131 Comments

Where is the release of the Epstein list/tapes and the Diddy list/tapes??

Expand full comment

What a comedy.

Fourth Reich Uniparty Demon Worshiping Pedophiles raising hell about anything sexual. Where it not so serious, would laugh.

Expand full comment

Does anyone really believe its coincidence that Diddy exploded at the same time that the Prime documentary on Prince Andrew and Epstein came out, because the 17 year old girl, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who brought sexual charges against Prince Andrew, testified that she was taken to Mar-a-Iago by Ghislaine Maxwell, and that she was “recruited from Mar-a-Iago” to have sex with Prince Andrew. Because from Mar-a-Iago to Epstein’s island is a boat ride.

And do you know WHAT HAPPENED TO THE CORRUPT US STATE ATTORNEY THAT LET EPSTEIN OFF...???

Alexander Acosta is the corrupt U.S. State Attorney who let Jeffrey Epstein off with the LIGHTEST SENTENCE EVER in the state of Florida for sex crimes, and made the SEALED secret deal with Epstein so that Epstein's crimes, and NAMES, would never be made public!

And what happened to Acosta as a result???

In 2017 Alexander Acosta was appointed the 27th Secretary of Labor for the United States of America!

By President Donald J. Trump.

Expand full comment

They won't do that, it will bring down both USA & Israel.

Pedophilia at the highest levels.

Expand full comment

THIS was known, none of y'all wanted to pay attention.. bc ppl don't really care about children. Gave y'all's parental authority away long time ago. It's why they kick y'all out of school board meetings, let principles push y'all off, don't know WTF was/is they are doing in schools.

Expand full comment

USA is already 'down'.

Expand full comment

Yes - this is so sickeningly but unsurprisingly hypocritical when Bill Clinton's still on the loose.

Expand full comment

We've all had relationships we regret. But one must not only question the timing of these ancient accusations, but also the political party and bank account of the woman making them.

Expand full comment

Hmmm....Let me get this straight....sexual misconduct or assault charges (or any other crime) are ONLY worth prosecuting if possibly committed by a political opponent?

SMH

Expand full comment

Perfect - thank you!

Expand full comment

Dredging up bullshit for money, is still bullshit.

Expand full comment

They throw everything and hope something sticks.

Expand full comment

and this time? we haven't seen anything like what's coming! Intent to remove the DoE? Intent to ship illegals back over the border? The removal of woke military brass and judges? We will be VERY fortunate to make it to January 20 without civil war. Winning the POTUS was the easy part!

Expand full comment

WW3 AND a civil war.

Expand full comment

frightening times.. prophetic times..

Expand full comment

Most of these women are an embarrassment to the rest of us. Rape is horrible. No argument there. But when you wait 20+ years and ONLY after the man becomes popular or successful...you're not doing it to right a wrong...you're doing it to become relevant and/or rich! Pathetic!

Expand full comment

Your comment has zero to do with this story. This woman went to the police within a few days of the incident in 2017. There was NO waiting 20+ years. And, Hegseth was not powerful and not even sniffing being a candidate in 2017.

Expand full comment

This situation was made possible when they did not prosecute the women who falsely accused Justice Kavanaugh. If those women, who were clearly lying, did not face consequences, if E. Jean Carroll does not face consequences, there is nothing to stop the Democrats from bringing an endless parade of liars to do their political bidding. Time to exact a price for such activity.

Expand full comment

The entire E. Jean Carroll thing makes me cringe! She is the bottom of the pit for over-the-hill opportunists!!!!!!

Expand full comment

Yes. And most people still frequent LinkedIn, which is owned by the guy who funded E Jean's court case against Trump. We have to stop supporting these monsters. No one should use LinkedIn. (And they should study who Reid Hoffman is and based on that not frequent his business.)

Expand full comment

I did not know that! Thank you… such a tangled web!!!

Expand full comment

There was no determination that either of those women falsely accused anyone, so why would they be prosecuted?

Expand full comment

The evidence was clear on the face of the matter that they engaged in false accusations. Based on the evidence in public , they should have been prosecuted. During the trial for defamation there could be a determination of the degree of the false witness. In other words, they could have defended themselves. To say that there was no determination that they falsely accused is silly - there was no hearing of the evidence. They were simply allowed to lie and bring false witness.

Expand full comment

Blasey Ford was not even interviewed by the FBI when they handled their short supplemental background check during the Kavanaugh hearings. In that background check, the FBI did not interview Kavanaugh, Blasey Ford, or many other people who had contacted the FBI as corroborating witnesses. They received 4500 tips during that time about Kavanaugh and talked to close to zero of those people. It was a sham investigation. There was no determination that Blasey Ford was lying. They just went forward approving the nomination without even looking into the accusations. You are drawing a conclusion that Blasey Ford was lying and allowed to bring false witness. That is only an opinion. What evidence are you saying there is "in public" regarding Blasey-Ford having lied?

Expand full comment

OMG. Did you watch the proceedings? She lied and lied and then lied some more. She was one of the most unconvincing witnesses in the history of testimony. Why did the government, as you note, not even interview her and check out her story? Because it was a fix, a scam, run by the likes of Fienstein and Harris. They did not want to check out Blassey Ford because they knew her story was bogus. Instead, they let false accusations flood the public airwaves. Anyone who has not paid attention to this corrupt practice on the part of the Democrat party is just in la la Land.

Expand full comment

How about we do this... Release ALL THE RECORDS of ethical and sexual misconduct by our Reps and Senators and the HUSH MONEY paid out (by WE the people!) to protect them. We know these records exist and we know accusers were paid off!! YOUR TAX DOLLARS at work!!!

Expand full comment

Convict them in New York state as well. There IS precedent until appeals throw the trash out.

Expand full comment

The people that are bringing up these old allegations are just going to continue to embarrass themselves.

When will they learn to stop?

Expand full comment

when you have no moral compass there is no such thing as embarrassment. Neither is there any such thing as discipline accountability or consequence when you are a democrat seeking desperately to remove a constitutional republic built on moral understandings of right and wrong.

Expand full comment

Perhaps you need to read what you just wrote. What is your definition of "moral code?" Is it only when the big bad Dems go against your guy or gal with Possible accusations of misconduct? What about the "moral code" breaking by the fornication of Hegseth? A lot more difficult for the enemy to getcha when you maintain sexual purity before marriage, right? I suppose moral codes only fit people's interpretations of them and whom they are levied against, right?

Expand full comment

It is the men's fault for allowing themselves to be put in these positions. Avoid the appearance of impropriety and your career may be saved. Screw around and expect the worst if you're famous.

Expand full comment

It takes two to tango, but I agree with you

Expand full comment

In Bill Clinton's case, the left of course said it was "just about sex"- and would not affect his job performance. Here we have a situation the police objectively investigated- found no crime-and both parties agreed not to pursue further- but it was a Republican. Therefore, the leftist personal destruction machinery flies into action (Bork him) for political purposes. It is time to aggressively call them out for this duplicity.

Expand full comment

Nice comment, bringing Clinton up! This dude bombed Belgrad on Easter Eve’s time because he needed some diversion, being caught with the dong in a very no-no place… The dems never pointed that at him, or they did? What worse sexual scandal than that one?

Expand full comment

Really? As a woman I felt immediate dislike for this woman who all of a sudden decides her life has been traumatized by an encounter with a man who just "happens" to be in line for a position the Democratic party does not want him to have. So incredibly disgusting - as always.

Expand full comment

What do you mean "all of a sudden"? It's a police report from 2017. These things leak out when people dive into candidates for positions.

Expand full comment

I am aware of the fact it’s a 2017 police report …my comment (to explain ) was that apparently the “victim “ has just realized how severely traumatic this was right before the person’s vote by the Senate - how convenient for the Democrats that her memory has dragged up these “awful” things that happened to her all those years ago…. The sarcasm is intentional.

Expand full comment

We have to look at timing.

Expand full comment

The accusation was made when he was not a candidate and not in any position of power. So, what would the "timing" issue be for the police report?

Expand full comment

I don't even remember the article I commented on. There would be no 'timing' issue if the accusation was made prior, I missed that. I thought the accusation was made afterwards in which case I would consider timing. My oversight, often I speed read through and miss important details.

Expand full comment

Timing Is Everything

Expand full comment

Today marks the Anniversary of the internal Coup that overthrew our Republic.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5gvTOwDkf4ed

Expand full comment

Oh, I so hope the Epstein/Diddy lists see the light of day during 2025...

Expand full comment

Same people/publications that weren't bothered by Ms broadricks accusations against Bill Clinton, though there was a mass of information, and Epstein's well known trafficking, now are spreading anything they hear about hegseth.

Danny Huckabee

Expand full comment

Tara Reade's credible accusation against Biden were ignored and it ended the #me too movement. So much for believing all women.

Expand full comment

Don't forget about Clarence Thomas' accuser, the woman who accused the governor of Missouri, Ford's accusations against Kavanaugh, etc, ad nauseum, ad infinitum. Always very vague, from years earlier with no corroborating witnesses. I just hope Trump hangs in and doesn't fold. I'm less certain about the R's in the Senate.

Danny

Expand full comment

Heard somewhere the woman in question was married and her husband was present at the conference where this occurred. If so, could be the time honored ploy of making an accusation to establish one’s own innocence. Was hubby suspicious?

Expand full comment

Her children were also, supposedly, there too. She didn’t come back to her hotel room until very late, claiming to her husband that she fell asleep on another guest’s couch. Wasn’t her behavior after her dalliance with Hegseth suspicious to her husband?

Expand full comment

Tired of this. We need to back up Hegseth. The democrats and RINOS are running pedophile rings along with God not knows what out of Epstein island and P Diddy’s house. We DONT CARE anymore about this nonsense.

Give Trump his cabinet unless these people who are making accusations come with real evidence from something that happened last week, not 7 years ago or 25 years ago.

Just like we blew them away on Election Day and said enough! We must say enough now. Enough!!

Expand full comment