Powerful video comparing two public health disasters. It is hard to watch the kids being used to “sell” a narrative. It was a marketing and PR dream assignment to promote jabs to the world.
Love Peter’s work and his courage to speak out from the beginning.
Utterly shocking. I watched the beginning of this video...but could not go the whole way. The images of those beautiful children being made into little parrots and shills for murder made me feel heart broken. Thanks for this. i hope it wakes 'em up....
Well done Nicholas. History will ascribe righteousness to you, John Leake and Dr. McCullough. Thank you for your faithfulness and diligence...not to mention all of your hard work. God bless you.
My grandfather, a doctor, wrote a lengthy study on the dangers of smoking way back in 1914.( I think that was the year). Anyway, I still have it in my possession.
"Safe and Effective" may have been the greatest lie ever perpetuated upon humanity.
The trusting public mistook intense marketing for sound medical advice. Rolling out three living presidents to push the jab? HA, who in their right mind would ever take medical advice from any of those three based on their own poor examples?
It's very confusing now, with the nomination of both Pfizer shill Nesheiwat and on the other hand the very courageous Bhattacharya who told the truth about the virus and the dangerous and ineffective jabs at great personal risk.
I am afraid "our" doctors will have to grow some kahoonas and turn the tables on the liars and murderers....Remember that very old story about a certain teacher driving out the money changers....I think it's come to that...
as far as I know the "very courageous Bhattacharya" is still shilling. I saw a video of him speaking at THE GREAT BARRINGTON f shill fest for kill shots....He just wanted to kill off "old people"....I guess that would be me and my husband....
just read and research THE GREAT BARRINGTON declaration....It calls for "focused protection" i.e. giving the death shots to old people. Don't tell me that scientists "did not know" about the lethality of the "vaccines"..By asking for "focused protection"....that meant zeroing in on a certain group of human beings so that other human beings would not be "protected" i.e. killed.
I knew at that time four years ago and I was just a high school teacher. Sucharit Bhakdi, Arne Buchardt and Walter Lang had already published their work. Esteemed scientist Dolores Cahill had come forward stating these shots would cause "auto immune attack"....Why did they know this and a big shot from Stanford University did not know these. things?
"Ignorance" is the lame cover that the good Germans used as their friends and neighbors went up in smoke--literally.
I'm sorry Patrick, but I can't "forgive" any of this until the crimes are addressed and retribution begins. And that includes the signers of the lame "focused protection" and their hollow deceptions that only prolonged the time in which little children would die from "vaccines" and babies would be killed before they ever saw a sunrise...
There are comflicting messages in the research literature about the vaccines that could confuse even a somewhat honest person, at least until they figure out the spike protein is the cause of COVID 19 the disease (proven in April 2021), but there were no vaccines available when the Barrington declaration came out, so focused protection may include prophylactic HCQ, McCullough's idea or nasal/oral washes, and possibly prophylactic antibodies. The vagueness of that part was a shortcoming of the declaration, and a point of criticism from the other side too.
Perhaps I mispoke myself.....But four years ago...It is now almost 2O25...there were large demonstrations in Europe against the mandates, the restrictions and the whole can of worms. People DID know something very dire was occurring and that this needed to be stopped. In my view THE GREAT BARRINGTON DECLARATION did not really get down to the meat of the matter....The participants of this "convention" stayed in a very ritzy place and ate gourmet food and then went home. In the meantime, Dolores Cahill and Heiko Schoning and the rest were dragged off to jails. Prof Cahill was fired and never got her job back. And no one has heard anything from Dr. Schoning since that time.
It seems to me that the “conflicting” messages in the research literature come from studies that were specifically designed to fail. Like when a study that under dosed IVM gave it late in the illness, gave it on an empty stomach when it should be given with food, and gave it to a group of healthy young people who would have done well anyway, with or without treatment, and then the “researchers” tried to say IVM was ineffective.
Love the video. Can you do a two hour feature? This historical context reveals some horrendous stories, on a pretty regular basis. That is an important message.
mRNA technology will be used in all childhood "vaccines"....they will be killing your children. Is that what we want? I guess people like Bill G*tes do think it is a good tactic to implement "birth control"...and actually decrease the number of people alive by using "vaccines"....these are not technically vaccines....they are a technology designed to kill you.
this is not technically correct. "Smoking" is not protective against anything....but NICOTINE is. Cigarettes contain all many of toxic additives. You can buy products that just contain nicotine...
Of course, you are correct, smoking is a health hazard. I said smoking because my siblings smoke, and I am relying in my mind on the knowledge they were imbibing nicotine in the cigarettes to assuage my fear of harms from the shots they took. Dr. Peter McCullough said he noticed his 'smoker' patients were better off during covid than nonsmokers. There was less hospitalization of smokers during that time. Nicotine patches and gums are being prescribed now because the spike has a high affinity for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). It seems nicotine interferes with the interaction of the S-protein of the virus with nAChRs.
I live in Idaho and I approve this message!!
LFG!!! 💪🏻
Restacking immediately.
Powerful video comparing two public health disasters. It is hard to watch the kids being used to “sell” a narrative. It was a marketing and PR dream assignment to promote jabs to the world.
Love Peter’s work and his courage to speak out from the beginning.
Huge fan and friend.
The kids' parents allowed them to be used, they must not have thought deeply about risks of experimental drugs.
Brilliant parallel analysis
Utterly shocking. I watched the beginning of this video...but could not go the whole way. The images of those beautiful children being made into little parrots and shills for murder made me feel heart broken. Thanks for this. i hope it wakes 'em up....
Agreed totally
There should be a ban on using kids to advertise drugs.
... and all the 'chemicals' in their foods...
Well done Nicholas. History will ascribe righteousness to you, John Leake and Dr. McCullough. Thank you for your faithfulness and diligence...not to mention all of your hard work. God bless you.
My grandfather, a doctor, wrote a lengthy study on the dangers of smoking way back in 1914.( I think that was the year). Anyway, I still have it in my possession.
The COVID 19 injections kill children and adults.
The CDC, FDA, and manufacturers KNEW this.
"Safe and Effective" may have been the greatest lie ever perpetuated upon humanity.
The trusting public mistook intense marketing for sound medical advice. Rolling out three living presidents to push the jab? HA, who in their right mind would ever take medical advice from any of those three based on their own poor examples?
And just who was the author of... 'safe and effective?' Where does the buck stop? Do some get an 'out of jail' pass?
Exactly, talk about a conflation, confusing political advice with medical advice.
My blood pressure won’t let me finish watching it.
Thank you for all the hard work you are doing to awaken theatre's to the truth! Have a Blessed Thanksgiving 🙏🏻❤️
Thank you Dr McCullough and Nicholas . You are doing God’s work. Bless you 🙏🙏
How likely is a market withdrawal? Are you thinking this will happen because of Trump's presidency and the appointment of RFK Jr.?
It's very confusing now, with the nomination of both Pfizer shill Nesheiwat and on the other hand the very courageous Bhattacharya who told the truth about the virus and the dangerous and ineffective jabs at great personal risk.
The key question is whether the N lady will end the persecution of our doctors that was initiated by her (android-lookalike) predecessor.
I am afraid "our" doctors will have to grow some kahoonas and turn the tables on the liars and murderers....Remember that very old story about a certain teacher driving out the money changers....I think it's come to that...
Most doctors lacked the honesty and character to stand up. They will follow orders. So, when the orders change, they will too.
My bet is she will never do the slightest thing that interferes with Pfizer's profits from murder by mRNA. She seems just as corrupt as Wallensky.
as far as I know the "very courageous Bhattacharya" is still shilling. I saw a video of him speaking at THE GREAT BARRINGTON f shill fest for kill shots....He just wanted to kill off "old people"....I guess that would be me and my husband....
What? Point me to any evidence at all of him shilling for the shots or for killing off old people.
You seem completely mistaken.
just read and research THE GREAT BARRINGTON declaration....It calls for "focused protection" i.e. giving the death shots to old people. Don't tell me that scientists "did not know" about the lethality of the "vaccines"..By asking for "focused protection"....that meant zeroing in on a certain group of human beings so that other human beings would not be "protected" i.e. killed.
I knew at that time four years ago and I was just a high school teacher. Sucharit Bhakdi, Arne Buchardt and Walter Lang had already published their work. Esteemed scientist Dolores Cahill had come forward stating these shots would cause "auto immune attack"....Why did they know this and a big shot from Stanford University did not know these. things?
"Ignorance" is the lame cover that the good Germans used as their friends and neighbors went up in smoke--literally.
I'm sorry Patrick, but I can't "forgive" any of this until the crimes are addressed and retribution begins. And that includes the signers of the lame "focused protection" and their hollow deceptions that only prolonged the time in which little children would die from "vaccines" and babies would be killed before they ever saw a sunrise...
There are comflicting messages in the research literature about the vaccines that could confuse even a somewhat honest person, at least until they figure out the spike protein is the cause of COVID 19 the disease (proven in April 2021), but there were no vaccines available when the Barrington declaration came out, so focused protection may include prophylactic HCQ, McCullough's idea or nasal/oral washes, and possibly prophylactic antibodies. The vagueness of that part was a shortcoming of the declaration, and a point of criticism from the other side too.
Perhaps I mispoke myself.....But four years ago...It is now almost 2O25...there were large demonstrations in Europe against the mandates, the restrictions and the whole can of worms. People DID know something very dire was occurring and that this needed to be stopped. In my view THE GREAT BARRINGTON DECLARATION did not really get down to the meat of the matter....The participants of this "convention" stayed in a very ritzy place and ate gourmet food and then went home. In the meantime, Dolores Cahill and Heiko Schoning and the rest were dragged off to jails. Prof Cahill was fired and never got her job back. And no one has heard anything from Dr. Schoning since that time.
It seems to me that the “conflicting” messages in the research literature come from studies that were specifically designed to fail. Like when a study that under dosed IVM gave it late in the illness, gave it on an empty stomach when it should be given with food, and gave it to a group of healthy young people who would have done well anyway, with or without treatment, and then the “researchers” tried to say IVM was ineffective.
I think he meant that any quarantine should be people at high risk, not the whole population. And that would have been a reasonable thing to do.
Do you have any quote of his advocating the death jabs for anyone?
Bhattacharya still does not understand the overall risk of modern vaccines in general.
Of course he "understands" the risk. But Jay likes the $$$$ more than saving lives.
That is a very bitter pill. We have to swallow a lot them right now.
Here is some sweeter medicine for your soul's benefit ....Hope it heals your heart
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFPHoLFijUs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0-reoYHKUw
The links are great, I read Elaine Pagels years ago, very enlightening.
More like an undeclared divorce than a market withdrawal.
.
The Vaccinated
Have Become
Second Class Citizens
To Their Own Natural Immunity.
.
Love the video. Can you do a two hour feature? This historical context reveals some horrendous stories, on a pretty regular basis. That is an important message.
I’m hoping!
They are putting the MRNA covid vax in your food you need to
do this right now visit.......... https://t.co/K2mXQiCZiT
mRNA technology will be used in all childhood "vaccines"....they will be killing your children. Is that what we want? I guess people like Bill G*tes do think it is a good tactic to implement "birth control"...and actually decrease the number of people alive by using "vaccines"....these are not technically vaccines....they are a technology designed to kill you.
The irony is smoking actually was protective against covid harms.
this is not technically correct. "Smoking" is not protective against anything....but NICOTINE is. Cigarettes contain all many of toxic additives. You can buy products that just contain nicotine...
Of course, you are correct, smoking is a health hazard. I said smoking because my siblings smoke, and I am relying in my mind on the knowledge they were imbibing nicotine in the cigarettes to assuage my fear of harms from the shots they took. Dr. Peter McCullough said he noticed his 'smoker' patients were better off during covid than nonsmokers. There was less hospitalization of smokers during that time. Nicotine patches and gums are being prescribed now because the spike has a high affinity for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). It seems nicotine interferes with the interaction of the S-protein of the virus with nAChRs.