by Satan himself.
Monoclonal antibodies may well be useful for some conditions, however, for COVID-19, the way the pandemic response was run, they are a lousy approach for several reasons:
1 - They are extraordinarily narrow. A single protein change in the virus's genome can - and does - render them ineffective.
2 - Their reported success, as in the article quoted above, is based on the fact that the vast majority of patients they were used on had crippled immune systems due to having only 5 to 25 ng/mL circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (like the rest of the population who do not properly supplement vitamin D3 and have not had a lot of UV-B skin exposure recently). If these patients had had their 25-hydroxyvitamin D level raised to at least the 50 ng/mL needed for proper immune function, in 4 hours, at admission to hospital (or earlier) then very few of them would have died, with or without monoclonal antibodies. See below on how this can easily be done.
3 - The treatment is expensive.
4 - The treatment requires advanced manufacturing and quality control arrangements, many of which are patented.
5 - The treatment requires medical staff.
6 - The treatment involves intravenous drips for long periods of time - perhaps continually - so it is only suitable for hospitalised patients, not those at home.
Please see the research articles cited and discussed at my page, co-signed by Patrick Chambers MD (Hawaii), concerning vitamin D and the immune system: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ .
If everyone had 50 ng/mL or more circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D, there would be no pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2 or influenza. Few of those infected would need to be hospitalised or would die. Proper immune function would somewhat reduce the chance of infection, but would greatly reduce severity of the infection, and so the total number of virus particles shed. There would also be very little sepsis, which killed 11 million people in 2017: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)32989-7/ .
For clinical emergencies such as COVID-19, sepsis and severe influenza, to boost a typical 25(OH)D level of 18 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL or more as quickly as possible, ordinary daily vitamin D3 supplemental intake quantities take far too long.
A bolus vitamin D3 dose such as (for 70 kg body weight) 10 mg (400,000 IU) raises the level safely over 50 ng/mL in, very approximately, 4 days - due to the delays inherent in hydroxylation, primarily in the liver.
If this was done for every newly infected person, pandemic spread, harm and death would have been greatly reduced.
However the best early treatment of all, for the majority of the population whose 25(OH)D levels are 25 ng/mL or less, is (for 70 kg BW) a single oral dose of 1 mg calcifediol. This _is_ 25-hydroxyvitamin D. It is easily absorbed and goes straight into circulation, without need for hydroxylation in the liver. This will get most people's 25(OH)D level safely over 50 ng/mL in about 4 hours. This 0.014 mg per kg body weight is about twice what was used in the Cordoba RCT in hosplitalised COVDI-19 patients reported in Castillo et al. 2020: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960076020302764 and https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#castillo .
This rapid attainment of proper immune function in 4 hours or so is the primary reason for this RCTs stunning outcomes: ICU admissions reduced from 50% to 2% and deaths from 8% to zero. (The other primary contribution was imperfect randomisation.)
This is not complex. Neither vitamin D3 nor 25-hydroxvyitamin D act as hormones. The steep decline in innate and adaptive response to the primarily bacterial pathogens which cause post-operative surgical site and hospital acquired infection is evident from the graphs at the end of https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/1782085. The two graphs combined is the first item at the first-mentioned page: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#00-quraishi .
It is wrong to prioritise drugs, vaccines, quasi-vaccines, monoclonal antibodies etc. over the nutritional supplements required for proper immune system function.
0.125 mg (5000 IU) vitamin D3 a day, on average (or more at intervals up to 10 days) will ensure that most people of average adult body weigh t 70 kg 154 lb without obesity will attain, after a few months, the 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D their immune system needs. This is a gram every 22 years. Pharma-grade vitamin D3 costs about USD$2.50 ex-factory.
“These observations suggest that the pandemic response was not all about money—it was about vaccine ideology.” to me. This is the key statement. But why?
That and HCQ/ivermectin were ALL condemned by the Faucci cartel at the CDC and cancelled or censored for use on needy Americans by the Biden folks. When you have no respect for viable babies in the womb it is not surprising to see just such inhumanity...it defines the Progressive political movement....along with corrupted elections.
Can you write a follow up post sharing which if those monoclonal products were researched or produced or have ongoing testing using aborted fetal cells?
With the blood supply now populated with the rogue spike protein from Mrna gene therapy Comirnaty experimental products, it does not bode well for monoclonal antibodies from a large segment of the general population.
I’m not convinced that monoclonal antibodies would have been needed at all, if early treatments had been used.
I’m not a fan of monoclonal anyibodies: The use of antibodies, 100’s of which were collected from both humans and transmugenic mice (mice injected with human stem cells), then only 2 antibodies (1 from a human and 1 from a transmugenic mouse) were chosen and replicated in hamster embryo cell cultures before being placed in the solution given to patients, doesn’t sound all that appealing.
I am not sure it is correct to say that the pandemic management was all about "vaccine ideology". This implies a belief in the vaccines as therapeutic agents. Although only peering into the minds of the corrupt public health officials and vaccine company leaders who directed the pandemic, such as Fauci, Birx, Collins, Becerra, Bancel, and Bourla is the only way of knowing, and we can't obviously do that, I believe that their intention was probably not to treat people, but to harm or kill people, and those who couldn't be disabled or murdered, would be sterilized, as part of a depopulation plan. Why else would they take all effective treatments off the market? Why would they approve only lethal treatments like remdesivir and intubation and assure that Dexamethasone could only be used at subtherapeutic doses. Why else would they recommend the vaccine for infants, children, and pregnant women, knowing it was causing massive harms and not stopping spread of the virus? The other goal I believe was probably in their minds, again unverifiable, is to get well over 90% of the population vaccinated so everyone could be put on vaccine passports. Vaccine passports would be a gateway to CBDC and to total surveillance and control over the surviving population. Although we can't fully assess the damages of the vaccine yet, the pandemic managers appear to have failed in their goals, if they were the ones I have said. Only about 70% of the population got the vaccine, if you can believe the data, and far fewer got the first booster. Even fewer got the second booster. Millions have been disabled and hundreds of thousands killed, but, according to the Rasmussen surveys, it appears that nearly half (and possibly more) of the population has become aware of the harmful nature of these vaccines. Their plan has undermined trust in the COVID-19 vaccine program and in the vaccine program in general. Now the globalists are trying to implement their plan without vaccine passports and with an ever increasingly distrustful population. They will try to foist their plan on us, but they are in for a serious fight. Let the best fighter win (we know who that will be).
“These observations suggest that the pandemic response was not all about money—it was about vaccine ideology.”
Or perhaps it was all about reducing the human population……considering that the drug companies, by virtue of their actual clinical trials, already knew the lack of efficacy and safety data with regard to the vaccine products, even before they were pushed out on to the public.
As I recall from RFK Jr.'s book The Real Anthony Fauci, the US Govt also pulled and destroyed lots of Ivermectin and HCQ, confirming the wicked motivations of our elected and appointed officials. Plandemic all the way, and it appears to have been directed by Satan himself.
Dr McCullough’s words against President Trump, a few weeks ago, and Mr Leake’s political activism, leave me cold.
Monoclonal antibodies may well be useful for some conditions, however, for COVID-19, the way the pandemic response was run, they are a lousy approach for several reasons:
1 - They are extraordinarily narrow. A single protein change in the virus's genome can - and does - render them ineffective.
2 - Their reported success, as in the article quoted above, is based on the fact that the vast majority of patients they were used on had crippled immune systems due to having only 5 to 25 ng/mL circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (like the rest of the population who do not properly supplement vitamin D3 and have not had a lot of UV-B skin exposure recently). If these patients had had their 25-hydroxyvitamin D level raised to at least the 50 ng/mL needed for proper immune function, in 4 hours, at admission to hospital (or earlier) then very few of them would have died, with or without monoclonal antibodies. See below on how this can easily be done.
3 - The treatment is expensive.
4 - The treatment requires advanced manufacturing and quality control arrangements, many of which are patented.
5 - The treatment requires medical staff.
6 - The treatment involves intravenous drips for long periods of time - perhaps continually - so it is only suitable for hospitalised patients, not those at home.
Please see the research articles cited and discussed at my page, co-signed by Patrick Chambers MD (Hawaii), concerning vitamin D and the immune system: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ .
If everyone had 50 ng/mL or more circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D, there would be no pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2 or influenza. Few of those infected would need to be hospitalised or would die. Proper immune function would somewhat reduce the chance of infection, but would greatly reduce severity of the infection, and so the total number of virus particles shed. There would also be very little sepsis, which killed 11 million people in 2017: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)32989-7/ .
For clinical emergencies such as COVID-19, sepsis and severe influenza, to boost a typical 25(OH)D level of 18 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL or more as quickly as possible, ordinary daily vitamin D3 supplemental intake quantities take far too long.
A bolus vitamin D3 dose such as (for 70 kg body weight) 10 mg (400,000 IU) raises the level safely over 50 ng/mL in, very approximately, 4 days - due to the delays inherent in hydroxylation, primarily in the liver.
If this was done for every newly infected person, pandemic spread, harm and death would have been greatly reduced.
However the best early treatment of all, for the majority of the population whose 25(OH)D levels are 25 ng/mL or less, is (for 70 kg BW) a single oral dose of 1 mg calcifediol. This _is_ 25-hydroxyvitamin D. It is easily absorbed and goes straight into circulation, without need for hydroxylation in the liver. This will get most people's 25(OH)D level safely over 50 ng/mL in about 4 hours. This 0.014 mg per kg body weight is about twice what was used in the Cordoba RCT in hosplitalised COVDI-19 patients reported in Castillo et al. 2020: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960076020302764 and https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#castillo .
This rapid attainment of proper immune function in 4 hours or so is the primary reason for this RCTs stunning outcomes: ICU admissions reduced from 50% to 2% and deaths from 8% to zero. (The other primary contribution was imperfect randomisation.)
This is not complex. Neither vitamin D3 nor 25-hydroxvyitamin D act as hormones. The steep decline in innate and adaptive response to the primarily bacterial pathogens which cause post-operative surgical site and hospital acquired infection is evident from the graphs at the end of https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/1782085. The two graphs combined is the first item at the first-mentioned page: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#00-quraishi .
It is wrong to prioritise drugs, vaccines, quasi-vaccines, monoclonal antibodies etc. over the nutritional supplements required for proper immune system function.
0.125 mg (5000 IU) vitamin D3 a day, on average (or more at intervals up to 10 days) will ensure that most people of average adult body weigh t 70 kg 154 lb without obesity will attain, after a few months, the 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D their immune system needs. This is a gram every 22 years. Pharma-grade vitamin D3 costs about USD$2.50 ex-factory.
All of them except...Remdesivir. Explain that please?
As you've been saying for months Dr McCullough, the goal has always been a needle in every arm. And it's not been with monoclonals.
“These observations suggest that the pandemic response was not all about money—it was about vaccine ideology.” to me. This is the key statement. But why?
That and HCQ/ivermectin were ALL condemned by the Faucci cartel at the CDC and cancelled or censored for use on needy Americans by the Biden folks. When you have no respect for viable babies in the womb it is not surprising to see just such inhumanity...it defines the Progressive political movement....along with corrupted elections.
Can you write a follow up post sharing which if those monoclonal products were researched or produced or have ongoing testing using aborted fetal cells?
Interesting. The banning of effective treatments has been the greatest tragedy of these last three years.
With the blood supply now populated with the rogue spike protein from Mrna gene therapy Comirnaty experimental products, it does not bode well for monoclonal antibodies from a large segment of the general population.
I’m not convinced that monoclonal antibodies would have been needed at all, if early treatments had been used.
I’m not a fan of monoclonal anyibodies: The use of antibodies, 100’s of which were collected from both humans and transmugenic mice (mice injected with human stem cells), then only 2 antibodies (1 from a human and 1 from a transmugenic mouse) were chosen and replicated in hamster embryo cell cultures before being placed in the solution given to patients, doesn’t sound all that appealing.
Wow. RFK
https://twitter.com/expose_the_dog/status/1643814298127572992?t=ob1rHMwJ4Eaqe2MlJhB9lg&s=19
I agree about Paxlovid. Seems that no one should use or suggest Paxlovid for SARS patients.
I'm glad you found something positive about OWS.
I still come back to #NoAmnesty #NoQuarter for those denying alternative treatments in lieu of jabs known to kill and maim. #CrimesAgainstHumanity