How about blood supply designation for blood products containing mRNA from Covid vaccines? Those who haven’t taken the vaccine would be exposed to the mRNA component much like HIV in the early 1980s.
RFK is brilliant and laser focused on restoring the health of our country. He will certainly make some missteps but he is building a coalition. Everyone enters this arena with a different perspective- be it vaccine injured, diet related health, environmental pollution, EMFs, and yes fluoride. Just like vaccines being captured by industry these other topics need to be vetted by "honest" science not the regulatory captured information that goes out to the public. I know if RFK Jr went "full vaccine" he would have been destroyed and the MAHA movement which is still evolving would have died. I see my fellow healthcare workers waking up. We should continue to lovingly engage them where they are ready. I am cautiously hopeful. We must watch and let our opinions be known because the devil is always in the details, be prepared for some exorcisms.
Get key personnel and health agencies out of the patent business! Stakeholders are the consensus. CHD has been studying this for at least a decade with experts in their respective fields.
People who have the financial means can afford to eat clean. All in the public should have access to clean foods. We have an epidemic of Mast Cell Activation Syndrome. Dyes and preservatives are highly inflammatory and can cause chronic conditions or worse.
There are 3 types of fluoride that are added to drinking and one of them is Fluorosilicic Acid which is the most commonly used fluoride additive in the United States.. Its an inexpensive liquid by-product of phosphate fertilizer mfg. Dr McCullough said it does not come from fertilizer. He needs to check his facts.
Prohibiting vaccine mandates is a good idea, but the problem is deeper than that. Even with no mandates, some people will still willingly allow themselves to be injected with shots called vaccines if after being informed, they still have the religious-like belief that the shots will protect themselves or their children. That's fine, but the products must be safe. Clearly, mRNA injections are not safe, and should be pulled from the market immediately.
One of Dr. M's health priorities is rescinding the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Action .Thereby ending liability protection for vaccine manufacturers. That should go a long way towards improving vaccine safety. Of course pharmaceutical companies do put out drugs without any such liability protection, having knowingly buried dangerous side effects. They run projections showing that profits will be greater than any liability costs from lawsuits in the future. With that in mind vaccines need to go through proper testing overseen and evaluated by experts whose only mandate is public health.
And, no matter how safe they make them, they should NEVER be mandated in order to go to school. Ultimately, too many vaccines destroy natural immunity in a population.
Yet, parents have accepted shots for decades for their kids, for the most part without complaint or a sense of violation. Unbelievable! I know that the anti-vax slurs against Kennedy will be forced off the tracks, as soon as mainstream media are compelled to tell the truth about vaccines and mRNA product dangers, the majority will 'get it.'
Of course they have. Informed consent was replaced by trust the "experts". It's not just in medicine, there has been a well orchestrated plan to convince people that only "experts" in various disciplines have the knowledge and comprehension. There are ways to present data and evidence that make them more accessible to a layperson. The powers that be have endeavored to do just the opposite, to make the data presented less assessable. I'm reminded of a Professor I once had, a brilliant individual but he couldn't convey his knowledge and perception in a way that students understood. They will try to make this issue about the cult of personality (maligning Kennedy). He needs to keep himself out of the spotlight as much as is possible. RFK Jr has already started out with the right message “If vaccines are working for somebody, I’m not going to take them away. People ought to have [a] choice, and that choice ought to be informed by the best information,” The data is damning if it can be presented to the public in a way that is assessable. It's interesting that people in general don't trust pharmaceutical companies, these companies are also the vaccine manufacturers. The penalties paid by these companies for violations are very eye opening regarding their priorities. https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/industry/pharmaceuticals
No pharmaceutical is safe, there is always risk. Those risks need to be divulged in no uncertain terms. Doctors regarding other drugs say, 'only in rare cases,' they say that for everything.
Dr. Still wagon--"some people will still willingly allow themselves to be injected with shots called vaccines if after being informed....etc .etc"
You are correct about what "some" people will do. Think about the things "some people" do even when informed of the consequences:
1. Drink and/or smoke themselves to death
2. Overeat low quality food loaded with toxic additives and sprayed with poison.
3. Ride on motorcycles despite the horrifying dangers of doing so.
4. Leave their kids with babysitters...who "seem nice" while actually not knowing anything about the background of these purported "caregivers"
5. Become addicted to tranquilizers and sedatives so they can sleep at night.
6. constantly hold a cell phone right next to their heads even though they have heard about the damaging effects from the frequencies emitted.
I could go on and on. But why bother. Human beings are committed to killing themselves AND each other off --- if not in one way...well then-in another way.
No mRNA delivery in our vaccines and no gain of function research anywhere, that's where the focus and change should start. Obviously take the immunity out of Big Pharma and make them accountable to the people harmed !!
Considering the shabby state of the "medical establishment" I am reminded of that famous philosopher, USMC Lieutenant General Chesty Puller, “We are surrounded. Good, now we can kill the bast#$ds in any direction."
Legislatively, Brian Festa's group has the good idea to make vaccination status a protected class under an expanded civil rights law. That requires Congress. Still same idea can be used for a Presidential action in terms of access to Federal funding.
In terms of immunity from liability for big pharma foray with the experimental covid 19 so called vaccine, pursuant to common sense and Law, fraud at the trial stage vititates full liability for all adverse events, which in turn throws informed medical consent out the window. I cite the famous words of the great UK judge, Lord Denning " Fraud unravels everything"
And, transparency that the school shots have never been studied using a placebo-controlled trial; transparency to parents of shot ingredients and real risk stats, from sources outside of conflicts of interest not pharma studies, not 'rare' or 'coincidence' lingo. It should be law that every pharmacist, school clinic and medical professional give the injectee all information prior to the injections, otherwise they risk license loss.
The removal of Fluoride from the water is not going to make any meaningful problem for the public. As you say 25% of the population does not have fluoride in the water. They seem to be fine. I’ve been drinking filtered water for 30+ years. My teeth are fine.
It’s the same type of argument that we have with taking ivermectin for people who have gotten Covid. Taking ivermectin for Covid has a near ZERO risk factor.
Ivermectin is not going to hurt people. Just like removing fluoride from the water is not going to hurt people. Removing fluoride from the water supply has ZERO risk and it will ELIMINATE fluoride as a possible problem.
How about blood supply designation for blood products containing mRNA from Covid vaccines? Those who haven’t taken the vaccine would be exposed to the mRNA component much like HIV in the early 1980s.
Right, because if there is no untainted blood, the unvaccinated will become vaxxed out of necessity for a transfusion.
Idaho, if I recall correctly, already identifies blood according to mRNA content. Smart
I hope they have enough clean blood when requested.
RFK is brilliant and laser focused on restoring the health of our country. He will certainly make some missteps but he is building a coalition. Everyone enters this arena with a different perspective- be it vaccine injured, diet related health, environmental pollution, EMFs, and yes fluoride. Just like vaccines being captured by industry these other topics need to be vetted by "honest" science not the regulatory captured information that goes out to the public. I know if RFK Jr went "full vaccine" he would have been destroyed and the MAHA movement which is still evolving would have died. I see my fellow healthcare workers waking up. We should continue to lovingly engage them where they are ready. I am cautiously hopeful. We must watch and let our opinions be known because the devil is always in the details, be prepared for some exorcisms.
Dr McCullough should have a position in the new administration.
He may not want it though. Del Big Tree said he would prefer to keep doing what he is doing.
Probably so. But he has so much to give, he could be RFK, Jr's right hand man.
Get key personnel and health agencies out of the patent business! Stakeholders are the consensus. CHD has been studying this for at least a decade with experts in their respective fields.
People who have the financial means can afford to eat clean. All in the public should have access to clean foods. We have an epidemic of Mast Cell Activation Syndrome. Dyes and preservatives are highly inflammatory and can cause chronic conditions or worse.
There are 3 types of fluoride that are added to drinking and one of them is Fluorosilicic Acid which is the most commonly used fluoride additive in the United States.. Its an inexpensive liquid by-product of phosphate fertilizer mfg. Dr McCullough said it does not come from fertilizer. He needs to check his facts.
Prohibiting vaccine mandates is a good idea, but the problem is deeper than that. Even with no mandates, some people will still willingly allow themselves to be injected with shots called vaccines if after being informed, they still have the religious-like belief that the shots will protect themselves or their children. That's fine, but the products must be safe. Clearly, mRNA injections are not safe, and should be pulled from the market immediately.
One of Dr. M's health priorities is rescinding the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Action .Thereby ending liability protection for vaccine manufacturers. That should go a long way towards improving vaccine safety. Of course pharmaceutical companies do put out drugs without any such liability protection, having knowingly buried dangerous side effects. They run projections showing that profits will be greater than any liability costs from lawsuits in the future. With that in mind vaccines need to go through proper testing overseen and evaluated by experts whose only mandate is public health.
And, no matter how safe they make them, they should NEVER be mandated in order to go to school. Ultimately, too many vaccines destroy natural immunity in a population.
To me, informed consent and no mandates are a given. Nothing else is acceptable.
Yet, parents have accepted shots for decades for their kids, for the most part without complaint or a sense of violation. Unbelievable! I know that the anti-vax slurs against Kennedy will be forced off the tracks, as soon as mainstream media are compelled to tell the truth about vaccines and mRNA product dangers, the majority will 'get it.'
Of course they have. Informed consent was replaced by trust the "experts". It's not just in medicine, there has been a well orchestrated plan to convince people that only "experts" in various disciplines have the knowledge and comprehension. There are ways to present data and evidence that make them more accessible to a layperson. The powers that be have endeavored to do just the opposite, to make the data presented less assessable. I'm reminded of a Professor I once had, a brilliant individual but he couldn't convey his knowledge and perception in a way that students understood. They will try to make this issue about the cult of personality (maligning Kennedy). He needs to keep himself out of the spotlight as much as is possible. RFK Jr has already started out with the right message “If vaccines are working for somebody, I’m not going to take them away. People ought to have [a] choice, and that choice ought to be informed by the best information,” The data is damning if it can be presented to the public in a way that is assessable. It's interesting that people in general don't trust pharmaceutical companies, these companies are also the vaccine manufacturers. The penalties paid by these companies for violations are very eye opening regarding their priorities. https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/industry/pharmaceuticals
No pharmaceutical is safe, there is always risk. Those risks need to be divulged in no uncertain terms. Doctors regarding other drugs say, 'only in rare cases,' they say that for everything.
Dr. Still wagon--"some people will still willingly allow themselves to be injected with shots called vaccines if after being informed....etc .etc"
You are correct about what "some" people will do. Think about the things "some people" do even when informed of the consequences:
1. Drink and/or smoke themselves to death
2. Overeat low quality food loaded with toxic additives and sprayed with poison.
3. Ride on motorcycles despite the horrifying dangers of doing so.
4. Leave their kids with babysitters...who "seem nice" while actually not knowing anything about the background of these purported "caregivers"
5. Become addicted to tranquilizers and sedatives so they can sleep at night.
6. constantly hold a cell phone right next to their heads even though they have heard about the damaging effects from the frequencies emitted.
I could go on and on. But why bother. Human beings are committed to killing themselves AND each other off --- if not in one way...well then-in another way.
We can't control what others do. However, it is incumbent on us to provide accurate risk information. Then the ball is in their court.
No mRNA delivery in our vaccines and no gain of function research anywhere, that's where the focus and change should start. Obviously take the immunity out of Big Pharma and make them accountable to the people harmed !!
Considering the shabby state of the "medical establishment" I am reminded of that famous philosopher, USMC Lieutenant General Chesty Puller, “We are surrounded. Good, now we can kill the bast#$ds in any direction."
Thank you for sharing that link to sign the petition!
Legislatively, Brian Festa's group has the good idea to make vaccination status a protected class under an expanded civil rights law. That requires Congress. Still same idea can be used for a Presidential action in terms of access to Federal funding.
In terms of immunity from liability for big pharma foray with the experimental covid 19 so called vaccine, pursuant to common sense and Law, fraud at the trial stage vititates full liability for all adverse events, which in turn throws informed medical consent out the window. I cite the famous words of the great UK judge, Lord Denning " Fraud unravels everything"
Saw your interview with The Great Wake-up awhile back. Thank You. It was very interesting. Your Humble Right-Winger.
Seemingly there are mRNA products in Canadian salmon, so now I have to check the label to see if salmon is from Canada and bypass.
And, transparency that the school shots have never been studied using a placebo-controlled trial; transparency to parents of shot ingredients and real risk stats, from sources outside of conflicts of interest not pharma studies, not 'rare' or 'coincidence' lingo. It should be law that every pharmacist, school clinic and medical professional give the injectee all information prior to the injections, otherwise they risk license loss.
Shannon Joy, if a Christian, needs to study scriptures on this topic, 1 Timothy 2:9, to help others avoid the appearance of Proverbs 7:10.
The removal of Fluoride from the water is not going to make any meaningful problem for the public. As you say 25% of the population does not have fluoride in the water. They seem to be fine. I’ve been drinking filtered water for 30+ years. My teeth are fine.
It’s the same type of argument that we have with taking ivermectin for people who have gotten Covid. Taking ivermectin for Covid has a near ZERO risk factor.
Ivermectin is not going to hurt people. Just like removing fluoride from the water is not going to hurt people. Removing fluoride from the water supply has ZERO risk and it will ELIMINATE fluoride as a possible problem.