Create a drug for one thing, then create another drug to mitigate the side effects of the first drug, then create another drug to treat the side effects of the 2nd drug… As long as there’s financial profit in it, Big Pharma will be all in.
This is their business model….sadly, I and my several years of health issues am likely living proof of it. I trusted but did not verify. Thankfully, I woke up to the capture and control of our government institutions (in education) in the few years before the pandemic. This caused me to question the pandemic narrative and do research on the “safe and effective” claims. Likely saved my life when I refused the jab. Sadly, my mother was not so fortunate. Her death at least permitted me to get exemptions for my daughters. The horror and injustice of the past few years for those of us profoundly affected and then expected to “shut up, sit down and suffer in silence” while the sham continues is enraging.
I’m glad you woke up and refused the jabs and got exemptions for your daughters. Hopefully your new knowledge and scepticism will help you to heal and provide self protection in the future too.
Will this new drug go through the 10 year testing and approval process or is it another EUA with the users becoming the testing ground guinea pigs again?
Pandemic — The Next Big Thing — The Sting Revisited
"Well, since there is not the least hint from them that they know we know they have been caught out, perhaps we are in store for the next big thing—oh so clever!—whether dreamed up well in advance, or perhaps just recently appearing on the drawing boards: the next medical product that will seal the fate of humanity in partnership with an ever-expanding BIG PHARMA presence and profits-spree. If spike protein has caused problems, why not introduce (after a maximum have been mRNA'd of course) a spike protein cleaner-upper, a scavenger of spike protein residues in the body that will solve all the residual post-vaccination and post-COVID-19 disease problems. Come one, come all! One dose of this miracle oil will Hoover up all harmful COVID residues!
This is called gene silencing and has been experimented with for at least the past 10 years. There are problems with it, as your paper mentions. Off-targeting can end up silencing the wrong gene, which can have disastrous results. Also, toll-like receptor 7 can become activated and cause the release of inflammatory cytokines. What was not mentioned is the toxicity of the lipid nanoparticle delivery system. This is a crisis intervention that some patients will tolerate, and others won’t.
Back to 'what's in the shot?" lnp's yes, what kind? pseudo-uridine? Is frameshifting an issue here too? How can it target infected cells and leave the rest untouched?
Is this just one more pharmaceutical for Big Pharma to make money on? What other maladies will it potentially cause? What about the self-constructing nanobots? Dr. Ana Mihalcea has done extensive research in this area, and concludes we are all infected to some extent whether or not we’ve had the jab. There are many questions. I’m sure the FDA will push this to maximum trials, and by the time it is approved, if ever, the mRNA will have killed off most of the intended humans on earth.
It is my understanding, that SI RNA and Ribonuclease, are presented by Dr McCulough and others, just as theoretical candidates, for removal of toxic pseudo- uridine modified mRNA, producing, in vaccinated, uncontrollable amount of spike protein. This is only a review article intended to raise initial interest in these 2 compounds, as Dr McC did for HCQ and Ivermectin.
I scanned the internet article. It is not funded by anybody. No conflict of interests.
Dr McC stated that after the compounds were injected, both are well tolerated. Who provided the compounds? I fear that any involvement of a Pharma company will be met with suspicion and objection. No other known vaccine has a “antidote”.
THE SUCCESS OF THESE 2 OR ANY OTHER CANDIDATES AS “ANTIDOTES”, WILL BE WELCOMED, BUT WILL AMOUNT OF ADMISSION OF VACCINE TOXICITY. This will mandate the removal of all mRNA vaccine of the market.
Well said! Dr. McCullough et al's paper is worth reading in its entirety. People are getting hysterical.....and I understand that after all we have seen and experienced. The reactions to this article indicates the enormous distrust people have of Pharma and anything related to mRNA shots. But all Dr. McCullough has done in this war against fraud and harms should not be negated because he is reporting an innovative way to treat his patients. I imagine these are patients that have not had good results with other treatments he typically uses and that the patients who choose to take this have given INFORMED CONSENT because that is who Dr. McCullough is. If miserable suffering people want to give this a try why not let them?
If this sounds as promising as you intimate, it could be a huge game changer. It’s in preprint now. Will other scientists try to duplicate your success? Will we hear about it? Do we even know whether people who did not sustain an injury shortly after the jab will be injured in the future? With no diagnostic tests it’s hard to figure out. Even if Dr. Phillip Buckhaults in his IRB testing of anonymous tissue samples, discovers integration will it get hushed up. If this works I wonder if everybody who got jabbed will need to have this? Would be mind boggling.
"It may seem unfathomable for doctors to inject more RNA to deactivate Pfizer and Moderna synthetic mRNA that has accumulated in the body after multiple injections. However, siRNA used today in my practice (patisiran, inclisiran) appears to be safe and well-tolerated only notable for injection site reactions.".........
That's the thing right there⬆️.
I don't understand how Spike replication can be stopped with yet Another mRNA injection!???
I admire you Dr. McCullough and have faith in your work, but this does not make sense to me....
Loraine, this paper is a conceptual proposal. If synthetic mRNA cannot be shut off in any way, we may have to look at these methods to silence Pfizer and Moderna and shut them off. At this stage we are battling Spike protein but have not addressed the source--mRNA.
Thank you for your response Dr. McCullough, I didn't realize it was a conceptual proposal. And what I read, the spike protein is truly the problem (along with the components that support its replication if I understand it correctly) and no matter how it's delivered into the body.
But I just have the to lay it out➡️ I'm so overwhelmed, shocked, and resentful after seeing the suffering of life changing disabilities and death of people all over the world, as well as the destruction of earth over the last 4 years. Not to mention None of that was reported on mainstream media, that it's still hard to get my head around it all. And honestly, I would be Very Hesitant to take Any form of nanotechnology....
Surely there must be a way to stop the replication of the nanotechnology that's so pervasive and in most of human bodies......I often think it may need a miracle and is in God's hands.......🙏
Heartfelt Thanks to you for your Valient efforts to make Humanity safe again!♥️
Create a drug for one thing, then create another drug to mitigate the side effects of the first drug, then create another drug to treat the side effects of the 2nd drug… As long as there’s financial profit in it, Big Pharma will be all in.
This is their business model….sadly, I and my several years of health issues am likely living proof of it. I trusted but did not verify. Thankfully, I woke up to the capture and control of our government institutions (in education) in the few years before the pandemic. This caused me to question the pandemic narrative and do research on the “safe and effective” claims. Likely saved my life when I refused the jab. Sadly, my mother was not so fortunate. Her death at least permitted me to get exemptions for my daughters. The horror and injustice of the past few years for those of us profoundly affected and then expected to “shut up, sit down and suffer in silence” while the sham continues is enraging.
I’m glad you woke up and refused the jabs and got exemptions for your daughters. Hopefully your new knowledge and scepticism will help you to heal and provide self protection in the future too.
Vaccines were supposedly safe too. Are we going to be live guinea pigs again?
Sorry, I love you Dr McCollough and read you and John daily but this almost reads like satire.
Sorry, not buying it.
Reaction: This is creepy.
Will this new drug go through the 10 year testing and approval process or is it another EUA with the users becoming the testing ground guinea pigs again?
A spike protein cleaner-upper! I predicted this 3 years ago:
https://peterwebster.substack.com/p/pandemic-the-next-big-thing
Pandemic — The Next Big Thing — The Sting Revisited
"Well, since there is not the least hint from them that they know we know they have been caught out, perhaps we are in store for the next big thing—oh so clever!—whether dreamed up well in advance, or perhaps just recently appearing on the drawing boards: the next medical product that will seal the fate of humanity in partnership with an ever-expanding BIG PHARMA presence and profits-spree. If spike protein has caused problems, why not introduce (after a maximum have been mRNA'd of course) a spike protein cleaner-upper, a scavenger of spike protein residues in the body that will solve all the residual post-vaccination and post-COVID-19 disease problems. Come one, come all! One dose of this miracle oil will Hoover up all harmful COVID residues!
This is called gene silencing and has been experimented with for at least the past 10 years. There are problems with it, as your paper mentions. Off-targeting can end up silencing the wrong gene, which can have disastrous results. Also, toll-like receptor 7 can become activated and cause the release of inflammatory cytokines. What was not mentioned is the toxicity of the lipid nanoparticle delivery system. This is a crisis intervention that some patients will tolerate, and others won’t.
So wait...now they are admitting that their mRNA is long lasting and causes adverse events??
Have no fear! Big Pharma to the rescue with another new, untested product that we know nothing about long term effects!
Line ‘em up!
Why would someone injured by these products trust Big Pharma for the solution? No thanks.
Haven't the molecular aspects of the human body been "confused" enough?
Adding more as street sweepers. I think I am back to being hesitant.
Thank you for sharing and truly caring however.
Back to 'what's in the shot?" lnp's yes, what kind? pseudo-uridine? Is frameshifting an issue here too? How can it target infected cells and leave the rest untouched?
How do we measure seroprevalence of Spike proteins?
How do we determine if mRNA is actively transfecting cells and creating Spike proteins?
Is this just one more pharmaceutical for Big Pharma to make money on? What other maladies will it potentially cause? What about the self-constructing nanobots? Dr. Ana Mihalcea has done extensive research in this area, and concludes we are all infected to some extent whether or not we’ve had the jab. There are many questions. I’m sure the FDA will push this to maximum trials, and by the time it is approved, if ever, the mRNA will have killed off most of the intended humans on earth.
All above comments are expected and reasonable.
It is my understanding, that SI RNA and Ribonuclease, are presented by Dr McCulough and others, just as theoretical candidates, for removal of toxic pseudo- uridine modified mRNA, producing, in vaccinated, uncontrollable amount of spike protein. This is only a review article intended to raise initial interest in these 2 compounds, as Dr McC did for HCQ and Ivermectin.
I scanned the internet article. It is not funded by anybody. No conflict of interests.
Dr McC stated that after the compounds were injected, both are well tolerated. Who provided the compounds? I fear that any involvement of a Pharma company will be met with suspicion and objection. No other known vaccine has a “antidote”.
THE SUCCESS OF THESE 2 OR ANY OTHER CANDIDATES AS “ANTIDOTES”, WILL BE WELCOMED, BUT WILL AMOUNT OF ADMISSION OF VACCINE TOXICITY. This will mandate the removal of all mRNA vaccine of the market.
Well said! Dr. McCullough et al's paper is worth reading in its entirety. People are getting hysterical.....and I understand that after all we have seen and experienced. The reactions to this article indicates the enormous distrust people have of Pharma and anything related to mRNA shots. But all Dr. McCullough has done in this war against fraud and harms should not be negated because he is reporting an innovative way to treat his patients. I imagine these are patients that have not had good results with other treatments he typically uses and that the patients who choose to take this have given INFORMED CONSENT because that is who Dr. McCullough is. If miserable suffering people want to give this a try why not let them?
If this sounds as promising as you intimate, it could be a huge game changer. It’s in preprint now. Will other scientists try to duplicate your success? Will we hear about it? Do we even know whether people who did not sustain an injury shortly after the jab will be injured in the future? With no diagnostic tests it’s hard to figure out. Even if Dr. Phillip Buckhaults in his IRB testing of anonymous tissue samples, discovers integration will it get hushed up. If this works I wonder if everybody who got jabbed will need to have this? Would be mind boggling.
These results must be replicated immediately by multiple independent studies. Time is of the essence.
You can literally count me out of any of this 💩
"It may seem unfathomable for doctors to inject more RNA to deactivate Pfizer and Moderna synthetic mRNA that has accumulated in the body after multiple injections. However, siRNA used today in my practice (patisiran, inclisiran) appears to be safe and well-tolerated only notable for injection site reactions.".........
That's the thing right there⬆️.
I don't understand how Spike replication can be stopped with yet Another mRNA injection!???
I admire you Dr. McCullough and have faith in your work, but this does not make sense to me....
What is science behind that helping?
Loraine, this paper is a conceptual proposal. If synthetic mRNA cannot be shut off in any way, we may have to look at these methods to silence Pfizer and Moderna and shut them off. At this stage we are battling Spike protein but have not addressed the source--mRNA.
Thank you for your response Dr. McCullough, I didn't realize it was a conceptual proposal. And what I read, the spike protein is truly the problem (along with the components that support its replication if I understand it correctly) and no matter how it's delivered into the body.
But I just have the to lay it out➡️ I'm so overwhelmed, shocked, and resentful after seeing the suffering of life changing disabilities and death of people all over the world, as well as the destruction of earth over the last 4 years. Not to mention None of that was reported on mainstream media, that it's still hard to get my head around it all. And honestly, I would be Very Hesitant to take Any form of nanotechnology....
Surely there must be a way to stop the replication of the nanotechnology that's so pervasive and in most of human bodies......I often think it may need a miracle and is in God's hands.......🙏
Heartfelt Thanks to you for your Valient efforts to make Humanity safe again!♥️
Loraine